Delhi HC seeks replies on PIL over delay in Juvenile Justice Boards cases
During the hearing, the Chief Justice reminded the Delhi Government's lawyer that, under the structure of the JJ Act, it is the State Government's responsibility to ensure that the law is properly implemented. He also pointed out that the setting up and disbanding of JJBs, along with their overall functioning, falls under the State's control.
The petition seeks the full and proper enforcement of the JJ Act, especially to protect the rights of children accused of offences, legally known as Children in Conflict with Law (CCLs). The law sets clear timelines for completing inquiries by the JJBs, and the plea argues that these deadlines are often not met.
'The petition had to be filed because these timelines are being badly ignored,' the plea states, adding that this leads to serious injustice and violates children's rights to a fair and timely trial under Article 21 of the Constitution and the JJ Act itself. The petition says such delay defeats the main purpose of the law, which is to ensure quick rehabilitation and reintegration of such children into society. The plea also asks the Court to direct Chief Judicial Magistrates and Chief Metropolitan Magistrates to review the case backlogs in the JJBs every three months, as required by Section 16(1) of the Act, and to submit reports to the High Court. It further urges the Court to instruct JJBs to publicly share case pendency figures every quarter on a website, and to take steps to include the JJBs in the National Judicial Data Grid.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
State vicariously responsible for Custodial death, says Delhi HC
The Delhi High Court has held the State vicariously liable for unnatural deaths in judicial custody, asserting that it has a constitutional obligation to ensure the safety and dignity of incarcerated individuals. The verdict came on Thursday from justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar in a case involving the custodial death of a Tihar Jail inmate, Javed, just two days before he was to be released in 2013. The court not only awarded compensation to Javed's legal heirs but also issued sharp observations on the failure of prison authorities to prevent gang violence in prisons. 'The State, owing a duty to ensure the security of the general public, including incarcerated persons, is responsible to compensate in cases of unnatural deaths in custody,' the court ruled. The judgment squarely placed the blame on systemic lapses and emphasised that the State's responsibility doesn't end at incarceration—it includes active efforts to prevent violence and the proliferation of gangs inside jails. Javed, who was serving a seven-year sentence for robbery, was due to be released on May 5, 2013. But two days before his release, his mother, Shakila, was informed that he had succumbed to injuries following a violent clash between rival gangs inside the prison. In her plea, Shakila had demanded a judicial inquiry, alleging that jail staff were responsible for her son's death. She also sought compensation, stating she was financially dependent on him. In December 2014, she was granted ₹1 lakh as interim relief based on recommendations by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The case was closed in 2017, following Shakila's death the previous year. But in 2019, her four children and five grandchildren successfully moved to revive the case. The Delhi government opposed the plea, contending that Javed had died in an intra-gang fight and that the petitioners were not eligible for compensation under the Delhi Victims Compensation Scheme (DVCS), 2018, as they were not 'dependents' after Shakila's death. Rejecting these claims, the court said Shakila had been wrongfully denied rightful compensation during her lifetime. 'She was forced to come to this court… but before the petition could be decided, she passed away,' the court observed. Highlighting NHRC's findings, the judge said there were evident lapses by jail personnel. He ordered the Delhi government to immediately pay ₹2 lakh to Javed's legal heirs and asked the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DLSA) to conduct a fact-finding exercise to determine additional compensation. In a noteworthy interpretation of DVCS, the court ruled that siblings and grandchildren of deceased victims are also entitled to claim compensation—regardless of marital status. 'Since this court has already held that a sibling is also entitled, there can be no distinction made between a married or unmarried sibling either. A similar logic would be applicable in the case of the children of the sibling(s),' the order said. Though the court declined to order a new judicial inquiry—citing prior acquittals in the case—it rebuked prison authorities for failing to maintain order. 'The fact that rival gangs had access to weapons or tools to cause injuries, resulting in death, reflects poorly on the discharge of duties by the jail administration,' the court said. This ruling comes amid heightened scrutiny of custodial violence in the Capital. Just days earlier, a preliminary report on the death of 24-year-old Aman Poddar inside the Saket court lock-up had flagged grave lapses, including the failure to separate rival inmates and delays in police response. Echoing that case, the court remarked: 'The State cannot escape liability by attributing the death to a gang altercation. Preventing such violence is a core part of the State's responsibility.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Chennai customs bust hydroponic ganja racket
Chennai: The arrest of two mules in recent weeks has seen the Chennai airport customs bust a reinvented modus operandi of drug smugglers using Sri Lanka as a transit point to bring in high-potent ganja varieties into the country. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On Tuesday, the air intelligence unit (AIU) team, based on intelligence, intercepted a man who arrived from Bangkok, Thailand, via Colombo. When his checked-in baggage was examined, the AIU team found some suspicious looking food packets emitting a strong odour. Six such transparent packets containing green flowering and fruiting tops, weighing 2.8kg, were seized. Testing of the samples using the field drug testing kit confirmed that it was marijuana. It was seized under the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985. Interrogation revealed that the flyer was promised 1.2 lakh if he delivered the contraband in Bengaluru. He had planned to reach Bengaluru by road if not caught at Chennai airport. While he was remanded in judicial custody on Thursday, customs sleuths said the six kg hydroponic ganja seized on May 16 was also smuggled from Thailand via Colombo. The contraband was hidden within 13 sealed packets disguised as 'Ritz toasted chips and multigrain tortilla chips'. Officials suspect that the smugglers might have used Sri Lanka as a transit point to reach Chennai to avoid suspicion since suspected flyers arriving from Bangkok undergo rigorous checking by customs at Chennai airport. "Smugglers bringing drugs via Sri Lanka is not new, but now they have changed the modus operandi since vigilance is tight at Chennai airport," said sources. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Customs sleuths also said that in both incidents, the final destination of the drug was Bengaluru, not Chennai, and they are investigating if the same gang is behind both incidents. Meanwhile, customs sleuths arrested an Indian male passenger who arrived from Thailand on Thursday in possession of 2.4 kg hydroponic weed wrapped in silver foils. The passenger was arrested and remanded in judicial custody. Chennai customs also made another seizure of 1 kg hydroponic ganja that was couriered from Thailand on June 3. Customs officers at the Postal Appraising Department (PAD) checked a package after suspicious results from X-ray scanning and discovered two packets of hydroponic weed, weighing a total of 1.022kg.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
State responsible for prisoner's death, states Delhi HC, awarding compensation
New Delhi: It is the duty of the State to ensure the safety and well-being of prisoners in its custody, and "gangs" are not permitted to proliferate in jails, Delhi High Court has said while awarding compensation to the kin of a man who died in a fight due to gang rivalry inside Tihar jail. Delhi HC said the State cannot shrug off responsibility by claiming that the convict was involved in a fight between gangs, adding that authorities owe a duty to ensure the security of the general public, including persons who are incarcerated, and compensate in cases of unnatural deaths in custody. "This court is of the firm opinion that it is the bounden duty of the State to ensure the safety of persons who are in its custody. While the deceased may have had criminal antecedents, the State is not absolved of its duty to ensure the safety and well-being of prisoners," Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar observed in a recent order. The court directed the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA) to pay Rs 3 lakh in compensation to the kin of the deceased, Javed—Rs 1 lakh of which has already been paid earlier to his mother, who has since passed away. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo The court noted that the authorities' contention that two rival gangs instigated the altercation, in which the victim was involved, "would not absolve the authorities of their bounden responsibility" to maintain prisoner safety and security. The bench further remarked that the fact that such a violent altercation occurred, with rival gangs having access to weapons or tools used to inflict fatal injuries on Javed, "speaks highly of the manner in which jail authorities discharged their duties." The compensation petition was originally filed by Javed's mother, who stated that her son had served seven years of imprisonment in a criminal case and was scheduled for release on May 5, 2013. However, she was informed of his death on May 3, 2013, reportedly due to a fight between inmate groups. The mother, who was granted an interim compensation of Rs 1 lakh, died in 2016. Thereafter, Javed's siblings and their children continued the litigation, seeking compensation on the basis that they were financially dependent on him. In addition to awarding Rs 2 lakh compensation, the court directed the DSLSA to conduct a fact-finding inquiry to assess the actual physical or monetary dependence of the siblings and their children on Javed, in order to determine the precise loss or injury suffered. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
