School shut for at least six months due to cracks
A school which was built in 2016 and forced to close earlier this week after a "number of cracks" were found will now be shut for at least six months.
Prudhoe Community High School in Northumberland was shut on Monday and pupils were told they would not be able to return until 3 March at the earliest.
But following further checks, parents were told the school, which is run by the Cheviot Learning Trust, would be closed for "six to nine months as a minimum".
The trust's head Alice Witherow said the safety of staff and pupils was the organisation's "top priority".
The trust said engineers had found that the building, which was built at a cost of £14.6m, was "not safe to continue operating".
It said lessons would be taught online until another solution was found.
Options being explored include relocation and the construction of temporary mobile classrooms.
Ms Witherow said she understood the anxiety the situation had caused particularly for those in their GCSE and A-Level examination years.
"I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the parents, staff, and community members for their continued support during this challenging time," said Ms Witherow.
"The safety of our pupils and staff is our top priority, and while this situation is difficult, I am confident in the strength of our school community to navigate through it."
She said meetings would be held after the half-term break to share updates and address any concerns from families.
The school was built under the previous Conservative government's priority school building programme (PSBP), which has now been withdrawn.
Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
School closes after cracks found in building
Prudhoe Community High School
Cheviot Learning Trust
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Badenoch to launch review examining whether UK should pull out of ECHR
Kemi Badenoch is expected to set up a review that will look into whether the UK should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights. The commission will examine whether Britain should pull out of a series of agreements, it is understood. It comes ahead of a speech Conservative leader Mrs Badenoch is expected to make on Friday. The ECHR was a dividing issue in last year's Conservative leadership election, with Mrs Badenoch's rival Robert Jenrick championing the idea that Britain should pull out. Mrs Badenoch has stopped short of calling for the UK to leave, but in February she suggested that the UK would 'probably' have to withdraw from the convention if it stops the country from doing 'what is right'. She told a London event: 'When it comes to the ECHR, I have always been very clear that the ECHR should not stop us from doing what is right for the people of this country and what is right in our national interest. 'And if it continues to do so, at some point we will probably have to leave. 'What I have not agreed with is deciding that we should leave without having a plan for what that looks like and how to do so in a way that makes sense.' The Convention's Article 8 – a right to a family life – has been notably used by foreign criminals to avoid deportation from the UK. The Government's immigration white paper released last month promised legislation to 'strengthen the public interest test to make it clear that Parliament needs to be able to control our country's borders and take back control over who comes to, and stays in the UK'. Sir Keir Starmer said at the time that the 'the right balance' needed to be made between individual rights and 'the national interest'.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
It's fair to criticise ‘activist' Hermer, says his lawyer friend
Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, can be 'fairly' criticised over his 'activism' as a lawyer, a legal friend has said. Ben Williams KC said Lord Hermer was an 'open activist' throughout his career, and claimed Sir Keir Starmer would have known this when he appointed him Attorney General. He suggested this provided an insight into the Prime Minister's own views on how the law could be used to pursue a political agenda. The suggestion comes despite Lord Hermer's claims that lawyers only take cases based on the 'cab rank' principle, which requires barristers to accept cases within their area of expertise, regardless of the client. Mr Williams, who has presented cases with Lord Hermer, made his comments on Twitter in response to a video issued by Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, in which he attacked Lord Hermer for spending his career 'defending Britain's enemies' in court. Credit: X/@RobertJenrick Saying the Attorney General was unfit for the job because of his past legal activism, Mr Jenrick linked him to a range of controversial figures he has represented, including Gerry Adams, Shamima Begum, the Isis bride, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi, described as Osama Bin Laden's 'right hand man'. Mr Williams tweeted: 'As a lawyer [and] a friend of Rich Hermer, I find this unpleasant. But before the usual suspects erupt, it's also entirely fair political comment. 'RH was an open activist throughout his career, [and] Starmer knew this when he chose to knife his shadow AG [Emily Thornberry] to appoint RH instead. 'This is obviously revealing about Starmer's own position on using the law as a political instrument; [and] both he and Rich will have known perfectly well that the latter's long history of acting against the UK Government would be subject to legitimate political attack. 'On reflection, I should have said that I find it discomfiting. It is not unpleasant.' Lord Hermer has come under increasing pressure over several controversial moves in Government, including a key role in Britain's surrender of the Chagos Islands. He was also forced to apologise for a 'clumsy' remark that compared Conservative and Reform calls to quit the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) with the early days of Nazi Germany. Sir Keir has faced calls to sack his Attorney General, with Kemi Badenoch arguing that Lord Hermer 'believes in the rule of lawyers, not the rule of law'. Lord Hermer and his allies have previously argued that he has only represented controversial figures as a result of the 'cab rank rule', an ethical principle that requires lawyers to accept instructions from clients, even if they disagree with the views or alleged crimes. However, in a previous tweet, Mr Williams challenged the concept barristers are strictly forbidden in any case from refusing to represent a client on the grounds they found them objectionable. Responding to a Twitter user making that argument, he said: 'This is at best unreal. You know perfectly well that the Bar is full of people who say 'I only defend', 'I won't represent alleged rapists', or 'I won't represent landlords'. 'As to the last, I went to a judicial valedictory last year where this specific position was openly celebrated. There are entire chambers that declare themselves 'radical'. 'The idea that one can't extrapolate revealed preferences from a career of acting only for a specific demographic is absurd.' In his video, Mr Jenrick challenged Lord Hermer's cab rank defence, saying he 'would have been inundated with cases, able to choose the pick of the bunch'. A Tory source said: 'Starmer and Hermer's mate, Philippe Sands, admitted he refused to represent Augusto Pinochet. The selective use of the cab rank rule is widespread amongst so-called human rights lawyers. Activist barristers now actively boast of their ideological purity.' However, Lord Hermer has been defended by some Tory legal experts. Dominic Grieve, the former attorney general, said Mr Jenrick's video was a 'disgraceful' attack on the UK's 'principles of justice and freedoms' which relied on a 'level playing field' for individuals' legal representation under the cab rank rule. A spokesman for the Attorney General's Office said: 'Law officers such as the Attorney General will naturally have an extensive legal background and may have previously been involved in a wide number of past cases. Barristers do not associate themselves with their clients' opinions.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Watch live: Starmer faces Badenoch at PMQs after Reeves vows winter fuel U-turn
Watch live as Sir Keir Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs on Wednesday (4 June), days after unveiling the UK's defence strategy for the next decade. On Monday (2 May), the prime minister announced his Strategic Defence Review with the aim to move the UK to 'warfighting readiness'. The government said that it will increase defence spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product from April 2027. Sir Keir also announced plans to build up to 12 new attack submarines which will replace the current fleet from the late 2030s onwards, and also confirmed that £15billion will be spent on its nuclear warhead programme. As the Labour government hikes up defence spending, opposition leaders will likely challenge the Prime Minister over what funding areas will have to be slashed in order to compensate. He will face questions in the Commons at noon, the majority from the Conservative leader who trivialised the plans as 'just an announcement' as 'a lot of the things they've announced in this strategic defence review require money'. Badenoch could also press the prime minister on the increasing numbers of small boat crossings. On Saturday (31 May), more than 1,100 migrants arrived in the UK, the highest number recorded on a single day so far in 2025.
