logo
‘Operation Narnia' and 'Red Wedding': How Israel pulled off 'Game of Thrones' on Iran

‘Operation Narnia' and 'Red Wedding': How Israel pulled off 'Game of Thrones' on Iran

Time of India2 days ago

Operation Narnia. Red Wedding. A vanished Supreme Leader. Nine scientists dead before sunrise. What unfolded over Tehran this month wasn't just a military campaign. It was a high-wire act of deception, logistics, and old-fashioned assassination - carried out with such precision it felt pulled from fantasy.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
But according to the Wall Street Journal, every bit of it was real. And if the consequences weren't already grave, they are only just beginning to unfold.
Driving the news
Israel's June 13 airstrike - 'Red Wedding' - marked the deadliest and most consequential single night in its long-simmering shadow war with Iran. The Wall Street Journal reveals how Israeli jets eliminated Iran's top air force leadership in one fell swoop, comparing the stunning outcome to the infamous massacre from Game of Thrones.
This was no isolated blow. That night also marked the success of 'Operation Narnia', a parallel mission that simultaneously killed nine of Iran's leading nuclear scientists. Within hours, Iran's military and nuclear elite were shattered.
Why it matters
These twin operations signal a tectonic shift in the Middle East power balance. With its military elite decapitated, Iran faces an uncertain future.
Israel, meanwhile, has solidified its regional military dominance and is now eyeing a historic realignment of alliances.
US support - delivered through precision bunker-buster strikes on Iran's nuclear sites - amplified the effect. President Donald Trump declared Iran's nuclear program 'obliterated.' But analysts question whether Iran's capacity has truly been neutralized or merely delayed.
The attacks also exposed how deeply Israeli intelligence has penetrated Iran, including the ability to stage drone strikes from within the country - a psychological as well as tactical coup.
The big picture
The Wall Street Journal's report, based on interviews with 18 Israeli and US officials, reads like a thriller - but the consequences are deadly real:
'Red Wedding' was designed to wipe out Iran's senior military planners in a single strike. Israeli intelligence tracked their movements and struck when they unknowingly clustered together. 'Rather than scattering, they gathered - sealing their fate,' WSJ wrote.
'Operation Narnia', dubbed so for its implausibility, eliminated key scientific minds behind Iran's nuclear program. The assassinations were nearly simultaneous, designed to prevent escape or dispersion.
The plan had its roots in a two-decade-long intelligence and training effort. Starting in the 1990s, Israel identified the need not only to destroy Iranian nuclear infrastructure but also the human capital behind it.
Israeli F-15s and F-16s trained for long-range missions in Greek airspace and later honed those capabilities during strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen - a proving ground for the logistics now deployed against Iran.
Netanyahu's final go-ahead came on June 9. To preserve surprise, Israel deployed strategic deception - including faking a wedding for Netanyahu's son and leaking false tensions with Trump to lull Tehran into complacency.
Zoom in: How they did it
Spycraft and drones: Mossad smuggled in parts for explosive quadcopter drones hidden in shipping containers and trucks. Teams set them up near air-defense systems and missile sites, ready to strike at launch time.
Airspace advantage: The fall of Syria's Iranian-aligned government in early 2025 cleared the path for Israeli jets to fly through without resistance - a key enabler of the operation's success.
Information dominance: Israeli intelligence mapped Iran's air defense grid using thousands of data points. At the critical moment, Iranian defenses were neutralized - by both remote attacks and internal sabotage.
US partnership: Trump's support came later - but crucially. US forces struck deep underground nuclear facilities, including Fordo, with B-2 bombers and Tomahawk missiles.
Trump claimed, 'Nothing was taken out... too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!' in response to reports Iran may have evacuated uranium ahead of the strike.
Between the lines
Deception was critical. Netanyahu's team played a long game, misleading both Iran and global observers.
Media leaks falsely implied Trump was holding Israel back from attacking. Netanyahu publicly planned a family wedding. Israeli military movements were framed as drills.
The real victory? Intelligence. Israeli infiltration of Iran was so complete that it not only enabled high-precision targeting but allowed drone teams to operate inside Iran - and coordinate with airstrikes.
Strategic misdirection worked. Iranian commanders, misreading Israeli and American intentions, assembled in a single location.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Israel's elite strike forces were waiting.
The risk was massive. Had even one part failed - if scientists escaped or defenses held - retaliation could've been catastrophic. Israel bet big. It won. For now.
A ceasefire, but not peace
Twelve days of war between Iran and Israel have ended in uneasy silence. The bombs have stopped falling, but Iran's theocratic regime is in chaos.
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 86 and visibly weakened, finally emerged on state TV to insist that the US and Israeli strikes had 'achieved nothing significant.' Most observers - and satellite imagery - disagreed.
Iran's nuclear infrastructure is badly damaged. Its Revolutionary Guard's leadership has been decimated. Its elite scientists are dead. And perhaps most damning: Israel operated with almost complete impunity, exposing Iran's hollow air defenses and compromised intelligence apparatus.
The ceasefire, brokered with US pressure, gave Tehran a break - but not a win. 'There must be some sort of purge,' said Hamidreza Azizi of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. 'But who will implement it? That is the question.'
What's next
I
ran may accelerate its nuclear weaponization - the very thing Israel sought to stop. US intelligence is divided over whether the program was set back by years or just months.
Meanwhile, President Trump says backchannel talks with Iran are 'already happening.' His envoy Steve Witkoff hinted at a 'long-term peace agreement.'
Meanwhile, Tehran is denying plans to resume nuclear talks.
For now, Iran's regime seems far away from collapse - it's just wounded. And wounded regimes don't always back down. They often lash out.
In 'Game of Thrones', the 'Red Wedding' wasn't just a massacre. It shattered the rules. It ended one war and started another. Israel's own 'Red Wedding' may have done the same.
(With inputs from agencies)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Qatar thwarted Iran's attack on US base; 300 troops scrambled – missiles lit up Doha sky
How Qatar thwarted Iran's attack on US base; 300 troops scrambled – missiles lit up Doha sky

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

How Qatar thwarted Iran's attack on US base; 300 troops scrambled – missiles lit up Doha sky

Qatar successfully intercepted a wave of Iranian missiles aimed at the US military's Al Udeid Air Base, in what officials described as a swift and coordinated defensive operation that averted catastrophe. The attack came in retaliation for US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and marked a critical flashpoint in the widening Israel-Iran conflict. Despite the scale of the attack, no casualties were reported, and damage was minimal, thanks to a rapid response by Qatari and US forces. President Donald Trump later described the Iranian strike as a 'very weak response,' while Qatar condemned it as a 'flagrant violation' of its sovereignty. Qatari-led response averts major damage According to CNN , Qatari officials were first alerted around 7pm local time when their military detected Iranian missiles airborne and heading toward Al Udeid, a key regional hub for US air operations. Brigadier General Jassim Al-Ansari, speaking to the network, said the response was 'Qatari-led,' even though it was closely coordinated with US forces. Within minutes, 300 Qatari troops were mobilised, and multiple Patriot missile defence systems were activated across two locations. A total of 19 missiles were fired from Iran, according to Qatari sources. Seven were intercepted over the Persian Gulf, and 11 were shot down over the capital, Doha. Only one missile landed in an uninhabited area of the airbase, causing limited damage. President Trump, speaking after the incident, said Iran had fired 14 missiles, 13 of which were intercepted, with one left to land harmlessly as it posed no threat. Despite the discrepancy in numbers, US Central Command confirmed that no personnel were harmed. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi insisted the attack was calibrated not to harm civilians, and on state television, Iran's National Security Council said the strikes posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar.' Al-Ansari, however, dismissed any suggestion that Qatar had prior knowledge of or permitted the strike. 'We would never put our people in danger for any political outcome,' he told CNN. 'This was a complete surprise.' Tensions erupt over nuclear site bombing The missile barrage followed US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, including Fordo, last Saturday. Satellite images released Sunday showed damage to the underground enrichment site, reportedly hit with precision bunker-buster bombs. Iran later claimed it had removed key nuclear material from targeted locations ahead of time. The attack on Al Udeid was widely viewed as Tehran's attempt to send a message without causing a direct confrontation with Washington. Trump claimed the US had been warned in advance, which allowed it to take precautionary measures. Iran said the number of missiles matched the bombs dropped by the US. Qatar's airspace was shut down for several hours during the attack, disrupting over 100 flights scheduled to land at Hamad International Airport. Commercial operations resumed on Tuesday. The UK and US embassies had earlier advised citizens in Qatar to shelter in place. Ceasefire emerges but tensions persist The fragile ceasefire officially took effect on June 24, following intensive diplomacy mediated by the US and Qatar, with Israel affirming its acceptance of the terms and Iran agreeing to halt operations in synchrony. However, the truce has been shaky: Iran allegedly launched two missiles into northern Israel on the morning of the ceasefire—intercepted by Israeli defenses—prompting immediate Israeli retaliatory strikes on Tehran's military infrastructure. Both sides accuse each other of early violations, with US intelligence indicating Iran's nuclear enrichment program was only set back by months, and not 'obliterated' like Trump had earlier claimed.

UK government condemns 'death to the IDF' chants at Glastonbury
UK government condemns 'death to the IDF' chants at Glastonbury

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

UK government condemns 'death to the IDF' chants at Glastonbury

GLASTONBURY: The UK government said on Sunday that the BBC had questions to answer over criticism of Israel by musicians at the Glastonbury festival that police are probing. UK officers are studying videos of rapper Bobby Vylan leading crowds in chants of "Death, death to the IDF", a reference to the acronym for the Israeli army, during his set on Saturday. They are also examining comments by outspoken Irish rap trio Kneecap, one of whose members wore a T-shirt dedicated to Palestine Action Group, which is about to be banned under UK terror laws. The IDF chants, condemned by the Israeli embassy in London, were broadcast on the BBC, which airs coverage of Britain's most popular music festival. "I thought it's appalling, to be honest, and I think the BBC and Glastonbury have got questions to answer about how we saw such a spectacle on our screens," UK minister Wes Streeting told Sky News. The Israel embassy said in a statement late Saturday "it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival". But Streeting, Labour's health secretary, also took aim at the embassy, telling it to "get your own house in order". "I think there's a serious point there by the Israeli embassy. I wish they'd take the violence of their own citizens towards Palestinians more seriously," he said, citing settler violence in the West Bank. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Thị trường có dấu hiệu suy thoái không? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo A spokesperson for the BBC said some of the comments by Vylan, part of British duo Bob Vylan, were "deeply offensive" and the broadcaster had "no plans to make the performance available on demand". 'A joke' Avon and Somerset police said Saturday that video evidence would be assessed by officers "to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation". Kneecap, who have made headlines in recent months with their pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel stance, led crowds in a chant against UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Starmer had said the band should not perform after its member Liam O'Hanna, known by his stage name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence. He appeared in court earlier this month accused of having displayed a Hezbollah flag while saying "Up Hamas, Up Hezbollah" after a video resurfaced of a London concert last year. The Iran-backed Lebanese force Hezbollah and the Palestinian militant group Hamas are banned in the UK, and it is an offence to express support for them. O'Hanna has denied the charge and told the Guardian in an interview published Friday that "it was a joke -- we're playing characters". Kneecap regularly lead crowds in chants of "Free Palestine" during their concerts. Their fans revere them for their anti-establishment stance and criticism of British imperialism but critics call them extremists. The group apologised this year after a 2023 video emerged appearing to show one singer calling for the death of British Conservative lawmakers.

Donald Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' On Saturday Was Different Than Earlier Draft: What Are The Changes?
Donald Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' On Saturday Was Different Than Earlier Draft: What Are The Changes?

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Donald Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' On Saturday Was Different Than Earlier Draft: What Are The Changes?

Last Updated: Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill': In a late-night post on social media, Trump declared a 'GREAT VICTORY' after the bill cleared the Senate Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill': Senate Republicans took a major step toward delivering President Donald Trump his ' big, beautiful bill" late Saturday. The bill cleared a key procedural vote, 51-49. Republican leaders must now satisfy numerous holdouts still demanding changes to the bill. In a late-night post on social media, Trump declared a 'GREAT VICTORY" after the bill cleared the Senate, offering praise to four key senators who shifted their votes to get the procedural bill over the finish line. Tech billionaire Elon Musk, however, doubled down on his criticism of the White House's 'Big Beautiful Bill", calling it 'utterly insane" and 'political suicide". The Senate must agree on a final version of the bill before sending it to the floor for a vote. The BBC report said that as it is likely to include some of the changes to the original House bill, it will return to the House for another vote where it may see more challenges. With BBC, CNN, Agencies Inputs About the Author Manjiri Joshi First Published: June 29, 2025, 14:52 IST News explainers Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' On Saturday Was Different Than Earlier Draft: What Are The Changes?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store