logo
Nato's eastern flank lifts landmine ban to face Russia threat

Nato's eastern flank lifts landmine ban to face Russia threat

The National19-03-2025

Four European states are backing out of a ban on landmines due to the rising threat from Russia. Anti-personnel mines, which are designed for use against humans rather than vehicles such as tanks, are banned by most countries under a 1997 treaty championed by the late Diana, Princess of Wales. Algeria leads efforts to keep curbs in place. But some military heavyweights, including the US and Russia, have never signed up, and the return of war in Europe has prompted a rethink. Poland, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia have announced plans to quit the treaty to allow their militaries to use 'every necessary measure' to defend themselves from Moscow. 'It is not right that we are prohibiting ourselves from using weapons that Russia is prepared to use against us,' Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said. A joint statement by the four countries says they face 'dire security challenges' that mean their armed forces need 'flexibility and freedom of choice' to develop new weapons. They said they would still respect the wider laws of armed conflict, such as rules on protecting civilians. The UN has reported an 'industrial use' of landmines during the war in Ukraine on a scale not seen since the Second World War. Kyiv was given landmines by former US president Joe Biden's administration in a 'limited exception' from American policy, and accuses Russia of contaminating large swathes of land with explosives. European states are ramping up their defences for fear that Russia will attack Nato territory and that President Donald Trump's America will not be a reliable ally. Germany embarked on a historic shift of its own on Tuesday by voting through more than $500 billion in borrowing to rebuild its military and infrastructure. The Halo Trust, a mine clearance charity that worked with Princess Diana in the 1990s, said on Tuesday that the treaty had been 'instrumental in saving millions of people's lives'. It said states should still put money towards landmine clearance even if they do not uphold the ban. The trust acknowledged that Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 had 'created a new reality' for the defence of Europe. It said that 'outside of eastern Europe the treaty will remain the bedrock of efforts to save civilian lives'. In addition to Ukraine, landmines have recently been used in North Korea and Myanmar with a 'direct, brutal impact' that could persist for decades, the International Campaign to Ban Landmines said last week. It said withdrawing from the treaty would 'send the wrong signal at the worst possible time, aligning these countries with those who seek to weaken international norms'. Countries will vote this month on a UN motion urging them to 'reinforce and enhance' their commitment to the mine ban. The push is being led by Algeria which says the world should keep aiming for a 'mine-free world'. Rachid Bladehane, Algeria's ambassador to the UN in Geneva, said the country's experience was shaped by French colonial mines left over from the 1950s war of independence. He told diplomats that Algeria was an 'outstanding example' of anti-landmine efforts after it was declared mine-free in 2017. 'This draft resolution is a timely push in favour of our ultimate goal of a mine-free world and safer future for the generations to come,' Mr Bladehane said. He said the motion backed by Britain, South Africa and four others came at a 'very critical juncture, characterised by serious and unprecedented threats and blatant attempts to draw back from the very significant achievements in this area'. More than 160 countries have signed up to the mine ban treaty, including nuclear-armed states Britain and France. They agreed they would 'never under any circumstances' develop or use anti-personnel mines and committed to destroying existing stockpiles. As well as the US and Russia, China has not signed up. The text of the Algeria-backed motion says states should consider ratifying the treaty if they have not done so, and should make 'co-ordinated efforts' to help survivors of landmine explosions. However, the text has been watered down to remove a line urging states to 'accelerate de-mining efforts and destruction of stockpiled anti-personnel mines'. A passage encouraging other states to join the treaty 'without delay' has also been softened.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU, Britain reach post-Brexit deal on Gibraltar Border
EU, Britain reach post-Brexit deal on Gibraltar Border

Al Etihad

time2 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

EU, Britain reach post-Brexit deal on Gibraltar Border

12 June 2025 00:14 BRUSSELS (WAM)The European Union (EU) and Britain have agreed on the status of the overseas territory of Gibraltar, facilitating border crossings and resolving years of political territory has had its border arrangements with Spain as a significant point of contention since the United Kingdom's decision to withdraw from the EU in Wednesday's agreement, arrivals at Gibraltar Airport will present their passports to both Gibraltarian and Spanish border British Foreign Office stated that this system mirrors the model used by French police at London's St. Pancras station, the terminus for the Eurostar service connecting Britain with mainland Europe. "We have reached an agreement which protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long-term once again," British Foreign Minister David Lammy said.

US warns countries not to join French, Saudi UN conference on Palestine: Report
US warns countries not to join French, Saudi UN conference on Palestine: Report

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US warns countries not to join French, Saudi UN conference on Palestine: Report

The US is lobbying foreign governments not to attend a UN conference next week sponsored by France and Saudi Arabia on a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, according to a US diplomatic cable reported by Reuters. The cable, sent to countries on Tuesday, warns them against taking "anti-Israel actions" and says attending the conference would be viewed by Washington as acting against US foreign policy interests. France, a permanent member of the UN Security Council, is a US ally in Nato. Saudi Arabia is one of the US's closest Middle East partners. US President Donald Trump was feted during a May visit to Riyadh, where Saudi Arabia signed billions of dollars of investment deals with the US. France and Saudi Arabia are co-hosting the gathering between 17 and 20 June in New York. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "We are urging governments not to participate in the conference, which we view as counterproductive to ongoing, life-saving efforts to end the war in Gaza and free hostages," the cable says, according to Reuters. "The United States opposes any steps that would unilaterally recognise a conjectural Palestinian state, which adds significant legal and political obstacles to the eventual resolution of the conflict and could coerce Israel during a war, thereby supporting its enemies,' it added. France had been lobbying the UK and other European allies to recognise a Palestinian state at the conference. However, Middle East Eye reported in June that the US has warned Britain and France against recognising a Palestinian state at the conference. At the same time, Arab states have been urging them to proceed with the move, sources told MEE. In late May, United Nations member states held consultations in preparation for the conference, during which the Arab Group urged states to recognise Palestinian statehood. The Arab Group said they would measure the success of the conference by whether significant states recognise Palestine, sources in the UK Foreign Office told MEE. Since the 1950s, successive American administrations have stated that their ultimate goal in ending the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a two-state solution. Many experts and diplomats have earmarked occupied East Jerusalem, the occupied West Bank and Gaza, which Israel seized from Egypt and Jordan in the 1967 war, as the heartland of a future Palestinian state. But US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told Bloomberg News on Tuesday that a Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank was no longer a US policy goal. He said Israel's 'Muslim neighbours' could give up their land to create one. According to the cable, the US said that "unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state would effectively render Oct. 7 Palestinian Independence Day'. Hamas led an attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, killing around 1,200 people. Israel responded by launching a devastating assault on Gaza that has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mainly women and children, and reduced the enclave to rubble. The US cable also said Washington was working with Egypt and Qatar to reach a ceasefire in Gaza and free the captives there. "This conference undermines these delicate negotiations and emboldens Hamas at a time when the terrorist group has rejected proposals by the negotiators that Israel has accepted,' it said. The Trump administration pushed Israel to agree to a three-phase ceasefire with Hamas in January. Israel broke that agreement by refusing to begin talks on ending the war permanently and unilaterally resumed attacking Gaza.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store