EU lawmakers vote to ban airlines from charging fees for hand luggage
Passengers travelling in Europe should be able to carry on board one personal item, such as a handbag, backpack or laptop and one small hand luggage without having to pay additional fees, members of the European Parliament transport committee concluded on Tuesday.
The position aims to bring into EU law a judgement made by the European Court of justice, which ruled back in 2014 that the 'carrying of hand baggage cannot be made subject to a price supplement, provided that it meets reasonable requirements in terms of its weight and dimensions and complies with applicable security requirements'.
Currently many low-cost airlines allow passengers to only take one small on-board item for free and charge extra for other hand baggage. The rules vary between airlines and different countries.
Tuesday's vote appears to be good news for passengers but it is not final.
The change will still have to be endorsed by all MEPs in the full parliament and green lighted by European governments in the EU Council.
Airlines against the move
Last year the Spanish Ministry of Social Rights and Consumption fined five airlines €179 million for such practices following a complaint by the Spanish consumer organisation OCU (Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios).
Consumer groups also lodged a complaint with the European Commission arguing that the EU top court recognised hand luggage as 'an essential aspect of passengers' carriage,' said European consumer organisation BEUC.
Advertisement
But airlines condemned Tuesday's vote as a limit to 'consumer choice' that will result in 'higher costs for millions of passengers who neither need nor use an extra trolley bag.'
Airlines for Europe (A4E), the group representing major air carriers at the EU level, said that 'travelling light is the choice for hundreds of millions of European passengers'.
In Spain, for instance, over 50 million passengers 'didn't need an additional piece of cabin baggage last year and had the choice not to have this included as part of their airfare," A4E said.
A4E Managing Director Ourania Georgoutsakou said: 'What's next? Mandatory popcorn and drinks as part of your cinema ticket? The European Parliament should let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't.'
The measure would apply to all flights departing or arriving within the 27-nation European Union.
Advertisement
Children must be seated next to accompanying passengers
The proposed change to hand luggage fees was part of a package of amendments to passenger rights when travelling by air, rail, sea, coach and inland waterways put forward by the European Commission in 203.
The committee also voted to ensure that children under 12 years old are seated next to their accompanying passenger free of charge.
People accompanying passengers with reduced mobility should also travel with them for free, and there should be compensation rights in case of loss or damage to their equipment or injury to assistance animals, MEPs said.
Italian MEP Matteo Ricci, who is in charge of the file, said the new rules aim to 'protect all passengers, with special attention to persons with disabilities and reduced mobility' and clarify the definition of free hand luggage 'up to a maximum size of 100cm.'
Rules for intermediaries
New rules also aim to clarify the role of intermediaries, such as ticket vendors or travel agencies, in the reimbursement of air passengers for cancellations, delays or denied boarding.
According to the parliament transport committee, these companies should inform passengers at the time of booking about the full cost of the air ticket, intermediation or service fees, and the reimbursement process.
This should not take longer than 14 days or, past the deadline, it will be for the air carrier to process the reimbursement within 7 days.
Advertisement
Multimodal journey
In a separate vote, MEPs also backed the proposal to introduce compensation for disruptions in journeys involving at least two modes of transport, for example plane and bus, or train, ferry and plane.
If a customer buys a single contract involving multiple transport modes from one operator, and a missed connection results in a delay of 60 minutes or more, the passenger should be offered meals, refreshment and a hotel stay free of charge.
'Switching between transport modes should not mean losing protection against missed connections and assistance', MEPs said.
'Our proposals are intended to strengthen passenger confidence and encourage companies to develop more attractive multimodal offers,' said German MEP Jens Gieseke, who leads on this part.
Question on compensation
In parallel, the European Parliament and Council are discussing a
revision of compensation rules
in case of flight delays or cancellations.
On Tuesday, MEPs also voted in favour of a common reimbursement form in case of travel disruption, with airlines requested to send passengers the pre-filled form within 48 hours following the problem - 'or activate alternative automatic communication channels'.
They also voted on a well a defined list of extraordinary circumstances, such as natural disasters or war, under which airlines can avoid having to pay compensation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
MEPs propose two pieces of free hand luggage when travelling by plane
The European Parliament's Committee on Transport adopted its position on Tuesday, stating that air passengers should have the right to take two items of personal luggage with them at no extra cost. But to reach a compromise, MEPs had to agree on the size of the luggage, as controversy continues over whether or not hand luggage should be free when travelling by plane in Europe. "The solution we came up with was to reduce the size of hand luggage," admits one of the report's three rapporteurs, Andrey Novakov (EPP). "But yes, the Parliament's proposal is to include it in the price of the ticket". "You can have your backpack or a handbag, which is already the case today, you can have a personal item, and a small piece of hand luggage, which should have a total length, height and depth of 100 cm," the Bulgarian MEP explained the committee's proposal. The European Consumers' Organisation (BEUC) welcomes this vote, which was adopted by a very large majority. "This is a fundamental consumer expectation, which is perfectly in line with the Court of Justice ruling that hand luggage of a reasonable size cannot be subject to additional charges," The organisation said. Meanwhile, Airlines for Europe (A4E), which represents 17 air carriers, believes that MEPs have taken advantage of "this vote to add, in a roundabout way, amendments specific to air transport which deprive passengers of their choice and their ability to decide which services they want to pay for, and, more importantly, which services they do not want to pay for." This vote by MEPs goes against the decision made earlier this month by the bloc's 27 transport ministers. Member states propose that airlines should be allowed to charge for hand luggage when the allowances are clearly displayed. The European Parliament's Committee on Transport has also proposed that people with reduced mobility should be allowed to travel with their companions free of charge. Similarly, children aged 12 should be able to sit next to their carer at no extra cost.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
UK to buy 12 fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear weapons
The UK will buy 12 F-35A fighter planes that can carry nuclear warheads in the biggest strengthening of the country's nuclear deterrent for a generation, the British government has said. The move, which was announced to coincide with the NATO summit in the Netherlands, will give Britain's Royal Air Force a role in the UK's nuclear programme for the first time since the 1990s, when defence cuts were made following the end of the Cold War. Currently, the country's nuclear deterrent is limited to a fleet of four nuclear-armed submarines. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer explained that the decision to purchase the US-built warplanes was both a boost to the country's national security and a sign of its commitment to NATO at a time of 'rising nuclear risks'. 'In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted, which is why my government is investing in our national security,' Starmer said. 'The UK's commitment to NATO is unquestionable, as is the alliance's contribution to keeping the UK safe and secure, but we must all step up to protect the Euro-Atlantic area for generations to come,' he added. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte 'strongly' welcomed the announcement. 'This is yet another robust British contribution to NATO,' he said. It is not immediately clear when the UK will purchase the jets, which will allow the UK to contribute to NATO's dual-capable aircraft (DCA) capability. Only a small number of NATO members, including Belgium and Germany, currently have the required jets and training to carry US-provided nuclear weapons. Britain's decision to bolster its air force comes as part of a European drive to increase defence spending, amid threats from Russia and concerns that the US will play a reduced role in the continent's security. To appease US President Donald Trump, many European countries are expected to agree to spend 5% of their GDP on defence by 2035. However, some nations have expressed unease, with Spain calling the deadline 'unreasonable'. Belgium has also indicated that it is unlikely to reach the target. Britain's new F-35A planes will be housed at RAF Marham, an air base in Norfolk, the UK government said.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
MEPs vote for Parliament to sue Commission over €150bn defence scheme
The European Parliament's legal affairs (JURI) committee on Tuesday recommended that the institution takes the Commission to court for bypassing MEPs to set up a €150 billion loan programme to boost defence spending across the bloc. The motion was approved in a secret vote with 20 out of 23 votes in favour. Roberta Metsola, the president of the European Parliament, now has to decide whether to follow JURI's recommendation. Euronews has contacted Metsola's cabinet for comment. Metsola had in early May warned her counterpart in the Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, that a lawsuit could be pending if the EU executive didn't amend the legal basis it used to set up the SAFE programme The Commission has invoked Article 122 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) to set up SAFE which allows member states to directly approve a Commission proposal "if severe difficulties arise in the supply of certain products" or if a member state is "seriously threatened with severe difficulties caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences beyond its control". Despite the threat, the Commission stuck to its argument and member states approved the SAFE regulation later that same month. A spokesperson for the Commission reiterated in a statement to Euronews that it stands firm in its belief that it has chosen the right legal basis because "Europe faces an unprecedented security threat". "The Commission will always be available to explain why Article 122 TFEU has been chosen as the appropriate legal basis," Thomas Regnier added Under the programme, the Commission will raise up to €150 billion on the market to then loan the money to member states for defence investments. It is a key plank of the Commission's 'Readiness 2030' proposal that aims to see hundreds of billions of euros invested into defence across the EU before the end of the decade, when some intelligence agencies believe Russia could be in a position to attack a European country. In her letter to von der Leyen, Metsola had stressed that "the European Parliament is not questioning the merits of this proposal for a regulation," but is instead "deeply concerned" that its adoption without a proper legal basis would be "putting at risk democratic legitimacy by undermining Parliament's legislative and scrutiny functions". Article 122 was previously used by the Commission to react swiftly to the COVID-19 pandemic and to speed up the permits for renewable energy during the height of the energy crisis. To access SAFE, member states now have to work on and submit plans detailing their projects. To be successful, they need to submit projects involving at least two member states (or a qualifying third county), while a European preference whereby two-thirds of the value of the project must be manufactured in Europe also applies. Funding for SAFE is expected to start in early 2026.
