Gloster ‘shocked' by claims of consultant misuse of waiting list system
Bernard Gloster was responding to a report in the Sunday Times that a consultant breached HSE guidelines by referring patients he was seeing in his public practice to his weekend private clinics, rather than securing earlier treatment for them by referring them to HSE colleagues.
The newspaper said the consultant was paid thousands of euros through the state's National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF), which pays private practices to treat patients on public waiting lists.
According to the report, the details were uncovered by an internal investigation by Children's Health Ireland (CHI).
Mr Gloster said if there was any evidence of misuse of public funds he would refer the matter to the gardai.
The HSE chief executive said he had been unaware of the CHI internal investigation.
'The content of it is absolutely shocking,' he told RTE's This Week programme on Sunday.
'Secondly, I'm even more shocked because nobody has told me about it, and in the light of everything we were doing in the last number of months with CHI, I'm just quite shocked.
'And, in fairness to the new CEO (CHI chief executive Lucy Nugent), that's not her fault – I'm not sure how much she has been told. I did speak to her briefly today.
'I believe a number of the issues around culture and other stuff that went on there were addressed, because the report was about more than that.
'But I want to be very clear, I've asked for a copy of the report myself, I have said to the CEO of CHI that I expect her and her board – other than or save for highly personal information – that that report should be published in the public interest.
'And I have made it clear that I reserve my position based on what I see in that report as to whether or not further questions arise and if any question arises, can I assure you, of anything connected with, or near connected with, alleged people ingratiating themselves financially in the public health system, the first step I'll be taking is to refer that matter to the gardai.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
6 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Hospital apologises for shortcomings in care which led to death of woman and her unborn baby
Tipperary University Hospital has apologised to the family of a young mother for the shortcomings in care which led to her death and that of her unborn baby. Caroline Kavanagh was 22 weeks pregnant with her second child, a baby boy, when she first presented at the Clonmel hospital's emergency department with chest pain. Advertisement The family's counsel, Dr John O'Mahony SC, told the High Court the 37-year old woman was misdiagnosed and her heart attack symptoms were not identified or addressed and she was discharged home. Dr O'Mahony said it was a 'heartbreaking and extremely sad case' where the young mother five days later was found unresponsive in bed at her Kilmallock, Co Limerick, home and later pronounced dead. 'Her mother came to her home and found her daughter motionless in bed. Caroline had died and the baby she was carrying died with his mother,' Dr O'Mahony told the court. Outside the High Court, Caroline Kavanagh's family said it had been a ten year long battle for justice and even though they now had the long awaited apology from the HSE and hospital it will not bring back Caroline or the unborn baby boy who was to be known as TJ. Advertisement Dr O'Mahony, instructed by solicitor Ciaran O'Keeffe, said at the hospital there was a misdiagnosis and a mistaken belief that an elevated level of the protein Troponin in the blood was due to pregnancy when in reality it can point to cardiovascular issues. The letter of apology was read to the court as Caroline's 74-year-old mother, Margaret Kavanagh, of Cashel, Co Tipperary, settled a High Court action against the HSE over her daughter's death on February 11th, 2015. The letter from the interim hospital manager, Ailish Delaney, expressed 'profound sympathy and condolences' to Mrs Kavanagh on the loss of Caroline and her unborn child. It added: 'The management and staff of the hospital apologise sincerely for the shortcomings in the care which was provided to Caroline and which led to her tragic death. The hospital wishes to acknowledge the heartache and distress suffered by her family because of her premature passing and to express our sincere sympathy and regret.' Advertisement A breach of duty was admitted by the HSE in the case. At the time of her death, Ms Kavanagh's daughter, Megan, was only nine months old. Outside court, Margaret Kavanagh said it had taken the family 10 years to get justice for Caroline. 'While we acknowledge the apology from the HSE, as a family we believe that if the past mistakes that were made had had been corrected we would not be here today.' Advertisement She said even though the family now has the apology, it will not bring back Caroline or the unborn baby who was going to be called Thomas James or TJ. She said Caroline had been so looking forward to the birth of her second child. 'She was a great mother, daughter, sister and just a great person,' she said. Clutching a picture of her daughter she wears in a pendant around her neck, Mrs Kavanagh said while the family had now got justice, it had taken so long. Advertisement 'Why are there all these mistakes? We are in the 21st Century and we seem to be going backwards,' she said. Mrs Kavanagh, who was accompanied to court by Caroline's sister Claire, said she hoped that no family in the future will have to go through 'the pain and loss we have experienced in the last 10 years.' World Nine hurt as turbulence forces Ryanair plane into... Read More In the proceedings, it was claimed that the correct diagnosis of acute heart attack was not made and Caroline Kavanagh was not offered appropriate cardiac care to significantly improve her chances of survival when she attended the hospital on February 6th, 2015. She ultimately died of the complications of heart attack on February 11th, 2015. It was claimed substandard care had been provided to Ms Kavanagh and she did not have an echocardiogram. She had been started on cardioprotective medication on admission to hospital but these were stopped on discharge. Noting the settlement and the division of the statutory €35,000 mental distress payment, Mr Justice Paul Coffey extended his deepest sympathy to the Kavanagh family.
BreakingNews.ie
12 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Government need to implement safeguarding legislation in nursing homes
The chairperson of Safeguarding Ireland, Patricia Rickard-Clarke, has repeated a call on the government to establish an interdepartmental interagency working group to implement the recommendations of the Law Reform Commission's report from April 2024, which set out the policy changes that needed to be made to implement safeguarding legislation. Ms Rickard-Clarke was responding to an RTÉ exposé into two nursing homes where residents were manhandled and ignored for long periods of time. Advertisement 'I am very disturbed and very distressed and very, very angry about this,' she told RTÉ radio's Morning Ireland. 'We're 20 years after Leas Cross. We have gone backwards, I think.' While Leas Cross had been closed down advances had not been made in terms of what to do or what we should be doing, she said. 'There are questions to be answered by Hiqa. I would say, though, that in relation to Hiqa, one of the limitations it has is that it doesn't have the function of taking individual complaints or concerns. It looks at systemic issues, and it goes in on an irregular basis, and also, there was a delay in responding to a particular request (by a whistleblower).' 'That's just not acceptable. It's not acceptable even if there's one person being abused; that is a serious incident that should be followed up immediately.' Advertisement The implementation of the recommendations about safeguarding would provide a legal framework, she said. 'At the moment, we're working to a HSE limited policy, which is run by the HSE by safeguarding and protection teams, but it is limited to healthcare issues. 'There are much wider issues in safeguarding, and again, there are offences that should be implemented straight away. The Law Reform Commission sets out a number of offences that straight away could be enacted under criminal law. "This is the Department of Justice responsibility. So, an offence of intentional or reckless abuse and neglect or ill treatment, an offence for exposure to serious harm, an offence of endangerment. The criminal law it's all set out in the 2024 Bill. Advertisement 'We need what Safeguarding Ireland has recommended, which is the establishment of an independent adult safeguarding authority which will have functions and roles in relation to adult safeguarding to protect people from abuse. It would have the function of receiving reports of suspected abuse or actual abuse, and it would have the statutory function of responding to those abuses." Meanwhile, the CEO of The Alliance, a trade association for the nursing home sector in Ireland, Shane Scanlan, has said he was 'utterly shocked and appalled' by the RTÉ exposé. 'As a nurse myself and the director of nursing for over 10 years, you just really feel for the residents and families that have been affected by this,' he told Newstalk Breakfast. Mr Scanlon paid tribute to nurse Claire Doyle who was the 'whistleblower' who approached RTÉ and made protected disclosures. Advertisement 'The real question is, what if she never went to RTÉ with those protective disclosures, that she met and her students met, still went into Hiqa months before that? And it's a very brave thing she did, because it's not easy to pick up the phone or put something in writing and whistle blow. "And in her own words, she said, 'from my point of view, within the system, I cannot blow the whistle any louder. No one is listening.' So, fair play to her in fairness. She's really called out what's happened here.' The effectiveness of Hiqa had to be questioned, he added. Hiqa had been set up in the wake of the Leas Cross nursing home controversy to prevent such abuse from happening again. 'It's clear to us that they have failed to deliver on what they were set up to do. And there will be calls for further powers to be given to Hiqa, the Office of the Chief Inspector of Social Services, and that's not the answer here. Advertisement 'I'd be calling for an immediate, independent, root and branch review of how Hiqa carries out their inspections and their methodology. Because inspectors clearly need to spend more time observing care, speaking with staff, speaking to residents. "There's a huge amount of agency staff that's currently being used by Hiqa. Last year alone, they spent €1.89 million on agency staff. And you'd be wondering, what are agency staff doing within that organisation? "As I've said, a full review of the current leadership of Hiqa and its effectiveness needs to happen. And off the back of this scandal, you have the question, should there be some resignations here at the senior level?' Mr Scanlan called for stronger protection measures for those who make protected disclosures. How that person can be protected and what will happen immediately afterwards. 'I think there's a taboo still in Ireland about making a protected disclosure for the fear of what will happen afterwards. You know, you might be in a job, you may be thinking down the line of a future career, will this get out in the public? We need to really look at that as a country.'
BreakingNews.ie
a day ago
- BreakingNews.ie
HSE must specify when services will be provided to children with disabilities, Supreme Court says
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment concerning the obligations of the HSE towards children with disabilities, including a need to specify when services will be provided to them. Compliance by the HSE with its obligations under the Disability Act 2005 involves setting out and implementing 'measurable' actions, the court said. Advertisement Although there is 'nothing objectionable' about the HSE's Individual Family Support Plan (IFSP) model for delivering services to children with disabilities, the court said the HSE must ensure it complies with its obligations and with the legislature's intention to give 'enforceable rights' to individuals. The five-judge court on Wednesday rejected the HSE's appeal against the High Court's finding that it failed to comply with its legal obligations in relation to an eight-year-old girl assessed as having autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay. Giving the judgment, Ms Justice Iseult O'Malley said the statutory process obliges the HSE to specify what services will be provided to children with disabilities and when they will be provided. Delays in assessments of need are a 'recurring' theme in cases before the courts, she noted. There was a delay of more than 18 months in assessing the girl and further delays in providing her with therapy services identified as being her health needs. Advertisement The High Court, in finding the statutory requirements were not complied with, said the only service for the girl where the HSE specified a time frame for delivery was the development of an IFSP, but that was not a 'clinical service'. The core issues in the HSE's appeal were whether the 2005 Act required that each health service identified in an assessment report should be specified in a service statement; and whether the statutory requirements regarding the content of service statements were breached by identifying the development of the IFSP as a 'specified' health service. Ms Justice O'Malley found, while not every service recommended in an assessment report must be included in the service statement, there must be 'a rational connection' between the content of both. On the second issue, she ruled an IFSP is a 'health service' within the meaning of section seven of the 2005 Act. Advertisement She said the commencement of an IFSP is the starting point for delivery of services and the plan continues as the evolving basis for development of further goals. The legislature had intended a process through which particular services and dates would be 'clearly identified' in the service statements, with a legal right to seek implementation through the courts if necessary. If each service statement only specifies a start date for the IFSP process, the right may appear reduced as the only complaint apparently possible would be the failure to commence that process, she said. The HSE can, within the IFSP model, comply with its obligations to set out and implement measurable actions, she said. Advertisement The first service statement should 'spell out' what will be involved in the IFSP process. Reviews of the service statement also required greater detail, including an overall assessment of the goals set out, whether those have been achieved, identification of overall goals for the near future and the work to achieve those, the judge said. That might mean 'relatively frequent' reviews. If the only service specified in the first service statement is an IFSP, the HSE should record that the needs specified in the assessment of need have not been included. This was necessary under the HSE's obligation to assist in measuring aggregate needs. In the case of the girl, represented by Derek Shortall SC and Colin Smith SC, instructed by solicitor Wendy Lyon, she said the original service statement and the first review statement did not meet these criteria. The original statement had been superseded and it seemed likely there would have been further reviews, she noted.
