logo
Washington may raise Discover Pass price to $45

Washington may raise Discover Pass price to $45

Yahoo04-03-2025

A campground at Paradise Point State Park. (Washington State Parks)
Washington's state parks and other natural sites may soon become more expensive to visit as lawmakers are looking to increase the price of the Discover Pass.
The pass allows visitors to access state-managed lands, such as parks, campgrounds, trails, and water access points. Federal lands, including national parks, are subject to different access fees. Currently, an annual Discover Pass costs $30 and can be used in up to two vehicles. A day-use state parks permit is $10.
Senate Bill 5390 proposes to increase the annual Discover Pass fee to $45. It would be the first price hike since the pass was introduced about 14 years ago. The way the bill is written, the increase would take effect in late July.
'The purpose of the bill is to essentially adjust the fees for inflation,' said its sponsor, Sen. Derek Stanford, D-Bothell. 'That will provide better funding for supporting our parks.'
Earlier versions of the legislation included an increase to the day-use permit fee from $10 to $15 but State Parks recommended against it to help protect access for lower-income visitors.
The Discover Pass was created in 2011 by the Legislature to fund state parks and recreation areas that were losing state funding due to budget cuts from the 2008 recession.
With the multibillion-dollar deficit the state is currently facing, the proposed increase would help protect state parks from having to make drastic cuts, said Mark Brown, a former state park commissioner.
According to Brown, it took more than 10 years to bring staffing back up to pre-recession levels after the downturn in the early 2000s, but parks are still struggling with staffing, especially with increases in visitation in recent years.
Anyone who drives a motor vehicle into designated state recreation sites or public lands is required to have a pass. This allows visitors to access more than 100 state parks, 350 recreational sites, and 700 water-access points.
Revenue from pass sales goes to Washington State Parks, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Department of Natural Resources.
Collections are split among the three agencies, with state parks receiving 84% and the other departments receiving 8% each.
Estimates attached to the bill indicate that the price increase to $45 could push down the number of annual Discover Pass purchases in the next couple of years by about 137,000 — from roughly 916,200 to around 778,800.
Dollar figures for how much the latest version of the bill — without the day pass price increase — would raise for the state were not available as of Tuesday. Discover Pass revenue has been around $30 million annually in recent years.
Senate Bill 5390 is awaiting a Senate floor vote and after that would still need House approval.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections

WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Republicans call on Michigan State Police leadership to resign following no confidence vote
Republicans call on Michigan State Police leadership to resign following no confidence vote

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans call on Michigan State Police leadership to resign following no confidence vote

Michigan State Police | Susan J. Demas Several Republicans in the Michigan House and Senate on Wednesday called for the director and chief deputy director of the Department of State Police to resign. The call for State Police Director James Grady and Chief Deputy Director Aimee Brimacombe to step down followed a weekend announcement from the Michigan State Police Troopers Association and the Michigan State Police Command Officers Association that said the two groups took a nearly unanimous no-confidence vote against the agency's leadership. Calls for their resignations came from Michigan Senate Minority Leader Aric Nesbitt (R-Porter Township), who is a Republican candidate for governor, state Sen. Jim Runestad (R-White Lake), who is the chair of the Michigan Republican Party, and state Rep. Mike Mueller (R-Linden). Department spokesperson Shanon Banner in a statement defended Grady and his leadership team, whom she said 'provide unwavering support to department members and are proud of the public safety services delivered every day to the public and our law enforcement partners across the state.' The no confidence vote follows a year's worth of discontent between the troopers' association and their leadership. Troopers filed an ethics complaint against Grady and Brimacombe in January. A handful of troopers also filed lawsuits against Brimacombe questioning her leadership, as well. Grady was appointed as director of the department following the departure of former director Joseph Gasper. Nesbitt said the vote of no confidence was a damning indictment on the agency's current administration. 'It is undeniable that this is the absolute worst leadership our state police has ever seen and completely unacceptable for the troopers and public they serve,' Nesbitt said in a statement released Monday. 'There needs to be a change at the top and that change needs to happen immediately. Col. Grady must step down or the governor must relieve him of his duties.' Runestad questioned how Grady and Brimacombe could continue in their roles after more than 1,000 troopers voted against their leadership. 'It has become alarmingly clear that Col. Grady and Lt. Col. Brimacombe's failed leadership has disparaged the reputation of the Michigan State Police,' Runestad said in a statement. 'I demand they step down immediately and urge the governor to relieve them of their duties if they do not resign voluntarily.' Mueller, a former law enforcement officer who has been investigating issues with State Police's leadership and other controversies at the individual post level, said troopers spoke loudly this weekend. 'They have no confidence in the current leadership. It is corrupt, dishonest, and doesn't keep the best interest of its own troopers in mind,' Mueller said in a scathing statement. 'If they have any shame, Grady and Brimacombe should resign right now.' In response, Banner said it has been a priority for Grady to conduct in-person visits to department worksites to listen to member feedback. 'During these visits, he's engaged in meaningful conversations, including seeking input from the membership about morale and opportunities for areas of improvement,' Banner said. 'Under Colonel Grady's leadership, the department has continued to invest in better training and professional development opportunities, updated equipment and improved technology. Further, dozens of new troopers joined the ranks last month and this year's proposed budget includes pay raises for troopers and sergeants.' Banner added that Grady remains committed to the department and 'is focused on moving the department forward while maintaining the department's proud tradition of service through excellence, integrity and courtesy.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Manchester school board warns language in budget trailer bill could cost city schools $10.2M
Manchester school board warns language in budget trailer bill could cost city schools $10.2M

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Manchester school board warns language in budget trailer bill could cost city schools $10.2M

The Manchester school board is sending a letter to state legislators sounding the alarm about a small section — six lines, to be exact — in the state budget trailer bill (HB 2) that would cost the school district approximately $10.2 million next fiscal year. Page 70 of the bill includes language establishing what is essentially a cap on targeted aid for larger school districts. For districts with 5,000 or more students, the bill seeks to subtract from targeted state aid until the amount decreases to $3,750 per student. The cap would effectively cut Manchester's adequacy aid from $127.8 million under current law to just under $117.6 million — a cut of more than $10.2 million. By comparison, the city of Nashua would see its targeted aid jump by more than $1.2 million under the new language, from $83.2 million to $84.4 million. 'As far as we can tell, Manchester is the only municipality in New Hampshire that stands to lose money because of this cap on targeted aid,' the letter from Manchester's school board to the Legislature's Committee of Conference says. 'Such a loss would put at risk our ability to best serve the educational needs of our students.' The state's education aid formula was tweaked in response to Manchester getting a bonus from the introduction of the Extraordinary Needs Grant in 2021, a more than $30 million annual increase. The amendment limits that bonus and will lead to Manchester getting more than $10 million less than it gets now. The amendment received support from members of both parties, because the $10 million is being shared by other income- and property-poor communities like Berlin, Claremont and Franklin. Manchester Mayor Jay Ruais said Tuesday he has been in contact with some of the committee members, who will likely begin meeting later this week. "I am reaching out to the conferees to gather information and develop a course of action to address this issue," Ruais said. School board member Bob Baines, a former mayor and educator, said he spoke to Gov. Kelly Ayotte about the targeted cap last week. 'We've been in touch with various representatives, but this needs to be watched very, very carefully in the (Legislature's) Committee of Conference,' Baines said. 'Can you imagine the devastation that will occur in Manchester, the most significant devastation possible in our public schools. We all need to work on that with our representatives, because I think in any big government bill — no matter how big and beautiful it is — some people don't read it and don't understand. 'Why would Manchester be singled out as the only community in the state of New Hampshire that would lose funding? If you care about Manchester, we should get that funding — we planned on it.' School board member Sean Parr drafted the letter and gathered the signatures of fellow board members this week. 'We are hoping to reach out to the Committee of Conference to let them know that it has this particular effect only on Manchester,' Parr said. 'I think it would be good for us to at least explain the situation, tell them that it's a significant impact to our budget in its current form, and to ask that they reconsider that part of the budget proposal.' In the letter, school board members urge committee members to reconsider the 'targeted cap' portion of the bill, warning the proposed budget could lead to 'harmful cuts and reductions to student services.' School officials point out that despite being the largest school district in New Hampshire with nearly 12,000 students, Manchester ranks at the bottom of the state in per-pupil spending, with over 53% of students qualifying for free and reduced-price meals, 20% multilingual learners, and 23% special education students. 'The proposed reductions would therefore have devastating consequences for our students, our educators, and ultimately, the future of our city,' the letter says. 'We welcome the opportunity to engage in continued dialogue, and we hope that you will collaborate in crafting a budget that reflects the values, priorities, and long-term vision of a thriving state with excellent public schools.' pfeely@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store