
Pentagon is cutting up to 60,000 civilian jobs. About a third of those took voluntary resignations
WASHINGTON — Roughly 50,000 to 60,000 civilian jobs will be cut in the Defense Department, but fewer than 21,000 workers who took a voluntary resignation plan are leaving in the coming months, a senior defense official told reporters Tuesday.
To reach the goal of a 5% to 8% cut in a civilian workforce of more than 900,000, the official said, the Pentagon aims to slash about 6,000 positions a month by simply not replacing workers who routinely leave.
A key concern is that service members may then be tapped to fill those civilian jobs left empty by the hiring freeze. But the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to provide personnel details, said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wants to ensure the cuts don't hurt military readiness.
The cuts are part of the broader effort by billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk 's Department of Government Efficiency Service to slash the federal workforce and dismantle U.S. agencies.
Acknowledging that 'some' military veterans will be among the civilians let go, the official would not estimate how many but agreed it could be thousands.
The department is using three ways to accomplish the workforce cuts: voluntary resignations, firing probationary workers and cutting jobs as employees routinely leave. The official said the military services and Pentagon officials are going over the personnel on a case-by-case basis to ensure cuts don't affect critical national security jobs.
Officials would not say how many Defense Department civilians requested the voluntary resignation plan — also known as the 'Fork in the Road' offer — but said more requested it than the number who eventually were approved.
The defense official said the 'vast majority' were allowed but that in some cases, people were denied for national security reasons or to make sure that too many people in one office didn't all leave.
He added that Hegseth also has given the secretaries of the military branches and Defense Department personnel leaders the authority to grant exemptions to the hiring freeze.
An average of 70,000 civilians are hired each year, which amounts to about 6,000 a month, he said. Because the services have a good deal of latitude in determining which jobs should not be subject to the freeze, it's not clear what portion of those 70,000 would actually be eliminated.
Plans to cut probationary workers, which the Pentagon said targeted about 5,400 of the roughly 54,000 in the department, are already on hold due to court challenges. Federal judges ordered the administration to rehire thousands, if not tens of thousands, of probationary workers that had been let go, finding legal problems with the way the mass terminations were carried out.
The official added that Hegseth is confident the staffing cuts can be done without negatively affecting military readiness. The Pentagon chief last month in Germany noted that he was planning to welcome DOGE to the Pentagon, adding that 'there are waste, redundancies and headcounts in headquarters that need to be addressed.'
Across the government, about 75,000 federal workers are being let go through 'deferred resignation program' buyouts. And at least 24,000 probationary employees were initially let go in the now-paused mass firings across multiple agencies since Trump took office, according to lawsuits challenging the firings. The government has not confirmed that number.
The personnel reductions come as top Democrats on the House Judiciary and House Oversight committees have filed a lengthy Freedom of Information Act request questioning whether the Trump administration's DOGE Service is operating 'outside the bounds of federal law,' The Associated Press has learned.
In addition, President Donald Trump has ordered a large-scale reduction in force to cut jobs and reduce the overall size of the government. Defense officials could not provide any details on what that would do at the Pentagon or what proposed cuts are being discussed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Doesn't Seem To Know Fort Bragg Is No Longer Named After A Confederate
President Donald Trump held a rally at North Carolina's Fort Bragg on Tuesday, criticizing his predecessor Joe Biden for having changed the fort's name but not seeming to realize that while it is again Fort Bragg, it is no longer named after the treasonous Confederate general Braxton Bragg. 'Can you believe they changed that name in the last administration for a little bit?' he asked the assembled Army troops. 'We restored the historic name of this very, very special place.' In fact, though, Trump and his secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, did no such thing. Instead, the fort is now named after Roland Bragg, a World War II hero at the Battle of the Bulge. The 2020 National Defense Authorization Act required that military facilities honoring Confederate officers be renamed. Trump vetoed it for that reason, but Congress overrode his veto and passed it into law. Those who fought on the side of the Confederacy during the Civil War are, by definition, traitors, having taken up arms against the United States. Under Biden, a commission came up with new names for Fort Bragg and eight other major installations after soliciting input from local communities. Fort Bragg became Fort Liberty in 2023. But Trump, who had repeatedly praised the Confederacy during his first term, promised to revert Fort Liberty's name to Fort Bragg, and do the same for the other bases, during his campaign to regain his office. 'He knows his audience,' said Mac Stipanovich, a longtime Republican consultant in Florida who left the party after Trump took over. 'Hell, I get it. I am a 76-year-old white Southerner.' But neither Trump nor Hegseth could unilaterally undo the law that had banned Confederate names for military bases, so Hegseth approved a plan to 'rename' Fort Bragg after a different Army officer with the same last name. Another major base, Fort Moore in Georgia, saw its name revert to Fort Benning, although not after its original namesake, either. The Army facility was named after Henry Benning, another Confederate general who supported slavery. After the passage of the provision in 2020, it was named Fort Moore, after Vietnam War hero Gregory Moore and his wife, Julia Moore, who helped create teams to notify families in person of their killed or wounded loved ones. Under Trump and Hegseth, the fort was renamed Fort Benning — only this time after Fred Benning, who received the Distinguished Service Cross in World War I. White House aides did not respond to HuffPost queries about whether Trump understood that the names are not honoring Confederate officers anymore. 'Remember, it was only that little brief moment that it wasn't called Fort Bragg. It was by the Biden administration, not Trump,' he said. 'We got it changed.' Stipanovich, who said he considers himself fairly well informed, said he had assumed that Fort Bragg had been renamed after Braxton Bragg. 'I don't know who the Bragg is that it's named after now,' he said. 'I doubt anybody sat down and briefed Trump.' In his speech on Tuesday, Trump said he would also restore the names of seven other bases originally named after Confederate officers. 'For a little breaking news, we are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort AP Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee,' he promised. Unless the 2020 law is changed, though, Hegseth would have to find veterans with the same last names as those seven other Confederate traitors as well, although it is unclear whether any officers have been named 'Robert E. Lee' in the Army's history other than the commanding officer of the Confederate forces. Trump's Real War Is Against America Trump's Double Standard On LA's Protests Couldn't Be More Glaring Trump Says Protesters At Weekend Military Parade Will Face 'Very Heavy Force'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon to restore names of 7 more Army bases that honored Confederate generals
President Trump on Tuesday announced the Pentagon will restore the names of the seven remaining military installations formerly named after Confederate generals after two others had been reverted back earlier this year. 'For a little breaking news, we are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Picket, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rutger, Fort Poke and Fort AP Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee,' Trump told attendees at a Fort Bragg, N.C. celebration marking the Army's 250th anniversary. The bases are currently known as Fort Barfoot in Virginia, Fort Cazavos in Texas, Fort Eisenhower in Georgia, Fort Novosel in Alabama, Fort Johnson in Louisiana, Fort Walker in Virginia, and Fort Gregg-Adams, also in Virginia, respectively. 'It's no time to change,' Trump told the crowd. 'And I'm superstitious, you know? I like to keep it going, right?' The promise fulfills a campaign pledge by Trump, who vowed to revert bases back to their original names after a Congressionally mandated commission recommended new titles for nine military bases in 2022. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this year ordered the names of two bases, Fort Liberty and Fort Moore, reverted back to Fort Bragg and Fort Benning. Hegseth brought back the original names but said they were being used to honor different individuals and not Confederate generals they were originally named for. In the case of Fort Bragg, it takes its title after Private First Class Roland Bragg, a decorated Army paratrooper who served in World War II, rather than Confederate general Braxton Bragg, who lost several costly Civil War battles before leaving the service to run a sugar plantation that used slaves. Hegseth ordered that change in February. Fort Benning, meanwhile, now pays tribute to Cpl. Fred G. Benning, who was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross for his actions during World War I while serving with the U.S. Army in France. The base was originally named for Lt. Gen. Henry Benning, a Confederate general who opposed freeing slaves. The Pentagon chief made that change in March, removing the moniker meant to honor Lt. Gen. Hal Moore and his wife Julie Moore, who committed their lives to the Army and helping military families – most famously through setting up survivor support networks and casualty notification teams still used to this day. The switch overs follow more than five years of political tug of war to rid military installations of names honoring Confederates, starting in late 2020 when the annual defense authorization bill first banned the Defense Department from naming assets after Confederate symbols. At the time, Trump, who was at the end of his first term, vetoed the defense legislation known as the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) partly over the base-renaming provision, but the veto was overridden by Congress. That was followed by the 2021 NDAA that mandated a commission to recommend new names for the nine military bases, with the installations officially receiving their new titles in ceremonies throughout 2023. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Fake images, conspiracy theories swirl around LA protests
There were numerous scenes of protesters throwing rocks or other objects at law enforcement officers and setting cars ablaze, including a number of self-driving Waymo taxis. At the same time, false images spread to revive old conspiracies that the protests were a planned provocation, not a spontaneous response to the immigration raids. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The confrontation escalated Monday as new protests occurred and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced — on social platform X — that he was mobilizing 700 Marines from a base near Los Angeles to guard federal buildings. They are expected to join 2,000 members of the California National Guard whom Trump ordered deployed without the authorization of the state's governor, Gavin Newsom, who normally has command of the troops. Advertisement The latest deployments prompted a new wave of misleading images to spread — some purporting to show Marines and the military service's weapons in action. One was a still from 'Blue Thunder,' a 1983 action-thriller about a conspiracy to deprive residents of Los Angeles of their civil rights. It features a climactic dogfight over the city's downtown. Advertisement Darren L. Linvill, a researcher at Clemson University's Media Forensics Hub, said conservatives online were 'building up the riots in a performative way' to help bolster Trump's claims that Los Angeles had been taken over by 'violent, insurrectionist mobs.' Linvill said the posts were also 'a bit self-fulfilling.' 'As they direct attention to it,' he said, 'more protesters will show up.' James Woods, an actor who has become known for spreading conspiracy theories, used his account on X to rail against the state's elected officials, especially Newsom, a Democrat. He also reposted a fabricated quote, attributed to former president Barack Obama, discussing a secret plot to impose socialism on the country, as well as a video of burning police cars that was from 2020. An innocuous photograph of a pallet of bricks, actually posted on the website of a building materials wholesaler in Malaysia, was cited as proof that the protests were organized by nonprofit organizations supported by George Soros, the financier who, to the feverishly conspiratorial right, has become a mastermind of global disorder. 'It's Civil War!!' an account on X wrote Saturday, claiming that the bricks had been placed near the offices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement for 'Democrat militants.' X posted a Community Note pointing out that the photograph had nothing to do with the protests, but it still was seen more than 800,000 times. It was also widely reposted, including by several seemingly inauthentic accounts in Chinese. The online trope dates at least to the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. It reappeared in 2022 after a conspiratorial post by Representative Lauren Boebert, Republican of Colorado, who suggested that bricks for a paving project near Capitol Hill were intended for violent protests after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Advertisement 'These days, it feels like every time there's a protest, the old clickbaity 'pallets of bricks' hoax shows up right on cue,' the Social Media Lab, a research center at the Toronto Metropolitan University, wrote on Bluesky. 'You know the one, photos or videos of bricks supposedly left out to encourage rioting. It's catnip for right-wing agitators and grifters.' It also fits into the narrative that protests against government policies are somehow inauthentic. On his own platform, Truth Social, Trump also suggested that the protesters were 'Paid Insurrectionists!' Numerous posts echoed unsubstantiated claims that the protests were the work of Soros as well as local nongovernment organizations or Democratic elected officials, including the mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass. Some posts disparaging the protests were shared by accounts with deceptive handles that closely resembled those of official government sources or news organizations. Mike Benz, a conspiracy-minded influencer on X who last year claimed that the Pentagon used pop star Taylor Swift as part of a psychological operation to undercut Trump, advanced an outlandish theory that the mayor had links to the CIA and had helped start riots in the city where she lives. He based that simply on Bass's role as a board member for the National Endowment for Democracy, the congressionally mandated organization formed during the Reagan administration to promote democratic governance around the world. Not surprisingly, perhaps, the theme was echoed by accounts across social media linked to Russia, which often amplifies content that discredits the United States. The Kremlin and its supporters have long accused Soros or the United States government of covertly sponsoring 'color revolutions' to overthrow governments -- from the Arab Spring countries swept up by mass street protests in 2011 to Ukraine. Advertisement 'It is nationwide conspiracy of liberals against not only Trump but against American people in general,' Alexander Dugin, a prominent nationalist in Russia, wrote on X on Sunday. Disinformation in situations like these spreads so quickly and widely that efforts to verify facts cannot keep up, said Nora Benavidez, senior counsel at Free Press, an advocacy organization that studies the intersection of media, technology and the law. She described it as part of 'a much longer effort to delegitimize peaceful resistance movements.' 'Information warfare is always a symptom of conflict, stoked often by those in power to fuel their own illiberal goals,' she said. 'It confuses audiences, scares people who might otherwise have empathy for the cause and divides us when we need solidarity most.' This article originally appeared in