Treasured wedding gifts: dusters, pegs and a tea strainer
Cliodhna Dempsey's letter (Bridal bucket is the best wedding gift, 26 May) brought back the happiest of memories. In July 1968 I was 21 years old, on the last day of my first year of teaching in Hampshire, and due to be married eight days later. My lovely class of first-year juniors, at final assembly, presented me with a huge laundry basket. Then each of the 42 children came up to put something in it: dusters, dishcloths, pegs, tin opener, washing-up brush, dustpan, tea strainer, teaspoons, slotted spoon, wooden spoons – an abundance of very thoughtful and useful gifts.
The long pink ribbon to tie everything inside the basket proved invaluable: that evening, driving 110 miles to visit Tim, my fiance, the bonnet of my Austin A35 van flew up and I used the ribbon to tie the bonnet catch to the radiator grille to safely finish the journey. Nearly 57 years later, and after racking up 74 years of teaching between us, we remain happily married and still use some of the surviving items.Vivienne SeakinsRugby, Warwickshire
My sister's 1981 wedding present list included a toilet roll holder, a 'lavatory cleaning set – green', 13-amp plugs and pan scrubs. She is still happily married, with the cleaning set and holder still in use.Andrew KeeleyWarrington, Cheshire
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Woman fined £770 after ‘taxi driver' registers at her address
A woman received 11 bus lane fines after a 'taxi driver' registered their vehicle at her address. Anna Brunskill, 49, said she feared she might be taken to court over the fines – despite having no idea who the owner of the vehicle was. The mother of two received a notice from the Driver Vehicle and Licensing Agency (DVLA) on April 23 telling her a vehicle had been registered at her address in Warrington, Cheshire, under a name she did not recognise. She has since received 11 £70 bus lane penalty notices, totalling £770. She said nine of the charges were posted on the same day, and she had alerted the DVLA and Warrington borough council. She added that the vehicle appeared to have a taxi light on its roof in the photos included in the penalty notices. Ms Brunskill acknowledged there was a chance that it was an innocent mistake because there are two roads with similar names in the area. However, she said she felt there was something 'fishy going on' because of the sudden volume of fines, and believed the driver could have deliberately registered his vehicle at her house to avoid paying them. Ms Brunskill said: 'We don't know this person. We've lived at this address for 14 years, and we don't know the car at all. 'If it's not a mistake it's a bit scary really, because how has he got the address? That's what you wonder ... I think it's either innocent, and there is another road [with a similar name] in Warrington, or it could be that he's trying to get away without paying the fines because nobody can trace him. 'Or has he used a local address so that he doesn't get in trouble with the police for not being a local taxi? That was my other thought.' Ms Brunskill has since received confirmation from the DVLA that her address has been removed from its records. The agency said any motorist who receives fines or correspondence for a vehicle they do not own should contact Action Fraud, the authority that deals with fraud and cyber crime, and write to the DVLA giving as much information as possible. The DVLA said that, if it was made aware of an error on the vehicle record, it would remove the address from the vehicle's record upon receipt of satisfactory evidence. It explained that it is an offence to knowingly provide false information or documents to the DVLA under the Road Traffic Act 1972. In the event of any fraud being uncovered, it will liaise with the police and other relevant authorities. Warrington borough council described the charges against Ms Brunskill as a 'genuine mistake' and said that all the fines have been cancelled. A spokesman said: 'Unfortunately, a genuine mistake was made when the taxi driver's vehicle was registered with the DVLA. Ms Brunskill's fines for driving in a bus lane have now been cancelled, and no further action will be taken.'
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
New 8pm to 8am parking ban kicks in for thousands of Brits – will YOU be impacted?
DRIVERS have been issued a warning after a new overnight parking ban kicks in for thousands of Brits. The new regulations will see motorists banned between 8pm and 8am at a popular tourist location following local concerns. Hampshire City Council has banned motorhomes and campervans from resting in Keyhaven. The new restrictions come after visitors flocking to the holiday hotspot have been leaving the area in a state. It has led to local concerns with county councillor highlighting a a massive spike in campervan numbers flocking to Keyhaven post-Covid. County Counillor, Fran Carpenter, told Birmingham Live she visited " a few days ago" and reported seeing "visible litter in the salt marsh". She said: "Campervans, some bigger than buses, were parked as far as the eye could see. "A van selling souvenirs and an Uber Eats car blocked the road while dropping off pizzas." Councillor, Lulu Bowerman, Hampshire County Council's Cabinet Member for Highways and Passenger Transport, warned there was a clear impact of having the larger vehicles in the area. "There are no public facilities overnight for parking, and campers use the local land, and many residents have asked for these controls to be introduced," she said. Bowerman explained "the new proposal will manage the situation". "I think the scheme would bring order to this particular beautiful part of Hampshire, and I think it's very necessary to maintain full accessible travel at all times." Additionally, she mentioned a "modest charge" in the area, which falls in line with similar locations, will deliver broader benefits to visitors. It will also help with the upkeep of the ecologically delicate area. New Pay and Display arrangements will be introduced at New Lane and Saltgrasss Lane, Keyhaven. The charges have been set at £1 per hour, up to a maximum stay of all day, operating Monday to Sunday from 10am to 6pm. But as part of the new traffic management arrangements, motorhomes and campervans won't be able to park between 8am and 8pm. Award-winning holiday park in St Ives In a council press release, Bowerman said: "Proposals to introduce parking charges on two seafront roads in Keyhaven stem from local concerns about unrestricted parking, resulting in an increase of overnight stays by motorhomes and campervans. "This has led to littering and other anti-social issues linked to camping activities for which the location is unsuited. "Introducing parking charges enables the County Council to curb overnight parking more effectively and to encourage a quicker turnaround of daytime parking so more people can enjoy this popular location. "We have carefully looked at the feedback received through two rounds of consultation and believe that on balance, a modest charge in line with those in place at similar locations, will deliver broader benefits to visitors whilst importantly, supporting the management of this ecologically sensitive site.' The new charging scheme is expected to be introduced later this year. A change to parking rules at Southeastern railway stations also caught drivers off guard in February. The new regulation saw a "pay and display" machines scrapped in favour of Automatic Number Plate Recognition with drivers now having to pay for their parking online. The move was designed to be "quicker and easier" for motorists who previously had to walk to the machine and back to their car to display their ticket.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Model is hauled to court after being attacked by mother and daughter in furious nightclub toilets catfight
A model who was attacked by a mother and daughter in a furious nightclub toilets catfight has been hauled to court. Bethany Brown left 23-year-old Amelia Begg with a bloody nose after attacking her when she was slapped by Amelia's mother, Heather, 40. Violence flared in the ladies' toilet at the venue PJs in Warrington, Cheshire, after the trio were said to have got into an 'exchange of words' on February 2. The argument escalated after Heather slapped 23-year-old Brown in the face, prompting the hairdresser to grab Amelia's hair and punch her in the face as Heather tried to separate them. Amelia then punched at Brown and her mother joined in the assault. During the brawl, Amelia threw a further slew of punches at Brown until she was pulled away by another woman in the bathroom. But it did not end there, as Brown then responded again by repeatedly punching Amelia to the head before he was also pulled off by another woman. The whole incident was said to have lasted around 45 seconds. At Warrington Magistrates' Court, CCTV footage was played of the incident as the women pleaded guilty to using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause fear of or provoke unlawful violence. Elizabeth Browne, for the prosecution, said: 'The matter dates back to February 2 of this year. 'This incident arises from an altercation in the communal area of a public bathroom. There is CCTV of the incident. 'I suggest showing it to you rather than describing it as it speaks for itself. There was substantial use of force. 'Miss Brown grabbed the other lady's hair and punched her on several occasions.' CCTV shown to the court showed the inside the busy communal area of the nightclub's ladies' bathroom Women can be seen at the washbasins, while Brown, wearing a backless top and trousers, is standing at the door looking out into the club with her back to the camera. During the brawl, Amelia Begg, pictured, threw a further slew of punches at Brown until she was pulled away by another woman in the bathroom She turns around briefly before going back to the door when she becomes involved in a confrontation with the Begg women who are standing outside of the bathroom. One of the women, said to be Heather Begg, slaps Brown to the left side of the face. The women move out of the bathroom briefly after which Brown can be seen holding Amelia's hair and punching her whilst Heather tries to pull her off and separate the women. The fight moves into the bathroom area and Amelia punches Brown. Heather also punches Brown. Amelia then rains down a series of punches on Brown. Another woman pulls her away. Brown hits back and she repeatedly punches Amelia in the face. Another woman pulls her back. Peter Green, defending the model, said his client is the lady who is initially assaulted, adding: 'What is clear is that perhaps initially she was acting in self-defence, but then it goes beyond self-defence. 'However, she did not start the incident at all - it is the other two ladies who started the incident. They were the initial aggressors. 'My client's involvement was not sustained. It was for a limited period that she was committing this offence. At the start of the violence, she was the person being assaulted.' For the Beggs, Simon Dunn said in mitigation: 'Heather Begg was the person who precipitated the incident. There had been some interaction between the two parties. 'It was based on a situation Bethany Brown took exception to and challenged Heather Begg and you can see the exchange in the doorway. 'Heather Begg accepts she should not have slapped Bethany Brown, but Bethany Brown reacted to that, grabbed hold of Heather, and Amelia came to her mother's rescue. 'From Heather Begg's point of view, she was trying to separate the two parties. 'The officer in their summary says that there is an opportunity for all in the party to disengage at various points but that did not happen. 'It lasted about 45 seconds and certainly other women are involved. Punches were thrown towards Heather and Amelia. 'Amelia did end up with a bloody nose and bruising to the face and was in shock by the whole set of circumstances. She wished she had not been involved. 'This happened in February of this year, and there have been no issues whatsoever since then. There is significant remorse for what happened and what occurred.' JP Alf Bean said: 'That does not make good viewing, does it? 'Watching it was not pleasant, and I am sure that you are quite ashamed of yourselves for behaving like that.' He told Brown: ' We have heard representations on your behalf that you were initially the victim and we tend to agree with that. 'That is how it started. But you moved from a position of self-defence, you grabbed Amelia against the wall and were punching her. 'It was not a good situation to be involved in, and your copybook has not been blotted. 'We have taken into account that you have never appeared before the court before - make sure that you do not come back again.' Brown from Birchwood, Warrington who was fined £546 with £303 in costs, was dealt with separately from the Beggs from Great Sankey area of the town, who were each fined £615 with £331 in costs and surcharge.
