Youth accused of killing Leo Ross told his trial will not take place next week
The 15-year-old youth, who cannot be named because of his age, had been due to face a jury trial at Coventry Crown Court next week accused of murdering Leo, who was stabbed in the stomach on a riverside path in January.
The accused, wearing a T-shirt and jogging bottoms, spoke only to confirm his name and that he understood directions being made by High Court judge Mr Justice Wall during a 20-minute hearing in Coventry on Wednesday.
Leo Ross, who was stabbed to death in Birmingham in January (West Midlands Police/PA)
He was not asked to enter any pleas and was remanded in custody until a further mention hearing at the same court next month, with a provisional four-week trial re-fixed to start on February 9.
Leo, a pupil at the Christ Church, Church of England Secondary Academy in Yardley Wood, died after being taken to hospital from The Shire Country Park in Hall Green, where members of the public had summoned the emergency services.
Appearing in person after being brought to court from youth detention accommodation, the defendant is further charged with possessing a bladed article, assaulting a woman on October 22 last year, seriously assaulting a woman on January 19 and January 20, and assaulting a woman on January 21.
Adjourning the case after hearing submissions from prosecutor Rachel Brand KC and defence lawyer Alistair Webster KC, Mr Justice Wall allowed the youth to remain seated.
A mural paying tribute to Leo in Yardley Wood (Matthew Cooper/PA)
The judge said the delay was 'not the fault of anybody' and told the defendant a trial was not likely to take place until early next year.
The judge said: 'You are not going to be tried next week.
'It (the case) will next be back in court on the 28th of July for me to be given an update. We are going to find you a trial date as soon as we can. We will do it as soon as possible.'
In a statement issued shortly after his death, Leo's family said: 'We want everyone to know what an amazing, kind, loving boy Leo was.
'Not only has Leo's life been taken, all of our lives have as well. Leo will be truly missed by all of us. He was loved so much by everyone.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
41 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘My mission is to make him so angry:' E Jean Carroll reveals plans for her $83m judgement against the president
E Jean Carroll, the woman who beat President Donald Trump in two separate court cases, has vowed to make him 'so mad' by spending her multimillion-dollar windfall on 'things that Trump hates.' In 2019, Carroll accused the commander-in-chief of raping her in the changing rooms of New York's Bergdorf Goodman department store in 1996, resulting in a civil case in 2023 in which he was found liable for sexual abuse and ordered to pay her $5m in compensation. She then sued him again for defamation after he repeatedly protested his innocence and denied knowing her, which resulted in a jury awarding her an astonishing $83.3 million payout in early 2024. A U.S. appeals court last week rejected Trump's attempt to overturn the first verdict. He is still appealing the second, claiming presidential immunity. Carroll, 81, is currently promoting a new book, "Not My Type," a title taken from the president's notorious slur against her. She told Newsweek that she's setting up a charitable foundation in her own name to manage the money and distribute donations to anti-Trump causes. 'My mission is to make him so angry and so mad by taking this $83.3 million and giving it to things that Trump hates. That's what I'm doing,' she explained. Carroll specifically said she would direct her capital to areas like 'women's reproductive rights, binding up the wounds that he's inflicting on democracy and shoring up voting rights.' The former columnist told Newsweek that she found it 'stunning' that Trump had won last November's presidential election after a year of blockbuster indictments and court hearings outlining his long track record of troubling behavior. She said the outcome left her with little choice but to conclude: 'People don't believe women when they're saying one thing and a very, very powerful man is saying something else.' Carroll said she retains 'complete, 100 percent faith' in the legal system as a corrective to executive overreach and corruption, but urged people, particularly women, to continue protesting against the administration in the streets. ' Women have the power. We just have to realize it. We hold, as they say, the purse strings,' she said. Shockingly, the writer also revealed that she is not taking any chances when it comes to her own safety, given the recent wave of political violence in America, and sleeps at night alongside a Mossberg shotgun she has nicknamed 'Aphrodite,' after the Greek goddess of love, and two guard dogs. Not My Type is about her experiences taking on Trump in Manhattan federal courtrooms, an experience she described as 'comedy gold' and which she said she was able to recollect thanks to the voice-accurate notes she recorded after each day's session as reminders, as well as the official court transcripts. Carroll described the transcripts as 'probably the most comedic script ever written since Jonathan Swift published Gulliver's Travels ' and said she relished observing and describing Trump's defense lawyers, particularly the fashion-conscious Alina Habba and the hulking Joe Tacopina, noting the latter was 'built like Popeye' with 'glittering eyes.' 'The whole thing to me was like a high comedy,' she said.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Race and lack of accountability involved in Child Q strip search, tribunal hears
Race and lack of accountability are at the heart of why and how a 15 year-old black girl was strip-searched at school by police after being wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis was handled, a misconduct hearing has been told. The degree of failures surrounding the 'grossly disproportionate search', allegedly without an appropriate adult present, meant the Metropolitan Police officers did not look to protect a potentially vulnerable child, according to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Their actions could possibly undermine public trust and confidence in the police, the IOPC warned. The girl, known as Child Q, was strip searched by officers in Hackney, east London, on December 3 2020. She arrived for a mock exam smelling of cannabis and was taken to the medical room to be strip-searched while teachers remained outside. This involved the removal of her clothing including underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body while she was menstruating, the panel heard. Trainee detective constable (TDC) Kristina Linge, Pc Victoria Wray and Pc Rafal Szmydynski, who were all police constables at the time, all deny gross misconduct over their treatment of the girl. In closing submissions Elliot Gold, for the IOPC, said discrimination is not the sole ground the panel needs to consider, but added: 'The issue of race provides you with the only explanation that is left as to why the officers' failures were so great and why so much went wrong and the only explanation as to why it all went so badly.' He told the tribunal panel in south-east London, who could consider sacking the officers if gross misconduct is proved: 'The resolution of this case should primarily be forward-facing. 'It is about preventing similar misconduct from recurring in the future, with the consequent damage to trust and confidence in the police, especially within the black community, which these events have caused.' He added: 'This case shows, that members of racial groups need protection from conduct driven by unrecognised or unconscious bias as much as from conscious and deliberate discrimination.' Mr Gold also noted 'there are almost no contemporaneous documents or records of this case – why? That's because it is the officers who failed to make them.' No drugs were found by the teachers before the school's safeguarding deputy called police. They were called amid fears Child Q could have been carrying drugs for someone, being exploited or groomed in the community – which meant it was a safeguarding issue for her and other school pupils. Mr Gold said 'there is a potential evidential conflict as to whether the teachers were insistent there should be a search'. He added: 'There may be criticism of the school calling the police for advice on a safeguarding matter but that shows they did not know what to do, rather than being insistent (on a search) it shows uncertainty.' Child Q's mother, who was described as a 'supportive' parent, was not present during the strip search and neither was any appropriate adult. Mr Gold said that 'simply being questioned by two police officers, two white police officers for a young black girl may be daunting.' Mr Gold said: 'No adult was present to assist child Q during this time – whether during the conversation with child to decide on the search, when the decision was made to perform a search or when the decision was made to perform a strip search.' PC Linge told Child Q she would be arrested if she failed to consent to being searched, the panel heard. Child Q told the two officers who searched her that she was menstruating, but the search continued during which her sanitary pad was exposed, the panel was told. When no drugs were found after the strip search, Child Q's hair was also scoured. When Child Q said she was on her period this was 'a new piece of evidence' for the officers and it was a chance for the officers to consider the proportionality of what they were doing, according to the IOPC. Within days of the strip search, Child Q had gone to her doctor with symptoms of anxiety. Mr Gold went through a series of doctors' notes including one which suggested Child Q had the 'appearance of symptoms of anxiety consistent with PTSD'. He added: 'No one is likely to suggest that Child Q was anything other than distressed and shaken by a traumatic episode.' According to the allegations, Pcs Linge and Szmydynski performed a search that exposed the girl's intimate parts when this was 'disproportionate in all the circumstances'. Pcs Linge and Wray are also accused of performing or allowing the search in a manner which was 'unjustified, inappropriate, disproportionate, humiliating and degrading'. It is alleged that all of this happened without authorisation, in the absence of an appropriate adult, and with no adequate concern being given to Child Q's age, sex, or the need to treat her as a child, and that the child's race was an effective cause of this. Pcs Szmydynski and Linge are further accused of giving a 'misleading record' of the search afterwards. Outrage over Child Q's treatment led to protests outside Stoke Newington Police Station. Scotland Yard has previously apologised over the incident.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Inmate died after ‘restraint-related' incident in prison, inquest hears
A home office doctor has warned jurors about the 'complex' restraint-related death of a father-of-four prisoner, an inquest heard. Azroy Dawes-Clarke, 28, from Romford, east London, was an inmate at HMP Elmley, on the Isle of Sheppey, when he died after suffering multiple cardiac arrests on November 10 2021. He is alleged to have attempted to commit suicide by suffocation before becoming violent and being 'restrained' by prison staff. The medical cause of death has been given as hypoxic ischemic brain injury but it is unclear when and by whom that injury was caused. On Wednesday, Home Office forensic pathologist Dr Olaf Biedrzycki told jurors at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court in Maidstone that medically, Mr Dawes-Clarke's case was 'about as difficult as it gets' for him. He said: 'The cause of death is given as hypoxic ischemic brain injury that's due to either the fact that his heart or lungs stopped working … and that happened very quickly after a period of third-party restraint, which happened shortly after seizure-like activity, which was treated with Diazepam. 'That all followed compression of the neck with a ligature.' There had been a previous incident where Mr Dawes-Clarke had attempted to self-harm or commit suicide two days before his death, the court heard. Body-worn camera footage taken in HMP Elmley and shown in court showed four officers kneeling on and next to Mr Dawes-Clarke, who was face down on the floor prior to his first cardiac arrest. He could be heard yelling repeatedly while restrained, until he was handcuffed and then went limp. One officer was heard saying, 'Have we got a pulse on him? We're not sure if he's breathing, we're not sure', as Mr Dawes-Clarke lay on the floor. Medical staff began CPR before he was taken to hospital, he suffered two more cardiac arrests in the ambulance and a fourth upon his arrival at hospital, where he died soon after. Dr Biedrzycki added that the 'crux' of the inquest would be whether Mr Dawes-Clarke recovered between the suicide attempt and the restraint from prison officers. 'The restraint element is of greater importance if you conclude that the initial ligature compression did not actually cause him to be unconscious and fitting,' he added. Mr Dawes-Clarke's alleged history of self-harm and suicide attempts whilst in prison was not known to the family; he also had several physical health conditions that required ongoing treatment, the court heard. His mother, Marcia Neil, was indignant through tears as she told the court: 'Maybe if they'd phoned me, I could have helped!' Reading a pen portrait, his sister, Shay Inico, said: 'My brother was more than just family; he was my anchor, my confidant, and my unwavering source of support. He was kind-hearted and compassionate, always putting the needs of others before his own. 'Losing him in such a senseless and cruel manner has completely shattered me. The thought of him being restrained, suffering and treated without dignity haunts me every single day.' Father-of-four Mr Dawes-Clarke liked fantasy films and played semi-professional football, he was in the Arsenal FC academy while he was growing up. 'I share this statement because my brother's story deserves to be heard. He was a person full of love, kindness, and potential. He was not defined by his circumstances, and he deserved so much more than the injustice he faced. His life mattered, and his memory will forever remain in our hearts,' said Ms Inico. On Wednesday, his mother, sister and uncle were in court to observe proceedings, and his brother appeared via video-link. Mr Dawes-Clarke was recalled to HMP Elmley on April 23 2020 after breaching his license. 'Where restraint-related deaths do occur, they're invariably erroneously complex cases,' Dr Biedrzycki warned jurors. He added: 'This is about as difficult as it gets for forensic pathologists, and I don't have all the answers.' The inquest continues and is listed until July 11.
