&w=3840&q=100)
'I don't care what she said': Trump on Tulsi Gabbard's Iran nukes claim
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday (local time) publicly rejected the assessment of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard regarding Iran's nuclear program.
Speaking to reporters while returning from the G7 summit in Canada, Trump contradicted Gabbard's testimony to Congress that Iran is not currently pursuing nuclear weapons. Instead, he sided with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has consistently claimed that Iran is inching closer to nuclear capability, justifying Israel's airstrikes on Iranian positions.
When asked how close Iran was to developing a nuclear bomb, Trump responded, 'Very close.'
Reporters also pointed out Gabbard's earlier statement to Congress in March this year, where she said US intelligence agencies believed Iran had not restarted its nuclear weapons program. To this, Trump replied, 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having one.'
This marks the first time in his second term that Trump has directly challenged Gabbard's view on Iran's nuclear intentions.
Ongoing tensions with US intelligence
Trump has a long history of clashing with intelligence officials. During his first term, he repeatedly cast doubt on agency findings — including the widely accepted conclusion that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help his campaign.
At one point, he even sided with Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials over US intelligence assessments during a summit in Helsinki.
Intelligence agencies differ on Iran threat
Meanwhile, Director Gabbard's position remains unchanged, according to a Reuters report. Her office maintains that US intelligence believes Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has not given orders to restart a nuclear weapons program.
Iran, for its part, continues to deny any intent to develop nuclear arms. It insists that its uranium enrichment activities are for peaceful, civilian use.
According to Gabbard's briefing to Congress, even if Iran decided to restart its weapons program today, it would still need up to three years to develop a nuclear warhead capable of targeting other nations.
On the other hand, Netanyahu, who has long warned about Iran's nuclear ambitions, welcomed Trump's stance. He has argued that pre-emptive Israeli action is necessary to prevent Iran from reaching weapons-grade nuclear capability.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
22 minutes ago
- First Post
China, Russia watch on as Trump weighs Iran strike to aid Israel
As Iran stands battered, and likely stands on the verge of defeat, in the war with Israel, Russia and China are anxiously watching the collapse of their principal ally in West Asia. Even if Iran survives, they would still have a host of problems. Read to know how the war has no good outcomes for Russia and China. read more Russian leader Vladimir Putin and Chinese leader Xi Jinping are seen at the Victory Day parade in Moscow, Russia. (Sergei Bobylyov/Reuters) As US President Donald Trump appears to be preparing to join Israel in the war on Iran, China and Russia are anxiously following the developments as their principal ally in the West Asia stands battered — and likely on the verge of defeat. Over the past many years, China has emerged as a leader of an anti-Western bloc that also comprised Russia, Iran, and North Korea. A defeat of Iran, or worse a regime change, would be catastrophic blow to the bloc and China and Russia's ability to project power in West Asia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Both China and Russia have offered to mediate between Israel and Iran, but the offer has found no taker in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel. The anxious wait for China and Russia appears set to last for a while as the war is nowhere near its conclusion. Even though Israel has decapitated Iranian military, assassinated the military and scientific brass, and battered its armaments, it has barely damaged the regime's nuclear programme — the main target of the war. Israel does not have the means to neutralise Iranian underground nuclear sites like Fordow. For that, Israel needs American 'bunker buster' munitions and specialised planes to launch them. While Trump has positioned aircraft and warships in the region, he has maintained that Iran wants to make a deal and it appears that he is giving the regime one last chance at negotiations. Russia loses yet another ally After the ouster of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, Russia appears set to lose another ally in the region in Iran. Even if Iran survives the war, it has already been reduced to a shadow of its former self by the Israeli bombardment. Previously, Russia projected power along the southern flank of Nato through ports and airbases in Syria. After losing those footholds, the alliance with Iran remained the main way for Russia to project power in the region. As Iran's defeat appears to be just a matter of time, Russia appears set to lose that as well. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China stares at energy crisis As the largest buyer of Iranian oil, the disruption in supplies from the war could affect the country. Moreover, as disruption spreads, or worse if the conflict spreads in the region, China's energy imports from other countries, such as the Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates (UAE), could also be affected. The problem may not be unique to China as around at least a fifth of world's all petroleum supplies transit through the region. 'It's an energy security risk. For a country already suffering under the strain of an economic downturn and a trade war [with the US], it's not an ideal scenario,' Tuvia Gering, a China and Middle East specialist at Israel's Institute of National Security Studies, told The Daily Telegraph. Neither Russia nor China can help Iran Even as China and Russia would want Iran to survive the war, there is little they can do support their ally. While Russia is bogged down in its own war against Ukraine, China would not risk a rupture with the United States with any overt military support to Iran at a time when the two sides are trying to mend ties. Moreover, there is little China can do as it is too far to provide arms and any air bridge would risk getting bogged into a conflict with Israel and the United States. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As for Russia, the regime is reliant on North Korea and China to sustain its war on Ukraine and on China to sustain its economy. As the country is dependent on North Korea for soldiers and artillery and on Russia for everything from heavy machinery and raw material to make weapons to consumer goods for the general public, it is not in any shape to support Iran in the war with the Israel-US combine. 'The collapse of the current regime would be a significant blow and would generate a lot of instability in the Middle East, ultimately undermining Chinese economic and energy interests,' Andrea Ghiselli, a scholar of China's relations in West Asia and North Africa, told The Telegraph. Despite such limitations, there has been some speculation about some Chinese help to Iran. The Telegraph has reported that multiple aircraft originating from China appear to have arrived in Iran deceptively in recent days. While the contents or occupants of the aircraft were not known, the newspaper reported that the planes were Boeing 747 freighters that are commonly used to transport military equipment and weapons and are chartered to fly government-owned cargo. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While 'the likelihood remains low' of China overtly helping Iran militarily, the possibility 'should not be dismissed and must be closely monitored', Tuvia told the newspaper. China, Russia to face problems even if Iran survives Even if Iran somehow survives the war, China and Russia would still have problems. Observers have said that if Iran survives the war, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei would have no option other than developing a nuclear weapon to restore lost deterrence. Russia and China do not want that. Firstly, Russia and China do not want the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Secondly, Russia and China do not Iran to outgrow its junior position in the bloc. If it would acquire nuclear weapons, the hold of China and Russia over Iran would weaken.
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
War Casualty Receives Traditional Hindu Last Rites At Sacred Karnataka Temple
A Russian military serviceman who embraced Hinduism received his final send-off according to ancient Hindu traditions at one of Karnataka's most revered temples. Sergey Grablev, who perished during the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict on April 28, was honored with complete traditional funeral rites at the historic Sri Mahabaleshwara Temple in Gokarna. Grablev had maintained a deep spiritual connection with India for nearly two decades, making regular pilgrimages to Gokarna over the past 18 years. His commitment to the faith extended beyond casual practice, as he had undertaken formal spiritual initiation ceremonies in the holy city of Varanasi, demonstrating his serious dedication to Hindu philosophy and customs. Despite the ongoing war, Grablev had returned to active military service, where he ultimately lost his life in combat. His death prompted an unusual but touching arrangement to honor his religious beliefs and spiritual journey. Due to international travel restrictions and the complex geopolitical situation, Grablev's family members could not physically attend the funeral ceremony in India. However, modern technology bridged this gap, allowing his relative Elena to participate virtually through a video call connection during the sacred proceedings. The elaborate funeral ceremony was conducted under the expert guidance of temple priest V Prashant Hiregange, who ensured that all traditional protocols were followed according to Hindu scriptural requirements. The rituals included the performance of Narayanabali, a specialized fire ceremony designed to facilitate the soul's liberation and guide it toward its ultimate spiritual destination. Additionally, the priests performed Pinda Daan, a significant ancestral offering ritual involving specially prepared rice balls mixed with clarified butter and black sesame seeds. This ceremony is believed to provide spiritual nourishment to departed souls and ensure their peaceful transition to the afterlife. The Sri Mahabaleshwara Temple, where these sacred rites took place, holds immense historical and spiritual significance. Constructed in the 4th century AD during the reign of Mayur Sharma of the Kadamba dynasty, the temple represents centuries of continuous worship and spiritual practice. The ancient shrine holds the distinction of being one of Karnataka's seven Muktikshetras, or sacred places of salvation, where devotees believe that prayers and rituals carry special spiritual potency. Its strategic location near the scenic Karwar beach adds to its appeal as both a major pilgrimage destination and tourist attraction. This unique funeral arrangement highlights the growing global appeal of Hindu spiritual practices and the lengths to which devoted practitioners will go to honor their religious commitments. Grablev's story demonstrates how spiritual beliefs can transcend geographical boundaries and cultural differences, creating meaningful connections between individuals and ancient traditions. The ceremony also showcases how religious institutions adapt to contemporary challenges, using technology to include distant family members in sacred rituals while maintaining the integrity and authenticity of traditional practices. This blend of ancient wisdom and modern connectivity enabled a respectful and complete farewell for a foreign devotee who had made India's spiritual traditions an integral part of his life.
Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
One visit, many openings: At G7, a step forward in India-Canada ties
After much anxiety on both sides, India and Canada have finally begun to turn a new page in their bilateral relations. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's recent visit to Canada for the G7 summit concluded with significant positives. His meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney, described by the latter as a 'foundational' step in rebuilding India-Canada relations, was crucial. Importantly, threats by some Sikh organisations to ambush PM Modi did not materialise at all, underscoring the resilience of diplomacy against disruptive elements. After the summit, Carney publicly acknowledged India's 'natural' and 'consistent' place at the G7 table, reflecting Canada's recognition of India's growing global stature and the Carney government's pragmatic resolve to address worsening bilateral ties. Carney emphasised India's importance, highlighting the 'size and dynamism of the Indian economy, Indian technology, and its role in a host of venues, G20 and beyond.' This recognition is central to India's perspective. As a proponent of making Canada an 'energy superpower', Carney lauded India's role in energy transition. At the Outreach Session, PM Modi reciprocated, underscoring the need for global energy security through sustainable and green pathways. He highlighted India's initiatives like the International Solar Alliance (ISA), the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI), and the Global Biofuels Alliance. Modi's consistent push for the Global South's concerns at such a high-profile forum further solidified India's role as their leading voice. PM Modi also reaffirmed India's stance against terrorism, urging G7 leaders to galvanise global action and pushing for strict measures against those who promote and support it. He briefed leaders on Operation Sindoor, carried out against terror infrastructure in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, demonstrating India's proactive stance. Discussions also focused on technology and innovation, particularly the AI-energy nexus and quantum-related issues, with PM Modi highlighting India's experience in democratising technology. Beyond the summit, PM Modi engaged in numerous bilateral meetings with other world leaders, expanding India's diplomatic outreach. Carney's realistic and encouraging description of their meeting as a 'foundation and necessary first step' conveyed a shared will to rebuild. PM Modi unequivocally communicated that, for India, national security and the fight against terrorism remain non-negotiable priorities. India's firm stance against any double standards in combating terrorism, underscores this commitment. This comes after a year of unprecedented tensions, marked by diplomatic expulsions and strained engagements stemming from the unresolved killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a designated Khalistani separatist. India has consistently denied involvement, attributing the crisis to Canada's perceived leniency towards extremist elements on its soil. The most tangible outcome is the agreement to restore the role of the high commissioners. Their absence had created a glaring void, impeding diplomatic functions and harming people-to-people and business ties. Reinstating these crucial diplomatic posts, alongside resuming senior and working-level engagements, is more than procedural; it signals a clear intent to restore normalcy and vital services. Both leaders affirmed the importance of open and forward-looking dialogue, stressing mutual respect, democratic values, sovereignty, and the rule of law, along with their commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. Stalled trade negotiations were also discussed. Negotiations are also underway to establish a joint working group on transnational crime. While Carney portrayed that as a starting point of the conversation, India sees this as a two-way street and demands accountability on Canada's side as well. Cooperation against transnational crime and terrorism demands genuine collaboration and a clear understanding of each other's security concerns. India has consistently provided evidence and sought action against elements promoting secessionism against India from Canadian soil. A relationship built on 'mutual respect' must inherently involve Canada addressing these core Indian concerns with seriousness and demonstrable action. Carney's concluding remark that 'there is a lot of work that needs to be done' resonates deeply in New Delhi. This visit is undeniably a positive development, a crucial first step on a path that promises to be long and arduous. It is not a magical cure for the deep-seated issues plaguing the relationship. Trust, once eroded, demands time and consistent effort to rebuild. The appointment of high commissioners is a vital beginning, but the real work of repairing trust and fostering deeper cooperation still lies ahead. The writer is assistant professor, Centre for the Study of the Americas, School of International Studies, JNU
