
New Zealand parliament gives record bans to Maori MPs over haka
New Zealand's parliament has handed record-long suspensions to three Indigenous Maori lawmakers who last year staged a protest haka on the debating floor.
Maori Party co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer were banished from parliament for 21 days, the longest-ever suspension.
Fellow Maori Party politician Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, New Zealand's youngest current MP, was suspended for seven days.
The bans stem from a haka performed during voting in November on the contentious Treaty Principles Bill, which sought to redefine the principles of a key pact between Maori and the government.
Mr Waititi held up a noose as he rose to speak in defiance of the ban.
"In my maiden speech, I talked about one of our (ancestors) who was hung in the gallows of Mt Eden Prison, wrongfully accused," he said.
"The silencing of us today is a reminder of the silencing of our ancestors of the past, and it continues to happen.
"Now you've traded the noose for legislation. Well, we will not be silenced."
Although performed on many different occasions, haka are often used as a kind of ceremonial war dance or challenge to authority.
New Zealand's foreign affairs minister Winston Peters earlier mocked Mr Waititi for his traditional full-face Maori tattoo.
"The Maori Party are a bunch of extremists, and middle New Zealand and the Maori world has had enough of them," said Mr Peters, who is also Maori.
"The one that's shouting down there, with the scribbles on his face... can't keep quiet for five seconds."
Ms Maipi-Clarke, 22, sparked the affair as parliament considered the highly contentious Treaty Principles Bill in November last year.
In footage widely shared around the world, she ripped up the bill and started chanting a haka before being joined by Mr Waititi and Ms Ngarewa-Packer.
Ms Ngarewa-Packer was also accused of pointing her fingers in the shape of a gun at the leader of the right-wing ACT Party, David Seymour, who had proposed the bill.
The trio were hauled before parliament's powerful Privileges Committee but refused to take part in the hearing.
Supported by New Zealand's three governing coalition parties, the bans were voted on and accepted today.
Ms Maipi-Clarke said Maori would not be silenced.
"A member can swear at another member, a member of Cabinet can lay their hands on a staff member, a member can drive up the steps of Parliament, a member can swear in Parliament, and yet they weren't given five minutes of suspension," she said.
"Yet when we stand up for the country's foundational document, we get punished with the most severe consequences."
The Treaty Principles Bill sought to reinterpret New Zealand's founding document, signed between Maori chiefs and British representatives in 1840.
Many critics saw the bill as an attempt to wind back the special rights given to the country's 900,000-strong Maori population.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
18 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Russia's ambassador to the UK ‘blames Britain' for Ukraine's daring drone attack & warns of ‘WWIII risk'
RUSSIA'S ambassador to the UK has blamed Britain for Ukraine's "historic" drone attack - and chillingly warned of World War Three. Moscow diplomat Andrei Kelin said that Ukrainian attacks "are bringing the conflict to a different level of escalation". Advertisement 7 The Russian ambassador to the UK Andrei Kelin who has been in post since November 2019 Credit: The Times 7 Ukraine hit bombers at the Russian Belaya Air Base in Irkutsk 7 Multiple aircraft were set ablaze at Belaya Air Base 7 Over the weekend, Volodymyr Zelensky hailed Ukraine's daring drone blitz on Russian airbases as one for the "history books". It marked Kyiv's longest range operation of the conflict so far with at least 40 aircraft being attacked as part of the expert operation codenamed "Spiderweb". In an embarrassing result for a raging Vladimir Putin 34 per cent of his cruise missile carriers at the targeted airfields were blasted, Zelensky said. A £260million AWACS aircraft and bombers capable of dropping nuclear weapons were also struck. Advertisement read more news Ukraine said the sneak attack was worth $7bn (£5.2bn) in damage to Russia. But Russian ambassador to the UK Kelin warned that Kyiv shouldn't "try to engulf World War Three" in an interview with He also seemingly blamed the UK for potentially providing Ukraine with weaponry that could have been used during the weekend attacks. He said: "[This] kind of attack involves, of course, provision of very high technology, so-called geospaced data, which only can be done by those who have it in possession. Advertisement Most read in The Sun "And this is London and Washington. "I don't believe that America [is involved], that has been denied by President Trump, definitely, but it has not been denied by London. Baby among 5 dead as Putin unleashes strikes on Ukraine hours after revenge vow "We perfectly know how much London is involved, how deeply British forces are involved in working together with Ukraine." US President Donald Trump has spent the past few months since he returned to office trying to balance his relationship with both Moscow and Kyiv. Advertisement In his latest attempt to draw both sides closer to a ceasefire he spoke with Putin over the phone in a 75 minute call . Trump revealed that the despot made it clear he feels he 'will have to respond' to the audacious drone assault. It comes as The Sun laid out the six possible methods Putin may use to respond to the enemy. The tyrant could retaliate with one of his terrifying tactical nukes, launch a deadly 7,600mph missile or even order a renewed 50,000 troop assault to overpower his enemies. Advertisement The Kremlin gave a chilling response earlier today regarding how they may respond. A spokesperson said: "Russian Federation will respond to the attack on airfields when and in the way that the military deems appropriate." And overnight, Vlad already launched his first retaliatory strikes on several residential regions. The worst saw a baby, their mum and grandma all killed due to a Shahed kamikaze drone blast which caused their home to collapse. Advertisement Two others were also found dead in Chernihiv with another 17 seriously wounded in Kharkiv. 7 Ukraine hit bombers at the Russian Belaya Air Base in Irkutsk 7 A satellite picture of the Belaya Airbase shows how a Russian bomber was left smashed to pieces after Ukraine's strikes Credit: AFP 7 Ukraine released photos of the drones in the crates taken from inside Russia Credit: Unpixs Advertisement


Irish Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Gerry Adams to donate €100k to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Gerry Adams said he will donate the €100,000 (£84,000) he is to receive in damages from the BBC to charities that help children in Gaza, the homeless in Ireland and Irish language groups. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Fein YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing "arrogance" when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: "As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. "These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast." He added: "When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. "They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. "The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. "They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. "Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. "They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. "In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. "On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson." He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. "They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? "Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. "In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. "Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid." Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to meet Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying "slan agus tog go bog e", which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages (€50,000 or £42,000) and €250,000 (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.


Irish Independent
a day ago
- Irish Independent
Gerry Adams to donate €100,000 from BBC defamation trial to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Féin YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing 'arrogance' when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: 'As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. 'These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast. 'When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. 'They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. 'The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. ADVERTISEMENT 'They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. 'Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. 'They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. 'In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. 'On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson.' He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. 'They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? 'Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. 'In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. 'Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid.' Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to met Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying 'slan agus tog go bog e', which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week, the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages €50,000 and €250,000 towards solicitors' fees.