US attack on Iran shakes East Asia's faith in non-proliferation norms
US President Donald Trump immediately hailed the raid as a 'spectacular military success', boasting on national television that Iran's key enrichment installations had been 'completely and totally obliterated'.
Some quickly interpreted the strike as a new policy doctrine. Matthew Kroenig, vice-president and senior director of the Atlantic Council's Scowcroft Centre for Strategy and Security, argued in The Washington Post that the US strikes signal a bold new counterproliferation military force policy to deter nations from pursuing nuclear weapons.
This marked the first time US warplanes joined Israel in openly attacking a nuclear programme, using seven
B-2 stealth bombers . The June operation shattered decades of precedent and set the stage for broader upheaval in global nuclear deterrence.
First, to Pyongyang, the strikes reinforced the government's narrative regarding nuclear capabilities. On March 8, North Korean state media paraded the country's leader,
Kim Jong-un , who inspected a 'nuclear-powered strategic guided missile submarine'. Such a vessel, likely built with Russian help, would give North Korea a true sea-based second-strike capability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Why China sees US trade deals with partners as a threat – and how it could react
Beijing has renewed its warning to other countries not to strike deals with the United States on terms that come at China's expense – ahead of Washington's looming deadline to conclude tariff negotiations with most of its trade partners. Chinese officials are concerned that nations from Europe to Southeast Asia may enter into trade agreements with the US that divert supply chains, reduce bilateral trade with China or compel governments to exit Beijing-led projects, analysts said on Monday. 'The first important one is not to shift the supply chain,' said Liang Yan, professor of economics at Willamette University. 'There's a possibility that other countries would disengage from China.' Issued over the weekend , Beijing's latest warning echoed a similar statement in April. It came after US President Donald Trump hinted at lower tariffs or extended waivers for countries that negotiate in 'good faith' – raising concerns in China, especially as many third countries maintain close ties with Washington, analysts said. On April 2, the Trump administration imposed sweeping global tariffs – dubbing it 'Liberation Day' – only to suspend most of the duties for 90 days to allow for talks.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
US shift towards Pakistan may unsettle India and the South Asia balance
The recent White House lunch date between Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, and US President Donald Trump was a renewal of high-level US-Pakistani engagement that suggested a potential rebalancing of US priorities in South Asia. Advertisement The visit, closely watched by stakeholders in South Asia and observers of Washington's policy on the region, has raised questions about the future of the US-India strategic partnership – particularly as US-China tensions appear to be easing and Trump seems more than eager to strike a deal with China, an 'iron brother' of Pakistan. Yet the significance of the lunch meeting should not be overstated: it signals flexibility, not a complete shift in priorities. It reflects a deal-centric approach that aligns with Trump's broader foreign policy instincts while introducing risks that could unsettle South Asia's delicate geopolitical balance. For one, the meeting – the first time a senior Pakistani official has been hosted in the White House in six years – marks a clear departure from the Biden administration's approach, which prioritised strengthening ties with India. Former president Joe Biden's strategy leaned heavily on India as a counterweight to China, emphasising shared democratic values. In contrast, Trump's decision to allow Pakistani leadership back into the White House for a visit reflects a return to transactional diplomacy , favouring more immediate economic and strategic interests over ideological alignment. Advertisement
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump not offering Iran ‘anything' after nuclear site strikes, nor speaking to Tehran
US President Donald Trump said on Monday he was not offering Iran anything nor talking to it 'since we totally obliterated' the country's nuclear facilities. 'I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama,' Trump wrote on social media. 'Nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities.' The statement comes as Iran's deputy foreign minister told the BBC that talks between Washington and Tehran cannot resume unless the US rules out further strikes on Iran. Majid Takht-Ravanchi told the British broadcaster that the US had signalled it wants to return to the negotiating table, a week after it struck three Iranian nuclear facilities. 'We have not agreed to any date, we have not agreed to the modality,' Takht-Ravanchi said.
