Utah's dubious destiny in nuclear power development
Union Electric Callaway Nuclear Power Plant in Missouri. (Photo by)
In February, 2025, in remarks delivered to the Nuclear Industry Council's showcase in Salt Lake City, Utah Gov. Spencer Cox outlined Utah's future as a national leader in nuclear power development: 'We believe that Utah is uniquely positioned to lead the nuclear renaissance in the U.S.'
At a conference in Park City in October 2024, Utah Senate President Stuart J. Adams went Cox one better and said, 'We want to establish Utah as an expert here for energy innovation . . . we want to be the world leader. And to do that, nuclear is going to be a big part of it.' Another Utah politician eyeing the moon while jumping on a pogo stick, Utah Congressional Rep. John Curtis (now Utah Senator) said at the same Park City venue, 'We want to be a big part of this. We're ready for nuclear facilities here in our state.' Unclear about referencing the state or the nation, he also said, 'We're not talking about dozens of nuclear facilities. We're talking about hundreds of nuclear facilities.'
Utahns have heard this before — big promises, big plans, out-of-this-world expectations, and fizzling results. A parade of top Utah leaders have long excelled in making thrilling predictions about the state.
For example, a Utah attorney in 1976 promised to sweep corrupting long-term power out of Utah's future. Orrin Hatch criticized then-incumbent Senator Frank Moss' 18-year tenure in the Senate, saying, 'What do you call a Senator who's served in office for 18 years? You call him home.' Hatch argued Moss had lost touch with his constituents after so long a time gulping down the muddy waters of the Potomac River.
Orrin Hatch won the election that year and promptly lost touch with his constituents for the next 42 years as he became the longest running elected U.S. Senator up to that time, serving seven six-year terms in office. His treacherous contribution to the political landscape helped to lay the basis of the Senate's current House of Lords-style lifetime service model, devoted primarily to serving the interests of an autocratic occupant of the White House rather than the people of this country.
Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt made promises and predictions during his 11 years in office about education that neither he nor the Legislature could bring to pass: reducing class sizes, raising up students in poor areas of the state, and improving educational achievement by handing out special grants to 'Centennial' schools. He and the state could not manage to improve the state's ranking of dead last in per student spending among the 50 states. Furthermore, Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores under Leavitt slid backward for 5th and 8th graders.
The aforementioned Utah Senate President Stuart Adams glibly promised the people of Utah that Utah would lead the nation out of the pandemic. However, Utah, with all its anti-vax religious libertarians leading the way, arguably led Utah and the nation back into another round of pandemic illness and death.
Now, along comes Gov. Spencer Cox in the prime of his fame and power in 2025. It seems to have slipped the governor's mind that Utah was the recipient of drifting nuclear mushroom clouds during the atom bomb testing beginning in 1945 at the Nevada Test Site. This tidy little underperformed piece of history produced an American Chernobyl with cascading cancer deaths from generation to generation as a result of the 'downwinder' effect on southern Utahns.
Cox also seems not to have taken to heart another nuclear warning story that comes to us from Utah's west desert. That part of the state is a holding place for some of the US military's deadliest materials. One article cites, 'Everything from compacted urban trash to nuclear reactor waste seems to end up there among the tumbleweeds, alkaline salt flats, and jackalopes. Even the Deseret News once called it 'a place to store and burn and bury our country's toxic trash.'' The Dugway Proving Ground located there became one of the centers of the nation's chemical and biological weapons testing and a dumping ground for nuclear waste. Dugway ran into trouble in 1968 when testing a new nerve agent that accidentally killed 6,000 sheep grazing in the desert.
In another slap to the face of Utah's megalomaniacal ambitions is that Utah is not even mentioned in the short list of states who are leading the way in developing nuclear energy, a list which includes only Virginia, Michigan, and Wyoming.
It is hard to know from what source Utah politicians are taking their delirious political prompts. It certainly is not necessary in an authentic democracy to always be first and best in everything.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
9 minutes ago
- E&E News
New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee's portion of Republicans' party-line bill proposes to sell off certain public lands and repeal billions of dollars for energy programs in Democrats' 2022 climate law. The committee's proposal, unveiled Wednesday evening, contains many of the provisions in the House-passed H.R. 1, the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act' — including ones that would target the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office or charge a one-time fee to speed up permitting for some natural gas projects. But there are some significant differences. Most notable is a new section favored by Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) to revive the sale of public lands, reigniting a firestorm of opposition from advocates. The provision goes further than an abandoned proposal in the House, encompassing Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands across 11 Western states. Advertisement ENR's text comes as the Senate is racing to tweak and quickly vote on tax, energy and national security legislation after the House approved its version last month. Republicans are working through the reconciliation process, which will allow them to skirt the Senate filibuster and pass the budget-focused bill with simple majorities.
E&E News
9 minutes ago
- E&E News
Trump is trying to kill the US climate effort. It was already in trouble.
President Donald Trump's latest climate rollback makes it all but official: The United States is giving up on trying to stop the planet's warming. In some ways, the effort has barely started. More than 15 years after federal regulators officially recognized that greenhouse gas pollution threatens 'current and future generations,' their most ambitious efforts to defuse that threat have been blocked in the courts and by Trump's rule-slicing buzzsaw. Wednesday's action by the Environmental Protection Agency would extend that streak by wiping out a Biden-era regulation on power plants — leaving the nation's second-largest source of climate pollution unshackled until at least the early 2030s. Rules aimed at lessening climate pollution from transportation, the nation's No. 1 source, are also on the Trump hit list. Advertisement Meanwhile, the GOP megabill lumbering through the Senate would dismember former President Joe Biden's other huge climate initiative, the 2022 law that sought to use hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks and other incentives to encourage consumers and businesses to switch to carbon-free energy. At the same time, Trump's appointees have spent months shutting down climate programs, firing their workers and gutting research into the problem, while making it harder for states such as California to tackle the issue on their own.
E&E News
9 minutes ago
- E&E News
Senate Republicans eye softer stance on green credits
A top Senate negotiator signaled Wednesday he was open to saving some renewable energy tax credits in the Republican megabill. At the same time, the top Senate Democrat is pulling out the stops to salvage what he can from the landmark climate law. At a closed-door Senate meeting, Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) told senators he wanted to 'extend the runway' for certain tax credits that House Republicans all but scrapped in their budget reconciliation package — though details were sparse. Advertisement Senators said Crapo talked about amending the language for when a project must 'start construction' and preserving a provision that lets a project sponsor transfer tax credits to a third party. The House-passed bill would also drastically phase out renewable incentives and enact strict new supply chain requirements that industry deemed unworkable. Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said he thought Crapo was 'very much' open to extending the lifespan of incentives for 'certain types of energy and then other types of energy are going to expire quicker, … and he talked pretty specifically of nuclear of course, to which I said, 'Amen and amen.'' The Finance Committee is expected to release more details Monday night, Cramer added. He said Wednesday's meeting 'was just more conceptual.' But others noted the ethos of the bill is not expected to change much. 'We're trying to keep the intent of the House intact, for the most part,' said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), a Finance member, though he's been pushing for some specific changes to soften strict requirements. Schumer a 'perpetual motion machine' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has called on clean energy advocates, tech executives and even 'friendly' Trump officials to save parts of the climate law. | Francis Chung/POLITICO As Republicans continue to inch forward on their megabill, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has been working to sway them against wholesale repeals of the Inflation Reduction Act. Indeed, after President Donald Trump and Republicans swept the elections last year, Schumer said he knew he had to gear up to protect the IRA. He reached out to clean energy executives and environmental leaders months ago, he said, but no one was prepared for how aggressive the House legislation that passed just before Memorial Day would be. 'No one expected it to be as bad as it was,' he said. 'At the last minute, overnight, they dramatically reduced or eliminated the clean energy provisions. Most of the Republican congressmen didn't know of it, but I called up everyone that weekend, and I said, 'DEFCON 1,'' referring to the highest alert level for nuclear war. In recent weeks, he's been enlisting finance people; clean energy advocates; tech executives; governors with major renewables investments; 'friendly' Trump administration officials; Duke Energy and Southern Co. executives; and Sean McGarvey, president of North America's Building Trade Union, to call their senators. 'Chuck is spending so much time and energy on this,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) said at a press conference on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. 'He's become like a perpetual motion machine.' Specifically, Schumer and his allies are targeting 16 Senate Republicans who he thinks show 'some discomfort' with undoing the IRA. 'I have a list of the one hundred biggest clean energy projects in America,' Schumer said. 'Eighty percent are in red states, it turns out. One of the companies that runs those projects is saying, 'People, call your senator,' and say, 'This will shut me down.' And they are doing it.' Energy price spike? Beside trying to woo Republicans, Schumer and other Democrats have been saying the GOP megabill threatens to raise energy prices. A new analysis from the Democratic-aligned Center for American Progress set to be released Thursday found that slashing the IRA could cut 13 gigawatts of clean power on the grid per year over the next decade. In 2024, the U.S. added 49 gigawatts of new capacity to the grid, with 95 percent from new solar, batteries, nuclear and wind power. 'As much as 72 percent of all clean energy capacity that would have been built over the next decade would disappear,' the report says. Asked if he worried Democrats might be able to run on rising electricity costs in the midterm elections, Rep. Buddy Carter (R-Ga.), who's running for Senate and has backed a Hyundai vehicle and battery plant in his district, shrugged off the question. 'That remains to be seen,' he said. 'I'm not sure energy costs are going to go up. In fact, I would submit that as we concentrate more on available energy such as natural gas, it might go down. And that's certainly something we're trying to do.' He added: 'So I think that's risky on their part — to say the least.' Intense lobbying Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) on Wednesday met with some House Republicans who sent a letter to Senate GOP leaders last week urging them to make big changes to the legislation they had nonetheless voted for. 'I think that that was important,' Murkowski said of last week's letter. 'I think they're raising the same kinds of concerns that we are raising on the Senate side. It's much of the same in terms of — how can you allow for a longer phase out for some of these credits, the issue of transferability. I don't think that there's anything new, but I think it is important that it's being reinforced on both sides.' Groups representing a host of interests have been ratcheting up lobbying. Advanced Energy United and Republican-led Built for America are among those running ads. Built for America has been trying to reach the president and his allies on Fox News and Truth Social, POLITICO reported. The Solar Energy Industries Association is planning a rally on Capitol Hill with workers next week. The trucking industry and allied trade associations sent a letter to Senate leaders asking to preserve the 30C tax credit, which applies to alternative fueling equipment installed at homes or businesses. It can include electric charging for cars and heavy-duty trucks. The House version of the bill would phase out the credits at the end of 2025. 'This short runway threatens to strand investments that have already been made in good faith based on the credit's availability, especially for projects that have begun construction but will not be completed by year-end,' the letter said. The GOP is up against a self-imposed Independence Day deadline to send legislation to Trump's desk. Many continue to say publicly that timeline is achievable, though Sen. John Curtis (R-Utah) said Tuesday 'a lot of us would be surprised if it passed by July Fourth.' Reporter Mike Lee contributed.
