logo
‘We knew everything,' Trump says about Israel's strikes on Iran

‘We knew everything,' Trump says about Israel's strikes on Iran

Al Arabiya13 hours ago

After months of urging Israel not to strike Iran while he worked toward a nuclear deal, President Donald Trump told Reuters in a phone interview on Friday that he and his team had known the attacks were coming – and still saw room for an accord.
'We knew everything, and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death. I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out,' Trump said.
'They can still work out a deal, however, it's not too late,' he added.
Trump had repeatedly pushed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay an Israeli attack to give diplomacy more time, though the president himself had threatened to bomb the Gulf nation if nuclear talks failed.
Trump's shifting stance around the Israeli strikes, which he called 'excellent' and 'very successful' in a series of media interviews on Friday, offered one of the most striking examples yet of how he conducts high-stakes negotiations through both frank public rhetoric and behind-the-scenes maneuvers.
The US president offered support for Israel's decision to launch a series of devastating raids in Iran, showing a willingness to embrace the use of military force to set back Tehran's nuclear program. In contrast, some allies stressed the need for restraint.
Asked if the US would support Israel against Iranian counterattacks, Trump said he supported Israel. He said he was not concerned about a regional war breaking out as a result of Israel's strikes but did not elaborate.
'We've been very close to Israel. We're their number one ally by far,' Trump told Reuters, adding, 'We'll see what happens.'
Later on Friday, two US officials said the US military had helped shoot down Iranian missiles headed toward Israel.
Talks in doubt
Still uncertain is whether Trump's attempt to reach an agreement with Iran to halt uranium enrichment is still viable, with a sixth round of talks still scheduled for Sunday in Oman but now in doubt after the attacks.
In negotiations with Iran, Trump sought to persuade the Iranians to give up uranium enrichment and was awaiting a counter-proposal from Iran. Tehran had balked at giving up enrichment, seemingly leaving little room for an agreement.
'They seek enrichment. We can't have enrichment,' Trump told reporters on Monday.
As the week wore on, Trump sounded increasingly resigned to the prospect that Israel would strike and hinted that he knew more than he was willing to talk about publicly.
'I don't want to say it's imminent, but it looks like something that could very well happen. Look, it's very simple, not complicated. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Other than that, I want them to be successful,' he told reporters on Thursday before the raids began.
Speaking to Reuters on Friday, Trump said he had given the Iranians 60 days to come to an agreement and that the time had expired with no deal.
'We knew just about everything,' he said. 'We knew enough that we gave Iran 60 days to make a deal and today is 61, right? So, you know, we knew everything.'
Trump said it was unclear if Iran still has a nuclear program following Israeli strikes on the country.
'Nobody knows. It was a very devastating hit,' Trump said.
Israel said it had targeted Iran's nuclear facilities, ballistic missile factories and military commanders at the start of what it warned would be a prolonged operation to prevent Tehran from building an atomic weapon.
Trump said the US still has nuclear talks planned with Iran on Sunday but he was unsure they would take place. US special envoy Steve Witkoff was scheduled to meet an Iranian delegation in Oman.
'They're not dead,' Trump said of the US–Iran talks. 'We have a meeting with them on Sunday. Now, I'm not sure if that meeting will take place, but we have a meeting with them on Sunday.'
The president had convened his top national security advisers at Camp David on Sunday night for what he said were discussions that included Iran, and he spoke to Netanyahu on Monday about Iran.
A White House official said Trump spoke with Netanyahu again on Friday. Trump also held talks about the attacks with his National Security Council in the White House Situation Room. No details of the discussions were immediately available.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Putin, Trump discuss Iran-Israel situation by telephone, Kremlin aide says
Putin, Trump discuss Iran-Israel situation by telephone, Kremlin aide says

Al Arabiya

timean hour ago

  • Al Arabiya

Putin, Trump discuss Iran-Israel situation by telephone, Kremlin aide says

Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump discussed hostilities between Iran and Israel in a new telephone call on Saturday, Russian news agencies quoted top Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov as saying. Ushakov, quoted by the agencies, said Putin condemned Israeli attacks on Iran and the two leaders did not rule out returning to discussions on Iran's nuclear program. Ushakov was also quoted as saying that Putin confirmed Russia's readiness to press on with negotiations with Ukraine. The agencies quoted Ushakov as saying the two presidents spoke for about 50 minutes. He described the talk as meaningful and useful.

The Way to End the Israeli Palestinian Conflict
The Way to End the Israeli Palestinian Conflict

Asharq Al-Awsat

time2 hours ago

  • Asharq Al-Awsat

The Way to End the Israeli Palestinian Conflict

This conflict cannot be resolved with a two-state solution. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres stressed this point recently, warning the Security Council that hope for a two-state solution may dissipate entirely. This conflict cannot be settled through perpetual war and the firepower of the Israeli occupation that is seeking endless annexation, gulping up more and more land through the expansion of settlements. For decades, those of us who follow Palestinian have been asking when this conflict will come to an end? This question seems to be on United Nations General Assembly President Dennis Francis's mind. He recently said that the conflict would not end until the Israelis and Palestinians are able to live side by side in their two sovereign and independent states, in peace, security, and dignity. It is time, then, to put an end to Israel's effort to change the demography of Palestinian territories. Indeed, it has been seven decades since the UN General Assembly first called for a two-state solution, and the world's commitment to this goal has been reaffirmed by numerous UN Resolutions. The pioneering role that Saudi diplomacy has played in this regard stands out. Saudi Arabia has long insisted that the first step to regional peace is recognizing an independent Palestinian state. This is not a symbolic concession but a strategic necessity that requires actions, not words, to ensure that our shared principles are practiced. One could ask: What if Israel had accepted the Arab Peace Initiative back in 2002? How would the course of the past two decades in the Middle East have been different if Israel had? On the French front, President Emmanuel Macron considers the recognition of Palestine both an ethical duty and a political demand. Paris has demonstrated a strong commitment to advancing the two-state solution. It also insists that there is no other viable path to peace. It seems that Paris believes this is the right time to build an international coalition that sets a concrete roadmap for arriving at a two-state solution. France, the beating heart of European politics, believes the moment has arrived. It is pursuing three key tracks to move closer to an independent Palestinian state: One: Ending the war in Gaza, ensuring the unconditional release of all hostages, and allowing the people of Gaza full access to aid. Two: Push political solutions to the forefront, above the alternatives that experience and common sense tell us are futile. Three: Ending settlement expansion, settler violence, and the campaign to weaken the Palestinian Authority. A close and thorough examination of the Palestinian question shows that we cannot kick the can down the road indefinitely. It is among the oldest items on the United Nations' agenda, and it has real implications for global peace and security. Anyone sensible can understand that Palestinian land, with its history, sanctity, and religious significance, is above ideological disputes and relative political conflicts. Its repercussions are felt in all four four corners of the earth. Accordingly, establishing a Palestinian state is crucial for regional stability, and its positive impact would extend far beyond the Middle East. It would potentially reinforce peace around the globe, and failing to establish it would undermine peace everywhere. It also has major implications for the consolidation of development and human rights, as failing the Palestine people has long been fueling a tragic cycle of resentment and violence across the globe. Every person with a sound conscience finds the status quo in Palestine intolerable: the occupation is deepening its roots and crushing of the land's indigenous inhabitants through crimes that violate holy and secular laws. A different path must be pursued. Peace must be achieved and the conflict must end. A timescale must be set for a solution that is founded on international law, human rights, the United Nations Charter, and the shared interests of all the region's inhabitants. There are no stop-gap solutions or alternatives to a negotiated two-state settlement that gives rise to a viable, independent Palestinian state. However, Guterres's words have been blowing in the wind of global diplomacy. We are at a historic crossroads- a juncture that will test the world's conscience. Will it wake up after its long slumber?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store