Global media highlights ICJ's dismissal of SAF's lawsuit; urges end to futile conflict
6 May 2025 18:34
CAPITALS (WAM)International media outlets have described the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) decision to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) against the UAE as a firm rejection of what they see as an attempt to deflect responsibility for the ongoing conflict.Commentators and analysts emphasised that the SAF should have prioritised ending the senseless war, and worked with regional and international partners to restore stability in Sudan.Various international media outlets highlighted in their coverage the dire humanitarian consequences of the ongoing civil war in Sudan.Reports described the situation as one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.CNN reported that the ICJ dismissed Sudan's case alleging that the UAE violated the Genocide Convention. CNN quoted Reem Ketait, Deputy Assistant Minister of Political Affairs in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as saying, "This decision is a clear and decisive affirmation of the fact that this case was utterly baseless."
"The Court's finding that it is without jurisdiction confirms that this case should never have been brought," Ketait has said.
"Quite simply, today's decision represents a resounding rejection of the SAF's attempt to instrumentalise the Court for its campaign of misinformation and to distract from its own responsibility," she added.The Associated Press (AP) reported on the bloody conflict that Sudan descended into in mid-April 2023, referring to the case filed by Sudan against the UAE, which the court decided to dismiss after "judges found that the International Court of Justice lacked the authority to continue the proceedings".The Guardian published an article stating that the ICJ rejected and struck the case entirely its list. The paper quoted Reem Ketait's statement, who said, "The facts speak for themselves: the UAE bears no responsibility for the conflict in Sudan. On the contrary, the atrocities committed by the warring parties are well documented.""The conflict, which has been ongoing since April 2023, has caused one of the world's worst humanitarian crises despite international peace efforts," The Guardian reported.Russia Today reported that the UAE government welcomed the decision, calling it a "categorical rejection of Sudan's false claim." It quoted Reem Ketait's statement: "The decision clearly and unequivocally confirms that the case is without merit… [It] represents a decisive rejection of the Sudanese Armed Forces' attempt to exploit the court to spread misinformation and divert attention from its responsibility in the conflict".In its coverage, Al-Arab newspaper described the ICJ's dismissal of the SAF's lawsuit as a political victory for the UAE, in the face of the SAF's attempts to deflect attention from its role in initiating and prolonging the war, and stalling progress toward a political agreement despite multiple regional and international initiatives.The paper also quoted observers as saying the Sudanese military's legal complaint against the UAE represented a tactic to buy time, and avoid accountability for its failure to achieve stability following the army's coup against the democratic transition and civilian rule, a move that triggered a civil war in April 2023.Several journalists and political observers criticised the legal action filed by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan's team, stating it reflected a lack of understanding of diplomatic and legal frameworks, and was based on a weak, unsubstantiated file that clearly aimed to divert attention from the military's failures.They stressed that the group behind the lawsuit does not represent Sudan or the will of its people, who continue to suffer the devastating consequences of the war. Meanwhile, this faction, they said, has been pursuing political gains at the expense of the Sudanese people.They reiterated that the SAF should have focused on ending the senseless conflict, and engaged regional and international allies to support Sudan's stability.
They also highlighted that the UAE's diplomatic and humanitarian efforts stand as clear testimony to its active and constructive role in supporting the Sudanese people.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
11 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Sudanese army accuses Libya's Haftar of joint border attack with RSF
The Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) have accused Libyan militia leader Khalifa Haftar of taking part in a joint border attack with the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in its war with Khartoum. The attack is the first time direct involvement of Libyan fighters in the conflict in Sudan has been alleged. SAF spokesman Nabil Abdullah said in a statement the attack took place on Tuesday on the borders of Sudan, Libya, and Egypt. Abdullah said Haftar's forces had attacked army positions in coordination with the RSF, denouncing a "blatant aggression against Sudan" aimed at taking control of the border region. Neither the RSF or Haftar have responded to the allegations. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The Sudanese foreign ministry accused the UAE, which backs Haftar as well as the RSF, of supporting the joint attack, calling it a "dangerous escalation" and a "blatant violation of international law". Abu Dhabi denies supporting the paramilitary group. "Sudan's border with Libya has long served as a corridor for arms and mercenaries supporting the [RSF] funded by the Emirates," it said in a statement. UK police handed dossier of war crimes committed by RSF in Sudan Read More » The RSF has been at war with its erstwhile allies the SAF since April 2023. In recent weeks, fighting has surged in key strongholds, especially in Darfur and Kordofan, where the RSF is pressing ahead with plans to form a parallel government. Both sides have deployed drones, air raids, intelligence units, and special forces in increasingly aggressive operations, particularly in Nyala - capital of South Darfur and a strategic RSF centre - and Port Sudan, the current seat of the SAF-aligned administration. The SAF has launched sustained air strikes on military installations in Nyala in recent days, with a focus on the city's international airport. Sudan's war has displaced millions and killed tens of thousands, while the RSF has been accused of extensive use of sexual violence. Across the country, nearly 25 million people are suffering dire food insecurity according to the World Food Programme.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
US Secretary of State Rubio terminates all USAID positions abroad: Report
By the end of September, there will be no such thing as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), The Guardian reported on Monday, because all of its overseas staff will be terminated. Many, if not most, are local hires who have depended on a USAID salary for years and sometimes decades to support their families. The Guardian attributed the revelation to a State Department cable that it had obtained. It said the chiefs of mission at embassies in more than 100 countries have been notified that a significant overhaul is coming. 'The Department of State is streamlining procedures under National Security Decision Directive 38 to abolish all USAID overseas positions,' the cable said. The State Department and Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'will assume responsibility for foreign assistance programming previously undertaken by USAID' from 15 June, it added. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In early March, Rubio said that US President Donald Trump's purge of the six-decade-old USAID was complete and that 5,200 of its 6,200 programmes had been eliminated. The remaining programmes, he said, would now be administered 'more effectively' under the State Department and in consultation with Congress. The axing of the aid agency was an initiative from the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, which aimed to save Washington billions in what it believed was unnecessary spending. Among its earliest finds was what the administration described as $50worth of condoms sent by the US "to Hamas". It was then revealed that it was a programme to prevent sexually transmitted diseases in the rural province of Gaza, Mozambique. Musk departed the administration two weeks ago. Since the Trump administration announced an immediate suspension of all foreign assistance, blocking ongoing aid programmes and freezing new funding, humanitarian workers around the world have been trying to work out exactly what this means for the millions of vulnerable people they are trying to keep alive. Middle East Eye reported on the impact of the initial USAID cuts on 1.8 million Sudanese experiencing famine. Food boxes sent by the US were rotting in warehouses because the agency no longer provided the money needed for the actual distribution. Since 1946, the Middle East and North Africa have been the biggest recipients of US financial assistance. Between April 2023 and April 2024, Congress appropriated around $9bn for the region. While most of the aid went towards military assistance, a fraction was funnelled into democracy programmes via USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy, a quasi-autonomous agency funded largely by the US Congress. MEE reported in May of this year that the Trump cuts to USAID have already impacted human rights defenders in the region who were reliant on the small grants to relocate and resettle abroad. Although modest in scope, the money provided a lifeline for exiled human rights activists.
Zawya
a day ago
- Zawya
Agreement between Mauritius and the United Kingdom (UK) fails to guarantee rights of Chagossians say United Nations (UN) experts
The recently signed agreement between the United Kingdom and Mauritius fails to guarantee and protect the rights of the Chagossian people, including their right to return to Diego Garcia, effective remedy and reparations and their cultural rights, UN experts* said today. On 22 May 2025, the United Kingdom and Mauritius signed a bilateral agreement to return sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia, to Mauritius to complete the decolonisation of Mauritius following years of negotiations and international pressure, including from the International Court of Justice and the General Assembly. 'By maintaining a foreign military presence of the United Kingdom and the United States on Diego Garcia and preventing the Chagossian people from returning to Diego Garcia, the agreement appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return, which also hinders their ability to exercise their cultural rights in accessing their ancestral lands from which they were expelled,' the experts said. They raised serious questions about whether the foreseen £40 million Trust Fund, which remains subject to yet-to-be adopted regulations, would comply with the right of the Chagossian people to effective remedy and adequate, effective, and prompt reparation, including restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition. Most notably, the current agreement contains no provisions providing for the full panoply of the right to adequate and effective reparations as it does not provide restitution, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition, the experts noted. The agreement also lacks provisions to facilitate the Chagossian people's access to cultural sites on Diego Garcia and protect and conserve their unique cultural heritage. 'In light of these significant concerns, we call for the ratification of the agreement to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated that fully guarantees the rights of the Chagossian people to return to all islands of the Chagos Archipelago, including Diego Garcia. This includes their right to adequate and effective remedy and reparations, including restitution, satisfaction, and guarantees of non-repetition, as well as their cultural rights,' the experts said. The experts had previously raised concerns about continuous forced displacement of the Chagossian people and lack of their effective participation in decision-making processes concerning negotiations over the Chagos Archipelago, in letters to the governments of Mauritius and the United Kingdom on 21 February 2023 as well as through a press release on 10 October 2024. 'We are gravely concerned about the lack of meaningful participation of Chagossians in processes that have led to the agreement,' the experts said. They urged the Governments of the United Kingdom and Mauritius to apply a human rights-based approach in addressing historical injustices against the Chagossian people. The experts are in touch with the United Kingdom and Mauritius regarding these issues. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of United Nations: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
