
Tory strategists caught flat-footed
Opinion
On a winter day more than a decade ago, when Stephen Harper's Conservatives were in power in Ottawa, I was sitting in a restaurant booth when a pair of Prime Minister's Office staffers sat down in the booth next to mine. They were talking loudly, so it was impossible to not hear what they were saying.
As they sat there, one of the staffers remarked how the Tories would have never returned to power if the Canadian Alliance and Progressive Conservative Parties had not merged to form the Conservative Party. By 'uniting the right,' he argued, it gave them their only realistic hope of ever winning a federal election again.
They then talked about how lucky the Tories were that the left and centrist segments of the Canadian political spectrum would never merge in a 'unite the left' movement, because such a combination would force them to water down their 'core conservative principles' on issues such as abortion and gun control in order to have any hope of winning an election.
The way they saw it, as long as the 'Libs and Dippers' kept fighting each other and splitting the large base of moderate and left-of-centre voters in roughly equal proportions, Conservatives would always have a decent shot of forming government. One staffer warned, however, that if that split ever disappeared — if Liberal and NDP voters ever joined forces in one way or another — future elections could become unwinnable for Conservatives.
They were right. Fast forward to the just-concluded election campaign, in which a massive shift by erstwhile NDP voters to the Liberals occurred and the Tories struggled to keep pace with the Liberals despite sky-high support and fundraising numbers prior to the election.
They polled at a higher level than normally required in order to win a majority government, but they were consistently behind the Liberals in the polls for the final weeks of the campaign.
The Conservative campaign strategists can only blame themselves. Based on the results of past campaigns, they crafted a platform and campaign strategy that focused on 'locking in' the percentage of voters they estimated they would need in order to win the election.
They failed, however, to anticipate and plan for exactly the scenario the staffer had described in that restaurant years ago — a huge wave of former NDP supporters being willing to vote for Liberal candidates in order to prevent a Tory win.
That shift — or at least the possibility of such a shift happening — should have been apparent in properly focused Conservative polling, for several reasons. First, the 'confidence and supply agreement' between the Liberals and NDP kept the Trudeau minority government in power for four years, sending a message to voters that the Liberals and NDP weren't all that different on a range of important policies.
Second, Tory MPs consistently derided the Liberal-NDP agreement as a 'Liberal-NDP coalition,' effectively promoting and legitimizing the idea of Liberal and NDP voters working together toward a common objective.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, a de facto merger of Liberal and NDP voters has already taken root in several provinces, making such an effort palatable to voters at the federal level.
In Manitoba and most other provinces, for example, there is a conservative party, a 'not conservative' party and a few single-digit bottom-feeders. That creates a binary choice for voters that has determined the outcome of many provincial elections for many years, and it may finally be an electoral reality at the federal level.
Given those factors, it is both fair and necessary to ask why the Tory strategists failed to see the potential for such a shift to occur and, despite their enormous financial and strategic resources, failed to have a 'ready to go' plan in place to counter it.
Without that strategy, the Conservative campaign was caught flat-footed and never really adapted to the new reality that was crushing their hopes of what, just months earlier, had seemed like an inevitable landslide victory.
That leads to this obvious question: If Tory staffers were concerned years ago about the possibility of Liberal and NDP voters combining to defeat Conservatives, how was the 2025 Conservative campaign team caught by surprise?
How did they not see this coming?
Deveryn Ross is a political commentator living in Brandon.
deverynrossletters@gmail.com
X: @deverynross

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
16 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Most Canadians don't support taxpayer subsidies for LNG
Proponents often claim that Canada's LNG will reduce global warming by displacing coal in other countries. However, we have run out of time for a 'transition fuel' if we're to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. In this context, new LNG infrastructure isn't a climate solution, but rather a substitute for investment in clean energy. Luckily, the price of renewables has dropped dramatically, making this transition both feasible and affordable. LNG is also a bad economic bet. The International Energy Agency has projected that LNG capacity will exceed demand by the next decade, making new capital investments especially risky. This is presumably why private investors are wavering and looking to Canadian governments to subsidize their projects with public dollars. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. A recent poll found that 56 per cent of respondents, both in B.C. and nationally, oppose multibillion-dollar public subsidies for foreign-owned LNG projects. Only 18 per cent of Canadians, and 22 per cent of British Columbians, are supportive while the rest are unsure. In B.C., where most LNG projects are proposed and LNG Canada will soon come online, people have other priorities for their tax dollars. In fact, supporting oil-and-gas is at the bottom of a list led by health care, housing, education, renewable energy and transit. The lack of public support for subsidizing fossil fuels has been consistent for years. In 2018, two-thirds of Canadians opposed subsidizing oil-and-gas, 41 per cent strongly. More than half remained unsupportive, even after being told oil-and-gas subsidies would create jobs and economic growth. In 2021, 62 per cent of Canadians wanted the federal government to stop fossil fuel subsidies and there was mounting frustration that the government hadn't acted on a 2015 campaign promise to do so. In 2023, the majority of Canadians felt that oil companies, not taxpayers, should foot the bill for the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion. Only 30 per cent of British Columbians supported subsidies for LNG. A 2023 poll found 96 per cent of Canadians felt the federal government should disclose subsidies for fossil fuels. That year, the government of Canada signed a joint ministerial statement at the UN climate talks that committed them to do just that by the end of 2024. There is still no inventory of fossil fuel subsidies in mid-2025, undermining Canadians' ability to understand where their tax dollars are going. Canada claims to be a global leader on climate change, yet we continuously fail to meet our climate targets. The main reason is that emissions growth from oil-and-gas production has offset progress in other areas. According to the UN Environment Programme , governments around the world, including Canada, are planning for continued fossil fuel production that will result in more than double the global emissions scientists advise are consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 C. Canada, unfortunately, is one the biggest funders of the fossil fuel industry globally. That includes billions of taxpayer dollars that the federal and B.C. governments have already committed to LNG in the form of direct subsidies, lower tax and electricity rates, and public loans. Canadian taxpayers have been footing the bill for fossil fuel developments that threaten our own climate, health and economy. In this critical moment, Canada's leaders should instead use public funds to support projects that advance Canada's economy and safety, not only today but for decades to come. Kathryn Harrison is professor of political science at the University of B.C. Cara Pike is co-founder and senior adviser to at Carleton University in Ottawa.


Global News
31 minutes ago
- Global News
B.C. government takes heat over marked growth in public payroll
B.C.'s NDP government is defending itself in the wake of new reports detailing the dramatic increase in public sector employees and the cost of payroll. The province is in the midst of a staffing shortage across key public sectors – currently short more than 1,000 teachers and six times as many nurses. But while critical positions go unfilled, the size of the public sector continues to grow, with British Columbia leading the country in the growth of taxpayer-funded jobs. 'It's gone from $5 billion worth of people (earning) over $75,000 to now $11.5 billion, so it's more than doubled,' BC Conservative finance critic Peter Milobar said. 'This government has a real problem when it comes to hiring, reining in costs and bringing things under control, and that leads to our structural deficit of over $12 billion.' Story continues below advertisement 1:57 B.C. database shows public sector salaries Critics say the size of government has increased across the board under the NDP's watch. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In 2017, there were just over 29,000 public servants. That number has increased to nearly 39,000, jumping 32 per cent over eight years. While the public sector is growing, private sector job growth is half of its historical average. The B.C. General Employees Union acknowledges the unionized workforce has grown, but says the real issue is the growth of non-union positions, and that management has increased at a pace nearly double that of union members. It's a claim that is echoed in health care, where the B.C. Nurses' Union says health authorities are top-heavy. 'Anecdotally, that's how it appears,' BCNU president Adrianne Gear said. 'From my members' perspective, it does seem like there is a lot of senior management leadership. Story continues below advertisement 'At any given time, we are almost 6,000 nurses short, that's how many vacancies we have, and when we move to full implementation of nurse-patient ratios … we are going to need many, many more nurses.' 1:20 How much could a new B.C. public sector contract cost taxpayers? The B.C. government has committed to hiring more front-line workers in health care, education and other critical occupations. But competition worldwide is intense. B.C. Premier David Eby said much of the growth is related to tackling that competition. 'They are doctors, they are nurses, they are teachers, they are people who provide vital services in our province. It is why we are leading Canada in recruiting family doctors and why we are on track to ensuring every British Columbian gets access to a family doctor. Ensuring we are competitive in wages for those doctors, ensuring we are competitive in wages for nurses, that we are the best place for a nurse to work in Canada,' Eby said. Story continues below advertisement 'It is how we are getting a handle on the big challenges we've faced in terms of closures at hospitals or shortages of nurses that are raising concerns among the profession here.' However, he admitted he was 'very concerned' about the growth in health care administration costs. He said the province is currently doing an 'extensive review' of B.C. health authorities to minimize those administrative costs. A renewed focus on B.C. resource economy, meanwhile, could bring an increase in private sector job creation. The business community is optimistic that the government is sending the right signals, but says it is waiting for the needed follow-through.


Canada Standard
36 minutes ago
- Canada Standard
Canada to meet NATO's defence spending target this fiscal year
Xinhua 10 Jun 2025, 00:15 GMT+10 OTTAWA, June 9 (Xinhua) -- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Monday his government would increase spending on the country's defence and security and achieve NATO's defence spending target this fiscal year. Carney said in a news release that the defence spending for 2025-26 will be over nine billion Canadian dollars (6.6 billion U.S. dollars), or two percent of GDP, meeting the NATO defence commitment half a decade ahead of schedule. According to the news release, measures in the defence spending increase plan include better pay for Canadian Armed Forces; new aircraft, armed vehicles, and ammunition; bolstering Canada's defence industrial capacity, as well as expanding the reach of the Canadian Coast Guard and integrating it into the NATO defence capabilities. "Canada requires these capabilities to uphold and assert its sovereignty and ensure our defence never becomes dependent on others again. As we strengthen the Canadian Armed Forces, we will also build up Canadian industry, driving innovation and creating good careers," said Carney. Carney promised to further accelerate the investments in years to follow. According to NATO's annual report, Canada's defence spending was around 1.45 percent of GDP last year.