Fund Winter Fuel Payments with MP expenses cut says petition
The petition was started by Yvonne Keegan, who calls for the benefit to be reinstated: "I know first hand the importance of Winter Fuel Payment - it's a lifeline to pensioners during the harsh winter months. Their heating bills can skyrocket, and they end up struggling, trying desperately to keep themselves warm.
"Meanwhile, our politicians are living comfortably with expenses that would be considered extravagant by most standards. We believe that our politicians – who have a stable income, can afford to pay their heating bills and do not need taxpayer-funded expenses to support this aspect of their lifestyle."
Once a petition reaches 10,000 signatures, the Government responds, and if 100,000 people sign, a debate in Parliament is considered.
This petition currently has 110,421 signatures. Signatures can still be added here.
How much do MPs get paid?
MPs' basic salary rose 2.8% to £93,904 from April, after Parliament's expenses watchdog linked it to wider proposals for the public sector.
They can also claim expenses including:
Office expenses
Office running costs
Staffing costs
Travel for staff
Centrally purchased stationery
Postage costs
Central IT costs
Communications allowance
They also receive allowances towards having somewhere to live in London and in their constituency, and travelling between Parliament and their constituency.
MPs can claim their utility bills, including gas, electricity, other fuel and water bills, on expenses at a single property, either in London or their constituency. This is only available to those who aren't MPs in London, or don't occupy 'grace and favour' accommodation in London.
There is no upper limit on how much MPs can claim back on heating and fuel costs.
Which pensioners will receive Winter Fuel payments after the changes?
The Government has said more pensioners will receive winter fuel payments, but payments will not be universal.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves told reporters that 'more people will get winter fuel payment this winter', adding that further details will be announced 'as soon as we possibly can'.
She said: 'People should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get winter fuel payment this winter.'
My instant response to Winter Fuel Payment news & key message to the Chancellor (I heard while walking to the office, so pls forgive the fact it was done there and then for speed) pic.twitter.com/5t2kxwAkPj — Martin Lewis (@MartinSLewis) June 4, 2025
Pensions minister Torsten Bell told MPs that, while more pensioners will be eligible, there is no prospect of returning to universal winter fuel payments.
Speaking to the Work and Pensions Committee, Mr Bell said: 'Directly on your question of is there any prospect of a universal winter fuel payment, the answer is no, the principle I think most people, 95% of people, agree, that it's not a good idea that we have a system paying a few hundreds of pounds to millionaires, and so we're not going to be continuing with that.
'But we will be looking at making more pensioners eligible.'
(Image: House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA Wire) The decision to means-test the previously universal payment was one of the first announcements by Chancellor Rachel Reeves after Labour's landslide election victory last year, and it has been widely blamed for the party's collapse in support.
The Government has insisted the policy was necessary to help stabilise the public finances, allowing the improvements in the economic picture which Sir Keir said could result in the partial reversal of the measure.
Pension Credit is currently the primary benefit by which pensioners can receive the winter fuel payment.
The credit tops up incomes for poorer pensioners and acts as a gateway to additional support, including the winter fuel payment.
Recommended reading:
What were the cuts to winter fuel payments, and who currently receives them?
On July 29 2024, the Government announced that from winter 2024, winter fuel payments would be dependent on receiving another means-tested benefit, as part of measures to fill a 'black hole' in the public finances.
This meant the number of pensioners receiving the payment was reduced by around 10 million, from 11.4 million to 1.5 million.
Asked what groups who are currently missing out on winter fuel payments he would like to include again, if possible, Mr Bell told the committee: 'We are committed to the principle that there should be some means-testing and that those on the highest incomes shouldn't be receiving winter fuel payments in the context of wider decisions we have to make – and fairness is an important part of that.
'You can then take from that that my priority is those who are on lower incomes but have missed out.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's raid on family businesses to cost his constituents 1,000 jobs
Labour's tax raid on family businesses is projected to cost hundreds of jobs in Sir Keir Starmer's constituency alone, new analysis shows. The revenue-raising scheme is also projected to hit the local economies of Labour constituencies harder than their Conservative, Reform and Liberal Democrat-voting counterparts. Analysis by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), which represents nearly 200,000 UK businesses, revealed that the changes to business property relief (BPR) announced in Rachel Reeves's October Budget will stifle growth in Labour seats across the country. The CBI claims that the average gross value added (GVA) losses in seats that elected Labour MPs at the last general election will be over £24 million, compared to £20 million in Conservative seats and £18.5 million in Reform constituencies. The projections span from the October 2024 budget to April 2030, after the next general election. Only seats held by the Green Party fared worse with an average GVA loss of around £40 million, suggesting that cities and urban centres will be worst hit by the raid. The CBI expects the economic hit to result in thousands of job losses in the most-exposed constituencies. Sir Keir's seat of Holborn and St Pancras will be the fourth-worst hit constituency in the country with 1,037 jobs expected to be lost, according to the analysis. Cabinet ministers to feel the pinch in their seats Red Wall seats are also set to suffer. The analysis shows that of £14.9 billion in nationwide GVA losses, some £4.6 billion (31 per cent) of that will hit constituencies that the Tories won in 2019 and Labour won back in 2024. These seats include the 31 Red Wall seats in the North and Midlands along with other key marginal constituencies which Labour will hope to win again at the next election if it wants to stay in power. Senior Cabinet ministers will also feel the pinch in their constituencies. The second-worst hit seat in the country, Manchester Central, is currently represented by Lucy Powell, the Leader of the House of Commons. The third-worst hit seat is Birmingham Ladywood, represented by Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary. Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary, represents the ninth-worst-hit seat of Leeds South. In the October Budget, the Chancellor slashed BPR in an attempt to raise money from family businesses. BPR was originally introduced by a Labour government in the 1970s. It allows company shareholders to leave business assets to loved ones without paying inheritance tax on them. But in a sweeping change that will take effect in April 2026, full business relief will only apply to the first £1 million of a business's assets upon a shareholder's death, with everything above this subject to 20 per cent tax.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: Flying Footsie defies the gloom
If the Government's finances are in such a mess and the economy is stagnant, why are share prices close to an all-time high? Could it simply be the UK is a pretty good place to invest – provided you are a foreigner and don't have to pay our taxes? This week sees Rachel Reeves' spending review, setting out what the Government proposes to do with our taxes for the next three or four years. It's the first shot a Labour government has had at this exercise since 2009, in the aftermath of the banking crash. Then Chancellor Alistair Darling savaged spending plans to such a scale that, in theory at least, there would be cuts of 490,000 public sector jobs. It was a total about-turn of the exercise by Gordon Brown when money taps were flowing. The so-called 'austerity' of the Coalition Government the following year was actually started by Labour. Reminding people of this is not to beat up Reeves' predecessors, or to get into the debate about spending headroom, or the commitment to the Office for Budget Responsibility's fiscal rules. It is just to point out that, for all the fine words of successive Chancellors, they are prisoners of the harsh mathematics of public finances. If the taxes come in strongly, that is fine. If not, they are in trouble. Right now, notwithstanding her increase in tax rates, revenues are weak. Why? Well, we don't yet know, but it looks like people with money are hunkering down – or bunking out. The top 1 per cent of earners pay 29 per cent of all income tax, and the top 10 per cent pay 60 per cent. It's early days, but there are bits of evidence of a shift in behaviour. The Capgemini World Wealth Report last week showed that the UK lost 14,000 millionaires last year. That's not as big a decline as in France or Germany, but a stunning contrast to the increase of 562,000 millionaires in the US. There is data from Henley & Partners that 26,000 non-doms left the UK last year, and there are suggestions that the changes brought in by Reeves will cut tax revenue rather than increase it. Job losses are certainly coming as a direct result of the increase in employers' National Insurance Contributions (NICs), but thanks to the unreliability of the Office for National Statistics' numbers it's too early to know how hard employment is being hit. What we do know is that revenues from income tax, NICs and capital gains tax in April, the first month of the financial year, were disappointing – disappointing, that is, from the perspective of the Treasury, if not from those of us handing over the money. This isn't a mass exodus of high-earners or of the already wealthy. It feels more like the 1970s when some people did leave the country, but most just cut their costs and waited for the change of government that eventually happened in 1979. The difference is that back in the 1970s, financial markets were all over the place, the pound was savaged before recovering, and inflation was heading upwards. Now UK shares are doing well, and the pound has made a decent recovery. The FTSE 100 index, at 8,838 is only 50 points off its all-time high in March, and the pound is back to $1.35. It is completely plausible that the Footsie could go through 9,000 in the next few days, and I expect sterling to reach $1.45 by year-end. All this is happening despite the chaos in world trade and expectation that Reeves will have to raise taxes again come the autumn. Why? Three explanations. One is that the UK equity market is the least ugly, or at least one of the less ugly, contenders in the global beauty parade. Where else do you put your money? You are buying into large, hitherto relatively unfashionable enterprises that earn decent profits and pay good dividends. At a time of huge uncertainty, you should not try to be clever, but just diversify your assets. Two, the fact that Britons are to be clobbered with yet higher taxes and the economy will stay stagnant is unimportant to foreign investors. Big UK firms earn on average three-quarters of their profits overseas. And finally, even if the global trade war does hot up, the UK is not in Donald Trump's firing line. What's not to like?
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Britain is ALREADY at war with Russia and ‘we are in pretty big trouble' admits defence expert in bombshell warning
Moscow has been 'menacing the UK in various different ways' for years GONE TO WAR Britain is ALREADY at war with Russia and 'we are in pretty big trouble' admits defence expert in bombshell warning RUSSIA is already at war with Britain, an author of the Government's defence review has warned. Fiona Hill, who was the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump's first term, delivered the stark warning of the threat posed by Vladimir Putin. 4 An author of the Government's defence review has warned that Britain is already at war with Russia Credit: EPA 4 Kharkiv, in Eastern Ukraine, was blitz by Russian missiles in retaliation for last week's Spider Web attack Credit: East2West 4 Fiona Hill, an author of the Government's defence review Credit: Getty She said: 'We are in pretty big trouble. "Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't anticipated.' Ms Hill said Moscow has been 'menacing the UK in various different ways' for years, including poisonings and assassinations on British soil, carrying out cyber attacks and cutting sea cables. In her grim alert, the Kremlin expert said: 'Russia is at war with us.' read more on russia WHITE VAN WHAM Army bosses to buy drones that can be fired from VANS after Ukraine op And she warned that Britain can no longer rely on US military might to protect itself from enemy states. Ms Hill co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review, which warned the UK is facing its biggest threats since the Cold War — and set out plans to urgently build more bombs and guns to arm ourselves. Her comments came as Russian missiles blitzed Kharkiv, killing three people and injuring at least 22, including a six-week-old baby and a 14-year-old girl. The eastern Ukrainian city was struck by 48 drones, two missiles and five glider bombs as part of a huge, countrywide bombardment by Putin in retaliation for last week's Spider Web attack on his nuclear bombers. PM Sir Keir Starmer used an article in last week's Sun on Sunday to deliver his starkest warning yet of the danger of war. Putting the nation on a war footing, he said Britain must prepare to 'sight and win' against our enemies. New footage of Op Spiderweb shows drone blitzing Putin's burning aircraft
