Bath end three decades of agony in controversial Premiership final win over Leicester
The 29 years of angst and agony are finally at an end. Bath are champions of England once again, winners of the Premiership final for the first time to snap their long drought. But boy how they had to work for it, Leicester going hell for leather to threaten a shock – and so nearly pulling it off.
And they might well have done, too, if not for a most unfitting farewell from Dan Cole. In his final game before retirement, a stray shoulder from the veteran prop proved oh so costly for a Tigers team that he has given blood, sweat and tears too. His indiscretion, and the resultant penalty, left old king Cole laying down his crown from the sin bin and Leicester two points short; Bath worthy winners over the course of the season but not perhaps so obviously triumphant on the day.
Leicester Tigers' Dan Cole (right) was sent to the sin bin after a crucial late penalty (Adam Davy/PA Wire)
Perhaps, in time, this will come to be known as the Finn Russell final rather than one defined by Cole, the fly half integral and influential throughout. It was at this ground where the Scot had endured two of his darkest recent days, last year's defeat in the Premiership final stinging deeply before a singular form of torture in the Calcutta Cup followed this February. Consider some of those ghosts exorcised, the magic man with a magic moment as he plucked an intercept to set up his side's crucial side. After this triumph, whatever Bruce Craig is paying Russell – and both club and player have denied that it is near certain figures reporting – has surely been worth it.
Finn Russell (right) starred for Bath (David Davies/PA Wire)
They are fitting victors in a season they had, largely, dominated until this final near miss. Their treble of trophies may not be of the highest prestige but it is a mighty achievement, league success added to cup and continental crowns. Yes, their budget is big, but they have won this title in style, homegrown heroes like Miles Reid and Charlie Ewels just as important as those lured from elsewhere. They won this final without playing remotely close to their best – the mark of a champion side.
Advertisement
This throwback final brought together two famous clubs but ahead of kick off there was only one team in town, nary a Tiger in sight in a Bath takeover of Twickenham. All along the Chertsey Road and down to the station they gathered in expectation, a tide of blue, black and white sweeping into Allianz Stadium. Such was the exodus that it must have been a down day for the parlours of Pulteney Bridge – though one suspects a few of the city's shop-keeps had deserted their stations to join the flood.
A fast start, you felt, was vital for Leicester given the likely impact of that crowd and Bath's bench behemoths, and the underdogs duly delivered. Michael Cheika has talked about re-capturing the club's DNA and the Tigers soon showed some trademark snarl, a destructive scrum setting up an equally powerful maul drive either side of a superb punted penalty from Handre Pollard. Advantage earned with the rumble, Jack van Poortvliet wrestled over from close range.
Russell got Bath going with a simple starter off the tee but could not quite get his side to find their flow in a frenetic first 20. One jink into space was scuppered by Joe Cokanasiga dropping an offload. It kickstarted a tough couple of minutes for the Scot, perhaps carrying a few unhappy memories of this place from the Six Nations, as he was run over by Olly Cracknell before shelling a pass from Ben Spencer.
Russell initially struggled to get Bath going but grew in influence (Adam Davy/PA Wire)
Yet Bath slowly turned it on, beginning to suffocate Leicester without the ball and threatening with it on the occasions they went more than two phases without a handling error. Russell's impact has been much mentioned since his arrival at The Rec but arguably more influential has been Thomas du Toit, the Springboks prop a force of nature in his own right and helping spur Will Stuart into a tighthead weapon himself. The South African started here in the opposite configuration to the semi-final and nudged Bath in front with a typically burly burst from the base of a ruck. Their prospects soon looked better: Julian Montoya, the Leicester captain, shown yellow after a high tackle.
Advertisement
But these Tigers are made of tough stuff, refusing to yield as the pressure came on in 10 minutes down a man. Restored to full complement, a soft penalty left Cheika incandescent at the half-time hooter, allowing as it did Bath to double their lead.
Leicester took it to favourites Bath in a physical final (David Davies/PA Wire)
November 2023 was the last time that Van Graan's side had let an advantage at the interval slip in the Premiership, and they had no intentions on doing so now. Out of the line stepped Russell to pluck the pass of Pollard, the trophy-shy Scot snaring the toss of the double world champion. Always thinking a step ahead, Russell surged to the line before making his conversion with an inwards fling to Ojomoh, whose dad, Steve, had won ten titles with Bath in their pomp.
Leicester sent for their stalwarts, the retiring Ben Youngs and Dan Cole on in quick succession either side of the hour to rousing receptions at a place the pair know better than just about anyone. It looked like being too little, too late, when Guy Pepper produced a solo score of sheer strength only to see it chalked off for a pernickety knock-on, and Solomone Kata's converted try moved Leicester within striking distance.
Leicester Tigers' Dan Cole was shown a yellow card by referee Karl Dickson (Action Images)
But only temporarily. Cole's career ended in ignominy, catching Russell after a high hoist and allowing Bath to extend their lead as he slumped into his seat in the sin bin after a perhaps harsh yellow card. How costly it proved: Emeka Ilione somehow writhed to the line to leave Leicester just short; the difference the three points collected after Cole's misdeed. Not everyone gets a fairytale finish.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How to watch Soccer Aid 2025: TV channel and live stream for charity match today
Star studded: Joe Hart and Tyson Fury will be among those appearing at Soccer Aid (©UNICEF/Soccer Aid Productions/Stella Pictures) Soccer Aid returns to Old Trafford today as England eye a seventh win over the World XI. It is the 14th instalment of the annual charity match, which has raised over £106million for UNICEF since its inception in 2006. Advertisement This year's fundraising is already underway, as Sam Thompson carried the match ball from Stamford Bridge to Old Trafford, raising over £1.5m in the process. As ever, a crop of former footballers will take the field, with the likes of Wayne Rooney, Gary Neville, Paul Scholes, Nemanja Vidic, and Edwin van der Sar all set to participate. An impressive lineup of celebrity guests has also been assembled. Former One Direction star Louis Tomlinson will appear alongside distance runner Mo Farah, pop star Tom Grennan, and radio host Roman Kemp. Comedians Lee Mack and Paddy McGuinness will both attend, with boxer Tony Bellew also set to make an appearance. Advertisement Harry Redknapp will again take to the England dugout, while World XI will be headed up by Peter Schmeichel and Robbie Keane. Read the full squad lists here. England halted World XI's run of five straight wins last year, winning 6-3 at Stamford Bridge with Joe Cole, Ellen White, Steven Bartlett, Jermaine Defoe, and Theo Walcott all on the scoresheet. Eden Hazard scored a free-kick for the World XI on his return to West London. How to watch Soccer Aid 2025 TV channel: Soccer Aid 2025 will be broadcast live and free-to-air on ITV1 in the UK, with coverage starting at 6pm BST. Live stream: The match will also be available to stream online via ITVX. Live blog: You can also follow the action with Standard Sport's LIVE blog.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Feed the goat and he will score' - a chat with King's Lynn returnee Adam Marriott
'Not much has changed' was Adam Marriott's verdict as he walked into the VIP lounge at The Walks. The ink was still drying on the contract which secured his return to the club that he ruled for a couple of incomparable seasons, so it was time to explain to the media how it all came about. Advertisement It's been four years since he departed, a victim of not being able to kick a ball because of Covid, furlough and all the other uncertainties of life in 2021. The exit door saw him head to Eastleigh, Barnet, Bromley and then Boston United, who released him at the end of the season. The move to Lynn seemed inevitable – Marriott lives just an hour away for starters, but a goal scorer was just what the Linnets needed. Fellow new signing Fletcher Toll, 21, is a work in progress with a CV that is excellent, but unproven at National League North level, while Gold Omotayo was joint leading scorer last season with 10 goals – in truth, apart from a couple of small spells, he never really got going. The possibility of a Marriott-Omotayo partnership will inevitably be mentioned in the same breath as that of Marriott-Michael Gash – but that was near-telepathic and came in a proven team under Ian Culverhouse. They also benefited from the excellence of players around them like Frazer Blake-Tracy, Ryan Jarvis, Michael Clunan, Ross Barrows and Chris Henderson, among others. Advertisement Memories of Marriott's 66 goals in 99 games for the Linnets are still clear in the mind. 'It was mad. It seemed like we were winning every week, scoring goals every week and nothing really went wrong. So hopefully that happens again. 'It's just great to be back, great to see some familiar faces - and not much has changed. I can't wait to get started straight away and kick on.' The million dollar question is how close to the Adam Marriott of 2021 is the Adam Marriott of 2025. 'I still felt really good last year (at Boston) training-wise and felt sharp - I just didn't get the games, which can happen in football if a manager's not really having you. Advertisement 'Now I feel good, my body feels good. I've had a good couple of weeks of fitness training, so I'm still ticking over for the summer and I'll be ready to go pre-season.' Marriott was always confident of scoring as long as two things happened: he was in the penalty area and the ball came to him. Very simple and logical. His confidence back in the first spell was almost a swagger, not quite cockiness but a knowledge that if the stars aligned, he was the best man to complete the job. What Lynn fans will hope for is a repeat, even though that might be asking a bit much. As the man himself said with a smile, 'I think they're quite high numbers!'. It wasn't an escape route if things don't work out: Marriott doesn't think that way. Advertisement 'If I play a game of football, I expect to score a goal,' he said. 'That's just the pressure I put on myself. That's kind of my job, isn't it? I'm probably the harshest critic going. 'I've scored a lot of goals in my career. You can rely on your experiences and know you can do it, so, yeah, you've got to back yourself at the end of the day. 'You can go through goal droughts, strikers can, but luckily, when I was here before, I didn't really go through them. Two or three games maximum, really so hopefully that continues. You've just got to back yourself.' Goals are what are expected of Marriott, but there's a lot to be learned for young Toll as well – and the wise head is happy to pass on his experience. Advertisement 'I see he's done really well for himself. He's still young. I've experienced a lot of games so I'll be talking to him, seeing what he brings. I'm sure we can bring different attributes. Whether it's playing together or just in training, I'm sure I can bring a lot to him and hopefully he really kicks on.' If there's one final observation, it is that Marriott hasn't returned to King's Lynn to while away the last couple of years of his playing career. 'I could have took the easy option and gone part-time and really not bothered,' he said. 'But I wanted to stay in full-time football. The manager has spoken to me and said what he expects from me and how he sees me in the team and how I play. I'm really excited for it. I think I've got a good couple of more years left in me.'

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How women's tennis returned to Queen's in London after more than 50 years
THE QUEEN'S CLUB, LONDON — A little before 6 p.m. Thursday afternoon, Emma Raducanu stood on the Andy Murray Arena at Queen's Club in west London, soaking up the applause from a packed crowd. She'd just beaten Rebecca Šramková to reach the HSBC Championships quarterfinals, at a time of day that for nearly two decades was basically 'the Andy Murray slot' — primetime for the British tennis television audience. As the crowd watched on from the stands and on BBC Two back home, it felt like the kind of moment the Lawn Tennis Association (LTA) had in mind when it secured a women's event at Queen's for the first time since 1973. Visibility for women's tennis and helping the push towards equality were major drivers of the event returning, and with her run to the last eight, Raducanu, the country's most recent Grand Slam singles champion, acted as the frontwoman for that message. Advertisement The original Queen's Club Championships was a joint men's and women's event from 1890 to 1973, before, with echoes of the modern day, a squeezed schedule led to the women's event being removed from the tournament calendar. The event was held the week before Wimbledon, and with 48 men's players and 64 women's players playing simultaneously, there was little wiggle room for the British weather. If it rained, matches had to be switched to lightning-quick indoor wooden courts in that instance. So the women's event moved to Eastbourne on the south coast of England, and the men's to Nottingham in the Midlands. The men returned to Queen's in 1977, and the tournament reestablished itself as the premier Wimbledon tune-up. A male-only tournament for over 50 years, Queen's slowly became synonymous with a particular type of old-fashioned British tennis thinking: Wimbledon was the last Grand Slam to award equal prize money to men and women, and until 2022, former champions were listed on the club's honor boards by their married names. The legendary Chris Evert was down as Mrs. J.M. Lloyd for her 1981 title, as she won that year during her marriage to the British former world No. 23 John Lloyd. Part of the motivation for the women's event returning to Queen's this year was to shake up some of the long-held assumptions about British tennis. That it is a sport for the middle class, that men are generally given preference, and that change happens at a glacial pace. An extremely expensive members' club in an affluent area of west London remains emblematic of how outsiders perceive British tennis, even more so than Wimbledon. Both are beautiful, old-fashioned venues, but for colored trousers, panama hats and open-necked pink shirts, Queen's has typically been the place to be. Advertisement Its members, gathered by the clubhouse overlooking the main court with Pimm's in hand, are far more prominent than their equivalents at the All England Club, who fade into the background. 'It's kind of what I think a lot of Americans would think of as a (typical) British club,' world No. 8 and Australian Open champion Madison Keys said of Queen's in a news conference Friday. A small group of Queen's members last year planned legal action against the event, reportedly furious that they weren't consulted about it being hosted at the club. Those tensions are said to have largely been smoothed over, helped by the club taking away a fee for booking courts that had existed even for members previously. 'Originally there was some frustration — you know what Queen's can be like, it can be a bit stuffy,' a member who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect professional relationships, said in a phone interview Thursday. Advertisement 'But generally now it's been taken pretty well — the changes to the fees have been good, and the extra week hasn't been that disruptive. You can still use the indoor and hard courts during the tournaments.' There is still exasperation among some members about the reduction over the last few years in guest passes for the tournament. This was down from around 400 to 100 in 2023, and they've remained hard to get. Queen's did not confirm the exact numbers for this year's events, nor whether the possible legal action amounted to anything. Another member made the point meanwhile that the growth of the tournament over the last decade or so has helped transform the facilities at the club. In any case, these sorts of internal disputes among an extremely privileged group of people are not how those in charge of British tennis want the sport in the UK to be viewed. The LTA and its tournament director, former world No. 27 Laura Robson, want the women's event to attract a more diverse audience than the men's event typically has. Both events are categorised as 500-level tournaments — the number of ranking points awarded to the winner — just below the 1,000 level, which is the rung underneath the Grand Slams. Advertisement Various fans said that they were visiting Queen's for the first time. One 22-year-old Ukrainian supporter explained Friday that he lived locally and bought a ticket on the day. Another spectator, David, was there with his 12-year-old son Woody, taking advantage of the easier-to-access tickets. Heather Watson, an experienced British player, felt this was a more diverse crowd than is typical at a tennis event in the UK. 'I came from Birmingham last week, and it felt quite polite, and then this week I felt I really had the crowd behind me,' she said in a news conference after losing in the second round to Elena Rybakina. 'I feel like, because it's in London, and it's a big tournament, maybe you get more of a diverse crowd.' That crowd remains generally well-heeled and overwhelmingly white. Crew Clothing Company, a very middle-class brand, is one of the main sponsors. But, certainly for the first few days, the event had a slightly different feel to the vibe of the men's event. 'We're encouraging it (more diversity) with the pricing of the tickets, the fact that it's more accessible than the men's,' Robson said Thursday, in an interview in the plush tournament director's office. Advertisement 'We've got different categories, and we're encouraging people to even walk up to the door and grab tickets that are available. For the men's event, no one would ever think to do that. There've been a lot of teenagers, a lot of people in their early 20s, which is great. The whole vibe across tennis is to try to get more young viewers and younger audiences. But I think that kind of comes back around to ticket pricing, where you're not going to get someone in their late teens, early 20s being able to afford a £150 ticket.' The cheapest ticket prices for the men's final are £100, before rising sharply, with women's final tickets starting at £35. There was a similar disparity for the first few days of the events — the cheapest on the Monday and Thursday for the men's was £50 and £70, compared to £20 for both days in the women's. There are four men's matches on those days, compared to three for the women's event, but the pricing disparity is intentional. 'The two events have two very different personalities and it's really felt like that — that everyone's having a good time enjoying themselves in what feels like a relaxed environment,' Robson said. 'And the players pick up on that as well, they love the support, they've loved the fact that there's been great crowds in every day.' More than 52,000 people will come through the gates in total, around 85 percent of the overall capacity. Only two other women's-only events this year have sold more than that 52,000 figure: August's Canadian Open and the Charleston Open in March and April. The Queen's men's event is a complete sellout as per usual. Advertisement Robson said the site has been designed to be more free-flowing this week, giving fans space to roam and get close to the players on the practice courts. Seeing the best players in the world helps, and although world No. 3 Jessica Pegula and four-time Grand Slam champion Naomi Osaka pulled out, eight of the world's top 20 made the trip to west London. The quarterfinals contained six of the world's top 15. The tournament's place in the calendar, straight after the French Open, will always mean some withdrawals. But Robson wants to make the event as appealing as possible for the players. The excellent facilities in such picturesque surroundings help; the fact that it takes place at an existing club, rather than at a purpose-built venue, gives it a point of difference to many events on the WTA circuit. Keys said she thinks it's the best 500 she's played at, and others have spoken publicly about how well looked after they've felt at the event. 'It's phenomenal, it's so nice, the grass is great, and it's a good switch-up from where we have been,' Keys said Friday after defeating Diana Shnaider to reach the semifinals. 'It's fun for me to finally come to new places after all these years on tour. I have always heard from all the guys that they love this tournament, it's the best. It's funny, walking into the players' lounge, and you see all the years they won the best 500. I mean, it's absolutely been voted that way for a reason. It's a fantastic tournament. Very happy that the women are here.' Advertisement One WTA executive briefed on tournament categorization, speaking anonymously to protect relationships, said that some within the organisation are viewing Queen's as a '750 or 800' event — ie somewhere between a 500 and a 1,000. There is currently no 1,000 event on grass, but Robson wants Queen's to be in that conversation. As a former player, Robson wants to create an event that the players love, alongside achieving financial success. Last year, only the Queen's men's event made a profit from the British pre-Wimbledon grass-court events. The prize money at the women's Queen's event is $1.4 million (£1 m), making it the highest-paying WTA 500 event of its draw size (28) in 2025, and the women's prize money at the Lexus Eastbourne International has gone up to $389,000 — making it the tour's highest-paying WTA 250 event. But both figures remain well below the prize pots for the men's events — a much higher $2.9 million for the men's Queen's event and $863,362 (£637,100) for the men's Eastbourne tournament. Equal prize money will not arrive until 2029. A downside of the combined event is that it centralizes the sport even more in London, at the expense of other regions. To accommodate the change, the 250 event in Birmingham was moved and downgraded to a 125 event, below the main WTA Tour. The Eastbourne women's tournament went from being a 500 to a 250. Whether all this has any effect on tennis outside of London will become clearer in the next few years. Advertisement Ultimately, the Queen's event provides a platform for British women to have success at one of tennis's grandest and most historic venues — a place where, for years, they had been on the outside looking in. Katie Boulter, who will give up her British No. 1 status to Raducanu Monday, said after exiting the tournament to Shnaider: 'Queen's is everything that I kind of dreamt it would be. I feel like every single day I have stepped out on the court, it's been a great crowd. 'It's been a joy to actually play here, and to get the opportunity is such a privilege. I feel like it's a moment for women's tennis and women's sport in general right now.' 'I think it's huge for tennis in this country,' Watson said in a news conference. 'Having a big tournament here in London, which is the home of British tennis, which is where pretty much all the players live and train, it's huge and very special for us and feels kind of like a reward.' Some of the week's best moments from a British point of view came on the smaller Court 1, where packed crowds saw Raducanu and Boulter team up for the doubles. They beat Jiang Xinyu and Wu Fang-hsien before going down to Erin Routliffe and Lyudmyla Kichenok. Advertisement Raducanu will rise to No. 35 in Monday's rankings, while Boulter will be No. 39. Then there's Sonay Kartal, who's just inside the world's top 50. British women's tennis is in a solid place, but no one looks like making the jump Jack Draper has over the last year or so to the world's top five. Almost exactly 24 hours after basking in the adulation of the Queen's crowd, Raducanu was again in the primetime slot and had them roaring her on as she saved three match points against Zheng Qinwen. But the Olympic champion quickly took the fourth, and that was it for home hopes at the event. Earlier on Friday, Tatjana Maria treated the crowd to a masterclass in slice and dice, defeating former Wimbledon winner Rybakina in straight sets. Maria then knocked out Keys in another stunning performance, to set up a final against Amanda Anisimova that has been more than 50 years in the making. This article originally appeared in The Athletic. Sports Business, Tennis, Women's Tennis 2025 The Athletic Media Company