Paying attention to changing climate
Opinion
Many Manitobans were disappointed to learn that Terry Duguid was not reappointed as minister for Environment and Climate Change Canada. A Mark Carney appointment just two weeks prior to the recent federal election — having served perhaps the shortest ministerial term on record — he is being replaced by an unexceptional Toronto lawyer. Apparently ECCC is not a priority for the new administration.
This should not come as a surprise given the lack of attention paid by either major party to environmental issues on the campaign trail, save for both savaging the carbon tax and trying to outdo one another in their love of pipelines.
The prime minister had a great deal to say about climate change in his book Value(s), none of which carried over into electioneering. Again, this is not surprising as the PM is a former investment banker who believes that tinkering with the system that caused the problem will solve it. Apparently only by making it extremely profitable can we save the planet — doing good by doing well. Well, maybe.
Russell Wangersky / Free Press
The climate is all around us, every day. Are governments paying close enough attention?
So, what should our new federal government and its rookie ECCC minister do to face a longer-term existential crisis while grappling with a shorter-term threat from our former best friends? Focus on renewable energy, energy infrastructure, water, science and co-operative federalism. All of these fall under the umbrella of climate change adaptation and none is fully under the ECCC mandate. Our response to climate change requires a government-wide effort. But ECCC has a very important role to play.
Notice that climate change mitigation — reducing carbon emissions — is not on my list. America now produces twice as much oil as Saudi Arabia. Washington has turned the clock back six decades to the heyday of fossil fuels and is exporting the notion around the world to an alarmingly receptive audience There are cost-effective ways to reduce emissions that we shouldn't ignore, but otherwise mitigation must go on the back burner for at least the next four years. There is no point in crippling our oil sector (and fatally alienating Alberta); it will make absolutely no difference to climate change. That sector will die a natural death and sooner than many suspect.
It is imperative that Canada expands its renewable energy capacity — wind, solar and hydro — as rapidly as possible. This may mean rethinking short-term economics, building beyond immediate demand. As with most past environmental issues, climate change will have to have us by the throat before global action is unavoidable; but when that occurs it will be sudden. The future may belong to those who can make that rapid transition to net zero.
Key to a renewable energy, self-sufficient economy is the ability to move electrical energy from coast to coast to coast. Presently our power grid is oriented north-south and that has to change. ECCC Minister Julie Dabrusin's role in energy production and transmission is largely regulatory. A regulatory process that minimizes environmental impact, co-ordinates the transboundary dimension of energy transmission, respects local concerns and delivers timely decisions is required. An aggressive renewable energy strategy is all about being prepared for a rapid transition to carbon lite industry and transportation. Not an easy task.
Water is the key to insulating our agriculture, infrastructure and urban centres from the expected extremes of surplus and scarcity. It will mean overhauling our water infrastructure, conveyance, retention and flood protection. ECCC and its Canada Water Agency — created by the now-discarded Terry Duguid — has a significant role in partnering with the provinces in this infrastructure overhaul, both from a financial and regulatory perspective. Another massive undertaking.
Science is critical to our response to climate change. There may not be a technological magic bullet to extract us from this mess, but we won't find one if we're not looking. And our water-related adaptation has to be supported by sound science. There is already a very solid water research platform to build on, much of it now co-ordinated by the Winnipeg-based water agency.
Weekday Evenings
Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening.
No climate change adaptation strategy will work without intimate co-operation between the federal, provincial and territorial governments, something that was not a strength of the Trudeau government, and on environmental matters was a disaster. The ECCC minister might start by reviving the once-effective Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment — like the water agency also headquartered in Winnipeg. It can and should be the national coordinating body for all matters water.
Of course, it all comes down to political will and money. This has to be a government of Canada priority in which ECCC plays an important supportive role. Money ought not to be the problem. We have come up with billions to support important issues like response to COVID, Reconciliation and economic support during the current trade uncertainty; we can fund climate change adaptation.
Perhaps the tariff wars will be all this government can handle. Perhaps some geoengineering Hail Mary will solve the climate problem. Perhaps the world's major economies will wake up, perhaps.
Unfortunately a future based on perhaps is not a very solid one.
Norman Brandson is the former deputy minister of the Manitoba departments of environment, conservation and water stewardship.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
an hour ago
- National Observer
If Carney wants to build, he should go big on a Youth Climate Corps
When our delegation of Youth Climate Corps (YCC) organizers met Mark Carney outside the Liberal caucus retreat in Nanaimo in 2024, Canada was a different place. To remind the Liberal Party of their promise made in the 2024 federal budget to hold consultations on a YCC, we staged a lemonade stand to 'raise' the $1 billion needed for a Canada-wide program to put thousands of young people to work confronting the climate emergency — the defining crisis of our lives. This fun stunt gained the attention of Carney — then just an economic advisor to the Liberals — and Members of Parliament, who reassured us a YCC would be established. We couldn't have predicted the political whirlwind that would follow just months later, resulting in former prime minister Justin Trudeau's resignation and Mark Carney's election to the position. Though the Liberals won, the results of the federal election show a persistent disconnect between the governing party and young Canadians. In a rightward shift among youth, the Conservatives won the student vote. If the Liberals want to earn back the trust of young people, they must make a compelling and inspiring offer, and the Youth Climate Corps represents just that, but only if it is a genuinely bold invitation. The crises we face call for more than a precarious pilot program After years of youth advocacy, the YCC was finally featured on most major party platforms: the New Democrats, Greens, and re-elected Liberals. This win is a testament to the dedicated and inspiring advocacy of Canadian youth across the country. But the 'pilot' program proposed by the Liberals is far too modest, and sends mixed signals about whether they truly understand the severity of the crises we face. As the Liberal platform states, 'Building Canada strong starts with our workers.' We agree. That's why they must scale up their inadequate promise and create the ambitious and visionary climate corps that Canada desperately needs. The YCC pilot envisioned in the Liberal platform is too small and susceptible to dismantling by future governments. Some conservative pundits have been calling for the 'Muskification' of Canada, advocating for our very own Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). To combat MAGA-style politics from entering Canada, an innovative and courageous program, like the YCC, must be protected and built right from the beginning, with human rights and Indigenous leadership at its core. If the Liberals want to earn back the trust of young people, they must make a compelling and inspiring offer, and the Youth Climate Corps represents just that, write Bushra Asghar, Erin Blondeau, Lea Mary Movelle and Juan Vargas Alba Late in his term, President Joe Biden launched an American Climate Corps, only to have President Trump terminate it as soon as he took office. We can't repeat the same mistakes as the United States. How a Youth Climate Corps would work The YCC should offer well-paid jobs and training for people 35 and under, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, building renewable energy, restoring ecosystems, and responding to climate disasters. The program would offer positions which include but are not limited to work, such as building retrofits, green construction, conservation, strengthening local food systems and supporting municipalities in developing and implementing their climate action plans. It would create accessible, barrier-free opportunities for young people, prioritizing underserved, undervalued and under-resourced communities. Young people would be empowered to enter the workforce with living wages and union representation, combatting the distressing rise in the youth unemployment rate. Indigenous sovereignty, rights and leadership would guide the way. But for a program like this to work, it needs to be big. If built right and in adherence to our campaign principles, the YCC would create at least 20,000 jobs across Canada in the first year, and grow with demand each year thereafter. If Carney wants to 'build, baby build,' then we need a well-trained and prepared workforce to get the job done. Polling shows the majority of Canadians across every demographic support the idea of a YCC, and 15 per cent of people under 35 are excited and ready to enlist immediately. The Liberal Party must reckon with the reality that young men are turning to the political right after feeling abandoned by the Liberals, yet a huge majority of young men are excited about the idea of a YCC. To Prime Minister Mark Carney: You have expressed your ambition to 'build things we've never imagined, at a speed we've never seen.' Now is your opportunity to establish a transformative, large-scale Youth Climate Corps, and watch as we strengthen this nation without leaving anyone behind. Erin Blondeau is the communications director at the Climate Emergency Unit, an independent journalist and a human rights and climate justice organizer. Bushra Asghar is the co-director of the national Youth Climate Corps campaign and a human rights and climate justice organizer.
Ottawa Citizen
an hour ago
- Ottawa Citizen
MacDonald: Canada must stop neglecting its spy agencies if it wants better defence
Article content Prime Minister Mark Carney has pledged to meet Canada's NATO obligation to invest two per cent of GDP in defence by the end of the year. But at a time of growing political instability, it's important to remember that soldiers are not the only ones protecting Canada. Article content Working in the shadows, Canada has a civilian army of more than 6,400 intelligence practitioners in the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Canadian Security Establishment (CSE) — both with headquarters in Ottawa, where most of their staff are — working around the clock to keep us safe. Unfortunately, according to a Public Safety Canada survey in 2021, 54 per cent of Canadians don't know what they do. Also, despite the vital role they play in Canada's defence, their budgets are not included in NATO's calculation of Canada's defence spending. Article content Article content Article content There are some important reasons for that, but it comes at a cost. Article content For one, it can create a political disincentive to invest in domestic intelligence — although, for Canada, that's nothing new. Of the countries that form the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing network, only New Zealand spends less than Canada on its intelligence agencies. Australia, meanwhile, with two-thirds the population, spends 22 per cent more ($2.2 billion Cdn) than Canada ($1.8 billion). Article content All this is dwarfed by the United States, of course, which had a budget of $104 billion Cdn for civilian intelligence in 2024. Article content Canada can't hope to come anywhere close to that anytime soon, but neither should it be complacent. Article content The fact is, with President Donald Trump's threats to annex Canada, tariffs, foreign interference, rampant disinformation and misinformation, and growing political unrest, the military isn't enough. Canada needs intelligence specialists who can effectively monitor and disrupt threats of all kinds, at home and abroad, wherever they come from, before they become headlines. Article content Article content There's a practical reason NATO doesn't include civilian intelligence spending in its calculation of a country's defence spending, of course: the classified nature of the spending makes it hard to standardize across countries. Article content Article content But this technical barrier can have real strategic consequences, unintentionally discouraging critical investments in non-military intelligence capabilities and even contributing to a lack of public awareness, respect and understanding for the work intelligence agencies do. Article content In countries such as Canada that are under political pressure to meet NATO's two-per-cent GDP defence spending target (Canada hasn't spent two-per-cent of GDP on defence since 1988), the problem is compounded. If Canada is already struggling to meet the target, why spend money on intelligence that doesn't count, when the military is underfunded too?
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Inviting Narenda Modi to the G7 summit was the right move for Mark Carney
Stephen Harper was right about India. And Mark Carney was right to invite India's Narendra Modi to next week's G7 summit in Canada. As a former Canadian prime minister offering advice to the current PM, Harper argued persuasively this month that Canada needs to move on from the latest impasse with India. Carney did precisely that because the time was right. Many Sikh Canadians bristled over the decision. Human rights critics argued that Carney moved too fast. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW But the world of law and order is changing in the new world order. As a middle power caught between the big players, Canada doesn't have as many choices — or as many choice friends and allies — as it might have once imagined. Justin Trudeau liked to say, upon defeating Harper as prime minister a decade ago, that the world needs more Canada. But Canada has moved on from Trudeau — and the world has moved on, too. The world doesn't much need Canada anymore. Today, it wants India more than ever. Canada, too, needs India, the world's largest democracy and most populous nation. As this year's host for the summit of industrialized nations, Canada plays a special role convening all seven member countries — and inviting guest leaders, like Modi, to join them in Alberta next week. It's an exclusive club that operates by consensus, which means we can't just pick and choose who's invited, who's disinvited and who displeases us. In truth, we're in the club and it's our turn to convene, but it's not our club to reconfigure. Federal Politics Analysis Mark Carney prepares for G7 summit littered with potential landmines Tonda MacCharles As G7 host, we don't just invite who we like. We invite who matters. That's diplomacy. That's the compromise of politics and the reality of realpolitik. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW That's not to say Canada was wrong to call out allegations of Indian misconduct at the bilateral level in late 2023. But at the multilateral level in 2025, we need to pick our fights and choose our timing. It has been nearly two years since Canada publicized and protested 'credible allegations' linking agents of India to the killing of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar near Vancouver. India dismissed the allegations and bilateral ties plummeted. Of course, when the United States made related allegations of Indian misconduct on American soil, India's government had a more measured and co-operative response. But at the end of the day, the U.S. and India moved on — not because the indictment didn't matter, but because national interests also matter. America needs and wants India as a counterweight to China. Canada, too, needs counterweights — not just against China but America. In today's beggar-thy-neighbour world, beggars can't be choosy. Middle powers can't be fussy. Canada is still reeling from the rupture in relations with China, when Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor were held hostage over the Huawei affair pitting U.S. commercial and criminal interests against those of China. Today, Canada is once again talking to China and trying to rebuild relations despite the bad blood. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Canada has barely recovered from the disruption of relations with Saudi Arabia in 2018, when criticism of its human rights record led to commercial retaliation and the sudden withdrawal of its medical students from Canadian universities. Against that backdrop, Canada can't stay mad at so many countries for so long. Bilateral irritants are real and human rights matter, but international relations and commercial ruptures can have enormous fallout — as our farmers in Saskatchewan can attest after bearing the brunt of Chinese retaliation over exports from the prairies. Canada cannot hold out forever against two of the most populous countries on the planet (China and India) and one of its richest nations (Saudi Arabia). We cannot fight everyone else at once. That explains why Carney has belatedly reached out to Saudi Arabia's Prince Mohammed bin Salman to attend the summit. The crown prince was an outlaw and an outlier amid allegations that his intelligence services killed dissident Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi in Istanbul, but even America's then-president Joe Biden set aside his harsh rebukes to meet bin Salman in Saudi Arabia when the time came. India is a consequential country that matters in any global discussion about trade, climate change and health. It cannot be wished away or put on hold. Two decades ago, ahead of another such summit for the G8 (as it was then called, before a warmongering Russia was disinvited), I was assigned to write about India's challenges because its then-prime minister, Manmohan Singh, was invited to attend. Then as now, India was at the table with industrialized nations as a rising global power. Canada, like the G7, can't afford to exclude India — or Saudi Arabia or China or America. No truck or trade for their transgressions? That's a dead end given the obstacles facing Canada today. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
