logo
How to save the world economy (and make Trump think it was his doing)

How to save the world economy (and make Trump think it was his doing)

US President Donald Trump is an enigma. He has correctly identified the two most unsustainable elements of the global economic order, but his attempts to bring about their creative destruction threaten disaster. Has he perhaps revealed a paradoxical truth that such destruction is the only practical way to go?
Advertisement
It was never going to be possible for the United States to remain the 'consumer of last resort' indefinitely, thereby allowing other economies to pursue
unsustainable export-led growth . It was also never going to be possible for the US to finance its level of consumption indefinitely by accumulating debt.
The two matters are intimately connected. The ability of the US government to take on debt – now at a record US$36.2 trillion, according to US Treasury data – depended upon trust among creditors or bondholders, and Trump himself
has largely destroyed that with his punitive tariffs.
But it also depended upon the continuance of record low interest rates globally, a situation
which has now ended . This means a potentially crippling debt service burden for the US government, whose interest payments account for 16 per cent of total federal spending and are rising.
Whether consciously or not, Trump has uncovered these inconvenient truths which few, if any, in Washington were prepared to countenance, at least publicly. However, he has approached the issue with all the delicacy and finesse of the proverbial
bull in a china shop , raising the question of whether he is an anarchist or the ultimate realist.
Advertisement
The Biden administration that predated Trump's second term could not have been unaware that
the US debt situation was unsustainable in a changing, tightening international financial environment, and that it would soon create a crisis of debt service and impact America's ability to import both goods and capital.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How dependent is America's arsenal on China's critical mineral supply?
How dependent is America's arsenal on China's critical mineral supply?

South China Morning Post

time29 minutes ago

  • South China Morning Post

How dependent is America's arsenal on China's critical mineral supply?

The US defence sector is dependent on critical minerals for its advanced weapon systems, but it has relied on China for most of those inputs. As Beijing tightens export restrictions, there is a growing risk to the Pentagon's military readiness and supply chain security. The big picture China dominates the global supply of rare earths , including controlling more than 90 per cent of the world's processing and refining. It also has an edge in most other critical minerals, such as refined gallium, of which it controls 98.8 per cent of the output. 05:00 US defence chief Pete Hegseth warns of 'imminent' China threat during Shangri-La Dialogue US defence chief Pete Hegseth warns of 'imminent' China threat during Shangri-La Dialogue A closer look In recent years, Beijing has leveraged its dominance in critical mineral production and refining as a key negotiating point in trade wars, as well as targeting defence industries in the US and its allies. In July 2023, Beijing imposed controls requiring exporters to seek permission to ship eight gallium-related and six germanium-related products abroad. The list was expanded to include antimony in August 2024. In December, the Chinese commerce ministry imposed export bans on gallium, germanium and antimony to the US, which affects American military end users. In April, Beijing imposed trade restrictions requiring a special export licence for seven categories of medium and heavy rare earth elements (REE) – samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium – as well as magnets and other finished products that contain them to be shipped out of China. Why it matters

Silicon Valley venture capitalists sit back from investing in AI start-ups
Silicon Valley venture capitalists sit back from investing in AI start-ups

South China Morning Post

time5 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Silicon Valley venture capitalists sit back from investing in AI start-ups

For Silicon Valley venture capitalists, the world has split into two camps: those with deep enough pockets to invest in artificial intelligence (AI) behemoths, and everyone else waiting to see where the AI revolution leads. The generative AI frenzy unleashed by ChatGPT in 2022 has propelled a handful of venture-backed companies to eye-watering valuations. Leading the pack is OpenAI, which raised US$40 billion in its latest funding round at a US$300 billion valuation – unprecedented largesse in Silicon Valley's history. Other AI giants are following suit. Anthropic now commands a US$61.5 billion valuation, while Elon Musk's xAI is reportedly in talks to raise US$20 billion at a US$120 billion price tag. The stakes have grown so high that even major venture capital firms – the same ones that helped birth the internet revolution – can no longer compete. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Photo: AFP/Getty Images/TNS Mostly, only the deepest pockets remain in the game: Big Tech companies, Japan's SoftBank Group and Middle Eastern investment funds betting big on a post-fossil fuel future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store