LGBTQ+ inclusivity: Plan for effective removal of rainbow pedestrian crossing leads to official clash
Plans by
Wicklow County Council
for the
effective removal of the State's first rainbow pedestrian crossing
have led to a clash between the council and the Department of Transport.
Rainbow crossings, which feature rainbow colours painted each side of a pedestrian crossing, are designed to signal inclusivity and respect for diversity, particularly to members of the LGBTQ+ community.
Wicklow County Council's Arklow Municipal District was the first local authority in the State to install a permanent rainbow crossing. The rainbow colours were painted on either side of the white lines of a pedestrian crossing on Arklow's Main Street in December 2021. Stakeholders and vulnerable road users such as visually impaired advocacy group the NCBI were consulted on the design.
However, in May, members of the municipal council were told the colours would be allowed to wear away.
READ MORE
The council said it was 'not in a position to refresh the paint, having regard to current legislation'.
The council said 'pedestrian crossings are regulatory road markings, and as such, it is not open to Wicklow County Council to ignore the detailed specifications set out'.
Asked what specifically has changed in legislation since the rainbow crossing was installed, the council told The Irish Times: 'All road markings are undertaken in accordance with the Traffic Signs Manual (updated December 2024). This manual, published by the
Department of Transport
, constitutes a direction given by the Minister of Transport to Road Authorities under Section 95 (16) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 in relation to the provision of traffic signs.'
However, the Department of Transport responded that the only change made to the Traffic Signals Manual since 2021, which updated the manual in 2024, was in relation to the use of orange flashing lights, known as Belisha beacons. The beacons require electricity and more complex installation, making them more expensive than signage. The update said the beacons could be replaced by signage, but was silent on the installation of rainbow crossings.
[
A quarter of major US corporate backers pull out of Dublin Pride over Trump fears
Opens in new window
]
The council also appeared to clash with a response from Minister for Transport
Darragh O'Brien
's office, which said: 'At present, the department does not intend to revise the guidance in relation to the current layout and road markings for pedestrian crossings, guidance which was in place at the time of first installation of the crossing [in Arklow] in question.'
In a Dáil reply to Wicklow Wexford Fianna Fáil TD Malcolm Byrne, Minister for State at the Department of Transport Sean Canny said rainbow crossings 'are installed at the discretion of the individual local authority'.
Arklow based film-maker Dave Thomas, who campaigned for the installation of the rainbow crossing, said the council 'wrongly cited legislation as the reason – yet the Minister for Transport has confirmed the same legislation that permitted the crossing in 2021 still stands today. The NCBI have also clarified they have no issue with such crossings if guidelines are followed.'
He said it was 'appalling' and 'deeply hurtful' that Wicklow County Council 'would announce this at the start of Pride Month'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
26 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Garda Commissioner allegedly found Dublin Airport employee posed risk to State security
The Garda Commissioner purportedly upheld the withdrawal of a Dublin Airport technician's security clearance after finding his 'ability to facilitate nefarious activity' within the airport poses a security risk to the State, having regard for 'what is known' about his 'associates'. Christopher Doyle (34), an employee of Dublin Aerospace since June 2022, lost his airport security clearance last November after failing a Garda 'security intelligence check', rendering him unable to work. In proceedings that came before Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty on Monday, Mr Doyle, of Claremont Lawns, Glasnevin, Dublin 11, wants the High Court to quash the Garda Commissioner's purported decision to dismiss his appeal of the failed security check. According to his court documents, Mr Doyle suspects the failed security check arises from an incident in November last year when he recorded another Dublin Aerospace employee pledging his support for Gerard 'The Monk' Hutch's 2024 general election campaign. READ MORE Mr Doyle did not share the video to social media but did send it to a number of his friends in a WhatsApp message. However, the video eventually surfaced on social media, where it was posted to various platforms by accounts connected to Mr Hutch's campaign. Mr Hutch, named in court as the head of the Hutch organised crime group, narrowly missed out on winning a seat in Dublin Central constituency last November. The Garda Commissioner is ultimately responsible for undertaking security checks of Dublin Airport employees, according to Mr Doyle's court documents. In December, Mr Doyle appealed the decision to fail his security check. In April, Mr Doyle said, the Garda Commissioner wrote to him, declining his appeal of the security clearance failure. 'In my view, given what is known in relation to a number of your associates, a risk potentially arises around your ability to facilitate nefarious activity within restricted areas of the airport, thus creating what I consider to be an unacceptable security threat to Dublin Airport and by extension the State,' the commissioner stated, according to Mr Doyle's documents. Mr Doyle said he has no criminal convictions and is not involved in criminality. He said that as far as he is aware, none of his family or associates have any links to criminality and none are involved in any conduct that would justify withdrawing his security clearance. Remy Farrell SC, appearing with Eoin Sreenan BL for Mr Doyle, on Monday sought permission to bring proceedings seeking an order quashing the Garda Commissioner's appeal determination. It is Mr Doyle's case that the decision not to recommend him for security clearance is 'unreasonable, unlawful, irrational', and is in breach of his constitutional rights and fair procedure. Ms Justice Gearty gave permission to counsel to bring the proceedings against the Garda Commissioner and the Minister for Justice, with Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) a notice party in the action. In March, Mr Doyle brought separate proceedings against DAA, the Minister for Justice and the Garda, seeking to compel the completion of his appeal of the failed security check. The proceedings were struck out after the Garda Commissioner communicated his decision on the appeal to Mr Doyle.
Irish Times
28 minutes ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on building infrastructure: design is not a luxury
Anyone with even a cursory knowledge of the architectural legacy of this State will be bemused by last week's statement from Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers that the Government will prioritise 'cost and efficiency over design standards and aesthetics' in future spending on infrastructure. The idea that Ireland's modern built environment is characterised by excessively high levels of design or an undue deference to aesthetics is a surprising one, and not borne out by the evidence. It is possible the Minister's remarks were prompted by widespread criticism of the project to build a national children's hospital, which has run wildly over budget and over schedule. Some observers have criticised the design of the building as a contributory factor in these overruns, although it is not entirely clear whether that is correct. Certainly, the new hospital has elicited both admiration for its child-centric vision and negative commentary for its scale and cost. But Ireland already has no shortage of low-quality contemporary architecture. The cities in general and Dublin in particular are littered with too many examples of banal buildings. READ MORE And it was only from the 1990s onwards that large-scale infrastructure – sports arenas, bridges and tunnels, a national motorway network – began to have a real impact on the landscape. The financial crash of 2008 put a sudden halt to any hope of continuing that progress. One casualty of the crash was the Metro connection to Dublin airport, which in various guises has been in gestation for nearly 25 years. That particular project might also have been on the Minister's mind when he made his comments. While Ireland dithered over building high-volume public transport infrastructure, other European countries forged ahead rapidly and cost-efficiently. One frequently cited example is Madrid's extensive, no-frills metro network, delivered in just a few years at a fraction of the cost per kilometre now estimated for Dublin's line. Ireland should certainly learn from such examples, while tendencies towards grandiosity at the planning stage will have to be kept in check if the State is to have any prospect of narrowing the infrastructure gap that currently exists between Ireland and other wealthy European countries. But to conflate cost control with the abandonment of good design is to miss the point entirely. When the new children's hospital finally opens its doors, it will not be the budget rows or delays that endure, but the experience of the space itself. Design is not an ornamental afterthought; it shapes how we use, feel, and function within our public spaces. A well-designed building earns its keep over decades in health, dignity and civic pride. If the State is serious about building for the future, it must recognise that fact.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Six ministerial advisers sought shorter cooling-off periods for private-sector jobs after political roles
Six former special advisers to government ministers sought exemptions last year from the 'cooling-off' period during which they cannot lobby, the Register of Lobbying annual report for 2024 has disclosed. It is the highest number of waivers sought since 2020, when eight applications were received to waive the prohibition on lobbying after stepping down from employment with government. The identities of the six special advisers were not disclosed by the Standards in Public Office Commission (Sipo), the public ethics watchdog, in the report. Special advisers to ministers are restricted from engaging in lobbying in certain circumstances for a year after they leave office. READ MORE A large number of special advisers left their roles in 2020 after that year's general election and at the end of last January following the 2024 general election. It is expected a significant number of waivers will be sought this year. Advisers, ministers, and senior public officials who leave employment to take up roles in the private or non-government sectors are subject to a cooling-off period. During that time they cannot engage in lobbying activities connected to their former employment or roles in the public service. [ Former taoisigh among steady stream of politicians turning to lucrative career in PR-lobbying firms ] The watchdog's report refers to a case study involving an unnamed special adviser who took up a position with a charity and applied to waive the final four months of the cooling-off period. The applicant confirmed they would not be involved in any lobbying activity for the last four months of the period, so a waiver was granted. There were three applications for waivers in 2023, none in 2022, five in 2021 and eight in 2020. No minister has sought to have the cooling-off period waived since 2016. Three former public servants were granted exemptions from the cooling-off period, all in 2016 and 2017. The annual report also reveals the total number of people registered as lobbyists increased to 2,710 last year, an increase of 172 on 2023. More than 12,300 returns of lobbying activities had been submitted in respect of the three reporting periods in 2024. The top policy matter subject to lobbying in 2024 was health, followed by economic development and industry, agriculture, justice and equality, and housing. Three investigations into possible unreported lobbying were carried over from 2023 to 2024, and one further investigation was launched during the year. The complaints and investigations unit closed one of these cases, leaving three ongoing at the end of 2024. A total of 414 fixed-payment notices for late returns were issued in 2024. Of these, 169 were for late returns in periods before 2024. A total of 27 notices of potential prosecution were issued in 2024 for non-payment of fixed payment notices.
