Laos among the highest for US Tourist visa overstays, but lowest for student compliance
VIENTIANE (Laotian Times): Laos is among the top countries with the highest overstay rates for the United States tourist and business visas, according to the latest data from the US Department of Homeland Security. However, when it comes to student and exchange visas, Lao nationals have the lowest overstay rate of any country reporting data.
According to the US Department of Homeland Security's latest report on entry and overstay patterns, Laos recorded a 9.55 percent overstay rate in the B-1/B-2 visa category, which includes temporary visitors for business and tourism.
This places Laos among the top two countries with the highest overstay rates in this category, alongside nations such as Djibouti.
By comparison, neighboring countries in Southeast Asia reported lower overstay rates. Vietnam and Thailand, for instance, were not listed among the highest-ranking countries in this category, indicating stronger compliance among travelers from those nations.
Despite concerns in the visitor category, Laos showed a strong performance in the student and exchange visa segment. For F, M, and J visas, granted to individuals participating in academic, vocational, or exchange programs, Laos reported an overstay rate of just 6.49 percent. While this figure may appear significant, it is the lowest among all countries that submitted measurable data for this visa category.
These findings come amid increased scrutiny of visa compliance in the US.
A recent proclamation issued on 10 June outlines new measures aimed at strengthening border security and reducing visa overstays, which are viewed as potential risks to national security. Countries with persistently high overstay rates may face stricter visa policies or additional requirements during the application process.
In response to the latest data, Laos has been listed among countries subject to partial visa restrictions, along with Burundi, Cuba, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela.
The move follows an executive order issued during the Trump administration that temporarily suspended the issuance of student visas worldwide. The directive also includes a pause on visa interviews as authorities expand social media screening for applicants seeking student and exchange visas.
While work visas and certain other nonimmigrant categories may still be available for applicants from these countries, the validity periods have been reduced in many cases.
The dual trends in Laos's visa record, high overstay rates among visitors but low rates among students, present a mixed picture for policymakers. While concerns remain about compliance in the tourism and business sectors, the country's student population in the US continues to demonstrate strong adherence to visa conditions. - Laotian Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Sun
Iran's nuclear programme, Netanyahu's age-old obsession
JERUSALEM: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's nearly 20-year-old threat to strike Iran came true on Friday, as US President Donald Trump warned Tehran of further 'brutal' attacks if it refuses to negotiate. In its largest military action against Iran to date, Israel's strikes hit about 100 targets including nuclear facilities and military command centres, and killed the armed forces' chief, top nuclear scientists and other senior figures. The strikes came as the United States and Iran were due to meet in Oman Sunday to pick up negotiations towards an agreement on the Islamic republic's nuclear programme. 'We are fairly close to a pretty good agreement,' Trump told reporters on Thursday, hours before news broke of the Israeli attacks. 'I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it,' Trump added, speaking of the Israelis. But on Friday, Trump seemed unbothered by Israel's action, and on his Truth Social platform urged Iran to make a deal. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' he wrote. Timing 'makes sense' Netanyahu, who has always scorned talks with Iran, paid no heed to Trump's original warning and took advantage of the seismic changes in the Middle East since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023. 'I doubt Israel would do this if the US told it not to,' Menachem Merhavy, an Iran expert at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told AFP. Merhavy said that the timing of the attack 'makes sense because Israel has been clipping the wings of Iran for the last year and a half', in actions against Tehran-aligned groups and proxies in the region, many of whom Israel has significantly weakened. Netanyahu said he had 'ordered' the attack on Iran's nuclear programme months ago. 'It was necessary to act and I set the implementation date for the end of April 2025,' Netanyahu said. 'For various reasons, it did not work out.' But his obsession with Iran goes back much further than the ongoing Gaza war, sparked by an unprecedented attack by Tehran-backed Palestinian group Hamas. After Iran's former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad caused international uproar in 2005 when he called for Israel to be 'wiped off the map', Netanyahu -- then an opposition leader following his first term as premier in 1996-1999 -- called Tehran's nuclear programme 'a serious threat for the future'. He said at the time Israel 'must do everything' to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb, even if it meant striking the country's nuclear facilities as Israel had in Iraq in 1981. Iran has consistently denied seeking atomic weapons, but after his return to power in 2009, Netanyahu repeatedly dismissed Tehran's assurances that its nuclear programme was meant for civilian purpose only, and advocated a 'military option'. Netanyahu called the UN Security Council's 2015 approval of an agreement with world powers lifting sanctions in exchange for curbs on Iran's nuclear activities a 'historic mistake'. In 2018, he applauded Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from the agreement, effectively scrapping it. Iran's reaction was to gradually abandon its commitments, enriching uranium to levels close to weapons-grade material and in unprecedented quantities. This gave Netanyahu a justification to keep up the fight against Iran's nuclear programme. 'Reshape the Middle East' All the while, Israel's Mossad spy agency worked in secret to undermine Iran's nuclear programme. Since the start of the Gaza war, Netanyahu has said on several occasions he was seeking to 'reshape the Middle East'. In late 2024, Israel dealt a hard blow to Iran's so-called 'axis of resistance', by crippling Lebanese armed group Hezbollah. The fall of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, another Iranian ally, helped cement the regional dominance of Israel -- the Middle East's only, if undeclared, nuclear power. But it was an Israeli response to 200 Iranian missiles in October 2024 that 'changed the balance of power' between the two foes, according to statements at the time by then defence minister Yoav Gallant, after a series of Israeli strikes inside Iran -- a rare direct confrontation. In February, Netanyahu told US Secretary of State Marco Rubio that with the Trump administration's support 'I have no doubt that we can and will finish the job'. Danny Citrinowicz, of the Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security Studies, told AFP that Trump most likely viewed Israel as 'serving his interests'. 'Trump really thinks that as long as Iran is weaker, he will be able to achieve a deal on the nuclear file,' said Citrinowicz. Holly Dagres, an Iran expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, warned that 'if the Trump administration somehow thinks it's going to be having a sixth round of talks with the Iranians in Oman on Sunday, then it truly doesn't understand the Islamic republic and how it operates'.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Netanyahu Launches Major Strikes on Iran Amid Nuclear Talks
JERUSALEM: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's nearly 20-year-old threat to strike Iran came true on Friday, as US President Donald Trump warned Tehran of further 'brutal' attacks if it refuses to negotiate. In its largest military action against Iran to date, Israel's strikes hit about 100 targets including nuclear facilities and military command centres, and killed the armed forces' chief, top nuclear scientists and other senior figures. The strikes came as the United States and Iran were due to meet in Oman Sunday to pick up negotiations towards an agreement on the Islamic republic's nuclear programme. 'We are fairly close to a pretty good agreement,' Trump told reporters on Thursday, hours before news broke of the Israeli attacks. 'I don't want them going in, because I think it would blow it,' Trump added, speaking of the Israelis. But on Friday, Trump seemed unbothered by Israel's action, and on his Truth Social platform urged Iran to make a deal. 'There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacks being even more brutal, come to an end,' he wrote. Timing 'makes sense' Netanyahu, who has always scorned talks with Iran, paid no heed to Trump's original warning and took advantage of the seismic changes in the Middle East since the start of the war in Gaza in October 2023. 'I doubt Israel would do this if the US told it not to,' Menachem Merhavy, an Iran expert at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told AFP. Merhavy said that the timing of the attack 'makes sense because Israel has been clipping the wings of Iran for the last year and a half', in actions against Tehran-aligned groups and proxies in the region, many of whom Israel has significantly weakened. Netanyahu said he had 'ordered' the attack on Iran's nuclear programme months ago. 'It was necessary to act and I set the implementation date for the end of April 2025,' Netanyahu said. 'For various reasons, it did not work out.' But his obsession with Iran goes back much further than the ongoing Gaza war, sparked by an unprecedented attack by Tehran-backed Palestinian group Hamas. After Iran's former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad caused international uproar in 2005 when he called for Israel to be 'wiped off the map', Netanyahu -- then an opposition leader following his first term as premier in 1996-1999 -- called Tehran's nuclear programme 'a serious threat for the future'. He said at the time Israel 'must do everything' to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb, even if it meant striking the country's nuclear facilities as Israel had in Iraq in 1981. Iran has consistently denied seeking atomic weapons, but after his return to power in 2009, Netanyahu repeatedly dismissed Tehran's assurances that its nuclear programme was meant for civilian purpose only, and advocated a 'military option'. Netanyahu called the UN Security Council's 2015 approval of an agreement with world powers lifting sanctions in exchange for curbs on Iran's nuclear activities a 'historic mistake'. In 2018, he applauded Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from the agreement, effectively scrapping it. Iran's reaction was to gradually abandon its commitments, enriching uranium to levels close to weapons-grade material and in unprecedented quantities. This gave Netanyahu a justification to keep up the fight against Iran's nuclear programme. 'Reshape the Middle East' All the while, Israel's Mossad spy agency worked in secret to undermine Iran's nuclear programme. Since the start of the Gaza war, Netanyahu has said on several occasions he was seeking to 'reshape the Middle East'. In late 2024, Israel dealt a hard blow to Iran's so-called 'axis of resistance', by crippling Lebanese armed group Hezbollah. The fall of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, another Iranian ally, helped cement the regional dominance of Israel -- the Middle East's only, if undeclared, nuclear power. But it was an Israeli response to 200 Iranian missiles in October 2024 that 'changed the balance of power' between the two foes, according to statements at the time by then defence minister Yoav Gallant, after a series of Israeli strikes inside Iran -- a rare direct confrontation. In February, Netanyahu told US Secretary of State Marco Rubio that with the Trump administration's support 'I have no doubt that we can and will finish the job'. Danny Citrinowicz, of the Tel Aviv-based Institute for National Security Studies, told AFP that Trump most likely viewed Israel as 'serving his interests'. 'Trump really thinks that as long as Iran is weaker, he will be able to achieve a deal on the nuclear file,' said Citrinowicz. Holly Dagres, an Iran expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, warned that 'if the Trump administration somehow thinks it's going to be having a sixth round of talks with the Iranians in Oman on Sunday, then it truly doesn't understand the Islamic republic and how it operates'.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Trump says Nippon-US Steel deal has resolvable national security risk
The logos of Nippon Steel Corp. are didplayed at the company headquarters in Tokyo, Japan March 18, 2019. Picture taken March 18, 2019. REUTERS/Yuka Obayashi (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that concerns over national security risks posed by Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion bid for U.S. Steel can be resolved if the companies fulfill certain conditions that his administration has laid out, paving the way for the deal's approval. Shares of U.S. Steel rose 3.5% on the news in after-the-bell trading as investors bet the deal was close to done. Trump, in an executive order, said conditions for resolving the national security concerns would be laid out in an agreement, without providing details. "I additionally find that the threatened impairment to the national security of the United States arising as a result of the Proposed Transaction can be adequately mitigated if the conditions set forth in section 3 of this order are met," Trump said in the order, which was released by the White House. The companies thanked Trump in a press release, saying the agreement includes $11 billion in new investments to be made by 2028 and governance commitments including a golden share to be issued to the U.S. government. They did not detail how much control the golden share would give the U.S. Shares of U.S. Steel had dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told the Japanese Nikkei newspaper that its planned takeover of U.S. Steel required "a degree of management freedom" to go ahead after Trump earlier had said the U.S. would be in control with a golden share. The bid, first announced by Nippon Steel in December 2023, has faced opposition from the start. Both Democratic former President Joe Biden and Trump, a Republican, asserted last year that U.S. Steel should remain U.S.-owned, as they sought to woo voters ahead of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, where the company is headquartered. Biden in January, shortly before leaving office, blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which began on January 20 and opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple "investment" in U.S. Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion. At a rally in Pennsylvania on May 30, Trump lauded an agreement between the companies and said Nippon Steel would make a "great partner" for U.S. Steel. But he later told reporters the deal still lacked his final approval, leaving unresolved whether he would allow Nippon Steel to take ownership. Nippon Steel and the Trump administration asked a U.S. appeals court on June 5 for an eight-day extension of a pause in litigation to give them more time to reach a deal for the Japanese firm. The pause expires Friday, but could be extended. June 18 is the expiration date of the current acquisition contract between Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel, but the firms could agree to postpone that date. (Reporting by Alexandra Alper in Washington, David Gaffen in New York and Nathan Gomes in Bengaluru; Editing by Anil D'Silva and Leslie Adler)
