
Dozens dead in twin attacks on Mali army bases, Timbuktu airport targeted
BAMAKO - Twin attacks on a Malian army base in the northern city of Timbuktu and in the centre of the country left dozens of soldiers dead, as well as at least a dozen assailants, security sources and local officials said on Monday.
Timbuktu came under attack and shells were also fired at the airport where heavy gunfire was heard, the army, local officials and residents said.
The army's general staff said in a statement it had "thwarted an attempt by terrorist fighters to infiltrate the Timbuktu camp" at around 10:00 am (local and GMT) with 14 attackers "neutralised", with no mention of other victims.
"The terrorists were quickly routed by the swift reaction of the men," the army said, adding that "31 suspected terrorists" had been arrested.
But the military was mourning the loss of at least 30 soldiers after reports emerged late on Monday of an attack on Sunday, likewise blamed on jihadists, at the Boulkessi army base in central Mali, near the border with Burkina Faso.
Security sources and a local official said they believed the death toll from that attack would likely rise.
"Our units on the ground report the death of 30 people on our side... Our men fought to the end but did not receive the necessary support," a security source in Bamako told AFP after the attack on what is one of the main military camps in the centre of the violence-plagued country.
The source added other soldiers remained missing.
"The toll is at least 60 soldiers killed," one local elected official told AFP on condition of anonymity.
A second security source told AFP there were "about 60 victims on the side of Malian forces", although that tally included "the dead, the missing and the soldiers taken hostage".
In a statement late Sunday, the army had indicated that troops had "responded vigorously" to the Boulkessi attack before withdrawing.
'FOUGHT UNTIL LAST BREATH'
The statement went on to declare that "many men fought, some until their last breath" to defend their country and that ensuing military operations "have destroyed several terrorists grouped in places of retreat".
Junta-ruled Mali has since 2012 faced attacks from groups linked to Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group as well as separatist movements and criminal gangs.
The army's general staff said Monday regarding the Timbuktu attack that it had thwarted an attempt by terrorist fighters to infiltrate the camp in the fabled desert city.
Later in the day, a security source said that operations in the camp were "already over" and that the attackers were "everywhere in the city".
"They did not raid the airport because the Russians are there. But they launched shells. It's hot everywhere," the source added.
A local official said the "terrorists" arrived in Timbuktu "with a vehicle packed with explosives".
"The vehicle exploded near the (military) camp," the official said.
UN staff were instructed in a message "to take shelter".
'UNDER FIRE'
A local journalist speaking by telephone said "the city is under fire".
The ancient city of Timbuktu, once known as the "city of 333 saints" for the Muslim holy men buried there, was subject to major destruction while under the control of jihadists for several months in 2012.
The jihadists who swept into the city considered the shrines idolatrous and destroyed them with pickaxes and bulldozers.
The ancient city was peacefully retaken in late January 2013 with the support of French military forces under Operation Serval, deployed to halt the jihadists' advance in Mali.
Since seizing power in coups in 2020 and 2021, Mali's military rulers have broken the country's traditional ties with its former colonial power France and moved closer to Russia.
Jihadist groups and the Malian army and its allies from the Russian paramilitary group Wagner are regularly accused of committing abuses against civilians.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
34 minutes ago
- eNCA
Trump-Musk showdown threatens US space plans
WASHINGTON - SpaceX's rockets ferry US astronauts to the International Space Station. Its Starlink satellite constellation blankets the globe with broadband, and the company is embedded in some of the Pentagon's most sensitive projects, including tracking hypersonic missiles. So when President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cancel Elon Musk's federal contracts, space watchers snapped to attention. Musk, the world's richest person, shot back that he would mothball Dragon -- the capsule NASA relies on for crew flights -- before retracting the threat a few hours later. For now, experts say mutual dependence should keep a full-blown rupture at bay, but the episode exposes just how disruptive any break could be. Founded in 2002, SpaceX leapfrogged legacy contractors to become the world's dominant launch provider. Driven by Musk's ambition to make humanity multiplanetary, it is now NASA's sole means of sending astronauts to the ISS -- a symbol of post–Cold War cooperation and a testbed for deeper space missions. - Space monopoly? - The company has completed 10 regular crew rotations to the orbiting lab and is contracted for four more, under a deal worth nearly $5 billion. That's just part of a broader portfolio that includes $4 billion from NASA for developing Starship, the next-generation megarocket; nearly $6 billion from the Space Force for launch services; and a reported $1.8 billion for Starshield, a classified spy satellite network. Were Dragon grounded, the United States would again be forced to rely on Russian Soyuz rockets for ISS access -- as it did between 2011 and 2020, following the Space Shuttle's retirement and before Crew Dragon entered service. "Under the current geopolitical climate, that would not be optimal," space analyst Laura Forczyk told AFP. NASA had hoped Boeing's Starliner would provide redundancy, but persistent delays -- and a failed crewed test last year -- have kept it grounded. Even Northrop Grumman's cargo missions now rely on SpaceX's Falcon 9, the workhorse of its rocket fleet. The situation also casts a shadow over NASA's Artemis program. A lunar lander variant of Starship is slated for Artemis III and IV, the next US crewed Moon missions. If Starship were sidelined, rival Blue Origin could benefit -- but the timeline would almost certainly slip, giving China, which aims to land humans by 2030, a chance to get there first, Forczyk warned. "There are very few launch vehicles as capable as Falcon 9 -- it isn't feasible to walk away as easily as President Trump might assume," she said. NASA, meanwhile, appeared eager to show that it had options. "NASA is assessing the earliest potential for a Starliner flight to the International Space Station in early 2026, pending system certification and resolution of Starliner's technical issues," the agency said in a statement Friday to AFP. Still, the feud could sour Trump on space altogether, Forczyk cautioned, complicating NASA's long-term plans. SpaceX isn't entirely dependent on the US government. Starlink subscriptions and commercial launches account for a significant share of its revenue, and the company also flies private missions. The next, with partner Axiom Space, will carry astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary, funded by their respective governments. - Private power, public risk - But losing US government contracts would still be a major blow. "It's such a doomsday scenario for both parties that it's hard to envision how US space efforts would fill the gap," Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told AFP. "Both sides have every reason to bridge the disagreement and get back to business." Signs of a rift emerged last weekend, when the White House abruptly withdrew its nomination of e-payments billionaire Jared Isaacman -- a close Musk ally who has twice flown to space with SpaceX -- as NASA administrator. On a recent podcast, Isaacman said he believed he was dropped because "some people had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target." The broader episode could also reignite debate over Washington's reliance on commercial partners, particularly when one company holds such a dominant position. Swope noted that while the US government has long favoured buying services from industry, military leaders tend to prefer owning the systems they depend on. "This is just another data point that might bolster the case for why it can be risky," he said. "I think that seed has been planted in a lot of people's minds -- that it might not be worth the trust."


eNCA
34 minutes ago
- eNCA
Greek artist warns of fanaticism after art vandalised
ATHENS - A Greek artist whose work was vandalised by a far-right nationalist MP warned last week that fanaticism could spiral out of control in Western democracies. "This violence is increasingly present in Europe and the United States, where ideas of purity, race or faith fuel nationalism," artist Christophoros Katsadiotis told AFP in an interview on May 29. On March 10, four of Katsadiotis's artworks at Greece's National Gallery were thrown to the ground by two members of extreme-right Orthodox Christian party Niki -- one of them a party lawmaker -- who viewed them as "blasphemous". Two months later, about 30 masked individuals attempted to assault him before an event in Thessaloniki, resulting in the 53-year-old engraver being put under police protection during public appearances. Katsadiotis said the vandalisation incident at the National Gallery was "an attack on democracy... (and) our civilisation". "If I need police protection, then freedom of expression no longer exists. It's a form of censorship," he told AFP on the sidelines of his new exhibition in Athens. The art in question -- four engravings depicting Saint Christopher with a dog's head -- was part of a collective exhibition titled "The Allure of the Bizarre". The two perpetrators, who smashed the glass protecting the engravings, were detained by police but later released. Niki later expelled the lawmaker involved, Nikolaos Papadopoulos, from the party and the National Gallery has sued him. Katsadiotis is also planning to take legal action. "I was surprised and upset. It was the first time this had happened to me," he said. The incident at the National Gallery sparked an outcry and was condemned by the culture ministry. But the Orthodox Church, which holds broad influence over politics and society in Greece, has publicly criticised parts of the exhibition involving Katsadiotis, who spends his time between Athens and Paris.

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Tech Billionaires and Political Power: The stakes of Trump and Musk's relationship
THE unravelling of the relationship between President Donald J Trump and the tech billionaire Elon Musk has raised to global significance the old age yet urgent question. Image: Allison Robbert / AFP THE unravelling of the relationship between President Donald J Trump and the tech billionaire Elon Musk has raised to global significance the old age yet urgent question. What, if anything, will possibly trigger the avalanche or sequence of dialectical events that would definitively spell the end of the empire? Keen observers have long theorised that the factors that could herald the Thucydides transition of these times would not result from a military invasion of the United States by a foreign power. By all indications, the factors would be internal, which by the sheer scale of their social depth and intractability and indeed the many dimensions of their complexities, would result in its implosion. Donald J Trump may be the last Emperor of the US hegemony, to the catatonic shock of the believers of its invincibility. And it came from an unexpected angle. The billionaires who have been plotting to have dominion over the machinery that rules over the empire have lost patience with the cycles that define democratic biorhythms and their contrived pretences of socio-political civility. The stakes are high, and the battle lines drawn are the hard ones, fixed and immutable. It is the people's power through their sovereign vote against techno fascism, a form of rulership by the technology billionaires, or what Naomi Klein refers to as corporate Zionism. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ If Trump blinks, for whatever reason, deducted or speculated, the empire will meet its spectacular demise at the sphincter of fascism, plunged deep in its heart by the richest man in the world. If Musk blinks, however, the power of the people's will and the continuity of the values that sustain their sovereignty will forever spell the indomitable and victorious spirit of their foremothers and forefathers who sacrificed everything for the legacies they so delicately enjoy. The consequences for so many parts of the globe are dire for some and desperate for others in equal measure. South Africa is a case in point. Musk portended a lot of promise for far-right and fascist tendencies in South Africa. The expectation was that the SpaceX and Tesla mogul would forever inhabit the gilded hallways of the White House and whose influence will be brought to prevail on whoever would be temporarily residing there, according to his dictates. This would have allowed Musk to go to any country and threaten them at will, at the back of US military might and the power of unilateral sanctions against anyone, rightly or wrongly. Musk cannot lose this battle. Being out of the White House, and in mortal combat with the main principal at the Oval Office, what possibility is there that Musk would influence the politics of South Africa as he wishes? The stakes are really, really high. And his vassals in the Republic of South Africa who have been advocating for regime change by alleging genocide against caucasian South Africans in general or that section of them who are farmers, would, as an existential necessity, revise their strategic imperatives in the light of these developments. All the trips to the US, both announced and those undertaken at pains of secrecy, had a singular objective. That is, to persuade the entire Christian Nationalistic movements of the United States, the fascist right movements, tech billionaires and above all, the ruling Republican Party, of the delegitimacy of the South African government. Or to be absolutely correct, the ANC's role in it. The playbook was somewhat simple. Claim genocide against white farmers. Derecognise the current genocidal construct, recently graduated from being a xenophobic lot. Facilitate the establishment of a forever transitional government that would exclude either the EFF and MKP or both. The script best suited for regime change artistes like USAID became too convoluted for Trump, and he abandoned his part in it midplay. Notwithstanding a second contingency of so-called 'genocide refugees' said to have quietly arrived in the US sometime last week, this raging battle for the God complex will snap the refugee scam rather abruptly.