Ukraine bombs Russian bases: Here are some of Kyiv's most audacious attacks
Ukrainian drones struck multiple military airbases deep inside Russia on Sunday in a major operation a day before peace talks scheduled to start in Istanbul.
The Russian Defence Ministry said Ukraine had launched drone strikes targeting Russian military airfields across five regions, causing several aircraft to catch fire.
The attacks occurred in the Murmansk, Irkutsk, Ivanovo, Ryazan, and Amur regions. Air defences repelled the assaults in all but two regions – Murmansk and Irkutsk, the ministry said.
'In the Murmansk and Irkutsk regions, the launch of FPV drones from an area in close proximity to airfields resulted in several aircraft catching fire,' the Defence Ministry said. FPV drones are unmanned aerial vehicles with cameras on the front that relay live footage to operators, who in turn use those visuals to direct the drones.
The fires were extinguished, and no casualties were reported. Some individuals involved in the attacks had been detained, the Russian Defence Ministry said.
On Sunday night, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy praised the 'absolutely brilliant' Ukrainian drone attack on the Telegram messaging app.
But the Sunday attacks were only the latest in a series of audacious hits on Russian military facilities, territory and symbols of power over the past three years of war — often acknowledged by Kyiv, and in some cases widely believed to have been carried out by Ukrainian special forces.
Zelenskyy said 117 drones had been used to attack the Russian bases on Sunday. 'Russia has had very tangible losses, and justifiably so,' he said.
The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said that it had hit Russian military planes worth a combined $7bn in a wave of drone strikes on Russian air bases thousands of kilometres behind the front line.
Targets included the Belaya airbase in Irkutsk, about 4,300km (2,670 miles) from the Ukrainian border, and the Olenya airbase in south Murmansk, some 1,800km (1,120 miles) from Ukraine.
Earlier on Sunday, multiple local media reports in Ukraine claimed that the operation was carried out by the SBU using drones smuggled deep into Russia and hidden inside trucks.
At least 41 Russian heavy bombers at four airbases were hit, the reports said. The strikes reportedly hit Tu-95 and Tu-22 strategic bombers, which Russia uses to fire long-range missiles at Ukrainian cities.
Russia is yet to confirm the extent of the damage, but the attack could mark Ukraine's most damaging drone strike of the war to date.
Al Jazeera's John Hendren, reporting from Kyiv, said it's 'an audacious strike, one that Ukraine has been waiting a long time and patiently to deliver, and it's come after Russian air strikes into Ukraine have dramatically accelerated over the past couple of weeks'.
Both Russia and Ukraine have sharply ramped up their drone attacks against the other side in recent days.
Russia launched more than 900 kamikaze drones and 92 missiles last week, killing at least 16 civilians. Those attacks followed days of Ukrainian strikes on Russian military infrastructure in Russia's Tula, Alabuga and Tatarstan regions, in which Kyiv used at least 800 drones.
Meanwhile, Ukraine confirmed that it will send a delegation to Istanbul led by its Defence Minister Rustem Umerov for talks on Monday with Russian officials.
A previous round of talks, on May 16, led to a deal under which Ukraine and Russia exchanged 1,000 prisoners of war each, before any goodwill from that agreement evaporated amid the aerial warfare that subsequently intensified.
Zelenskyy, who has previously voiced scepticism about Russia's seriousness about peace talks, said that the Ukrainian delegation would enter the meeting in Istanbul with specific priorities, including 'a complete and unconditional ceasefire' and the return of prisoners and abducted children.
Russia has said it has formulated its own peace terms and ruled out a Turkish proposal for the meeting to be held at the leaders' level.
Monday's meeting in Turkiye has been spurred by US President Donald Trump's push for a quick deal to end the three-year war.
But no breakthrough appears to be in sight. In a rare display of criticism, Trump recently vented his frustration at Russian President Vladimir Putin.
'Something has happened to him,' Trump wrote on his social media platform on May 25, referring to Putin. 'He has gone absolutely CRAZY!'
Trump told reporters, 'We're in the middle of talking and he's shooting rockets into Kyiv and other cities.'
The US president is yet to react to Sunday's Ukrainian attacks on Russian airbases.
The strikes are the latest in a series of stunning, headline-grabbing attacks that Russia has periodically suffered since it launched the full-fledged invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
In May 2018, four years after Russia annexed the Crimean Peninsula, Putin drove a truck across a newly built bridge connecting the Russian mainland to the peninsula, enraging Ukrainians.
Ukraine would take its revenge, first in 2022 and then again in 2023.
In October 2022, a truck explosion that Russia blamed on Ukraine blew up a part of the bridge. Russia repaired the damage, and Putin tried to revive the symbolism of 2018, again driving across it, this time in a Mercedes.
But Ukraine would strike again. In July 2023, the bridge that serves as a crucial supply route for Russian forces in Ukraine was blown up. Russia's National Antiterrorism Committee said the strike was carried out by two Ukrainian sea drones. Officials said two people were killed and a child was wounded.
In September 2023, Ukraine launched a series of attacks on occupied Crimea, using drones and missiles to target key facilities of Russia's Black Sea Fleet near Sevastopol.
Satellite images showed that the first attack destroyed half of the Black Sea Fleet's communications command centre in Verkhnosadove.
Ukraine followed up on that attack with a strike against the Saky airfield in Crimea, which was hosting 12 Russian combat aircraft, including Su-24 and Su-30 fighter-bombers, according to the Ukrainian broadcaster Suspilne.
Then came the most devastating of the attacks, on September 22.
Ukraine hit the Black Sea Fleet command headquarters and claimed to have killed 34 officers, including fleet commander Admiral Viktor Sokolov. A further 105 soldiers were reportedly wounded.
In the dead of night in early May 2023, the ultimate symbol of Russian power for centuries — the Kremlin — came under attack, as flashes of light from small explosions over the red building's citadel were seen in images and grainy video around the world.
Moscow said that two Ukrainian drones had been used in the attack on Putin's residence, but had been disabled by electronic defences.
'We regard these actions as a planned terrorist act and an attempt on the president's life, carried out on the eve of Victory Day, the May 9 Parade, at which the presence of foreign guests is also planned,' the Kremlin said in a statement.
Zelenskyy denied that his country had attacked the Russian capital or its president.
'We don't attack Putin, or Moscow, we fight on our territory,' Zelenskyy told a news conference in Helsinki, Finland. But independent analysts, including from Western nations that are Ukrainian allies, believe Ukrainian special forces were behind the drone attacks on the Kremlin.
And a year later, Ukraine would blur the line between its territory and Russian land in the escalating war between the neighbours.
Ukrainian forces launched a surprise attack on the Kursk region on August 6, 2024, taking Moscow by surprise. Russia began evacuating the neighbouring Belgorod region as the country's forces were forced to confront Ukraine's offensive in Western Russia.
At the height of the incursion, Ukrainian forces claimed nearly 1,400 square kilometres (540 square miles) of Kursk — roughly twice the size of Singapore.
By the start of 2025, Russia had most of the territory it lost in Kursk before Ukraine launched a second wave of attacks in January.
However, Kyiv suffered a major setback earlier this year after Trump temporarily cut off all military and intelligence assistance. By early March, Russia had recaptured most of the territory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
UK prepares for war: How much will it cost?
The United Kingdom has announced a major investment in defence in response to a 'new era of threats' driven by 'growing Russian aggression'. The UK's Strategic Defence Review (SDR), unveiled on Monday, includes new investments in nuclear warheads, a fleet of new submarines and new munitions factories. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the SDR would bring the country to 'war-fighting readiness'. 'The threat we now face is more serious, more immediate and more unpredictable than at any time since the Cold War,' Starmer said as he delivered the review in Glasgow, Scotland. The SDR described Russia as an 'immediate and pressing' threat, and referred to China as a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge'. European nations have rushed to strengthen their armed forces in recent months, following Trump's repeated demands that Europe must shoulder more responsibility for its security. The defence review, the UK's first since 2021, was led by former NATO Secretary-General George Robertson. Among the 62 recommendations in the SDR, all have been accepted by the government. Starmer said the measures recommended in the review would bring 'fundamental changes' to the armed forces, including 'moving to war-fighting readiness', re-centring a 'NATO first' defence posture and accelerating innovation. 'Every part of society, every citizen of this country, has a role to play because we have to recognise that things have changed in the world of today,' he said. 'The front line, if you like, is here.' Based on the recommendations in the review, the government said it would boost stockpiles and weapons production capacity, which could be scaled up if needed. A total of 1.5 billion pounds ($2bn) will be dedicated to building 'at least six munitions and energetics factories', with plans to produce 7,000 long-range weapons. In turn, UK ammunitions spending – just one component of overall military spending – is expected to hit 6 billion pounds ($8.1bn) over the current parliamentary term, which ends in 2029. There are also plans to build up to 12 new attack submarines by the late 2030s as part of the AUKUS military alliance with Australia and the United States – equivalent to a new submarine every 18 months. This accounts for nearly half the projected spending outlined in the SDR. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) also said it would invest 15 billion pounds ($20.3bn) in its own nuclear warhead programme. The SDR recommended procuring new F-35 fighter jets and the Global Combat Aircraft Programme, a sixth-generation fighter produced jointly with Japan and Italy. The target size of the army will remain roughly the same, but the SDR recommended a slight increase in the number of regular soldiers 'if funding allows'. There are currently about 71,000. Instead of a dramatic increase in troop numbers, the SDR recommends using technology, drones and software to 'increase lethality tenfold'. To do this, the MoD plans to deliver a 1 billion pound ($1.35bn) 'digital targeting web', an AI-driven software tool designed to collect battlefield data and use it to enable faster decision making. More details about the SDR will be provided in the upcoming Defence Industrial Strategy, expected in the coming weeks, but UK defence companies will be among the big winners from the new SDR. Though supposedly a 10-year review, past SDRs suggest its shelf life might be more limited. The last SDR was published in 2021 and recommended 'a strategic pivot towards the Indo-Pacific region to counter China's influence and deepen ties with allies like Australia, India, and Japan', in line with strategic priorities of the time. This SDR, undertaken in the wake of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, has re-oriented the UK's geographical priorities. In the coming years, those could change again. Proposals to prepare the UK's armed forces to be 'battle ready' will cost at least 67.6 billion pounds ($91.4bn) through to the late 2030s, according to costings and estimates provided in the SDR. Before Monday's announcement, the government had already pledged to increase spending on defence from 2.3 percent currently to 2.5 percent by 2027, an increase of about 6 billion pounds ($8.1bn) per year. This would raise 60 billion pounds over 10 years – a bit shy of the cost projected by the SDR. The government has said it will cut overseas aid to fund that 0.2 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) rise in defence spending. Critics say this will not be enough and that the measures outlined by the SDR will cost more like 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, said the 'authors of the strategic defence review were clear that 3 percent [not 2.5 percent] of GDP 'established the affordability' of the plan.' In February, the Labour government said it had 'an ambition' to raise defence spending to 3 percent in the next parliament (after 2029), but Cartlidge said: 'That commitment cannot be guaranteed ahead of the next general election.' According to researchers at the Institute for Fiscal Studies – an independent, London-based research organisation – raising defence spending to 3 percent of GDP by 2030 would require an extra 17 billion pounds between now and then, which the government has not yet accounted for. But the UK could be required to raise spending even more than this. In discussions taking place in advance of the NATO summit in The Hague later this month, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte is understood to be pushing for member nations to commit 5 percent of GDP towards defence-related spending. Rutte has proposed that NATO's 32 members commit to spending 3.5 percent on hard defence and 1.5 percent on broader security, such as cyber, by 2032. 'At this Ministerial, we are going to take a huge leap forward,' Rutte stated before a meeting of defence ministers in Brussels on Thursday this week. 'We will strengthen our deterrence and defence by agreeing ambitious new capability targets.' He specified air and missile defence, long-range weapons, logistics, and large land manoeuvre formations as among the alliance's top priorities, according to a briefing note from NATO on Wednesday. 'We need more resources, forces and capabilities so that we are prepared to face any threat, and to implement our collective defence plans in full,' he said, adding: 'We will need significantly higher defence spending. That underpins everything.' On Monday, Starmer refused to rule out another raid on the aid budget to fund higher military spending, and signalled that he was hopeful the extra investment could be supported by a growing the economy and generating more taxes to pay for defence. After the SDR's announcement, Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned that the prime minister will need to make 'really quite chunky tax increases' to pay for the plans. Alternatively, increased defence spending could be siphoned off from other parts of the budget – for instance, through reduced state spending on areas like transport and energy infrastructure.
Qatar Tribune
19 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Asian shares slide, oil prices climb higher
Agencies Asian shares sank on Monday and oil prices jumped as trade tensions and the Russian-Ukraine conflict ratcheted up geopolitical uncertainty. Hong Kong's Hang Seng plunged more than 2 percent as Beijing and Washington traded harsh words over trade. US President Donald Trump's announcement that he will double tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50 percent layered on still more worries for investors. China blasted the US for issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. A report over the weekend that China's factory activity contracted in May, although the decline slowed from April as the country reached a deal with the US to slash President Donald Trump's sky-high tariffs, further undermined market sentiment. Markets in mainland China were closed for a holiday. Oil prices rallied after OPEC+ decided on a modest increase in output beginning in July. It was the third monthly increase in a row. US benchmark crude oil gained $1.80 to $62.59 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international standard, was up $1.60 at $64.38 per barrel. Moscow pounded Ukraine with missiles and drones just hours before a new round of direct peace talks in Istanbul and a Ukrainian drone attack destroyed more than 40 Russian planes deep in Russia's territory, Ukraine's Security Service said on Sunday. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 1.4 percent to 22,969.03 as China and the US accused each other of breaching their tariff agreement reached in Geneva last month. Tokyo's Nikkei 225 lost 1.3 percent to 37,470.67, while the Kospi in Seoul added 0.1 percent to 2,698.97. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 retreated 0.2 percent to 8,414.10. India's Sensex lost 0.4 percent while the Taiex in Taiwan fell 1.6 percent . On Friday, Wall Street closed its best month since 2023.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
De-escalating to escalate: Ceasefire is no longer on the horizon in Ukraine
For a while now, the Ukraine-Russia war has been compared by various pundits to the Korean War of the early 1950s. That conflict, which split the Korean Peninsula in two, ended without a clear victor. Hostilities ceased with the signing of an armistice in 1953, but no formal peace treaty ever followed. The Korean Peninsula remains technically at war, suspended in an uneasy truce and still divided along the 38th parallel. Could Ukraine be heading toward a similar outcome? In many respects, today's deadlock echoes the dynamics of the Korean War. North Korea relied on support from China and the Soviet Union, while South Korea was backed by a United States-led coalition. Following a series of offensives and counteroffensives, the conflict slowed down to a war of attrition, which dragged out the negotiation of a ceasefire for two years. Today, Russia, bolstered by China's backing, is fighting in Ukraine, whose army is sustained by its Western allies. In the past year, the conflict has slowed down, and the map of the front line no longer sees dramatic changes. But unlike in the Korean War, the prospects of a ceasefire here appear slim after three years of fighting. The diplomatic and pressure politics offensive by US President Donald Trump to force the two sides to put down their weapons has borne no fruit. Both sides talk about ceasefire, but act as if they want the war to continue. On Sunday, a fresh dose of fuel was poured into the fire. Ukraine launched a series of precise, destructive, and strategically painful strikes against Russian military airfields. The damage inflicted reportedly amounts to $7bn. Forty-one aircraft — about one-third of Russia's strategic bomber fleet — were hit. In parallel, two bridges collapsed in two Russian regions bordering Ukraine, derailing trains; the local authorities said they suspected sabotage. A week before that, Russia sent a swarm of more than 900 drones and dozens of missiles – killing at least 16 civilians, including three children – across Ukraine. On Monday, the Russian army sent a barrage of missiles deep into Ukrainian territory, hitting a training camp for soldiers and killing 12. The timing of these attacks appears to have been deliberately chosen. They came just ahead of the latest stage of peace talks — raising questions about whether such gestures are intended to strengthen each side's negotiating position or derail the process altogether. It is not the first time that the two sides have stepped up attacks when talks have come up. Last year, precisely as Moscow and Kyiv were about to start negotiating a partial ceasefire, Ukraine launched its incursion into Kursk. The efforts to bring the two sides to the negotiating table fell through. This time, Russia chose to downplay Sunday's explosions deep inside its territory. The Russian Defence Ministry grudgingly acknowledged that 'several units of aircraft caught fire', but made no overt threat of retaliation. Rather than lodging a formal protest, Russian delegation members proceeded to Istanbul for negotiations with their Ukrainian counterparts. On Monday, the two sides met and managed to reach agreement on two issues: a prisoner exchange of at least 1,000 soldiers each, and the possible return of 10 abducted Ukrainian children by the Russian authorities. There was no progress on a ceasefire agreement. It was clear that neither Moscow nor Kyiv was ready for serious talks. The leadership in both capitals has its reasons for avoiding the order to put down weapons. Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown, time and again, that he will not allow others to dictate terms to him; he prefers to set them himself. As the principal architect of this war, he is getting everything he wants: expanding political influence, territorial gains, and a drawn-out conflict that bolsters his image at home. He seems ready to torment Ukraine for as long as either it — or he — survives. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, for his part, is not the kind of man to yield or retreat. Setting aside his courage and stubbornness, it's clear the war has given him what peace never could: enduring popularity, a steady flow of international aid, and a firm grip on power. If Ukrainians see a truce concluded with Russia as a form of capitulation, Zelensky's presidency might not last months — perhaps not even weeks. That danger weighs heavy on him. Meanwhile, the West seems willing to supply resources to continue the war effort, which is giving Kyiv more confidence. On June 3, the Ukrainian army struck the Kerch Bridge in Crimea — a structure constructed by Russia after its illegal annexation of the Ukrainian peninsula. The bridge is both a symbol of Putin's imperial ambition and a strategic artery linking Russia to occupied Crimea. An attack on it is certain to provoke a response. What form that response will take, we will likely know very soon. Ukraine's gamble on Western backing has raised the stakes. The war may be entering a new, more dangerous phase: one defined not by front lines, but by symbolic attacks and overwhelming retaliation. For many ordinary Ukrainians, the fragile hope that the fighting can come to a stop has given way to a grim sense that the war will drag on for months, if not years. Among us are optimists who firmly believe that Ukraine will ultimately prevail. At the other end are pessimists who argue that defeating an enemy vastly superior in size, military power, and enormous revenues from hydrocarbon sales is simply impossible. Politics and war are not about fairness, justice, or morality. War feeds on human lives. It endures as long as leaders turn a blind eye to the suffering of their people. At present, there is no sign that the Ukrainian and Russian leaderships are ready for compromise. And that does not bode well for the ordinary Ukrainians who bear the brunt of this war. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.
