
For the evicted congregation, Touro Synagogue was never just a building
Eight years later, my daughter led a service for her bat mitzvah in front of the ark as a stream of sunlight illuminated this significant moment. Surrounded by family, friends and congregants, my husband and I blessed our daughter, longing for her future well-being. On that day, I understood how deeply the building had woven itself into my own family history and connected us to the shared Jewish experiences of previous generations.
Since April, our services have taken place without any of the splendor of this historic home. After
Advertisement
Our eviction wasn't a surprise but no less disgraceful. Two congregations have laid claim to Touro — my congregation, which has operated there for more than a century, and Congregation Shearith Israel, which supported Touro's founding from its home in New York City.
It is beyond comprehension to understand how a congregation so far removed, geographically and relationally, could make such a consequential decision about a place they have never truly known, all the while removing the very soul that existed there.
The ruling leaves our thriving Jewish congregation ripped from its roots. Though we have been a responsible tenant, we have also been Touro's beating heart, sustaining it spiritually, financially, and communally through generations of devotion and presence. No matter
It's true that the soul of Touro, and of Jeshuat Israel, was never in its bricks. It was, and is, in the people. But the soul, however, like congregants, is interconnected with a physical space to dwell in, to act through, to make meaning tangible.
Many of the 100-plus members have known this much longer than I have. Rita, now 92 years old, as a young woman courted her husband, Aaron, from the Touro balcony and later became both the first female congregant and the first woman to serve as CJI president in 1999.
Advertisement
Yaakov, following five generations of celebrations and milestones on both sides of his family at Touro Synagogue, is to have his bar mitzvah this year on the heels of his father and great ancestors.
Having been embraced by this community, I have seen firsthand how much it means to the Jews of Newport: I know the young girls who chanted Torah for the first time at Touro last year. I know their grandparents who wiped tears from their eyes as they watched.
I know the pride of Mr. Josephson and Mrs. Davis who told our children stories from their own childhoods. I know the dedication of Ron, our security guard. I know our rabbi who, since he arrived, has been integrating traditions of our Spanish-Portuguese origins into our Jewish practices.
And I know the heartbreak we all feel now. A Jewish concept explains that the soul, the neshama, is not just the engine of life; it also embodies its meaning and purpose and it uses the physical body to fulfill this mission. This partnership of spiritual and physical is essential. In the same vein, there exists a bond between a building of worship and its congregation. When congregations relocate for their own practical or spiritual purposes, breaking that bond can be generative. But ripping the bond apart without a congregation's consent creates a spiritual dislocation and a profound disruption of wholeness.
I wish that my fellow New Yorkers who brought this lawsuit could know for themselves what it means to be Jewish in Newport. It's not passive. It's not inherited without effort. It's personal. It requires presence. It requires each of us to actively sustain a community that is small but mighty, rich in heart and history. And that we have. CJI has faithfully preserved both this historic building and the vibrant community within it, with unwavering dedication and care.
Advertisement
The tragedy lies in the belief that this new situation serves the collective Jews of Newport. As Jeshuat Israel meets across the street, at the historic Levi Gale House with windows that directly overlook Touro, it weighs heavily to think of the unnecessary action that led to this schism between Jews and a grueling legal process that reduced a centuries-old relationship and a web of historical documents into a simplified landlord-tenant framework.
Yes, we have been invited to CSI's Touro services. But it is a profound insult to our legacy and current membership to have been given an ultimatum to accept that in order to keep using the space that has sustained us, we must allow the operations of our community to be dictated by outsiders.
We remain a functioning community with places to worship, programs to run, and members to support. We will continue to do what we've always done: sustain Jewish life, in and around Newport County, with heart, dignity, and the deep, enduring knowledge that our legacy is not something that can be taken; only lived.
A building does not define a Jewish community, but to deny that our spiritual spaces embody memory, spirit, and identity is to erase what makes them sacred. Let this moment be recorded for what it is — a profound loss of a living bond.
Molly R. Goldman is a member of Congregation Jeshuat Israel.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cheerleaders for Violence: The Troubling Defense of Terror in Boulder
It was supposed to be a peaceful demonstration. Instead, it ended in flames. But what came after the attack in Boulder may be even more incendiary, especially online, where some users in their teens and 20s were not condemning the violence. They were endorsing it. On a clear afternoon in late May, a pro-Israel demonstration on Boulder, Colorados iconic Pearl Street Mall turned into a scene of terror. An Egyptian citizen, wielding improvised firebombs, attacked the crowd, injuring 15 people and igniting panic in a city more often associated with peaceful protests and college town calm. Authorities swiftly arrested the suspect, now charged with multiple felonies including attempted murder and arson. Law enforcement has labeled the incident an act of terrorism. But while the violence rattled the city and the Jewish community in particular, a very different response was unfolding online. Videos posted by major outlets such as ABC News, Daily Mail, and MSNBC quickly amassed thousands of views on TikTok and Instagram. In the comment sections, a disturbing trend emerged: Rather than denouncing the attack, many young users applauded it. "He just wanted freedom for Palestine." "Keep up the good work brother! Hero." "Free him, he did no wrong. He did what we all wanted." "I was about to comment about how terrible this is and then I realized it was a pro-Israel rally and I suddenly didnt feel bad anymore." Some expressed outright Jew-hatred, writing things like, "Reduce their population" and "We owe Germany an apology." Others painted the attacker as a martyr or revolutionary. Several claimed the incident was staged entirely, a so-called "false flag" to build sympathy for Israel. This chorus of justification, denial, and celebration is jarring but not entirely surprising given the current climate. Recent polling shows a dramatic shift in how young Americans view the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. According to Pew Research Center, 53% of U.S. adults now hold an unfavorable view of Israel. Support for the Palestinian cause has grown, particularly among Democrats and younger voters. In one RealClearPolling analysis,respondentsunder 28 years old were more likely than any other age group to sympathize with Palestinians over Israelis and to view Israels military actions in Gaza as unjustified. As someone from this generation, and from Boulder, Ive watched these sentiments evolve online, where politics blur with memes and moral lines often collapse under the weight of outrage or irony. Seeing this unfold in my own hometown made it feel less like an aberration and more like a wake-up call. Whats chilling isnt just the cruelty of the comments. Its how natural they seem to the people posting them, many of whom are my peers. Layered atop this political shift is a deepening distrust of institutions. A significant share of younger Americans express skepticism toward government narratives, traditional news media, and even the legitimacy of domestic law enforcement. According to the spring 2025 Harvard Youth Poll, fewer than one in three express trust in major institutions. But when that skepticism is applied to something as clear and violent as the Boulder attack, is it truly thoughtful or is it reflexive, corrosive doubt - the kind that opens the door to conspiracism and moral disengagement? That mindset helps explain the abundance of conspiracy-laden responses: "Yeah they set this up. Dont believe it at all," read one comment. Another called it a "planned distraction," while others insisted it was staged with actors. Though many of these reactions remain anonymous and ephemeral, they point to a generational divide not just in foreign policy, but in the moral frameworks through which violence is interpreted. Zoe Mardiks, a recent graduate of the University of Colorado Boulder and a Jewish student leader, was at her apartment when she learned of the attack. "My first reaction was to text some of my other Jewish friends to check in and ensure that everyone was okay and safe," she said. "I felt very scared that this had happened in my community." What disturbed her just as much as the attack itself was the flood of online comments defending it. "The ongoing justification for violence significantly downplays the rights of Jews and Israel to exist," Mardiks said. In her view, social media has warpedher generations sense of moral clarity. "Because of how the war has been broadcast on social media, everyone feels they have a say in the issue and believes they possess all the knowledge," she said. Mardiks said her response to those defending the attacker is simple: "If you truly care about saving or freeing anyone, we can only do that by educating each other in a non-attacking way … the line is drawn when you praise violence." The Boulder attack marks a grim milestone: a foreign conflict spilling onto American soil in the form of violence, and met, in some corners of the Internet, with tacit approval. That many of those corners are populated by Americans under 30 raises hard questions about what this generation, my generation, believes, whom they stand with, and what they consider justifiable resistance. For us, the line between protest and terrorism used to feel clear. Now, for too many, that line seems negotiable. "He did what we all wanted." If thats true, we may need to start asking what "we" really means now. Adair Teuton is a 2025 intern with RealClearPolitics.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Harvard's Battle With Trump Reignites School Pride Among Alumni
(Bloomberg) -- Jessica Tang has two degrees from Harvard University but barely donated directly to the school in two decades as an alumnus. She's even publicly criticized Harvard's labor practices. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. But now, she's co-founder of Crimson Courage, a grassroots campaign trying to rally goodwill and money for Harvard's fight against the Trump administration. The group is drawing in graduates like Tang who have previously provided little to no financial support to the university as well as those who have taken issue with its handling of an array of recent controversies. The oldest and wealthiest US university, Harvard has one of the strongest alumni organizations in the country but faced particular rebuke and a pullback in donations over its response to campus protests amd antisemitic incidents following the Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas on Israel and the Jewish state's retaliatory response. Harvard's attempt to crack down on protests then deepened divisions between the administration and some students, faculty and alumni. But this year, after President Alan Garber led Harvard's defiant response to the Trump administration, there's far more unity. 'We don't agree on everything, but we agreed we could agree on these shared values,' said Tang, now the president of the Massachusetts chapter of American Federation of Teachers, an AFL-CIO affiliate. 'That doesn't mean we don't think there are problems at Harvard that still need to be resolved, because we do,' she said. 'But we think the federal overreach and retaliation is extremely dangerous — not just for Harvard, but for democracy itself.' So far, the campaign has raised more than $50,000 in less than two weeks, primarily through appeals over its website and social media. Organizers are hoping for a bigger haul as Harvard welcomes back graduates for alumni day on Friday. That's a mere fraction of the $2.6 billion in federal funding for Harvard that's been frozen by the Trump administration and the billions more that are jeopardized by threats to its tax-exempt status and an effort to prevent the university from enrolling international students. Harvard on Thursday sued to block the White House from banning foreign nationals from entering the US to study at the university. The fundraising also pales in comparison to the kind of big-money gifts that have traditionally powered Harvard's $53 billion endowment, underscoring the limits of such grassroots efforts to stabilize its financial situation. Cash gifts to Harvard dropped 15% in the fiscal year that ended in June 2024 amid a pause in support by prominent backers such as billionaires Len Blavatnik and Ken Griffin who have called for changes at the university. While high-profile alumni Massachusetts Democratic Governor Maura Healey and conservative commentator Bill Kristol joined a recent kickoff video call for the Crimson Courage that drew more than 5,000 viewers, it's not yet clear if deep-pocketed graduates will rally around this call for support. Others including investor Bill Ackman have continued to criticize the school. Renewed Loyalty Still, there's a renewed sense of loyalty among at least some Harvard students, alumni and faculty. At Harvard's commencement last month, hundreds of graduating students and their family members sported Crimson Courage stickers passed out by the campaign's volunteers. Garber received multiple standing ovations, a sharp contrast to the chorus of loud boos that greeted him last year. The Crimson Courage group has also helped rally more than 8,000 signatures for a planned amicus brief supporting Harvard in its lawsuit over the Trump administration's funding freeze. 'This is going to be a really healthy and cathartic moment between the university and the alumni community,' said Hunter Maats, another alumni founder of Crimson Courage who is now a real estate investment manager. It's 'a moment to reset the relationship.' Garber has also appealed to alumni to donate to a special, newly created fund that would give him the ability to plug spending gaps. The money that the Crimson Courage has raised will go to that fund, but while the organizers are in touch with university officials, they consider their initiative separate from Harvard's own efforts to rally donations. 'We are appreciative of all alumni and friends who support Harvard's continued efforts to advance knowledge, foster innovation and serve the public good,' a Harvard spokesperson said in an email. Crimson Courage defines its mission as 'standing up for academic freedom and constitutional rights at Harvard and in higher education nationally.' The group has taken pains to be politically inclusive. Its website does not mention President Donald Trump by name, instead referencing 'financial and other unconstitutional threats from the federal government.' Harvard has also tried to walk a fine line of agreeing with the White House that reforms need to be made while also defending its right to control academic and campus policies. Garber, who is Jewish, has apologized for Harvard's handling of antisemitism and acknowledged that he has experienced prejudice himself at the school. But he has also said the extent of the government's demands show that 'the intention is not to work with us to address antisemitism.' That message appears to be resonating with some cohorts of the Harvard community. 'A lot of folks have kept their Harvard sweatshirts in their drawers,' Maats said. 'Now they're dragging them out.' Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom What America's Pizza Economy Is Telling Us About the Real One The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mahmoud Khalil responds to 'grotesque' charges in new legal filing, says arrest caused 'irreparable harm'
Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student detained in March by immigration agents, responded for the first time to the charges against him and described the "irreparable harm" his arrest has had on him and his family. "I have suffered—and continue to suffer—as a result of the government's actions against me," he said in a declaration included in a letter his legal team filed on Thursday in support of his bid for a preliminary injunction in his federal case. "The most immediate and visceral harms I have experienced directly relate to the birth of my son, Deen. Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone," Khalil said. "I listened to her pain, trying to comfort her while 70 other men slept around me. When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep." His wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, was eight months pregnant when Khalil was arrested March 8 at his New York apartment building. She said she had requested his presence at the birth but was denied by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Khalil said that not being able to see his family has been "devastating." In his declaration, he condemned the White House and President Donald Trump over the "grotesque and false" claims made against him. Khalil was targeted for deportation after he helped organize pro-Palestinian rallies on the university's campus. He is being held at a facility in rural Jena, Louisiana. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement that "it is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the United States of America." "When you advocate for violence, glorify and support terrorists that relish the killing of Americans, and harass Jews, take over buildings and deface property, that privilege should be revoked, and you should not be in this country," the statement added. DHS said Khalil was granted a contact visit with his wife and son before his court appearance and has been given the option of self-deporting. The Department of Justice declined to comment, and ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "It is hard to describe the humiliation and pain of seeing mugshot-style images of myself circulated from the highest levels of the U.S. government—accompanied by inflammatory language, grotesque and false accusations, and open celebration of my deportation," Khalil said in the declaration. "These were not just attacks on my character; they were efforts to erase my humanity." Khalil said his wife and family have also been subjected to harassment after the government labeled him a "U.S. foreign policy concern" and accused him of supporting Hamas. He said the allegations against him are false and "deeply racist." Khalil's attorney said in the letter that his arrest has damaged his reputation and "severely" undermined his pursuit of one day working in international diplomacy and human rights advocacy. Khalil said he had accepted a position at Oxfam International as a policy advisor, but the job offer was revoked. "I strongly believe that the Rubio Determination, my arrest and detention—and the public stigma that followed— played a significant role in this decision," he said. "I was not surprised; roles like this depend on your reputation." Oxfam International said it does not comment on individual HR or personnel matters. In a separate declaration, Khalil's wife described how she is "afraid for our safety." "Mahmoud's case has impacted every aspect of our life," she said. "I have experienced Islamophobia my whole life as a Muslim woman who wears a hijab, but it has been amplified by Mahmoud's detention and ongoing case. Mahmoud's and my careers, our desire for a stable life, and Deen's future will forever be impacted by these false allegations against him." This article was originally published on