Trump calls China's Xi tough, 'hard to make a deal with'
Donald Trump said on Wednesday (June 4, 2025) that Chinese President Xi Jinping is tough and "extremely hard to make a deal with," days after the U.S. President accused China of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions.
"I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH," Mr. Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt had said on Monday that Mr. Trump would speak with Mr. Xi this week as the two leaders seek to iron out differences on last month's tariff agreement in Geneva, among larger trade issues.
A U.S. trade court last week ruled that Mr. Trump overstepped his authority in imposing the bulk of his tariffs on imports from China and other countries under an emergency powers act.
Less than 24 hours later, a federal appeals court reinstated the tariffs, saying it was pausing the trade court ruling to consider the government's appeal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
Russia Mocks Trump-Musk Spat, Offers To Broker ‘Peace Talks' And Give Tesla A Home
Last Updated: The feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk provoked chatter, mockery and amusement among the ruling class in Moscow, where one senior official joked about hosting peace talks. The public fallout between US President Donald Trump and his one-time ally and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has provoked chatter, mockery and intrigue in Moscow where the senior officials and media persons are treating the feud as both comedy and opportunity. Seniors leaders in Moscow are also joking about hosting peace talks between the two individuals and urging the tech giant in a tone mixing humour to bring his businesses to Russia. 'Elon, don't be upset! If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity," nationalist senator Dmitry Rogozin, who once ran Russia's space programme, posted on X. Elon @elonmusk, don't be upset! You are respected in Russia. If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us and become one of us – a 'Bars-Sarmat" fighter. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity.— ROGOZIN (@Rogozin) June 6, 2025 Former Russian President and senior security official Dmitry Medvedev took the trolling a step further, offering to mediate between the feuding duo. 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee," he posted on X, before jokingly requesting Starlink shares as payment. Reuters, the fallout has been widely ridiculed as an example of chaos in Washington. Margarita Simonyan, one of Russia's most powerful state media executives, mocked it as an example of 'modern US political culture" — "Sort of like the English Industrial Revolution. Only in reverse." Современная американская политическая культура войдет в историю как переломная, конечно.Вроде английской промышленной революции. Только наоборот. Но наблюдать занятно. — Margarita Simonyan (@M_Simonyan) June 5, 2025 Kirill Dmitriev, head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has in the past tried to interest Musk in cooperating with Russia on flights to Mars, asked on X, "Why can't we all just get along?" He then asked Grok, X's AI chatbot, how Musk and Trump could reconcile. However, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, when asked about the clash, said it was an internal matter for the US, though he was confident that Trump would handle it. 'Presidents handle a huge number of different things at the same time, some more and some less important," Peskov said. What Happened Between Trump And Musk? The high-profile alliance between Trump and Musk has dramatically unraveled into a bitter public feud with the two exchanging sharp accusations. The fallout began when Trump publicly criticised Musk at a White House press briefing, backing legislation that could severely impact the electric vehicle industry- a direct hit on Tesla. Musk, in response, fired back on his platform X, claiming that without his financial and strategic backing, Donald Trump would have lost the 2024 election. Calling the US President 'ungrateful", Elon Musk said, 'Without me, Trump would have lost. The Democrats would control the House." Musk then dropped a bombshell claim that Trump's name appears in sealed files related to Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting that's why the documents remain hidden. He wrote, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files." He then went on to endorse a post calling for Trump's impeachment and suggested that Vice President JD Vance replace him. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that Musk's Epstein tweet 'is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted." Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : donald trump elon musk moscow Russia Location : Moscow, Russia First Published: June 06, 2025, 21:33 IST News world Russia Mocks Trump-Musk Spat, Offers To Broker 'Peace Talks' And Give Tesla A Home
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump asks Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department
Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to permit it to proceed with dismantling the Department of Education, a move that would leave school policy in the United States almost entirely in the hands of states and local boards. The Justice Department asked the court to halt Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's May 22 ruling that ordered the administration reinstate employees terminated in a mass layoff and end further actions to shutter the department. The Justice Department said the lower court lacked jurisdiction to "second-guess the Executive's internal management decisions," referring to the federal government's executive branch. "The government has been crystal clear in acknowledging that only Congress can eliminate the Department of Education. And the government has acknowledged the need to retain sufficient staff to continue fulfilling statutorily mandated functions and has kept the personnel that, in its judgment, are necessary for those tasks. The challenged (reduction in force) is fully consistent with that approach," the filing said. The department, created by a U.S. law passed by Congress in 1979, oversees about 100,000 public and 34,000 private schools in the United States, though more than 85% of public school funding comes from state and local governments. Live Events It provides federal grants for needy schools and programs, including money to pay teachers of children with special needs, fund arts programs and replace outdated infrastructure. It also oversees the $1.6 trillion in student loans held by tens of millions of Americans who cannot afford to pay for college outright. Trump's move to dismantle the department is part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. Closing the department long has been a goal of many U.S. conservatives. Attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia, as well as school districts and unions representing teachers, sued to block the Trump administration's efforts to gut the department. The states argued that the massive job cuts will render the agency unable to perform core functions authorized by statute, including in the civil rights arena, effectively usurping Congress's authority in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Trump on March 20 signed an executive order intended to effectively shut down the department, making good on a longstanding campaign promise to conservatives to move education policy almost completely to states and local boards. At a White House ceremony surrounded by children and educators, Trump called the order a first step "to eliminate" the department. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced plans on March 11 to carry out a mass termination of employees. Those layoffs would leave the department with 2,183 workers, down from 4,133 when Trump took office in January. The department said in a press release those terminations were part of its "final mission." Trump on March 21 announced plans to transfer the department's student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education, nutrition and related services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which also is facing deep job cuts. Joun in his ruling ordered the administration to reinstate the laid off workers and halt implementation of Trump's directive to transfer student loans and special needs programs to other federal agencies. The judge rejected the argument put forth by Justice Department lawyers that the mass terminations were aimed at making the department more efficient while fulfilling its mission. In fact, Joun ruled, the job cuts were an effort to shut down the department without the necessary approval of Congress. "This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself," the judge wrote. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields called the judge's ruling "misguided." The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by Joun.
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump vs Musk: What happens to Nasa's ISS missions if SpaceX grounds Dragon capsule? Is Russia only other option?
President-elect Donald Trump listens as Elon Musk explains the operations ahead of the launch of the sixth test flight of the SpaceX Starship rocket, Nov. 19, 2024, in Boca Chica, Texas. (AP) As US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk exchanged barbs on social media on Thursday, Musk said he might stop using the Dragon spacecraft, which is used to take astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station (ISS). This came after Trump said he may cancel government contracts given to Musk's companies, SpaceX and Starlink. Musk responded on X, saying SpaceX "will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' It is not clear how serious Musk was. But the Dragon spacecraft is important for keeping the ISS working. Nasa also depends on SpaceX for other programs, such as launching science missions and, later this decade, taking astronauts to the moon. SpaceX and Nasa's partnership In 2006, a company named Space Exploration Technologies Corp, or SpaceX, got a Nasa contract to carry cargo and supplies to the ISS. At the time, SpaceX had not launched anything into orbit. Its first successful launch happened two years later with Falcon 1. In 2010, SpaceX launched the first Falcon 9 rocket. By 2012, it began sending cargo to the space station. Nasa gave money to help develop the Falcon 9 rocket. SpaceX then used the Nasa connection to attract other clients to launch satellites using its rockets. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo During the Obama administration, SpaceX also got a contract to take astronauts to the ISS. This happened for the first time in May 2020, during President Trump's first term. "Today the groundbreaking partnership between Nasa and SpaceX has given our nation the gift of an unmatched power a state-of-the-art spaceship to put our astronauts into orbit at a fraction of the cost of the space shuttle," Trump said in a speech at Kennedy Space Center in Florida on May 30, 2020, after that flight. He also praised Musk in the same event. As SpaceX made progress, other companies faced difficulties. Today, SpaceX is the main company handling both US civilian and military space activities. The US government now depends a lot on SpaceX. Musk started the company in 2002 with the goal of one day sending people to Mars. For now, the company is the only option the U.S. has to send people and equipment to space. Impact of decommissioning Dragon SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsules are used to take astronauts and cargo to the ISS for Nasa. If Musk follows through on his statement about decommissioning, it could affect the future of the space station. Later in the day, Musk seemed to take back the threat. But if he had followed through, SpaceX would likely bring back the Crew Dragon that is already docked at the space station, along with the four astronauts who plan to return in it. However, there would be no way to send the next group of astronauts to the ISS. Dragon capsule Right now, SpaceX is the only US company that can take crews to and from the ISS, using the Dragon capsule, which can carry four people. Another US company, Boeing, has a capsule called Starliner. But it has flown astronauts only once. That test flight had problems, and the two Nasa astronauts had to return to Earth using SpaceX in March. That was more than nine months after they launched last June. Starliner is still not ready to fly again. Nasa is deciding whether to do another test flight with cargo instead of a crew. SpaceX also uses Dragon capsules for its own private missions. The next such mission, managed by Axiom Space, is expected to launch next week. Cargo versions of Dragon are also used to carry food and other supplies to the ISS. Russia's Soyuz: The only other option The only other way to send crews to the ISS is using Russia's Soyuz capsules. Each Soyuz can carry three people. Usually, each Soyuz trip includes two Russians and one Nasa astronaut. Each SpaceX trip includes one Russian under a mutual agreement. This setup ensures that in an emergency, both US and Russian crew members have a way to return. When SpaceX started sending crews for Nasa in 2020, it reduced Nasa's dependence on Russia. Earlier, Nasa had to pay Russia tens of millions of dollars per seat. For cargo, Nasa also works with Russian spacecraft and a US company called Northrop Grumman.
