The BCMEA Welcomes the Ready and Rogers Industrial Inquiry Commission Report
VANCOUVER, BC, June 12, 2025 /CNW/ - The BC Maritime Employers Association (BCMEA) welcomes the federal government's Industrial Inquiry Commission (IIC) report by respected labour relations experts Vincent Ready and Amanda Rogers on longshoring labour disputes at Canada's West Coast ports.
The findings and recommendations outlined in this report are thorough, balanced, and provide a clear path forward for the federal government, the BCMEA and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union — one that, if acted upon, will advance long-term stability at Canada's West Coast ports to the benefit of all parties.
As Canada urgently pivots to new, more reliable trading partners and builds a single Canadian economy, our competitiveness and economic success hinge on the reliability and long-term stability of our West Coast ports.
The BCMEA is committed to working constructively with the Minister of Jobs and Families Patty Hajdu and Secretary of State (Labour) John Zerucelli, our labour partners and other interested parties to realize the objectives and recommendations contained in the report, for the benefit of all Canadians.
Mike LeonardPresident and CEOBC Maritime Employers Association
SOURCE BC Maritime Employers Association
View original content to download multimedia: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/June2025/12/c7547.html
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
29 minutes ago
- Business Wire
U-Haul Offers 30 Days Free Storage and U-Box after San Antonio Flooding
SAN ANTONIO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--U-Haul ® is offering 30 days of free self-storage and U-Box ® container usage at 16 facilities across the San Antonio metro area to those affected by Thursday's record-breaking flooding. U-Haul is offering 30 days of free self-storage and U-Box to flood victims at 16 Company centers across San Antonio metro. Share San Antonio and its suburbs received up to seven inches of rain. Flash floods made streets impassable, swept away vehicles and produced several fatalities. Some residential properties likely sustained water damage. Access to dry and secure self-storage units and portable storage containers are essential to communities during the clean-up and recovery process following natural disasters. The U-Haul disaster relief program applies to new self-storage and U-Box rentals and is based on availability at participating facilities. The U-Box portable container offer is for on-site storage at Company centers, or free delivery to and pick-up from impacted homes, while these services are available. People seeking more information on the 30 days free storage offer or needing to arrange services can contact their nearest regional office or stop by a U-Haul self-storage facility in the cities below: U-Haul Co. of San Antonio East (7 stores) Store locations: New Braunfels, San Antonio (210) 731-2805 U-Haul Co. of San Antonio West (9 stores) Store locations: San Antonio (210) 569-0962 In addition to its 30 days free self-storage disaster relief program, U-Haul is proud to be at the forefront of aiding communities in times of need as an official American Red Cross Disaster Responder. About U-HAUL Celebrating our 80th anniversary in 2025, U-Haul is the No. 1 choice of do-it-yourself movers with more than 24,000 rental locations across all 50 states and 10 Canadian provinces. The U-Haul app makes it easy for customers to use U-Haul Truck Share 24/7 to access trucks anytime through the self-dispatch and -return options on their smartphones with our patented Live Verify technology. Our customers' patronage has enabled the U-Haul fleet to grow to 193,900 trucks, 138,200 trailers and 40,300 towing devices. U-Haul is the third largest self-storage operator in North America and offers 1,060,000 rentable storage units and 92.0 million square feet of self-storage space at owned and managed facilities. U-Haul is the top retailer of propane in the U.S. and the largest installer of permanent trailer hitches in the automotive aftermarket industry. Get the U-Haul app from the App Store or Google Play.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Liberals under fire for rushing bill through Parliament to speed up resource projects
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is coming under fire for seeking to rush through a major piece of legislation that grants cabinet sweeping powers to quickly approve major projects. Government House leader Steven MacKinnon put a motion on notice Thursday that would push Bill C-5 through the House of Commons by the end of next week — leaving just one day to hear from civil society groups, stakeholders and experts. Critics charge the move is anti-democratic. In a fiery exchange in question period, Bloc Québécois House leader Christine Normandin accused Prime Minister Mark Carney of trying to "steamroll" a bill through the House that would greatly expand his own powers. "The prime minister has no right to impose C-5 under closure when the bill gives him exceptional powers unlike anything that we've seen before," she said in French. "Is that the prime minister's intention, to bypass Parliament and govern by decree like Donald Trump?' MacKinnon pushed back by saying "Canadians and Quebecers spoke loud and clear" in the last election for action to shore up the economy, in part due to the illegal trade war initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump. "We are acting in a democratic way," he said, noting the bill delivers on election promises laid out clearly in the Liberal platform. The bill includes controversial provisions that could allow cabinet to skirt existing processes and laws to fast-track approvals for projects the government deems to be in the national interest. The government aims to streamline disparate processes to limit approval timelines for big projects to a maximum of two years, boosting investor confidence. When asked about the timeline at a press conference Thursday, Energy Minister Tim Hodgson said the legislation needs to pass quickly to shore up an economy being undermined by Trump's tariffs. "We have a trade war that is affecting sector after sector after sector. Canadians' jobs are at risk. Canadians' livelihoods are at risk. And quite frankly, the prosperity of the country is at risk," Hodgson said. But NDP MP Leah Gazan said in the House of Commons foyer Thursday that the bill isn't going to build the economy out because it will trigger a series of court challenges. She called on the government to extend the time frame of the public study and do more to consult with Indigenous Peoples — something she said got shortchanged in the bill. "I'm calling on the prime minister to slow it down, to not rush a bill that has this much consequence through in five days," she said. Hodgson pointed to support for the bill from the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, which represents more than 100 First Nations seeking to have their own projects advanced, and said he is consulting privately with stakeholders. "I can tell you I've got multiple conversations going on with different rights holders and business leaders as part of my department's efforts to ensure that consultation is robust," he said. The Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs said in a statement Thursday that it has unanimously passed a resolution opposing Bill C-5. It said the organization is calling for its immediate withdrawal. "The federal government cannot cloak violations of our rights under the guise of national interest," said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, the organization's president. "This legislation, as currently written, would be a complete betrayal of Canada's commitments under the (United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples) and the hard-fought recognition of our inherent and constitutionally protected title and rights. "It will not stand unopposed." Indigenous Services Minister Mandy Gull-Masty said there will be a meeting between the Prime Minister's Office and First Nations leaders, citing the wildfires as one reason it has been delayed. "I also want to acknowledge that because there are many communities in a critical state of wildfire and evacuation, that time will be taken to have that dialog," she said. "I know that it is the intention of the Prime Minister's Office to sit down with First Nation's leadership directly and to have the economic discussion and hear from them." But Anna Johnston, staff lawyer at West Coast Environmental Law, said the drive to push the bill through quickly is "incredibly concerning" because the government has done "very little engagement" so far on such a major piece of legislation. "The biggest concern is that it's going to give cabinet the power to approve projects before they have any information about them beyond what the proponent has decided to give the government," she said. "There's a reason why we have decisions at the end of environmental assessments and regulatory processes. It's so that governments can make informed decisions about projects that have the potential to harm Canadians and to harm the environment." Stuart Trew, a senior researcher with the left-leaning think tank Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said the bill is "destined to end up in court" and "really bump up against the government's commitments to reconciliation with First Nations." "It seems geared to let the government ram projects through, without adequate study, without all the usual considerations about the impacts on endangered species," he said. "We should raise our eyebrows any time a government claims a national emergency in order to rush through legislation with implications as significant as this does." The legislation also looks to break down internal trade barriers and make it easier for workers to take jobs in other provinces. MacKinnon rejected a call from the Bloc Québécois this week to split the landmark legislation in two. That would have allowed the House to speed through the less contentious internal trade provisions while putting the controversial major projects portion under the microscope. Carney has vowed repeatedly to eliminate interprovincial trade barriers by Canada Day, 19 days from now. The House has been sitting for just three weeks and is currently scheduled to rise next week on June 20. MacKinnon said in a scrum on Wednesday that he has not tried to get consensus from the other parties to have the House sit any later. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 12, 2025. Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is Elon Musk a U.S. citizen? The SpaceX billionaire is no longer a DOGE government employee
Tesla CEO, SpaceX founder and South Africa-born billionaire Elon Musk became a 'special' federal employee in February, allowing him to work for the federal government with or without pay for a limited time. Now, around four months later, Musk is coming off the heels of a very public falling out with President Trump shortly after leaving his position as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). While there are some exceptions, according to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, you generally must be a U.S. citizen to work for the federal government. And since supporting President Trump's 2024 campaign, flurries of comments on social media posts about Musk often accuse him of not being a U.S. citizen. Following the news of his job and due to his and President Donald Trump's strong views on immigration, some asked, "Is Elon Musk a U.S. citizen?" The short answer is yes. Regardless of his current employment status (or lack thereof) with the Trump Administration, it's still one of the most commonly asked questions about the wealthiest man in the world. Here's where Elon Musk's citizenship status stands, which countries he grew up in and where he currently lives. Musk and Trump's relationship: A timeline from campaign cash to 'disgusting abomination' Musk left his position with DOGE at the end of May and, about a week later, on June 5, started posting accusatory tweets on his social media platform X, formerly Twitter. He berated Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination,' and even accused of being involved with the late child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein in now-deleted posts on X. But on June 11, Musk posted on X, 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.' Musk hasn't changed his opinion about the bill yet, at least publicly. While Musk has deleted some of his more inflammatory posts about Trump, some posts about killing the bill are still up on his X profile. What we know after his apologetic post: Does Musk still oppose the 'Big Beautiful Bill?' 'Musk has been a U.S. citizen since 2002 according to a 2023 biography of Musk by journalist Walter Isaacson,' Politifact and CNN reported. Musk was born in Pretoria, South Africa, in 1971. His father, Errol Musk, is a South African businessman, politician, mine owner, consultant, and property developer. His mother, Maye Musk, is Canadian. Through her, Elon Musk also has Canadian citizenship. In his college years, Musk came to the U.S. on an Exchange Visitor Visa, which allows visa holders to teach, lecture, instruct, study, conduct research, consult, receive graduate training and more. In October, the Washington Post reported that Musk was — at one point — working illegally during his startup days in Silicon Valley, while he and his brother were creating PayPal. President Biden later echoed the Post's report, which went viral on X, Musk's social media platform formerly known as Twitter. Musk fired back on X, saying that he 'was in fact allowed to work in the U.S.,' and described his immigration journey as a 'gray area," CNN reported. Regardless of whether or not he was working illegally at the start of his career, Musk is now a U.S. citizen and maintains his primary residence in the U.S. Elon Musk surrenders: World's richest man is caving to Trump after their epic feud Musk was mostly raised in South Africa. He moved to Canada when he was 17 to study at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. In 1992, he transferred to the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, where he graduated with bachelor's degrees in economics and physics. Yes, Elon Musk lives in the U.S. Currently, his main residence is in Boca Chica, Texas, the location of SpaceX Headquarters. He has a tiny home and a small two-bedroom home in the area, according to Architectural Digest. 'In 2021, Musk revealed in a post on X that he was living in a three-bedroom ranch, also in Boca Chica. He claimed to be renting the $50,000 property from SpaceX,' Architectural Digest reported in January. 'Like his tiny home, the property is a short drive from his company's beachfront launch site, SpaceX Starbase.' According to Forbes' real-time billionaires list, Musk is the richest man in the world as of Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2025. He ranks just slightly above Jeff Bezos. Musk is worth more than $400 billion, according to Reuters. Contributing: Kinsey Crowley, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Elon Musk and Donald Trump: Is the SpaceX billionaire a U.S. citizen?
