logo
Eliminating farm produce programs won't solve food insecurity in ag-rich Fresno region

Eliminating farm produce programs won't solve food insecurity in ag-rich Fresno region

Yahoo23-03-2025

In the late 1960s when my parents stuffed all our belongings into a U-Haul trailer and the back of a well-traveled Chevy truck to make the 800-mile journey from the deserts of New México to the land of plenty, visions of endless foods like grapes, melons and oranges danced inside my teen head.
The San Joaquín Valley, however, presented a different reality: seasonal work in the fields that left very little money to sustain us year round. That is why we survived on canned chicken, blocks of cheese and powdered eggs that we got from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Those fried tacos my mother made with that canned chicken were scrumptious.
I soon came to realize that the Valley – whose dirt, climate and water nourish the world with its fruits, nuts and vegetables – can grow enough produce to feed the hungry in an area where 30% of the residents live beneath the poverty line. The problem remains that the economics of farming – seasonal work and seasonal paychecks – don't mesh with the human need for work, shelter and food.
Opinion
My stepfather was a hardworking man. He grew and baled alfalfa, worked as a farm manager, drove a motorcycle from Earlimart to Madera to operate heavy machinery, and always made sure there was a roof over our heads.
Alas, he found out that his paycheck didn't stretch far enough to provide for five kids. My mother, a former waitress, also pitched in selling Avon products. Still not enough.
It was a good thing that Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency weren't around to cripple the USDA's Commodity Supplemental Food Program, which provided welcomed boxes of surplus food. I, however, never cared much for those powdered eggs.
It is embarrassing that hunger persists in the land of plenty.
'We grow so much food, and yet the access and availability of that fresh produce is minimal,' a community advocate told me when I wrote about the Valley's food insecurity in 2003. 'We have so much hunger and poverty.'
That is reason enough that the USDA should not toy around with two Biden-era programs designed to distribute farm produce to schools, food banks and tribes. As part of the cost-cutting mandate from the Trump administration, the USDA cut off $1 billion from the Local Food for Schools program and the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement. After an uproar, funding for existing programs was unfrozen, but future funding is uncertain.
The programs were a win-win-win situation. Farmers made money by selling fresh produce, schools provided healthier meals for their students, and food banks counted on fresh food to include in their boxes of groceries for needy families.
Now, schools officials, food banks and farmers are left scratching their heads about why programs with bipartisan support vanished. Are starving kids – like those we see too often in television commercials lobbying for dollars to feed starving children in Third World countries – what the Trump administration and Musk's DOGE folks want to see?
Do they honestly believe the $1 billion will be better used to offset tax cuts for the richest – and most well-fed – Americans?
The Valley, despite its agricultural riches, remains hampered by poverty rates that are among the highest in the country. Fresno County had a poverty rate of 18.7% in 2023, according to the Federal Reserve Economic Data. In 1980, that rate was 14.5%.
A March 17 virtual press conference organized by Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, delivered reasons those programs should continue.
'Over 30% of the students in our schools live below the poverty rate,' said Fresno County Superintendent of Schools Michelle Cantwell-Copher. 'We consider those school meal programs a lifeline for our students.'
Fresno Unified spokesperson, Nikki Henry, said the district spent its $500,000 on fresh produce, organic chicken and turkey for its students. 'This funding didn't just benefit our students, it stayed right here in our local community supporting local farmers and businesses,' said Henry. 'When students eat well, they learn better. They stay focused. They thrive.'
The Fresno-based Central California Food Bank, the fiscal agent for 10 food banks from Amador to Kern counties, received more than $9 million from the USDA. The program, said food bank CEO Natalie Caples, shows how the government 'can effectively support local growers and producers.'
There's no reason the Trump administration should starve the Valley.
California could feel the misery of House GOP math that doesn't add up. Here's why | Opinion
Rep. Tom McClintock is failing his constituents, and he doesn't want to hear about it | Opinion

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The last day of preschool was harder on me than on my kids. I realized they'll never be this little again.
The last day of preschool was harder on me than on my kids. I realized they'll never be this little again.

Business Insider

time25 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

The last day of preschool was harder on me than on my kids. I realized they'll never be this little again.

I looked up during breakfast and saw my husband trying to hide how hard he was crying. I couldn't even attempt to do the same. "Mamá, are those happy tears?" one of my twins asked me as I tried to contain a waterfall with my hands. It was the last day of Pre-K for our twins. All three of our kids attended the same place from when they were 2 years old, and knowing this was the last drop off we would ever do there was hitting harder than I expected. I suddenly realized my kids will never be this little ever again. We know, it goes by fast If I had a dollar for every time someone told me to enjoy my kids when they were little because they grow up so fast, I would probably be fighting Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos on the billionaire list. I know — it does go so fast. Yet, waking up this morning, a day that I've been mentally preparing for weeks, I was utterly overwhelmed by all of the emotions I was feeling. Suddenly, memories of dropping off my kids for the first time came to me. Their tiny little hands held tight to my neck as they were nervous to go into a new environment with new people they had never met. I remembered being overburdened with the packing list, all the things they needed, from diapers to indoor shoes to a small stuffed animal that would make them feel at home. I also remember how nervous I was to hand my most beloved humans on earth to someone I barely knew, putting all my trust in them. I had to grow with my kids, too. They blossomed into who they are And those Pre-K teachers loved them so much. My three kids would come home with art projects, dirty clothes, and full of stories to tell us, from Cream the bunny exploring the classroom to learning about Chinese food and even finding the courage to help make maple syrup with an open fire. If any of them were having a bad day, we would get a call to let us know, and I would rush to pick them up, ready with a big hug and snuggles to help. But days turned into months, which turned into years, and my kids became more and more confident during their time in preschool. From being the new kids to being the old kids, they became leaders, explored their interests, and learned how to read and write — but more importantly, they all learned what it means to be a good friend. And if I blinked, I missed how they changed from one month to the next. It's hard to say goodbye to their little selves So, as I dropped the twins off one last time at this preschool before they head into real school, I realized that what was difficult about this transition was not the change. I can handle change easily. What is hard is realizing that they are not the little versions of themselves I still sometimes picture when I think of them. They are not toddling around in diapers, shyly exploring the playground. They are confidently jumping off platforms, building dams, and having fun. They are growing. And I'm left trying to say goodbye to who they were. A version of themselves they will never be again. A clear realization that time won't slow down, that this will go way too fast, and that I might miss it and later regret it. don't have any more babies in the house, and this is one transition that no one prepared me for.

Florida gears up for annual 'Python Challenge' aimed at solving snake infestation: 'A great way to get people directly involved'
Florida gears up for annual 'Python Challenge' aimed at solving snake infestation: 'A great way to get people directly involved'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Florida gears up for annual 'Python Challenge' aimed at solving snake infestation: 'A great way to get people directly involved'

Preparations are underway for the latest annual event to combat a persistent invasive species in the Florida Everglades. Starting July 11, contestants will compete for cash prizes while helping control the population of Burmese pythons wreaking havoc on the ecosystem. The annual Florida Python Challenge is a 10-day event where contestants across eight designated hunting areas compete to capture the most pythons. As the Tampa Free Press reported, last year's event saw 195 invasive snakes removed, bringing the total of all events to date to 1,112. In addition to the grand cash prize ($10,000), there are prizes for runners-up and the longest python. According to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the 2024 winner bagged an impressive 20 snakes. Burmese pythons are an invasive species that first came to the Sunshine State as exotic pets that escaped or were released into the wild by irresponsible homeowners, per the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Invasive species harm an ecosystem by outcompeting native species for resources. The Burmese python's immense size, longevity, and fertility make it a serious problem for the Everglades. They have absolutely devastated local mammal populations. A 2012 study estimated a 99% reduction in bobcats, opossums, and raccoons in areas where pythons infest. The initiative is one of several novel community-based approaches to tackling invasive species and a great example of taking local action. While some invasive species make for tasty dishes, pythons shouldn't be consumed due to their dangerous mercury levels. Of course, there are less adventurous but no less valuable ways to combat invasive species and protect local biodiversity. Better yet, they involve very little effort and can even save money in the long run. Gardening with native plants and rewilding your yard are suitable for crucial pollinators and require less water and fewer harmful chemicals. The 2025 Florida Python Challenge is shaping up to be the biggest yet. "The Python Challenge is a great way to get people directly involved in the protection and stewardship of the Everglades," the fantastically named "Alligator Ron" Bergeron, a South Florida Water Management District Governing Board member, told the Tampa Bay Free Press. Should we be actively working to kill invasive species? Absolutely It depends on the species I don't know No — leave nature alone Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

10 States With the Highest Percentage of Families on SNAP
10 States With the Highest Percentage of Families on SNAP

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

10 States With the Highest Percentage of Families on SNAP

The original Food Stamp Program, created in 1939 by the federal government, was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, in 2008. The program provides government-funded benefits to Americans most in need of food assistance. Currently, there are an estimated 42.1 million Americans who receive SNAP benefits. Find Out: For You: This large percentage of Americans in need of food assistance is essentially a poverty issue, as in America, food is generally readily accessible if you can afford it. Raising the incomes of the impoverished is the best way to provide them with access to healthy and plentiful food, though that's easier said than done. To determine the 10 states with the highest percentage of families on SNAP, GOBankingRates used the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program data tables and the U.S. Census Bureau's American Consumer Survey. Here's the ranking of states with the highest percentage of families on SNAP, presented in reverse order, along with a brief examination of the potential causes and cures for the problem. Total number of people with SNAP: 752,200 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 15% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 38% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $320 Nearly 16% of Alabama's population lives below the poverty line, so it follows that nearly the same percentage of people need food assistance. Each household member on SNAP receives an average daily benefit of $6.31. Total number of people with SNAP: 1.94 million Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 15% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 39% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $288 One of the main reasons that Illinois ranks higher than might be expected in terms of SNAP participation is that the state is very effective at getting eligible residents to sign up for the program, with between 95% and 100% of eligible individuals participating. Learn More: Total number of people with SNAP: 2 million Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 15% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 29% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $285 Pennsylvania has approximately 12% of its population living below the poverty line and a 17% child poverty rate. Households with children show a monthly average SNAP benefit of $506. Total number of people with SNAP: 277,400 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 16% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 36% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $258 West Virginia is one of the poorest states in the U.S., and this contributes greatly to the above-average SNAP participation rate. More than one in five children in the state lives below the poverty line. The average SNAP benefit for a household with children is $508 per month. Total number of people with SNAP: Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 16% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 31% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $274 Massachusetts is one of the wealthiest states in America, but nearly one-quarter of its residents still rely on SNAP. For each household member per day, the average SNAP benefit is $6.44. Total number of people with SNAP: 505,500 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 16% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 44% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $276 It's estimated that Nevada has a poverty rate of 12%. To add to that, the poverty rate for children is 16.6%. The average SNAP benefit for a household with children is $479. Total number of people with SNAP: 686,800 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 17% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 42% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $332 In Oklahoma, more than 66% of SNAP participants are in families with children and more than 42% are in working families. This combination of factors helps keep the SNAP participation rate fairly high. Total number of people with SNAP: 757,700 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 18% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 35% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $247 Unemployment and poverty rates in Oregon are both above the national average, no doubt contributing to the state's high SNAP participation rate. However, the state has also made a significant effort in the past few decades to increase awareness of SNAP benefits, which is likely pumping up numbers as well. Total number of people with SNAP: 847,100 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 18% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 41% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $336 Louisiana has one of the highest poverty rates in the nation, at 18.9%, so it makes sense that the state's SNAP participation rate would be high. This far surpasses the national poverty rate, which is estimated to be about 12.7%. Total number of people with SNAP: 451,200 Percentage of state residents on SNAP: 21% Percentage of people with income at or below 50% poverty line: 44% Average monthly SNAP benefits per household: $307 New Mexico's numbers are likely boosted by the fact that the state pays out benefits to those earning high levels at the federal poverty level, whereas there are more limitations in most states. New Mexico residents can also apply online, which provides greater access to benefits, though that might be subject to change under the Trump administration. John Csiszar contributed to the reporting for this article. Methodology: For this study, GOBankingRates analyzed recipients of SNAP benefits to find the states with the highest percentages of families utilizing the program. Using data from the US Census American Community Survey, the total population ages 65 and over, household median income and total households were sourced for each state. The cost-of-living indices were sourced from the Missouri Economic and Research Information Center and using the average expenditure costs as sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, the average expenditure costs for each state can be calculated. The average single-family home value was sourced from Zillow Home Value Index and by assuming a 10% down payment and using the national average 30-year fixed mortgage rate, as sourced from the Federal Reserve Economic Data, the average mortgage can be calculated. Using the average mortgage and expenditure cost, the total cost of living can be calculated. Using data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities' SNAP State-by-State fact sheets, SNAP participation can be analyzed to find the percentages of families receiving SNAP benefits, average amount of SNAP benefits by household members, poverty level of households receiving SNAP benefits, the households dynamic of households that receive SNAP benefits, and average amounts per person. The states were sorted to show the highest percentage of recipients who receive SNAP benefits. All data was collected on and is up to date as of May 20th, 2025. More From GOBankingRates 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on 10 States With the Highest Percentage of Families on SNAP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store