Oxfordshire mum with brain tumour backs research funding calls
Georgie Maynard has suffered from regular migraines all her adult life, but one Saturday lunchtime in May 2023 she knew something wasn't right."I went out to the garden to get some fresh air and I thought 'no, this light is doing my head in' so I walked inside, sat on the sofa and then it just went bang! "It was excruciating... I actually thought that was it, I was dying at that moment."The mother of five from Oxfordshire had suffered a sudden seizure.Her children called an ambulance and paramedics arrived within minutes. The 46-year-old was taken to hospital and given a CT scan then sent home.The following week an MRI scan revealed she had a grade four glioblastoma (GBM) - an aggressive brain tumour."It's the worst type of brain tumour," she said."One in four live past a year, five per cent last five years."It's quite shocking. At that point you've got no belief that that's coming at your door because it's completely out the blue."
Mrs Maynard underwent an awake craniotomy as well as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Her latest scan showed the tumour was stable, but she is aware that the average life expectancy following diagnosis is 12 to 15 months.According to Cancer Research UK, glioblastomas are the most common type of cancerous brain tumour in adults and remain the biggest cancer killer of children and adults under the age of 40.However, just one per cent of the national spend on cancer research is allocated to the disease.
Mrs Maynard is keen to raise awareness of the condition and do all she can to ensure funding for research is made a priority.Together with her brother, Charlie Maynard - the Liberal Democrat MP for Witney - Mrs Maynard visited the Centre for Medicines Discovery at Oxford University.A team led by Prof Daniel Ebner is working on a five-year study to identify existing cancer drugs that might be able to shrink brain tumours.Out of 10,000 drug combinations, only half a dozen have real potential.
'Fantastic breakthoughs'
While clinical trials would still be required, because they have already been approved by regulators, Prof Ebner said they could be given to patients within the next five years."I'm optimistic for glioblastoma research. Some of the best scientists I've ever worked with are making fantastic breakthroughs," Prof Ebner said.He added: "Where we would definitely need additional help is with funding to carry a lot of the pre-clinical work we've done to date through to clinical trials. That's the major stumbling block at the moment."In 2018, the government pledged to invest £40m in research into brain tumours and improve access to clinical trials, following the death of Dame Tessa Jowell.Nearly seven years later, only about £15m of that £40m has been spent, according to the Brain Tumour Charity.Mr Maynard said he wanted to know why the remaining money has not been invested.He said: "There's tonnes of really good research that's crying out for money. It's not doing any good sitting in a bank and I really want some answers."Does it exist... and then what are we going to do to spend it and start saving some lives?"
A spokesperson for the Brain Tumour Charity said: "A sustainable and strategic approach to government funding for research into brain tumours is long overdue in order to make progress. "This should include a broad range of research projects from early-stage understanding - like Prof Ebner's - to late-stage trials."At The Brain Tumour Charity we are proud to fund a comprehensive and robust research programme and can only do so thanks to supporters like Georgie."A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: "We will build on Tessa Jowell's powerful legacy to improve both research and care for brain cancer patients across the UK."We spend more than £1.6bn annually on health research and have recently launched two new calls for studies unlocking the next generation of treatments for brain cancer."
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 hours ago
- The Independent
What are the symptoms of bowel cancer? Expert reveals warning signs
A breakthrough study has found bowel cancer cells can adapt to resemble skin and muscle cells, which allows them to spread more aggressively. Scientists hope the discovery, published in the study by the Cancer Research UK Scotland Centre and the University of Edinburgh, could help make current treatments more effective and stop the disease from spreading. Bowel cancer stands as the fourth most prevalent cancer in the UK, and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, according to Bowel Cancer UK. It is also increasingly being diagnosed in young people globally. Here's what you need to know about bowel cancer, including symptoms and signs to watch out for. What is bowel cancer? 'Bowel cancer, also known as colorectal cancer, affects the large bowel, which is made up of the colon and rectum,' explains Dr Lisa Wilde, director of research, policy, and influencing at Bowel Cancer UK. 'Most bowel cancers develop from pre-cancerous growths, called polyps. But not all polyps develop into cancer. 'If your doctor finds any polyps, they can remove them to prevent them becoming cancerous.' Here are some symptoms to look out for… Bowel changes A change in your pooing habits could be an early warning sign. 'You might be going more or less often, or have diarrhoea or constipation that might come and go,' says Wilde. Blood 'One of the most recognisable symptoms to look out for is blood in your poo or bleeding from your bottom,' highlights Lindsay Easton, CEO of Bowel Research UK. 'This can be a sign of a less serious condition, but it's best to get this checked out with your GP as soon as you can.' Pain or lump in your stomach 'A pain or lump in your tummy is a symptom of bowel cancer,' says Wilde. Weight loss Losing weight when you are not trying is also common in people with cancer. 'This may because of reduced appetite, but not always, some people lose weight even when they are eating normally,' explains Dr Angela Rai, GP at The London General Practice. 'This is called cachexia, and the body may not be absorbing all the protein, fat and carbohydrate from the food you eat. 'Cancer may release chemicals in the body that contribute to the loss of fat and muscle.' Unexplained tiredness Feeling constantly tired and not knowing why is also a symptom. 'There are many causes of fatigue and this should be investigated,' says Rai. 'Bowel cancer can cause anaemia, and the lack of healthy red cells causes fatigue. 'A simple blood test can detect this. Anaemia can be an early warning sign of bowel cancer and occurs when the tumour starts to bleed causing a reduction of red blood cells and a reduction in a protein called haemoglobin, which carries iron.' When should you see a GP about these symptoms? 'Not everyone will have all the symptoms of bowel cancer and sometimes symptoms may come and go,' says Wilde. 'If you have any of the above symptoms, or if your pooing habits just don't feel normal for you, our advice is to contact your GP straight away. 'They will want to hear from you and may give you an at-home test to help decide whether your symptoms need further investigation.' When should you ask for an urgent GP appointment or get help from the NHS 111 or go to A&E? 'The NHS advises people to call 111 if your poo is black or dark red or you have bloody diarrhoea, and to go to A&E or call 999 if you're bleeding non-stop from your bottom and there's a lot of blood,' says Easton. Can you get an at home test? How does this work? 'If your GP wants to rule out bowel cancer, they may ask you to do a Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT), which is a test you do at home that that looks for blood in your poo,' explains Easton. 'These are the same tests sent out to people as part of the bowel cancer screening programme, and we would encourage anyone eligible for screening to take part when they are invited because early diagnosis is so important.'
Powys County Times
20 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Around 1,000 doctors urge MPs to vote against ‘unsafe' assisted dying Bill
Around 1,000 doctors have written to MPs urging them to vote against the assisted dying Bill describing it as 'simply not safe'. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will return to the House of Commons for debate on Friday, with MPs expected to consider further amendments. But in a letter, published this week, doctors from across the NHS have urged lawmakers to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'. They warn the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. In its current form the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.' Sir Ed Davey welcomed the letter on Monday, telling Sky News he had 'real concerns'. 'I have voted against this assisted dying legislation, as I did on previous occasions,' the Liberal Democrat leader said. 'I have real concerns about the pressure on individuals, that they will put on themselves, if they think they are a burden on their family, so I welcome this letter.' He added: 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on.' But Sir Chris Bryant said he would be voting in favour. The technology minister told Sky News: 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote. 'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate. 'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life, but I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.' Some of the Bill's opponents have urged MPs to focus on improving end-of-life care rather than legislating for assisted dying. Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill. Opinions among members of the medical profession remain varied, with TV doctor Hilary Jones describing assisted dying for the terminally ill as 'kind and compassionate', adding that he would help a patient to end their life if the law was changed. The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, told the PA news agency he believes medicine will go 'back to the Dark Ages' if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down. While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20.
The Herald Scotland
21 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Around 1,000 doctors urge MPs to vote against ‘unsafe' assisted dying Bill
But in a letter, published this week, doctors from across the NHS have urged lawmakers to listen to those 'who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill'. They warn the Bill 'poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce'. In its current form the proposed legislation, which applies only to England and Wales, would mean terminally ill adults with only six months left to live could apply for assistance to end their lives, subject to the approval of two doctors and an expert panel. Last month, MPs approved a change in the Bill to ensure no medics would be obliged to take part in assisted dying. Doctors already had an opt-out but the new clause extends that to anyone, including pharmacists and social care workers. Encouraging or assisting suicide is currently against the law in England and Wales, with a maximum jail sentence of 14 years. The letter to MPs said: 'As experienced medical professionals who regularly work with dying patients and who have reviewed the worldwide evidence on assisted dying, it is our opinion that this Bill poses a real threat to both patients and the medical workforce, and we urge you to vote against it. 'We are concerned that the private member's Bill process has not facilitated a balanced approach to the collection of evidence and input from key stakeholders including doctors, people with disabilities and other marginalised groups. 'This Bill will widen inequalities, it provides inadequate safeguards and, in our collective view, is simply not safe. 'This is the most important piece of healthcare legislation for 60 years and we urge you to listen to the doctors who would have to deliver the consequences of this deeply flawed Bill.' Sir Ed Davey welcomed the letter on Monday, telling Sky News he had 'real concerns'. 'I have voted against this assisted dying legislation, as I did on previous occasions,' the Liberal Democrat leader said. 'I have real concerns about the pressure on individuals, that they will put on themselves, if they think they are a burden on their family, so I welcome this letter.' He added: 'I hope, as time has gone on, as the arguments have been better exposed, that MPs will switch sides and join the side that I and many MPs are on.' But Sir Chris Bryant said he would be voting in favour. The technology minister told Sky News: 'The Government doesn't have a formal position at all and individual members are free to choose how they vote. 'I'm not going to hide my own personal preference. I abstained on the first time round, I decided I wasn't going to vote because I wanted to hear the debate. 'I have listened to a lot of the debate. Of course, I don't want anybody to feel that they are a burden on society and that should lead them towards taking their own life, but I also have heard the cries of people who are absolutely miserable, and that's why I will be voting for the Bill.' Some of the Bill's opponents have urged MPs to focus on improving end-of-life care rather than legislating for assisted dying. Ahead of last month's Commons debate on the Bill, two royal medical colleges raised concerns over the proposed legislation. The Royal College of Physicians (RCP) said it believes there are 'concerning deficiencies', while the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) said it has 'serious concerns' and cannot support the Bill. People with terminal illnesses, surrounded by loved ones, display their dying wishes on tags outside the Palace of Westminster in London to urge MPs to support the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Jas Lehal/PA) Opinions among members of the medical profession remain varied, with TV doctor Hilary Jones describing assisted dying for the terminally ill as 'kind and compassionate', adding that he would help a patient to end their life if the law was changed. The GP, often seen on ITV's Good Morning Britain and the Lorraine show, told the PA news agency he believes medicine will go 'back to the Dark Ages' if proposed legislation being considered at Westminster is voted down. While Friday is expected to see debate on further amendments to the Bill, it is thought a vote on the overall legislation might not take place until the following Friday, June 20.
