logo
Higher metals tariffs kick in as deadline for best offers arrives

Higher metals tariffs kick in as deadline for best offers arrives

Mint2 days ago

By Jasper Ward and Jeff Mason
(Reuters) -The U.S. tariff rate on most imported steel and aluminum will double on Wednesday as President Donald Trump ratchets up a global trade war on the same day he expects trading partners to deliver their "best offer" in bids to avoid punishing import tax rates on other goods from taking effect in early July.
Trump late Tuesday signed an executive proclamation that puts into effect from Wednesday his surprise announcement last week that he was taking the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports that had been in place since March to 50% from 25%.
"We started at 25 and then after studying the data more, realized that it was a big help, but more help is needed. And so that is why the 50 is starting tomorrow," White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said in explaining the move at a steel industry conference in Washington on Tuesday. The increase comes into effect at 12:01 am (0401 GMT).
The increase applies to all trading partners except Britain, the only country so far that has struck a preliminary trade agreement with the U.S. during a 90-day pause on a wider array of Trump tariffs. The rate for steel and aluminum imports from the UK - which does not rank among the top exporters of either metal to the U.S. - will remain at 25% until at least July 9.
About a quarter of all steel used in the U.S. is imported, and Census Bureau data shows the increased levies will hit the closest U.S. trading partners - Canada and Mexico - especially hard. They rank No. 1 and 3, respectively, in steel shipment volumes to the U.S.
Canada is even more exposed to the aluminum levies as the top exporter to the U.S. by far at roughly twice the rest of the top 10 exporters' volumes combined. The U.S. gets about half of its aluminum from foreign sources.
The unexpected increase in the levies jolted the market for both metals this week, especially for aluminum, which has seen price premiums more than double so far this year. With little current capacity to increase domestic production, import volumes are likely to be unaffected unless the price increases undercut demand.
Wednesday is also when the White House would like trading partners to submit their proposals for deals that might help them avoid Trump's hefty "Liberation Day" tariffs from taking effect in five weeks.
Administration officials have been in active talks with a number of countries since Trump announced a pause on those tariffs on April 9, but to date only the UK deal has come to fruition. Even that agreement, which provided the basis for the carve out from the metals tariffs, is more of a preliminary framework for more talks.
With just weeks remaining, the Trump team is eager to bring more deals over the line.
Reuters reported on Monday that the U.S. Trade Representative was asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for purchase of U.S. industrial and agricultural products and plans to remedy any non-tariff barriers.
In turn, the letter promises answers "within days" with an indication of a "landing zone," including what tariff rates countries can be expected to be saddled with after a 90-day pause on the tariffs expires on July 8. At issue for most trading partners is whether they retain the current baseline rate of 10% on most exports to the U.S. after that date, or something sharply higher in many cases.
White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed the report on Tuesday, saying: 'USTR sent this letter to all of our trading partners just to give them a friendly reminder that the deadline is coming up."
Other items requested by the Trump administration include any commitments on digital trade and economic security, along with country-specific commitments, according to the letter.
(Additional reporting by Alexandra Alper in Washington; Writing by Dan Burns; Editing by Lincoln Feast.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Immigrant rights groups sue to invalidate Trump administration's El Salvador prison deal
Immigrant rights groups sue to invalidate Trump administration's El Salvador prison deal

Hindustan Times

time3 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Immigrant rights groups sue to invalidate Trump administration's El Salvador prison deal

A coalition of immigrant rights groups on Thursday sued to invalidate the Trump administration's deal to house detainees in a notorious prison in El Salvador, saying the arrangement to move migrant detainees outside the reach of U.S. courts violates the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C., notes that the administration has argued that those sent to El Salvador are beyond the reach of U.S. courts and no longer have access to due process rights or other U.S. constitutional guarantees. The deal, the plaintiffs allege, 'is contrary to law. And it was entered into without any legal basis.' The administration has sent hundreds of migrants to El Salvador, including some it accuses of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. The administration in March agreed to pay $6 million for El Salvador to house 300 migrants. President Donald Trump has said he'd like to eventually send U.S. citizen criminals to the Salvadoran prison, though that'd likely be unconstitutional. The lawsuit notes that the State Department has reported that inmates in El Salvador's prisons may be subject to 'harsh and life-threatening' conditions, torture and lack access to reliable food, water and medical care. The prisons are run by the government of El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, who once called himself 'the world's coolest dictator' and has posted images of detainees sent from the U.S. getting marched into his centerpiece prison, the Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In one notorious case cited in the lawsuit, the Trump administration has not returned Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man it deported to El Salvador in violation of a judge's order, saying the man is no longer in its custody. That was the administration's argument when another judge ordered it to halt deportations under an 18th century wartime act — that the deportees were on a plane to El Salvador and outside the legal reach of federal judges. The suit was filed by Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigrant Equality, the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice and Democracy Forward, which is co-counsel in a separate lawsuit over the initial flights to El Salvador. Thursday's lawsuit says the deal violates the Administrative Procedures Act, which prevents agencies like the State Department, which reached the deal with El Salvador, from undertaking unconstitutional or otherwise illegal acts. In addition to violating the constitution, the suit notes that housing prisoners in El Salvador violates the First Step Act, a law requiring federal prisons to try to house inmates close to home. That law was signed by Trump in 2018.

Trump threatens to terminate Musk's government contracts as two spar in public fall-out
Trump threatens to terminate Musk's government contracts as two spar in public fall-out

Indian Express

time8 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump threatens to terminate Musk's government contracts as two spar in public fall-out

Tensions between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk reached a breaking point after a flurry of online posts from both sides. President Trump took to Truth Social, writing two posts targeting Musk. 'Elon was wearing thin, I asked him to leave, I took away his EV mandate that forced everyone to buy electric cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. He then added that the 'easiest way to save money' through his signature tax bill was to 'terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' Meanwhile, Musk intensified his attacks on X, claiming that Trump 'is in the Epstein files,' referencing government documents related to the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi had announced the release of the 'first phase' of declassified Epstein documents, though much of the information had already been public. Time to drop the really big bomb:@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Musk also launched a poll on X, asking his followers if there should be a 'new political party' representing 'the 80 percent in the middle.' The billionaire, who had often portrayed himself as a centrist despite frequent engagement with global right-wing leaders, had previously pledged $100 million to Trump-aligned groups—but had not delivered. Observers speculated he could redirect his vast resources into launching a new political project. The public feud comes after Musk last week officially left his government post, where he was tasked with rooting out excessive spending through DOGE.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store