NEPRA reserves ruling on tariff
Listen to article
The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) on Thursday reserved its judgement on a request for increase in electricity rates up to Rs1.27 per unit on account of fuel charges adjustment (FCA) for April 2025.
Nepra held a hearing to consider the tariff hike plea submitted by the Central Power Purchasing Agency Guarantee Limited (CPPA-G). The hearing was chaired by Nepra chairman and attended by the representatives of CPPA-G, officials of the Ministry of Energy, business community members, journalists and members of the public.
According to Nepra, CPPA-G had filed a request for a tariff hike of Rs1.268 per unit under the FCA for April. If approved, the increase will be applicable for one month only.
The proposed adjustment will apply to all consumers of power distribution companies (DISCOs), excluding lifeline consumers, pre-paid meter users and electric vehicle charging stations. Nepra also stated that the adjustment would not be applicable to K-Electric consumers.
The regulator emphasised that it carefully heard the views of all relevant stakeholders. It will now conduct further scrutiny of the data before issuing a detailed decision.
According to the CPPA-G petition, the actual fuel cost borne during April was Rs9.9197 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) while the reference cost – used for billing consumers – was Rs7.6803 per kWh. The difference of Rs1.2685 per unit is now sought to be recovered from consumers.
In its request, CPPA-G stated that a total of 10,513 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity was generated in April, of which 10,196 GWh – nearly 97% – was supplied to DISCOs while the rest was lost in transmission.
Data revealed that power generation in the month under review remained heavily reliant on costly imported fuels. Over 20% of electricity was generated by using imported liquefied natural gas (LNG) at an extremely high cost of Rs24.26 per unit. The electricity produced from imported coal also proved expensive, costing Rs16.60 per unit.
While the share of hydroelectric power was relatively significant at 21.94% and nuclear power contributed 17.91% at a low cost of Rs2.10 per unit, these cheaper sources were unable to offset the impact of expensive fuel-based generation.
Local coal accounted for 14.51% of the generation at Rs11.21 per unit and gas-based power added another 8% at Rs11.82 per unit. Power generation from furnace oil, though minimal at just 0.79%, was the costliest, being recorded at Rs28.77 per unit.
The petition highlighted a small quantity of power — around 0.31% – imported from Iran, which came at a high cost of Rs25.35 per unit. No generation was recorded from high-speed diesel, which is typically reserved for emergency use due to its high cost.
The proposed tariff increase, if approved, will be reflected in the electricity bills of millions of consumers, excluding lifeline users.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
KCCI praises faceless customs assessment system
KARACHI: President Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry (KCCI) Muhammad Jawed Bilwani has said that only those individuals who are engaged in mis-declaration, under-invoicing, or other malpractices have faced difficulties under the new system. For the vast majority of compliant importers and exporters, the FCA has made processes faster, simpler, and more transparent; hence, all types of rumours circulating about the rollback of this system must be fully discouraged.' While strongly praising the performance of the Faceless Customs Assessment (FCA) system and calling for its immediate implementation across the country, Bilwani commended the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and Pakistan Customs for launching the FCA system in Karachi, which he described as a model of effective reform that has brought far-reaching benefits to the business community. The system, which leverages Information Technology (IT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) to eliminate physical interaction in customs assessment, has drastically curtailed corruption, enhanced transparency, reduced losses on account of demurrage & detention and restored confidence among genuine traders. He noted that the introduction of FCA has significantly improved the efficiency of customs operations by expediting clearance times and simplifying documentation. With reduced dependence on clearing agents and elimination of discretionary powers, businesses now experience faster processing, fewer delays, and greater predictability in their import-export operations. The adoption of self-clearance by a growing number of traders has led to a considerable reduction in their cost of doing business, empowering them to manage their shipments independently through a digital interface. Bilwani emphasised that one of the most commendable achievements of the FCA system is the minimisation, almost complete elimination of physical visits to Customs House. This not only saves valuable time and operational resources but also reduces the opportunities for malpractices historically associated with manual assessment systems. As a result, legitimate businesses are finally operating in a more secure and equitable environment. Highlighting the success of the Karachi rollout, he stressed the need for swift nationwide replication. 'The outstanding results in Karachi clearly demonstrate that Pakistan's trade infrastructure can be modernised when technology is implemented with integrity and vision. There is no reason to delay its expansion to other cities and ports.' He further urged the government and relevant authorities to introduce similar IT and AI-enabled systems in all other departments linked with trade, taxation, and regulatory approvals. By reducing human involvement, he stated, the government can eliminate the root causes of corruption and inefficiency across the board. He also called for full digitisation of the entire trade process, from documentation and submission to assessment, approvals, and final clearance so that the entire ecosystem functions with greater transparency, accountability, and speed. Jawed Bilwani also appreciated the Customs officials in Karachi for their commitment to ensuring the success of the FCA system. He reiterated KCCI's full support for all initiatives that aim to simplify trade, reduce bureaucratic hurdles, and foster an environment conducive to fair and transparent business practices. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Nepra's MYT decision: a step in the right direction
EDITORIAL: After a prolonged delay, the regulator — National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) — has finally approved the Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) for the only private entity operating in the power utility sector. There has been a considerable outcry in the media following the Power Minister's criticism of Nepra's decision to allow KE (Karachi Electric) to incorporate recovery losses. But before delving into the controversy, it must be emphasised that this is a step in the right direction, as it will unlock KE's valuation for its shareholders. It will help resolve disputes among existing shareholders and incentivize much-needed investment in the fully integrated energy-utility company. This, in turn, will bode well for the sustainability of the power supply to Karachi, the country's economic hub and a city of teeming millions. Moreover, the move sets the stage for the privatisation of other distribution companies (Discos) — a long-awaited reform in the power sector's transmission and distribution segments. Until now, reform efforts have largely focused on the generation side. Unfortunately, the debate primarily concerns KE receiving compensation for recovery losses. On paper, KE's recovery losses appear higher than those of a few other Discos. Ironically, in the so-called 'better-performing' Discos, recovery during 8MFY25 exceeds 100 percent for consumers using 0–200 units but drops to the 80s for higher-slab consumers. The pattern for KE is similar. However, its overall recovery rates are lower — mid-80s for the 0 — 200-unit slab and mid-70s for higher slabs. These figures point to overbilling by other Discos and lower collection efficiency by KE. Nepra has allowed KE to pass on these costs to different consumers. However, shifting the burden to others is unfair to honest consumers. Yet, other Discos have been doing the same — without any transparency. The PHL surcharge (Rs3.23/unit), paid by all electricity consumers nationwide, including KE's, represents a legacy cost linked to historical losses by state-owned Discos. These public entities are not held financially accountable for their losses; the costs are absorbed into the infamous circular debt. In contrast, KE's shareholders bear the losses and are justified in seeking cost coverage. The way forward should focus on reducing KE's losses and ending overbilling by others. Media scrutiny should push KE to improve its recovery rates. Nonetheless, KE's AT&C (Aggregate Technical and Commercial) losses, as allowed by Nepra, have declined from 43.2 percent in 2009 to 20.3 percent today, with a target of 15.3 percent by 2030. The power division's criticism is a grievance against KE's current management. Nepra's determination came after consultations with all stakeholders, including the power division. If there were objections, they should have been raised during that process. It is important to note that Karachi is a complex city, and the private operator has halved its losses over the past 15 years. Had other Discos achieved similar results, the savings would have been substantial. Nepra's allowance for losses is set to decline over the next seven years — and the same standard should be applied to other Discos as well. Achieving this, however, requires investment and competent management. Such outcomes are unlikely without corporatisation and privatisation. To move forward, Discos must be held accountable for their losses and rewarded for improved performance. They need their MYTs and access to private investment — both of which would benefit Pakistan's broader, evolving power sector. KE's MYT approval is a step in this direction. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Tariff comfort, consumer cost, Nepra's gamble
In a move that will raise eyebrows among those advocating for performance-based regulation, Nepra has sided with K-Electric in allowing a recovery shortfall allowance based on a 92 percent recovery ratio — a decision that flies in the face of the Ministry of Energy's more disciplined proposal. KE had argued that, unlike state-owned discos whose losses are quietly absorbed into the circular debt, its commercial shortfall should be treated as a legitimate pass-through cost. But instead of asking why a privatized utility with over 100 years of history and significant capital investment still needs regulatory shelter for basic operational efficiency, the regulator has chosen to codify KE's weakest performance year (FY24: 92.8 percent) into its future tariff framework. Worse still, the benchmark recovery percentage even by the end of the MYT in FY30 period does not reach the levels seen in FY22. The Ministry's stance — rooted in logic, precedent, and consumer interest — was brushed aside. The MoE had argued for using a 'high watermark' recovery ratio from FY22 or FY23 (96.6 percent and 96.7 percent, respectively) to prevent one off-year from becoming the baseline for tariff calculations. That approach would have halved the burden on consumers, reducing KE's claimed recovery loss allowance from Rs2.88/kWh to Rs1.41/kWh. Instead, with Nepra's green light, KE has now locked in a structural inefficiency at a time when the rest of the sector is — at least on paper — moving toward performance benchmarking and fiscal discipline. Nepra's ruling signals a worrying precedent: if a private utility can socialize its commercial inefficiencies while retaining operational autonomy, then the case for privatization or performance-linked regulation becomes weaker. What message does it send when a regulator backs comfort over competition? If the regulator's decision to validate KE's recovery allowance set a risky precedent, its approval of actualization of units sent-out could also be problematic. In theory, adjusting tariff revenue to reflect real demand variations — much like what is allowed for discos — sounds reasonable. But in practice, it opens up a perverse incentive: KE's revenue is now insulated from shortfalls in demand, even if those shortfalls are partially self-inflicted. Given the regulator's own acknowledgment that this framework could encourage increased load shedding in high-loss areas, the decision feels like an open invitation for KE to game the system — maximizing revenue protection while shifting risk onto the consumer. The regulator has held on to usual warnings: KE is 'directed to ensure uninterrupted supply' and its performance will be monitored on benchmarks like SAIFI, SAIDI, and load-shed adherence. But let's be honest — the track record doesn't inspire confidence. KE has flouted load-shedding rules in the past, often citing commercial losses, and faced penalties so negligible they barely qualify as deterrents. If the regulator is serious about disincentivizing this behaviour, it needs to do more than issue legalese-laden warnings. It must link revenue protections directly with performance metrics, impose penalties that bite. Otherwise, what Nepra has created is a regulatory shelter — one that could make blackouts not just a coping mechanism, but a profit-maximizing strategy. This also comes at a time when KE's future demand growth is under serious question. With overall electricity consumption falling by 7.2 percent in FY23 — and 7.9 percent in residential and 1.5 percent in industrial segments — and with net metering and competitive CTBCM dynamics gaining traction, KE's captive market is eroding. The Ministry of Energy had flagged this, rightly recommending a downward revision in demand projections and capital spending. But KE continues to push ahead with an ambitious investment plan, and now has the regulatory cushioning to shift the consequences of demand shortfalls onto consumers. In such an environment, the risk isn't just of rising tariffs — it's of deepening the disconnect between consumer experience and utility accountability. Nepra's accommodation — from recovery shortfall allowances to actualization of sent-out units — may seem like one-off technical approvals, but they carry deeper structural implications as Pakistan inches toward privatizing other discos under the IMF's watch. By allowing revenue protection mechanisms that decouple financial performance from operational efficiency, Nepra risks embedding regulatory moral hazard into the very model it aims to scale. If a legacy private utility is allowed to socialize commercial inefficiencies and manage demand risk without tight performance-linked conditions, what incentive remains for future investors to run leaner, consumer-centric utilities? Worse, it sets a precedent where privatization becomes a risk-free return model underwritten by public consumers, undermining the very fiscal discipline that the IMF reforms seek to instill.
