Final legislative roundup includes health care, absenteeism and school accountability
The Indiana House voted on dozens of bills on the last day of the legislative session, April 24, 2025. (Niki Kelly/Indiana Capital Chronicle)
One-hundred-and-seven days after the General Assembly convened, this year's legislative session came to a close early Friday morning after a marathon day at the Statehouse.
Dozens of bills sprinted across the finish line in the final days — and hours — before the sine die gavel strike brought policymaking business to a close.
Thursday alone saw more than two dozen proposals sent to Gov. Mike Braun's desk.
And although the next state two-year state budget was the highlight of the night, debate swirled around other major bills, too, including those dealing with education 'deregulation,' pharmaceutical pricing and public retiree bonuses.
Lawmakers also compromised on measures to connect Hoosiers to broadband; curb local energy project moratoriums; address K-12 chronic absenteeism; reinstate an A-F school grading system; and create separate bans on marijuana advertising and lab-cultivated meat.
Tensions rose in the Senate before the chamber voted, barely, to send a Republican-backed education 'deregulation' measure to the governor.
Heated debate on House Enrolled Act 1002 centered around last-minute conference committee changes, which included a dozen new code repeals.
Sen. Mike Young, R-Indianapolis, was displeased with the rush to approve a long bill with new language.
'I can't be in the dang room because I don't know what's in it,' Young said.
After the extremely narrow 27-21 vote, he approached the floor mic again — this time raising his voice.
'This is bull crap. You've got a 116-page bill. You've got 30 minutes to read it. We should have more time than that,' said Young, the only senator to refrain from voting. Twelve of his GOP colleagues cast unfavorable votes alongside Democrats. That's after the House voted the bill out 61-25.
'I am so mad about this,' Young continued. 'Our one job is to do what's right for our constituents, and we can't do it if we don't have a chance to read the dang bill.'
Democrats, including Indianapolis Sen. Andrea Hunley, agreed that the bill required 'a little bit more scrutiny.'
She referenced a repealed requirement for charter schools to publish economic interest statements. Also removed was an existing requirement for administrators to contact employment references before hiring teachers or other school personnel.
Despite its length, the legislation will strike multiple sections of current state education code.
This is bull crap. You've got a 116-page bill. You've got 30 minutes to read it. We should have more time than that.
– Sen. Mike Young, R-Indianapolis
Examples include the removal of dozens of 'may' provisions, eliminating specific COVID-19 pandemic requirements and striking duplicate code. Republican bill author Rep. Bob Behning estimated that the cuts would reduce state education regulations by nearly 10%.
There were bipartisan concerns earlier in the session about the bill's deletion of existing requirements for teachers to complete training in social and emotional learning (SEL) trauma-informed care and cultural competency.
Some of that language was added back in the final version to ensure teachers are prepared to '(support) students who have experienced trauma that may interfere with a student's academic functioning.'
Other legislation to further address widespread chronic school absences among Hoosier students earned mostly bipartisan support in both chambers; an 84-8 vote in the House and a 48-2 in the Senate.
Sen. Stacey Donato's Senate Enrolled Act 482 specifically seeks to beef up the state's absenteeism statute.
The measure has multiple parts, including a new definition in state code for chronically absent, specified in the bill as missing 10% or more of the school year, regardless of whether it is excused. Another provision allows local prosecuting attorneys to hold 'intervention meetings' with parents to help improve a student's attendance before any legal action is taken.
A final section of the bill prohibits K-8 students from expulsion 'solely because the student is chronically absent or habitually truant. Current law permits students in those grades to be expelled for missing too much school.
Indiana officials say chronic absenteeism rates are improving, but there's still more work ahead
In the final days of the session, however, a conference committee added language to sunset the expulsion prohibition on July 1, 2026. After that date, students could be removed from school once again if they miss too many days of class.
The latest attendance numbers released by the Indiana Department of Education last fall reported that 17.8% of K-12 students — roughly 219,00 kids — were 'chronically absent' during the most recent 2023-24 school year, meaning they missed at least 18 days.
There was less consensus on a different bill to bring back a statewide letter grade system for Indiana's K-12 schools. It was sent straight to Braun after a quick 65-25 House vote.
Earlier this week, lawmakers appeared to disagree on a final draft of House Enrolled Act 1498. Any serious conflicts were quashed behind closed doors; Rep. Bob Behning, R-Indianapolis, called his measure for a final concurrence vote in the House Thursday evening, signaling a truce with the opposing Senate chamber.
Behning said his bill seeks to put the state education board's recently unveiled accountability draft — or something like it — into action.
In its final form, the legislation will strip back much of the previous accountability framework and task Indiana's State Board of Education (SBOE) with building a new A-F rule — that looks beyond just academic performance and graduation rates — by the end of 2025.
Once approved by the governor, a new round of grades will be assigned to Hoosier schools around the start of the 2026-27 academic year.
Although the state board is responsible for hammering out the particulars, the bill does require the new grading system's methodology to be based on data from the state education department's existing GPS dashboard and proficiency rates from state assessments, including the IREAD. It also has to prioritize students earning new diploma seals recently approved by the state board.
Yes, we certainly should hold people accountable. We should hold school leaders accountable. We should hold our children accountable. We should hold our parents accountable. But I don't think we should give them a label of an F (to show) that you're failing.
– Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary
School grades have been effectively suspended since 2018, when Indiana shifted from ISTEP to a new state standardized test and later grappled with the COVID-19 pandemic.
House Democrats 'still had a problem' with the final draft, said Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary.
'We do feel like we need to look at our school accountability process, but we don't feel like we need to hold the Department of Education accountable for using the model of A through F,' he said.
'Yes, we certainly should hold people accountable. We should hold school leaders accountable. We should hold our children accountable. We should hold our parents accountable. But I don't think we should give them a label of an F (to show) that you're failing,' Smith continued, saying he preferred an earlier idea to give schools a 'need for improvement' designation, rather than a 'bad' letter grade. 'I just don't think that we need to do this.'
A bid to boost Indiana's electricity supply — by side-stepping often-hostile local zoning authorities — squeaked through to the governor despite opposition from advocates of local control and renewable energy.
A negotiated compromise for Senate Enrolled Act 425 just barely earned the constitutionally required majority of supportive votes during a 51-40 vote in the House. It enjoyed stronger margins in the Senate, with a 31-19 tally.
Under the legislation, the owner of a proposed power plant wouldn't have to seek any local zoning approval in certain circumstances. But the Senate explicitly excluded solar and wind installations.
Rep. Matt Pierce, D-Bloomington, said it's ironic that a small modular nuclear reactor — 'which uses radioactive fuel and will generate radioactive waste' — would encounter less local scrutiny than solar panels and wind turbines.
'It's not consistent with the rhetoric that we hear on this floor all the time about how we are an 'all the above' energy state,' Pierce added.
The measure's House sponsor, Rep. Ed Soliday, has maintained the Senate wouldn't allow it.
'There was just no hope of putting it back in,' he said Wednesday. '… We went back to them several times and they said 'no.''
The eased requirements apply if a project is located on land that already hosts an electric generation facility — even it's not operational — or a former mine. State regulators would also have to either grant a certificate of public convenience and necessity for construction or decline jurisdiction.
Senate Enrolled Act 425 also aims to stop 'abuse' of moratoriums on electric generation projects by local authorities. It caps them to one year and prohibits renewals.
'I've seen how moratoriums can be abused,' Rep. Kendell Culp, R-Rensselaer, said Monday.
He argued the 'real purpose' of moratorium is to create a 'pause' while a local government hurries to adopt an ordinance. But some keep moving the 'goal posts.'
'If there's a certain type of development your jurisdiction does not want, then just say 'no' upfront and save all the headache,' Culp said.
Additionally, lab-cultivated meat could soon be banned from production or sale in Indiana for two years with violators to face $10,000 per-day fines.
That's if Braun approves of House Enrolled Act 1425, which is coming his way after final votes of 74-15 in the House and 43-7.
But a state study of the products' safety was shelved as lawmakers look to cut spending.
'We were supposed to have a study, I guess to determine what we would do after the moratorium, and apparently the fiscal people said we're broke, so take the study out,' Pierce said. 'So it makes me wonder what we're going to actually be learning in the next two years.'
The Senate introduced the study and a one-year moratorium following pronounced confusion in that chamber's committee. In addition to cutting the study, the final version of the legislation extends the moratorium to two years.
In another governor-bound proposal, those advertising marijuana within state lines could face fines of up to $15,000 apiece under a once-inconspicuous agency bill.
Also in the co-opted House Enrolled Act 1390 — originally focused on the Bureau of Motor Vehicles — are contentious regulations for towing and overgrown rural intersections.
The advertising ban would also apply to the rest of Indiana's Schedule I list of controlled substances. Contracts locked down before the measure's passage would be exempt. Hoosiers who live around the edges of the state have seen billboards and other advertising pop up because adjoining states have legalized marijuana.
Other provisions would set standards for how law enforcement agencies handle their towing contractors, how much companies can charge for emergency towing, how owners can recover their towed vehicles and more.
CONTACT US
Both concepts landed in the final bill draft after being stripped out three weeks ago. In between, they were added to a bill about the sale of utility trailers and then removed.
Lawmakers also folded in a weaker take on a tragedy-sparked push for better sightlines at overgrown, uncontrolled rural intersections. Counties would be able to mow or maintain vegetation in state- or county-owned right-of-way with permission from the Indiana Department of Transportation. The onus was previously on landowners.
The legislation retained plenty of Bureau of Motor Vehicles changes, too.
It would allow the agency to issue electronic registration certificates, requires that toll road operators invoice drivers within a year, caps the amount private driving skills trainers can charge for exams, and more. One other provision allows for real-time electronic insurance verification after accidents. The current system is unwieldy and often results in license suspensions.
It eased through the House in an 81-9 vote, but encountered greater opposition in the Senate's 31-19 vote.
Large numbers of Hoosiers will now be carved out of a bill regulating pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs. Senate Enrolled Act 140 will require insurers and PBMs ensure network adequacy and restricts anticompetitive practices — but Medicaid, managed care organizations and the state employee health plan are all exempt due to concerns about cost increases.
Instead, the issue of contracting under Medicaid and the state employee health plan is punted to an interim study committee — though at least one sponsor said it was 'kind of up to debate' whether or not there would be an added cost.
'We don't have a fully transparent model. So the fact that there could be a fiscal on it — and with this current budget situation — that's what's putting the pause on it,' said Rep. Julie McGuire, R-Indianapolis, before a Thursday committee.
A bill seeking to define a 'squatter' encountered several hurdles this session, too, with critics concerned about whether vague language would unintentionally harm tenants with informal or unwritten rental agreements.
Under the finalized Senate Enrolled Act 157, law enforcement officers can remove an individual on a property without the permission of the owner within 48 hours, unless there is 'credible evidence that the person is not a squatter.'
It would also penalize someone who tries to evict someone who might have a right to the property.
'We don't want an unscrupulous landlord to be able to use the wrong date or something very simple like that as a means to abuse this part of the code,' said Rep. Joanna King from the floor.
Still, the changes weren't enough for a handful of lawmakers. Pierce, a Democrat who voted no, previously indicated his doubts that such a law was necessary.
However, it got a unanimous nod in the Senate — its originating chamber — and now goes to the governor.
Indiana's public sector retirees are set to get a coveted bonus by October under legislation on its way to Braun — but with a 5% discount.
The thousands of former state and local employees who live off pension benefits that don't keep up with inflation would've gotten nothing after Senate edits. But they would've won several years worth of full-amount bonuses through the original version of House Enrolled Act 1221.
'The 5% cut, it's not what we wanted. One year is not what we wanted. But, we live to … advocate for another day,' said Rep. Greg Porter, D-Indianapolis.
'This is the spot we landed on to preserve something,' Rep. Mike Karickhoff, R-Kokomo, told the Indiana Capital Chronicle after the 90-0 vote. He authored the legislation.
The 13th check would range from $143 to $428, based on years of service for former teachers; excise, conservation and gaming officers; and most other retirees. That's instead of the typical $150 to $450 range. Former Indiana State Police employees would get checks for 0.95% — instead of 1% — of their maximum annual pension amounts.
The bonuses would cost about $31.8 million, with the 5% cut saving about $1.7 million. That's according to an earlier fiscal analysis, which estimated the full-amount bonuses would've totaled $33.5 million in the 2026 fiscal year.
Others were dissatisfied, arguing that a dismal revenue forecast shouldn't affect the checks. They're paid out of supplemental reserve accounts — featuring money from retirees themselves and employer matches — not the General Fund.
Pierce accused the Senate of 'insisting' on the cut to 'send a message' of fiscal responsibility. He called it a 'kick in the teeth.'
In the Senate, however, the 39-11 vote featured opposition exclusively from worried Republicans.
'The math is not math-ing,' said Sen. Aaron Freeman, R-Indianapolis.
Under one of the final bills approved this session, a whopping $870 million in federal incentives could be on the way to help Indiana connect its last 150,000 Hoosiers to high-speed internet. That's if the state's own service providers don't get in the way, though.
'Number-one obstructionist': Electricity co-ops lambasted for slow broadband rollout
Lawmakers' attempt to mediate utility pole attachment disputes between electric utilities and telecommunications companies crossed the legislative finish line Thursday night, after languishing on the Senate's calendar for four days.
'Obviously, I passed on this bill a lot of times,' Sen. Andy Zay, R-Huntington, told his colleagues. 'I had a lot of consternation whether … it was time for this.'
Senate Enrolled Act 502 would give both sides a 60-day deadline to meet after a government broadband grant contract is executed. They'd have four months to reach a project management agreement after the National Telecommunications Information Administration approves the Indiana Broadband Office's proposal for spending the federal Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) money.
It also sets detailed deadlines for cooperation if they can't concur. And the office could set up a 'rapid response mediation process' when disputes arise — pulling back from the hefty fines previously considered.
That's the compromise lawmakers reached in the House after several rounds of edits. Zay filed a motion to concur with that chamber's changes, but waited to call it for a vote.
'I wasn't certain whether to bring it forward this year or wait until next year when we're in the throes of the BEAD program,' he confessed.
Ultimately, he decided that having 'this process in place will be a great start as implementation hopefully begins later this year,' adding that lawmakers could simply adjust it next year if needed.
Zay's proposal sailed through the Senate on a concurrence for of 47-2. It heads to Braun for final approval.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Musk could lose billions of dollars depending on how spat with Trump unfolds
NEW YORK (AP) — The world's richest man could lose billions in his fight with world's most powerful politician. The feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump could mean Tesla's plans for self-driving cars hit a roadblock, SpaceX flies fewer missions for NASA, Starlink gets fewer overseas satellite contracts and the social media platform X loses advertisers. Maybe, that is. It all depends on Trump's appetite for revenge and how the dispute unfolds. Joked Telemetry Insight auto analyst Sam Abuelsamid, 'Since Trump has no history of retaliating against perceived adversaries, he'll probably just let this pass.' Turning serious, he sees trouble ahead for Musk. 'For someone that rants so much about government pork, all of Elon's businesses are extremely dependent on government largesse, which makes him vulnerable.' Trump and the federal government also stand to lose from a long-running dispute, but not as much as Musk. The dispute comes just a week before a planned test of Tesla's driverless taxis in Austin, Texas, a major event for the company because sales of its EVs are lagging in many markets, and Musk needs a win. Trump can mess things up for Tesla by encouraging federal safety regulators to step in at any sign of trouble for the robotaxis. Even before the war of words broke out on Thursday, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration requested data on how Musk's driverless, autonomous taxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request follows an investigation last year into 2.4 million Teslas equipped with full self-driving software after several accidents, including one that killed a pedestrian. A spokesman for NHTSA said the probe was ongoing and that the agency 'will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' The Department of Justice has also probed the safety of Tesla cars, but the status of that investigation is unclear. The DOJ did not respond immediately to requests for comment. The promise of a self-driving future led by Tesla inspired shareholders to boost the stock by 50% in the weeks after Musk confirmed the Austin rollout. But on Thursday, the stock plunged more than 14% amid the Trump-Musk standoff. On Friday, it recovered a bit, bouncing back nearly 4%. 'Tesla's recent rise was almost entirely driven by robotaxi enthusiasm,' said Morningstar analyst Seth Goldstein. 'Elon's feud with Trump could be a negative.' One often-overlooked but important part of Tesla's business that could take a hit is its sales of carbon credits. As Musk and Trump were slugging it out Thursday, Republican senators inserted new language into Trump's budget bill that would eliminate fines for gas-powered cars that fall short of fuel economy standards. Tesla has a thriving side business selling 'regulatory credits' to other automakers to make up for their shortfalls. Musk has downplayed the importance of the credits business, but the changes would hurt Tesla as it reels from boycotts of its cars tied to Musk's time working for Trump. Credit sales jumped by a third to $595 million in the first three months of the year even as total revenue slumped. Musk's foray into right-wing politics cost Tesla sales among the environmentally minded consumers who embraced electric cars and led to boycotts of Tesla showrooms. If Musk has indeed ended his close association with Trump, those buyers could come back, but that's far from certain. Meanwhile, one analyst speculated earlier this year that Trump voters in so-called red counties could buy Teslas 'in a meaningful way.' But he's now less hopeful. 'There are more questions than answers following Thursday developments,' TD Cowen's Itay Michaeli wrote in his latest report, 'and it's still too early to determine any lasting impacts.' Michaeli's stock target for Tesla earlier this year was $388. He has since lowered it to $330. Tesla was trading Friday at $300. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Trump said Thursday that he could cut government contracts to Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, a massive threat to a company that has received billions of federal dollars. The privately held company that is reportedly worth $350 billion provides launches, sends astronauts into space for NASA and has a contract to send a team from the space agency to the moon next year. But if Musk has a lot to lose, so does the U.S. SpaceX is the only U.S. company capable of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. The other alternative is politically dicey: depending wholly on Russia's Soyuz capsules. Musk knew all this when he shot back at Trump that SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft. But it is unclear how serious his threat was. Several hours later — in a reply to another X user — he said he wouldn't do it. A subsidiary of SpaceX, the satellite internet company Starlink, appears to also have benefited from Musk's once-close relationship with the president. Musk announced that Saudi Arabia had approved Starlink for some services during a trip with Trump in the Middle East last month. The company has also won a string of other recent deals in Bangladesh, Pakistan, India and elsewhere as Trump has threatened tariffs. It's not clear how much politics played a role, and how much is pure business. On Friday, The Associated Press confirmed that India had approved a key license to Starlink. At least 40% of India's more than 1.4 billion people have no access to the internet. Big advertisers that fled X after Musk welcomed all manner of conspiracy theories to the social media platform have started to trickle back in recent months, possibly out of fear of a conservative backlash. Musk has called their decision to leave an 'illegal boycott' and sued them, and the Trump administration recently weighed in with a Federal Trade Commission probe into possible coordination among them. Now advertisers may have to worry about a different danger. If Trump sours on X, 'there's a risk that it could again become politically radioactive for major brands,' said Sarah Kreps, a political scientist at Cornell University. She added, though, that an 'exodus isn't obvious, and it would depend heavily on how the conflict escalates, how long it lasts and how it ends.' ___ Associated Press Writer Barbara Ortutay in San Francisco contributed to this report.


Boston Globe
35 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Buildup to a meltdown: How the Trump-Musk alliance collapsed
Papers in that file showed that Trump's nominee to run NASA — a close associate of Musk's — had donated to prominent Democrats in recent years, including some who Trump was learning about for the first time. The president set his outrage aside and mustered through the public farewell, with both men praising each other and saying their relationship would continue. But as soon as the cameras left the Oval Office, the president confronted Musk. Trump started to read some of the donations out loud, shaking his head and pointing out several of the most recent ones in the file. This was not good, the president said — an early signal of the simmering tensions between the two men that would explode into the open less than a week later. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Musk, who was sporting a black eye, which he blamed on a tussle with his young son, tried to explain. He said his friend Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur who was set to become the next NASA administrator, cared about getting things done. Yes, he had donated to Democrats, but so had a lot of people. Advertisement Maybe it's a good thing, Musk told the president — it shows that you're willing to hire people of all stripes. But Trump was unmoved. He said that people don't change. These are the types of people who will turn, he said, and it won't end up being good for us. Advertisement Musk was anxious about mounting a vigorous defense of Isaacman with other people around, including Sergio Gor, director of the presidential personnel office who has clashed with Musk over nominees. Musk believed that he would be able to talk to the president after the gathering, privately. But later that day, Trump decided he would withdraw Isaacman from consideration to run NASA, dealing a blow to Musk, who had worked to place a top associate in charge of the agency most important to SpaceX, his rocket business. Musk spent the next day trying to salvage Isaacman's nomination, to no avail. Musk was stunned by the timing. This account of the crumbling relationship between the president and Trump is based on interviews with 13 people with direct knowledge of the events, all of whom asked for anonymity to describe private discussions. On Thursday, less than a week after the confrontation in the Oval Office, an extraordinary political alliance exploded, with Trump and Musk hurling insults at one another on social media. The feud culminated in threats from the president to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts with Musk's companies, and Musk claiming there were references to the president in government documents about Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender. Musk indicated his support for the president's impeachment. By Thursday evening, Musk signaled he would be open to de-escalating the fight, while the president seemed to have little interest in an immediate reconciliation. Late Thursday, Musk backed off a threat to 'immediately' decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which transports NASA astronauts and supplies to and from the International Space Station. A short time later, when Bill Ackman, the hedge-fund billionaire, posted on social media that the two men 'should make peace for the benefit of our great country,' Musk responded, 'You're not wrong.' Advertisement Over the past several months, Musk saw his standing in the administration diminish. He angered the president by planning to attend a sensitive briefing about China at the Pentagon, one the president learned about from a New York Times report. He also sparred with Cabinet officials and top Trump aides, and criticized the president's tariffs. The president had grown more distant from a man with whom he had once seemed inseparable. One point of contention between the men was the president's signature domestic policy bill. Musk spent several days assailing the bill on X, his social media platform, furious because he said it would undo his work to cut government spending. He also suggested that he would support efforts ahead of next year's midterm elections to unseat Republicans who backed the bill. But it was the decision to pull Isaacman's nomination that people close to both men said had accelerated the end of the relationship. For Musk, there were few positions across the thousands in the federal government that mattered more than the head of NASA, because of its crucial importance to SpaceX. So it was of great personal benefit to Musk when Trump chose Isaacman, who has flown to space twice with SpaceX, to oversee the agency. For weeks, Senate Republican leadership had been under pressure from the White House to expedite his nomination, despite concerns from some Republican lawmakers about his past donations. The president, a White House aide told leaders, was fine with those donations, and the leadership should be as well. Advertisement After Trump withdrew Isaacman's nomination, Musk, his allies, and even some White House officials pinned the blame on Gor, believing he intentionally sabotaged Isaacman as Musk was on his way out. Gor and Musk had clashed several times early in Trump's second term, including at two Cabinet meetings, where Musk questioned how swiftly Gor was moving to fill the top ranks of agencies. By Friday morning, White House officials said Trump was planning to sell the red Tesla he said he had purchased in March in a show of support for Musk.


The Hill
44 minutes ago
- The Hill
Musk empire faces risks with Trump feud
The Big Story Elon Musk, the world's richest man, may have made himself an enemy of the world's most powerful leader. © Evan Vucci, Associated Press The public blowout between Musk and President Trump is threatening the tech billionaire's businesses, some of which have billions of dollars' worth of federal contracts. Musk's aerospace company SpaceX alone reportedly has at least $22 billion in federal contracts — which Trump had threatened to revoke at the peak of his feud with his former adviser. 'Trump goes after people, companies and organizations he doesn't like,' said Peter Loge, a political science professor at George Washington University and former senior FDA adviser during the Obama administration. 'As a real estate developer, politician and president, he has used every tool at his disposal to punish people he thinks have wronged him,' Loge added. 'Unless Musk expresses contrition, Trump is likely to hurt him in every way he can think of. If Musk is contrite, he can be welcomed back into the Trump tent.' While the two could reconcile in the future, observers agree the dramatic turn of events leaves Musk's business empire vulnerable to Trump's wrath. Trump, at one point during Thursday's back-and-forth, threatened to cut Musk's government contracts as he called his former adviser 'crazy.' 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Musk, in turn, said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is responsible for ferrying astronauts and cargo to and from the International Space Station. He later backed off, after an X user urged him to 'cool off and take a step back.' The public exchange underscored how Musk's business ventures could get caught in the crosshairs of any feud with the president, who is known to have a proclivity for retribution. 'If this turns into a hot war, certainly, the consequences for Musk's business relationship with the federal government could be in peril, or at least significantly complicated,' said GOP strategist and Trump campaign alum Brian Seitchik. Read more in a full report Saturday morning at Welcome to The Hill's Technology newsletter, we're Miranda Nazzaro and Julia Shapero — tracking the latest moves from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the tech sector now and in the future: Grassley to Trump, Musk: Listen to my wife and stop fighting Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) delivered a stern message to President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk on Friday amid their dramatic fallout — a message from Grassley's wife, that is. 'I just heard Barbara Grassley say this disagreement and arguments btwn musk and Trump must end I know she loves both musk and Pres Trump,' the 91-year-old senator wrote on social platform X, using his notable shorthand and … World Liberty Financial to invest in Trump meme coin following crypto wallet dispute World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture launched by President Trump and his sons, plans to invest in the president's meme coin, seemingly resolving a dispute between the two crypto firms tied to the Trump family. Eric Trump — who helps run World Liberty Financial alongside Donald Trump Jr. — announced Friday that the $TRUMP token had 'aligned' with the company and would no longer being moving forward with a crypto wallet, … Musk-Trump, from fast friends to breaking up: A timeline President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk's alliance formed with swift and intense speed less than a year ago. It devolved just as quickly this week. Their relationship abruptly imploded in a matter of days, as a simmering feud boiled over and spilled out in public between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful leader. Just last week, Trump presented a ceremonial key to Musk at the White House. … The Refresh News we've flagged from the intersection of tech and other topics: Crypto Corner Trump-tied crypto firms resolve wallet dispute © AP Photo/Altaf Qadri Welcome to Crypto Corner, a daily feature focused on digital currency and its outlook in Washington. World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture launched by President Trump and his sons, plans to invest in the president's meme coin, seemingly resolving a dispute between the two crypto firms tied to the Trump family. Eric Trump — who helps run World Liberty Financial alongside Donald Trump Jr. — announced Friday the $TRUMP token had 'aligned' with the company and would no longer being moving forward with a crypto wallet, which had caused the rift between the two firms. 'Although their meme wallet isn't moving forward, they remain focused on building the most exciting MEME on earth – $Trump,' Eric Trump wrote in a post on X. 'Moreover, we're proud to announce that World Liberty Financial plans to acquire a substantial position in $TRUMP for their Long-Term Treasury,' he continued. 'We share a bigger vision for crypto, patriotism, and long-term success. Stay tuned for more to come!' The team behind the meme coin initially announced Tuesday that they were launching a crypto wallet alongside Magic Eden, a nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace. However, the announcement sparked confusion as the president's sons denied involvement in the project. World Liberty Financial reportedly sent cease-and-desist letters to both Magic Eden and Fight Fight Fight, the company behind $TRUMP, over the wallet, according to Bloomberg. However, the two firms appeared to have resolved their differences Friday. 'The Trump meme and WLFI may be different lanes, but they share the same highway. Same values, same mission—amplifying American strength through innovation,' World Liberty Financial said in a post. What Others are Reading Two key stories on The Hill right now: Abrego Garcia to return to US to face charges The Trump administration has moved to return Kilmar Abrego Garcia from imprisonment in a Salvadoran facility in order to file a criminal case against … Read more Hegseth could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions on Qatari jet, says Raskin The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee has warned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that he could be 'on the hook' for hundreds of millions … Read more What Others are Reading Opinions related to tech submitted to The Hill: You're all caught up. See you next week! Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here