Israel furious as France shuts four weapons stands at Paris Airshow
PARIS/JERUSALEM: France shut down the four main Israeli company stands at the Paris Airshow for refusing to remove offensive weapons from display, in a move condemned by Israel and highlighting tensions between the traditional allies.
A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday that the instruction came from French authorities after Israeli firms failed to comply with a direction from a French security agency to remove offensive or kinetic weapons from the stands.
The stands were those being used by Elbit Systems , Rafael, IAI and Uvision. Three smaller Israeli stands, which didn't have hardware on display, and an Israeli Ministry of Defense stand, remain open.
France, a long-time Israeli ally, has gradually hardened its position on the government of Benjamin Netanyahu over its actions in Gaza and military interventions abroad.
French President Emmanuel Macron made a distinction last week between Israel's right to protect itself, which France supports and could take part in, and strikes on Iran it did not recommend.
Israel's defense ministry said it had categorically rejected the order to remove some weapons systems from displays, and that exhibition organizers responded by erecting a black wall that separated the Israeli industry pavilions from others.
This action, it added, was carried out in the middle of the night after Israeli defense officials and companies had already finished setting up their displays.
'This outrageous and unprecedented decision reeks of policy-driven and commercial considerations,' the ministry said in a statement.
'The French are hiding behind supposedly political considerations to exclude Israeli offensive weapons from an international exhibition — weapons that compete with French industries.'
IAI's president and CEO, Boaz Levy, said the black partition walls were reminiscent of 'the dark days of when Jews were segmented from European society.'
Two US Republican politicians attending the air show also criticized the French move.
Talking to reporters outside the blacked-out Israeli defense stalls, US Republican Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders described the decision as 'pretty absurd,' while Republican Senator Katie Britt criticized it as 'short-sighted.'
The French prime minister's office did not immediately return a request for comment.
Meshar Sasson, senior vice president at Elbit Systems, accused France of trying to stymie competition, pointing to a series of contracts that Elbit has won in Europe.
'If you cannot beat them in technology, just hide them right? That's what it is because there's no other explanation,' he said.
Rafael described the French move as 'unprecedented, unjustified, and politically motivated.'
The air show's organizer said in a statement that it was in talks to try to help 'the various parties find a favorable outcome to the situation.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
43 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
US can stop Israel's attacks on Iran with ‘one phone call,' Tehran says
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Monday that the United States could stop Israel's attacks on the Islamic Republic with 'one phone call.' 'If President (Donald) Trump is genuine about diplomacy and interested in stopping this war, next steps are consequential. Israel must halt its aggression, and absent a total cessation of military aggression against us, our responses will continue,' Araghchi said in a post on X. 'It takes one phone call from Washington to muzzle someone like (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu. That may pave the way for a return to diplomacy,' he added. Araghchi said that Iranian forces will 'pummel' Israel until the attacks against Iran stop. 'Our powerful Armed Forces are making clear to the world that the war criminals hiding in shelters in Tel Aviv will not go unpunished for their crimes,' he said. 'We will continue to pummel the cowards for as long as needed to make sure that they are no longer firing at our people,' Araghchi added.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Israel's Netanyahu suggests killing Iran's supreme leader would ‘end the conflict'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu refused to rule out killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Monday, saying this would 'end the conflict.' 'It's not going to escalate the conflict; it's going to end the conflict,' Netanyahu said in an interview with ABC News. Iran and Israel have been trading blows since last week after the Israeli military began striking Iran's nuclear program and then assassinating top nuclear scientists and military generals. Over the weekend, US officials were quoted as saying that President Donald Trump vetoed Netanyahu's plans to kill the Iranian supreme leader. So far, the US has rejected Israeli requests to join the attacks on Iran; however, the US military continues to assist Israel in taking down Iranian missiles and drones. Netanyahu said Israel was 'doing what we need to do' when asked if he would order the killing of Khamenei. 'We've had half a century of conflict spread by this regime that terrorizes everyone in the Middle East; has bombed the Aramco oil fields in Saudi Arabia; is spreading terrorism and subversion and sabotage everywhere,' he said. Netanyahu defended the Israeli campaign as preventing a forever war. He also doubled down on previous remarks that the US should support Israel's current attacks. 'Today, it's Tel Aviv. Tomorrow, it's New York,' he claimed. Netanyahu played down reports on Monday that Iran had signaled to the US that it wanted to end the current round of fighting and accused Iran of 'stringing' the US along during the last few weeks of negotiations to reach a nuclear deal. Netanyahu said Iran wanted to keep building their nuclear weapons program and ballistic missile stockpile. 'They want to continue to create the two existential threats against Israel while they're talking. That's not going to happen,' he said.
Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
Settling for half a victory in the Iran-Israel war
This war had been brewing for two decades — long anticipated but repeatedly avoided. Both the Iranian and Israeli sides had succeeded in avoiding direct confrontation, limiting themselves to proxy wars, until the Oct. 7, 2023, attack happened. At that point, the Israelis decided to eliminate the sources of threat and shift their strategy from 'mowing the lawn' — targeting the proxy threats as they grew — to destroying the entire octopus. They started with Hamas, then dismantled Hezbollah's capabilities, exposed the Assad regime in Syria, and now the war has reached Iran. There, Iran is developing its nuclear and missile capabilities, which have rendered Israel's deterrence doctrine obsolete — making war necessary to restore the balance of power in Israel's favor and reinforce deterrence. When it comes to the Israeli concept of deterrence, the country's first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion said: 'A long war is not an option for us; deterrence is our true weapon.' Moshe Dayan explained it further: 'We must scare them from even thinking of waging war, not just win it.' Deterrence remains a cornerstone of Israel's military policy and that is why it seeks — at least in theory — to strip Iran of its threatening capabilities. But fighting between two heavily armed and destruction-ready forces is an extremely dangerous affair. We have seen in recent history how wars have spun out of control. Hassan Nasrallah never imagined that he and his group would be wiped out when he launched a few rockets. Bashar Assad never thought he would end up an isolated refugee in a suburb of Moscow. And Yahya Sinwar never envisioned the horrific destruction of Gaza when he planned the Oct. 7 attack. It has only been a few days of fighting, yet the losses are significant. The Iranians have lost top-tier commanders and their nuclear and missile facilities have sustained major damage. The Israelis are bleeding too — Jaffa, Israel's third-largest city, has suffered massive destruction not seen since the 1948 war, due to Iranian missile attacks. The Iron Dome did not offer full protection for a small country in terms of both population and land. Fighting between two heavily armed and destruction-ready forces is an extremely dangerous affair. Abdulrahman Al-Rashed This confrontation differs from previous wars in terms of how victory and defeat are defined. The Israelis are now prepared to tolerate heavy human losses. In the past, governments would fall if as few as five people were killed. So far, Israel has lost more than 400 soldiers in the Gaza war, and it has not stopped. That is what makes this different — both Israelis and Iranians are willing to bear the cost, and each side sees it as an existential war. Each party accuses the other of crossing red lines by targeting civilians — seemingly laying the groundwork to justify expanding the war, just as happened in the Iran-Iraq War, when most missiles were deliberately aimed at cities. Israel's defense minister warned that 'Tehran will burn' if Iranian attacks on Israeli cities continue. This in turn will lead to the targeting of political leaders — who were considered off-limits at the start of the war. Can the war be stopped in its first week? Israeli sources say they have achieved immediate success by dismantling Iran's defenses — systems, missiles and command centers — but strategic Iranian capabilities remain, as not all facilities have been destroyed. Will both sides settle for half a victory to halt the war and return to nuclear negotiations? Perhaps Tehran is willing in order to stop the ongoing destruction, while the Israelis do not yet seem satisfied with the results — they want to 'complete the mission' to ensure Iran will not threaten them for the next 20 years. There are other players too — particularly US President Donald Trump — who are likely inclined to stop the war. Will President Trump act in the second week, before things spiral out of control? How could it spiral? The Russia-Ukraine war began with two countries; today, it includes North Korean troops, Iranian drones and Western European experts.
