Australian accused in mushroom murders disputes accounts of fatal lunch
An Australian woman accused of the murder of three elderly relatives of her estranged husband by feeding them poisonous mushrooms disputed on Tuesday accounts of the fatal lunch given by other witnesses, a court heard.
Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with the July 2023 murders of her mother-in-law Gail Patterson, father-in-law Donald Patterson and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, along with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband.
The prosecution accuses her of knowingly serving the guests the death caps as part of a Beef Wellington at her home in Leongatha, a town of about 6,000 people some 135 km (84 miles) from Melbourne.
She denies the charges, which carry a life sentence, with her defence calling the deaths a 'terrible accident'.
On Patterson's third day of cross-examination, prosecution lawyer Nanette Rogers asked whether she had lied about serving herself on a plate of a different colour from those of her guests, which the prosecution says she did to avoid the poison.
'I suggest that this description that you gave to the jury of the plates you used at the lunch is a lie. Correct or incorrect?' Rogers said.
'Incorrect,' the accused replied.
The cook, the killer mushrooms and the deadly mystery gripping Australia
In his evidence, Ian Wilkinson, the sole surviving guest from the lunch, whose recovery took months in hospital, had said Patterson served herself on a plate of a different colour.
Patterson's estranged husband, Simon Patterson, previously testified that Heather Wilkinson had remarked on the different coloured plates before she died.
Erin Patterson also disputed an account by her son, who said in his evidence he had not seen her repeatedly visit the bathroom as a result of also becoming sick after the meal.
The defence's decision to call Erin Patterson as a witness has re-ignited interest in the trial that began in late April.
Media have descended on the town of Morwell where the trial is being held, about two hours east of Melbourne.
State broadcaster ABC's daily podcast on the trial is currently Australia's most popular, while many domestic newspapers have run live blogs.
Patterson is currently in her sixth day of giving evidence and her third day of cross-examination by Rogers.
The prosecution rested its case on June 2 after a month of evidence from relatives and medical, forensic and mushroom experts.
The trial, expected to conclude this month, continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
36 minutes ago
- CBC
P.E.I. judge to decide this fall on legality of DNA taken from Byron Carr murder suspect
Dates have been set for court proceedings that will determine whether the DNA collected from Todd Joseph Gallant as part of the investigation used to charge him with the murder of Byron Carr violated his rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Gallant has been charged with one count of first-degree murder and one count of interfering with human remains connected to the 1988 killing of the 36-year-old Montague Regional High School teacher. Charlottetown Police had long said they believed Carr had consensual sex with a young man he brought to his Charlottetown home, and presumed that person was his killer. Advances in technology prompted the force to reopen the Carr cold case in 2007. Last year, Charlottetown Police announced it had used genetic genealogy to match a DNA sample taken from underwear at the Carr crime scene to Gallant, who lived on P.E.I. at the time of the murder but left the province shortly afterward. He returned to the Island in 2022. Gallant's lawyer, Chris Montigny, told CBC News on Tuesday that the defence is taking issue specifically with one step in the process that investigators said they used to match the crime scene DNA to Gallant. "We're alleging that the seizure of some of the evidence was contrary to the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure," Montigny said. "An accused person is allowed to ask a court to consider whether or not that evidence was collected in violation of their Charter rights — and if so, what is the appropriate remedy? "In this case, we're asking that that evidence that we say was gathered improperly be excluded from the trial." Sample gathered in 2023 Montigny said this comes down to "an opportunity to get DNA" from Gallant in 2023 when had returned to P.E.I. and was living in Souris. No details have emerged in court about how this DNA was gathered. Gallant has already pleaded not guilty and elected for his case to be heard before a judge and jury in the Supreme Court of P.E.I. But the arguments on whether the DNA evidence can be produced will be made before a judge alone, starting Oct. 8. In the meantime, both Montigny and the Crown prosecutor handling the case will be preparing for that hearing. They have to file documents with the court on dates that were fixed during a court appearance on Tuesday. The hearing in October will involve calling witnesses, which Montigny said will likely include police officers who took part in the investigation. Gallant has been in jail for a year and a half so far and will stay there until his next scheduled appearance, at the October hearing.
CTV News
5 hours ago
- CTV News
26 years after disappearance, two men charged in 1999 Quebec murder
Two men have been charged with second-degree murder in connection with 1999 murder case. Investigators from Quebec's provincial police (SQ) unsolved case division have arrested two men in connection with the 1999 murder of Maxime Berthiaume. Kenneth Forman, 82, of Lachine, and Timothy Helpin, 58, of Deux-Montagnes, were arrested on warrants for second-degree murder. The accused appeared virtually at the Joliette courthouse on Tuesday. According to the SQ, Berthiaume was reported missing by his family in February 1999. Montreal police (SPVM), along with the SQ, conducted an investigation. In January, SQ investigators were able to establish a link between Berthiaume's disappearance and the unidentified body of a homicide victim found in September 2015 in Rawdon.
CTV News
5 hours ago
- CTV News
Weinstein jury pores over accuser's emails during deliberations
Harvey Weinstein appears in state court in Manhattan for his retrial on Tuesday, June 10, 2025 in New York. (Curtis Means/Pool Photo via AP) Warning: This story contains graphic details. NEW YORK — Jurors in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial appeared to be focusing on one of his three accusers as deliberations stretched into a fourth day Tuesday, with no further sign of interpersonal tensions that flared earlier. The jury had requested to start off Tuesday with electronic copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to Jessica Mann — the accuser with arguably the most complex history with Weinstein. Jurors deliberated through the morning without sending any further requests. During days of testimony, Mann said the Oscar-winning movie producer raped her in 2013 amid a consensual relationship that continued for years afterward. Weinstein's lawyers emphasized that she kept seeing him, accepting invitations and sending warm messages to him. Mann said she 'compartmentalized' the pain he caused her. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to all the charges in the case. In addition to the rape charge, he's accused of sexually assaulting two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola. Weinstein didn't testify during the current trial, but maintained through his attorneys that he had completely consensual encounters with his accusers, who wanted his help building show business careers. Weinstein was one of the movie industry's most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges. The jury is made up of seven women and five men. Their closed-door discussions began Thursday and apparently have been fractious at times. One juror asked Friday to be excused because he felt one member of the group was being treated unfairly. Then on Monday, the foreperson complained to the judge, prosecutors and defense lawyers that some jurors were 'pushing' others to change their minds, talking about Weinstein's past and going beyond the charges. The foreperson didn't specify what was said. Trial evidence has included some testimony about allegations outside the scope of the current charges, such as mentions of the groundswell of claims against the ex-studio boss in 2017. Yet another juror soon asked to speak to the court, where she opined that things were 'going well.' By the end of Monday, the jury as a whole said in a note that it was 'making good progress.' There was progress Tuesday on at least one front: Jurors ultimately were given coffee, as requested, Judge Curtis Farber said. He hadn't initially thought the state court system could provide it. Weinstein originally was convicted in New York in 2020 of raping Mann and forcing oral sex on Haley. Sokola's allegation was added last year, after New York state's highest court overturned the 2020 conviction and sent the case back for retrial. Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles. The Associated Press generally does not identify people without their permission if they say they have been sexually assaulted. Sokola, Mann and Haley have agreed to be named. Jennifer Peltz, The Associated Press Resources for sexual assault survivors in Canada If you or someone you know is struggling with sexual assault or trauma, the following resources are available to support people in crisis:
