Joyful Eid dawns in al-Sulaymaniyah: City embraces tradition and togetherness
Shafaq News/ As the first light of Eid al-Fitr dawned, Kurdistan Region's al-Sulaymaniyah awoke to a scene of joy and serenity. The city embraced the occasion with a renewed spirit, carrying the essence of traditions passed down through generations.
Echoes of Takbeer Fill the Air
With the break of morning, mosques and open squares are filled with worshippers dressed in their finest, their hands raised in prayer. At Haji Ahmed Mosque in the heart of the city, the courtyards overflowed with people of all ages, their voices united in the rhythmic chants of Allahu Akbar (God is the Greatest), marking the arrival of Eid.
Hassan Abdul Qader, a man in his sixties, reflected on the moment, 'This day holds a special place in our hearts. When we chant the Takbeers (saying Allahu Akbar) together, we feel an overwhelming sense of unity and love. Eid prayer is more than just an act of worship, it is a chance for reconciliation, for strengthening the bonds between us. After the prayer, we shake hands, exchange warm wishes, and even past disagreements simply fade away.'
For 25-year-old Dana Karim, who attended the prayer with his father and brothers, the joy of Eid lies in its heartfelt traditions. 'I've loved this atmosphere since childhood. But the best moment is stepping out of the mosque and seeing people embrace, laughing and greeting one another. It's as if the entire city is glowing with happiness,' he shared with Shafaq News.
Eidiya… The Magic of Childhood
No moment is more eagerly awaited by children than the giving of Eidiya, the cherished Eid gift.
For Um Aram, a grandmother in her seventies, Eid is measured in the joy of her grandchildren, 'There's nothing more beautiful than seeing their little faces beaming with happiness as they come to me, dressed in their finest clothes, waiting for their Eidiya. It's not just about money; it's a tradition of love and joy that we've carried on for generations.'
Eight-year-old Sirwan could barely contain his excitement, 'Eid is the best day of the year! I got my Eidiya from my grandfather and uncle. I can't wait to buy new toys!'
A Feast of Tradition
Eid morning wouldn't be complete without a feast of cherished traditional dishes. After the prayer and the joyful exchange of Eidiya, families come together for a breakfast steeped in heritage and comfort.
Saman Jalal, a well-known chef who runs a popular restaurant in al-Sulaymaniyah, shared his insight, 'On Eid, families return to the flavors of their ancestors. One of the must-have dishes is Qaisi, apricots slow-cooked with sugar. It's rich, energizing, and perfect after a month of fasting. Rice with beans is another staple that people never tire of.'
For Shireen Mahmoud, a mother of five, preparing the Eid meal is a labor of love, 'The day before Eid, I start cooking so that everything is ready by morning. We begin the day with sweets and tea, then gather around the turkey, which adds a special touch to our feast. My children love Qaisi, while my husband insists on having rice and beans—it just wouldn't feel like Eid without it.'
A Day of Gatherings and Warm Embraces
After breakfast, the spirit of Eid continues with visits to family and friends, a cherished tradition that strengthens bonds and rekindles connections.
Farhad Karim, a father in his forties, spoke of the importance of these visits, 'Eid is a time to reconnect. Life keeps us busy, but on this day, we set everything aside to be with family. I start my morning at my parents' house, then visit my uncles and aunts, and later, we welcome guests into our home.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
2 days ago
- Shafaq News
Fatal plane crash kills 240+ in India
Shafaq News/ At least 240 people were confirmed dead when an Air India flight bound for London crashed shortly after take-off, Indian authorities announced on Thursday. The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner had just departed with 242 people on board, including passengers and crew, en route to Gatwick Airport in southern England, when it crashed near the airport in a crowded residential area. 'There appear to be no survivors,' a local police commissioner informed reporters at the scene. Air India reported that the aircraft was carrying 217 adults, 11 children, and two infants. The nationalities of those on board included 169 Indian citizens, 53 from the United Kingdom, seven Portuguese nationals, and one Canadian. This marks the deadliest accident involving the Dreamliner since the aircraft's entry into service in 2011. Flight tracking data from Flightradar24 confirmed the aircraft type, noting that it was operating under normal parameters before the sudden loss of contact. Authorities have also launched an investigation, led jointly by Air India and India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The cause of the crash remains unknown.
Memri
2 days ago
- Memri
Chinese Influencer Mu Xue: 'The Jews Are Heartless, Disloyal, and Hateful' – If You Give a Starving Jew Bread, He'd Thank God Instead of You, Kill You, Seize More, Demand 100 Loaves from Your Family
On May 14, 2024, Chinese influencer Mu Xue uploaded a video titled 'The True Face of the Jews' to her account on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok. In the video, Xue explained that if a person were to give half a loaf of bread to a starving Jew, the Jew would thank God for the bread instead of thanking the person, and will then ask God for more bread, and will subsequently demand the second half of the loaf of bread from the person who gave him the first half. She elaborated: 'Not only that, he'll try to make you sign an IOU, stating that you owe him 100 loaves of bread.' She continued: 'You turn around and walk away, but this Jew will not hesitate to kill you from behind, seize your half-loaf of bread, press your bloodstained fingerprint onto the IOU, and finally take this IOU to your family to demand they fulfill it.' She emphasized that this is the true nature of the Jews, and that this is why they have been expelled from country to country for a thousand years. She emphasized: 'The Jews are heartless, disloyal, and ungrateful.'
Shafaq News
4 days ago
- Shafaq News
The Abaya: How a dress code debate exposes Iraq's deeper fault lines
Shafaq News/ A recent administrative decision by the Baghdad Provincial Council, aiming to officially recognize the "Zaynabiyya Abaya" as an acceptable dress code within state institutions, has unexpectedly ignited a widespread and heated debate across Iraqi social media. What might, at first glance, appear to be a mundane local policy pronouncement, has swiftly escalated into a telling microcosm of Iraq's intricate struggles with identity, religious influence, individual freedoms, and the enduring shadow of political opportunism. Zaynabiyya Abaya: A Garment Steeped in Meaning The defining characteristics of the Zaynabiyya Abaya set it apart as one of the most conservative and encompassing forms of Islamic dress. Designed for ultimate modesty, it is notably loose-fitting and voluminous, intended to shroud the entire body. Its wide cut ensures that the wearer's figure and bodily contours remain completely concealed, a central tenet of its design. The vast majority of Zaynabiyya Abayas are black, a deliberate choice of color that serves to minimize visual distraction and avoid drawing undue attention to the wearer, thereby reinforcing the principle of modesty. Unlike many modern abayas that incorporate intricate embellishments, vibrant colors, or contemporary cuts, the Zaynabiyya Abaya is characteristically devoid of ostentatious decorations, elaborate embroidery, or flashy patterns. It is typically an open-front garment worn over regular clothes, with relatively narrow sleeve openings designed to prevent the arms from being exposed; this minimalist approach ensures that the garment itself does not become a source of attraction or adornment. At its essence, the Zaynabiyya Abaya is viewed by its adherents as the quintessential manifestation of Islamic dress principles, prioritizing chastity, humility, and the complete spiritual and physical veiling of the woman, serving as a tangible form of emulation of the revered women of the Prophet's household. While traditional abayas have been a staple of dress in Iraq and the Levant for centuries, the concept of the "Zaynabiyya Abaya" evolved to represent the pinnacle of modesty and traditional Islamic covering. It is not exclusively an Iraqi garment; its widespread adoption can be observed across many Muslim-majority nations, though its prominence varies. In countries like Iraq, Kuwait, the UAE, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Algeria, Egypt, parts of East Africa, Syria, and Turkiye, it is a commonly accepted, and often dominant, form of female dress. In other societies, such as Lebanon, parts of Central Africa, Malaysia, and Indonesia, it is more specifically worn by a significant segment of the population recognized for its religious commitment and piety. Baghdad's Provocative Resolution The Baghdad Provincial Council's recent vote on June 4, to officially sanction the Zaynabiyya Abaya as part of the formal dress code within the capital's state institutions was championed by Huda Jalil Al-Aboudah, who chairs the Environment Committee within the council and is affiliated with the politically influential Al-Hikma (Wisdom) Movement, led by Ammar al-Hakim. Al-Aboudah explicitly stated that the decision aims to "enhance respect, dignity, and modesty," particularly within examination halls. The announcement immediately triggered widespread confusion and, subsequently, a torrent of backlash. The initial public perception was that the Council was mandating the abaya for all women in official settings, including those who do not typically wear a headscarf (non-hijabis) or women belonging to other faiths. This misinterpretation, whether accidental or by design, ignited a fierce debate, forcing Al-Aboudah to issue a swift and defensive clarification. She categorically stated that the decision was not an imposition and did not apply to women who do not wear the hijab or individuals of other religious affiliations. Instead, she insisted it merely granted official recognition to the Zaynabiyya Abaya, thereby validating it as a formal dress option for women who choose to wear it, aligning it with their "identity and Islamic culture." Despite the clarification, Al-Aboudah's subsequent remarks only added fuel to the fire. She revealed her ambition to "submit a request to the Prime Minister, the Council of Ministers, and members of the House of Representatives to generalize the decision across all of Iraq, to preserve and protect the dignity of Iraqi women." This aspiration to expand a provincial decision nationwide further amplified concerns about the potential for future, more widespread impositions. Curiously, she also preemptively denied any electoral motivations, asserting she would not be participating in upcoming elections – a denial that, for many, only underscored the political nature of her initiative. It is crucial to emphasize that, unlike some other countries in the region, Iraq does not currently have a general, legally enforced hijab mandate. While wearing a headscarf or abaya is deeply ingrained in Iraqi culture and widely accepted, it remains, legally speaking, an individual choice. The Iraqi government does not impose it as a prerequisite for educational enrollment, employment, or participation in public life. This fundamental context makes the Council's decision, even with its subsequent clarifications, appear perplexing and, to some, an unnecessary intervention in personal freedoms. Legal Quagmire and the Chasm of Interpretation The legal validity and implications of the Baghdad Provincial Council's decision have exposed a significant schism among legal experts, reflecting broader ambiguities within Iraq's legal framework regarding religious and personal freedoms. Ali Al-Tamimi, a prominent legal expert, has voiced support for the decision from an administrative standpoint. He argues that the decision is "correct and without fault" because Islam is enshrined as the official religion of Iraq. From his perspective, the resolution aligns with the constitutional principle of freedom of dress, as it permits rather than mandates the wearing of the abaya during official duty. This, he asserts, implies that other women retain the freedom to wear different forms of attire. Al-Tamimi further bolsters his argument by referencing Article 11 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which generally allows individuals to choose their clothing, provided it does not violate public order (laws) or public morals (prevailing customs, values, and ideals). His interpretation leans on the idea that by formalizing an existing practice, the council is not restricting freedom but acknowledging a cultural and religious choice within a predominantly Muslim society. However, Mohammed Jumaa, another legal expert, offers a starkly contrasting view, dismissing the decision as "legally meaningless." Jumaa contends that there is no existing law that prescribes an official uniform for Baghdad province or any other Iraqi province. Furthermore, he emphasizes that there has never been any legal prohibition against wearing the abaya in any public or private sector setting across Iraq. He points out that numerous women already hold high-ranking governmental positions, such as deputy ministers or general directors, and perform their duties while wearing the Islamic abaya, which is undeniably "part of Iraqi culture." For Jumaa, the council's decision is redundant at best, potentially an overreach of authority, and serves no practical legal purpose, as the freedom to wear the abaya already existed without this decree. Political Maneuvering and Misplaced Priorities Beyond the legal debate, the timing and nature of the abaya decision have triggered deep skepticism among a significant segment of the Iraqi public, particularly students, activists, and those weary of political posturing. Athraa Hazem, a university student in Baghdad, who herself wears the abaya daily, attests that its wear is widely accepted on campus and that she has never faced harassment due to it. Yet, she observes that the sudden "timing of this decision and the surge of interest from officials coincide with elections, therefore it might carry a clear political agenda." This sentiment is echoed by Alia Al-Hathal, a prominent lawyer and activist, who states unequivocally that "there is no objection to the abaya decision," as it's already a common sight in markets, universities, and government offices. However, she asserts that "some are exploiting this decision due to the proximity of elections." Al-Hathal's critique extends beyond mere timing to question the fundamental priorities of the Baghdad Provincial Council, particularly the role of Al-Aboudah, the head of the Environment Committee. Al-Hathal powerfully argues that a committee tasked with environmental oversight should be focused on the urgent, visible, and life-threatening crises plaguing Baghdad: rampant waste accumulation, severe water pollution in the Tigris River, and the resulting surge in diseases. For Al-Hathal, prioritizing a symbolic dress code, especially one that was not previously prohibited, is a glaring example of misplaced priorities and a thinly veiled attempt at "self-promotion" ahead of elections. She also draws a sharp parallel to past instances where lawmakers introduced controversial social legislation (such as personal status laws) that critics viewed as electoral ploys, suggesting that Al-Aboudah might be attempting to replicate such a strategy. Furthermore, Al-Hathal raises serious allegations about the initial intent behind the resolution, claiming that the decision's original wording or underlying aim might have been to mandate or impose the abaya. According to her, it was only after the fierce public backlash that Al-Aboudah "changed the concept," clarifying that it was merely about "not preventing" those who choose to wear the abaya. Al-Hathal dismisses this clarification as "unconvincing," given that no such prohibition ever existed in the first place, citing examples of abaya-wearing women freely attending universities and even appearing in graduation photos. Human Rights, Modesty, and Progress The most profound and unyielding opposition to the Baghdad Council's decision comes from human rights activists who view it as a fundamental assault on individual liberties and a dangerous regression for women's rights in Iraq. Lina Ali, a prominent activist, offers a scathing condemnation, asserting that the "abaya decision is oppressive and has no connection to human rights, especially for women." She goes as far as to state, "We have not seen such decisions even in the era of ignorance (Jahiliyyah)," drawing a provocative parallel to pre-Islamic tribal societies. Her critique stems from a belief that while societies evolve and human progress is constant, there persists a harmful tendency to view women as mere "commodities" whose attire can be controlled without legitimate justification, despite the absence of religious or customary compulsion. Ali contends that such decisions inherently create an "atmosphere of oppression and self-flagellation" for women, fostering an unhealthy and regressive environment. She fundamentally challenges the notion that this decision is about "modesty," arguing that true modesty "is not compulsory" and cannot be legislated through clothing. Instead, she passionately defines modesty as an inherent quality of character, encompassing the "modesty of the tongue, mind, logic, and morals." In a powerful concluding statement, Ali emphasizes the urgent need for Iraqi officials to shift their focus from superficial debates to the pressing realities confronting the nation. She implores them to instead "issue decisions that uplift the country's deteriorating reality and protect its wealth from theft," arguing that these are far more critical than "occupying the public with women's attire."
