logo
Calls for Scotland-wide seagull summit amid warnings someone could be killed

Calls for Scotland-wide seagull summit amid warnings someone could be killed

Former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross, who called a debate on the issue at Holyrood, warned that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'nuisance' gulls.
Fellow Tory Rachael Hamilton said a nationwide summit must be held to tackle the issue as she warned that Scots are being left 'scared, attacked and traumatised'.
Agriculture minister Jim Fairlie had already promised to hold a seagull summit in the north of Scotland but Ms Hamilton, who represents the south of Scotland, said a summit for the whole country is needed.
The Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP said 'aggressive' seagulls had attacked seven children in one month last year in Eyemouth, with one girl 'left with gashes to her scalp and blood running down her face'.
She called for action on the 'growing nuisance', which she said posed a health and safety risk to residents.
Despite rising complaints from locals, though, she said NatureScot's licensing system to control the birds was bureaucratic and failing to solve the issue.
'I think we need a summit,' she said. 'I don't think we just need a summit in Moray, we need a summit across Scotland.'
Ms Hamilton said the debate was 'important' as she criticised what she said was a lack of action from the Scottish Government.
She told MSPs: 'Absolutely nothing is getting done. I don't believe the Government are listening to us because the issue continues in my constituency in Eyemouth.
'Aggressive seagull behaviour continues to cause a real concern amongst businesses, amongst tourists, amongst everybody that has anything to do along the harbour.
'And it is not just a seasonal nuisance. It is a serious, growing health risk. It's a safety risk, particularly for children and elderly residents.'
She said one business owner had described the situation as 'people being scared, attacked and traumatised'.
NatureScot and the SNP have ignored this problem for far too long.
I'm bringing forward a debate in Parliament today to demand action to control the menace of gulls in our communities. pic.twitter.com/W85WB2ZeAC
— Douglas Ross MSP (@Douglas4Moray) June 26, 2025
MSPs debated the issue on Thursday, the last day of Parliament before the summer recess.
Opening the debate, Mr Ross said people often 'smirk' when hearing that the Scottish Parliament is debating the problems around gulls – but he said it was an 'extremely serious issue'.
The Highlands and Islands MSP said constituents have told him they are worried about leaving their homes for fear of being 'divebombed', while others have suffered mental health issues thanks to a lack of sleep caused by noisy gulls.
One resident, he said, is spending £2,000 a year to remove nests from her home.
'People should not have to keep living in fear of being divebombed by these menaces on a daily basis, and are crying out for action,' he said.
He accused NatureScot of having a conflict of interest as the body responsible for both the licensing to control birds and to conserve them.
He went on: 'The behaviour of the SNP's quango NatureScot confirms they have lost the plot. They have told people to protect themselves with umbrellas and even suggested dogs as a deterrent.
'The time has come to break up NatureScot. There is a clear conflict of interest in the fact they are responsible for considering licences to control gulls but are also responsible for protecting bird numbers.
'If the minister cannot see that is a problem, then he is divorced from reality.
'The strength of the cross-party support in my debate today should be all the SNP Government need to finally act before we see someone killed due to being attacked by a gull.'
Jim Fairlie, the minister for agriculture, said while people often 'chuckle and laugh' about the issue of gulls, he warned it was 'deadly serious'.
But he told MSPs that he could not intervene on NatureScot to change the licensing system because it would leave the Government open to judicial review.
He urged people to stop feeding the birds, which he said was the primary reason for the issue.
The birds have been an increasingly common site in urban areas as they leave their natural habitat in search of food.
He said: 'We have to work out what it is that is causing the issue in the first place.
'We are feeding them – it is quite simple. We are creating habitat, and we are creating feeding stations which are allowing gulls to inhabit our space, and that is now quite clearly coming into conflict.'
He added: 'We have got to try and limit food waste and public littering. We have got to take away these feeding opportunities.'
SNP MSP Christine Grahame warned against 'demonising' gulls, which she described as 'clever, adaptable' animals.
'Language such as 'mugging', 'menace' can be applied to us, our fellow counterparts,' she said, 'but it is not appropriate to demonise an animal simply looking for food.
'Anthropomorphising is tempting but not helpful.'
A NatureScot spokesperson said: 'We understand gulls can sometimes cause problems in our towns and cities.
'At the same time, gull populations are facing serious declines. NatureScot has a duty to balance health and safety concerns with gull conservation.
'Over the last five years we have supported many individuals, businesses and communities to better manage gulls without the need to kill the birds or destroy their nests.
'As a result, the number of licence applications to destroy nests and eggs and kill chicks has reduced, from 2,633 in 2023 to 1,601 in 2024.'
The spokesperson said in the longer term, Scots will 'need to find ways to live with gulls and other wildlife'.
They added: 'We will continue to work with local authorities to ensure that collaborative gull management plans are put in place for future years, with a focus on effective preventative measures, deterrents, changes to behaviour and guidance.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Student flats should be open to resident challenge says MSP
Student flats should be open to resident challenge says MSP

Glasgow Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Student flats should be open to resident challenge says MSP

Pauline McNeill, Glasgow Labour MSP, raised the issue in the Scottish Parliament with the government. She highlighted the plans for the old 02 ABC site on Sauchiehall Street, approved this month by Glasgow City Council despite objections from the local community. READ NEXT:Get You in Town: New campaign to promote Glasgow city centre as a destination McNeill questioned the number of applications being approved and said the motivation for investors is the ability to collect high rental charges. She said: 'Scotland needs good, affordable student accommodation, but the way that planning consents are being granted in Glasgow makes it seem as if they are being handed out as an easy fix for gap sites. 'We are seeing oversaturation because purpose-built student accommodation is currently favoured by investors due to the ability to charge high rents. 'Last week, a proposed nine-storey student accommodation block was approved on the site of the former O2 ABC iconic music venue, but that is just one of many student developments that have been heavily objected to by local residents and community groups.' McNeill asked Ivan McKee, public finance minister, if there should be a right to challenge overprovision. READ NEXT:Hundreds access emergency homeless help over winter in Glasgow McKee said the council can act if there are concerns about any negative impact. He said: 'Local authorities, including Glasgow City Council, are able to identify areas of concentration where further development would undermine residential amenity. 'That power already exists. There is also a power for local communities to produce local place plans to feed into local development plans. 'We should recognise, as I think Pauline McNeill does, that students who are studying at our colleges and universities are a hugely important part of society. I welcome international students and the making of provision for them, and any PBSA provision obviously takes pressure off the private rented sector, which I think we would all agree is to be welcomed.' The plan 02 ABC site is for a House of Social nine storey block, including student accommodation, a food hall, a public courtyard, a bar, a gym, and more.

We investigate the state of the welfare state – read our new series
We investigate the state of the welfare state – read our new series

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

We investigate the state of the welfare state – read our new series

Some 80 years after Labour's 1945 electoral victory on a platform of "great national programmes of education, health and social services", the UK's welfare state is in bad shape. We have been planning this new series for several months. It is purely coincidence that we are publishing it in a week where Labour MPs will vote to strip benefits from disabled people after next year. Fourteen years of Tory austerity brought the welfare state to its knees, leaving a legacy of benefit sanctions and a record number of food banks. Enter stage left; a Labour Government which would sicken its predecessors of 1945, committed to removing even more state support from the most vulnerable in society. Food bank use reached record levels under the Tories Meanwhile the Scottish Government is forging a different path. We heard just this week in a Big Issue report that Scotland is leading the way at reducing child poverty while kids in other parts of the UK are increasingly struggling. We want to show that Scotland could do more without being tied to the sinking ship of the UK. Our investigation from Monday to Sunday will show how Westminster governments systematically sought to remove the protections of the welfare state, while Scotland tried to chart its own path and help those in need. It'll feature expert commentary, deep dives into the data, livestream Q&As with key figures, personal essays reflecting on how the UK Government treats people who are unemployed and living with disabilities, and much more. As we mark this key anniversary of Labour coming to power with promises of a fairer, more secure future for UK citizens, it's time to reflect on what went wrong. We hope you'll find the series informative and, hopefully, infuriating. Read online or in print from Monday to Friday. Take advantage of a subscription from just £1 to get access to the full investigation.

Kneecap performances ‘satirical', says rapper ahead of Glastonbury show
Kneecap performances ‘satirical', says rapper ahead of Glastonbury show

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Kneecap performances ‘satirical', says rapper ahead of Glastonbury show

The rap trio are due to take to the West Holts stage at 4pm on Saturday, just over a week after one of their members appeared in court and as senior Westminster politicians criticised their participation in the popular music festival. Kneecap member Liam Og O hAnnaidh appeared in court last week after being charged for allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah' at a gig in November last year. The band were also criticised following footage of a November 2023 gig allegedly showing a member saying: 'The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP.' British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said he does not think it is 'appropriate' for Kneecap to perform at Glastonbury, while Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said she thought the BBC 'should not be showing' Kneecap's performance. O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, said the videos only resurfaced after Kneecap performed at Coachella in April, where they said 'F*** Israel. Free Palestine'. Mo Chara, along with bandmates Naoise O Caireallain (Moglai Bap), and JJ O Dochartaigh (DJ Provai), said the ensuing controversies are a distraction from what is happening to Palestinians. They said they are happy to lose income and clout in order to be 'on the right side of history', and said they hoped that 'being vocal and being unafraid' would encourage other bands to speak up on Palestine. In an interview with The Guardian newspaper ahead of Glastonbury, O hAnnaidh defended their performances as 'satirical'. 'It's a joke. I'm a character. Shit is thrown on stage all the time. If I'm supposed to know every f****** thing that's thrown on stage I'd be in Mensa,' he said. 'I don't know every proscribed organisation – I've got enough shit to worry about up there. I'm thinking about my next lyric, my next joke, the next drop of a beat.' Asked about the 'dead Tory' comments, he said it was 'a joke' and 'we're playing characters'. 'It's satirical, it's a f****** joke. And that's not the point,' he said. 'The point is, that (video) wasn't an issue until we said 'Free Palestine' at Coachella. That stuff happened 18 months ago, and nobody batted an eyelid. 'Everybody agreed it was a f****** joke, even people that may have been in the room that didn't agree – it's a laugh, we're all having a bit of craic. 'The point is, and the context is, it all (resurfaced) because of Coachella. That's what we should be questioning, not whether I regret things.' Ó hAnnaidh added: 'If you believe that what a satirical band who play characters on stage do is more outrageous than the murdering of innocent Palestinians, then you need to give your head a f****** wobble.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store