logo
US passenger complains over crying baby on delayed flight, viral videos spark debate

US passenger complains over crying baby on delayed flight, viral videos spark debate

India Today2 days ago

A passenger on a Delta Airlines flight in the US sparked a debate online after he publicly complained about a baby who cried for nearly two hours while the plane remained grounded with no air conditioning.The passenger, Pat McAuliffe, documented his experience through a series of videos posted on X. The background of each clip echoed with the cries of the infant, while McAuliffe appeared increasingly agitated.advertisementIn his first post, he wrote, 'If your child is screaming on a flight (that's late with no AC and hasn't taken off yet @Delta), show it a phone. Brain rot the baby on TikTok until it's quiet. Is that too much to ask?'
In another post, he said he sympathised with the parents but insisted they should have made more effort to calm the child. 'Walk him up and down the aisle, distract him, do something. Simply praying it'll stop is not acceptable,' he wrote as he pointed out that the child had been crying continuously.He added in a third update, 'At what point does this become a medical emergency? It's been two hours. Also, why are these people not even trying to talk to their child to soothe him? Stand up and walk him up and down.'advertisementWatch one of the videos here: His posts, which have clocked over millions of views, received sharp responses from social media users. A section of the internet criticised his tone and offered a more empathetic take on the situation.'Is it too much to ask to buy proper noise-cancelling headphones?' a user asked. McAuliffe, however, remained unbothered. 'I could be 1000 feet underwater and this child's cry would still penetrate my ears,' he replied.Another user said, 'People have kids. Kids aren't perfect. Families have to fly. Put your noise-cancelling AirPods on, turn up the volume, and get to your destination. Fall in line.'But not everyone disagreed with McAuliffe's take.A user argued, 'Children under 10, unless it's a transoceanic flight, or it's a medical necessity, shouldn't be allowed on commercial flights. Private flight, I don't care.'Another shared their own experience, saying, 'This happened to us too. The child cried for 3+ hours, and the parents just sat there. A responsible parent would at least speak to a paediatrician beforehand for advice.'While several users sympathised with the distressed parents, others believed Pat McAuliffe had a point. The incident reignited a familiar online debate about parental responsibility, travel etiquette, and the extent to which fellow passengers are expected to exercise patience.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bound for Mecca, these pilgrims rode from Spain on horses
Bound for Mecca, these pilgrims rode from Spain on horses

Time of India

timea day ago

  • Time of India

Bound for Mecca, these pilgrims rode from Spain on horses

More than 1.5 million people travelled to Saudi Arabia this year for the haj. Only three of them rode on horseback all the way from Spain, recreating the pilgrimage of Andalusian Muslims centuries ago and sharing their travels in the most modern way with big followings on social media. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In Bosnia, they lost days looking for borrowed horses that broke free after a scare and ended up wandering into a minefield. In France, the horses panicked in a tunnel filled with mud, and one nearly drowned before one pilgrim, on foot and chest-deep in the muck, helped pull the animal out. "We were really scared... There were too many horses jumping," said Abdelkader Harkassi Aidi, one rider. 'Hajj on Horseback', as they called the project, took four years of preparation and about seven months of travel over 4,000 miles across about a dozen countries with sometimes treacherous terrain. The journey was, in a sense, a test of their faith in God, humanity and the internet. The project drew over 345,000 followers on Instagram and over 250,000 on TikTok. Some of their posts - on camping, making meals, hosing down horses, and running into obstacles that added many miles to the trip - have been viewed over 550,000 times. It was not always clear the group would make it, but their fans helped with supplies and assistance on ground, and with offers of aid, like donations and a logo revamp. The pilgrims, Harkassi, Abdallah Rafael Hernandez Mancha and Tarek Rodriguez, are Spanish Muslims. The seed of their project began germinating some 35 years ago when Hernandez converted to Islam and pledged to someday make the haj - and to do it on horseback. About six years ago, Harkassi and Hernandez met on a project when he revealed his dream and the latter immediately agreed to help him. They then made extended practice rides, building endurance and fostering the camaraderie that got them through the journey. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Rodriguez joined them later. The trio set out from Spain last Oct with about $1,700 each. They ran out of funds early in the journey, but before they left, they began soliciting donations, including on a crowdfunding site where they raised about $56,000 for supplies, horse feeding, care and logistics. In a post upon their arrival, the group said they were grateful for the "extraordinary" journey that brought them to Mecca. For the riders, the lowest point came in Italy, when they had very little money, they were cold, and the roads were busy and difficult. From there they travelled through Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Bulgaria, Turkey, Syria and Jordan to Saudi Arabia. They grew tense approaching each border, never sure what the rules would be for their unusual form of transport. Still, Harkassi said, his favourite parts often came right after clearing those hurdles, once they entered a country and were greeted enthusiastically. They hope to make a documentary about their journey.

Three Indian Women Removed From Spirit Airlines Flight After Argument With Flight Attendant
Three Indian Women Removed From Spirit Airlines Flight After Argument With Flight Attendant

News18

timea day ago

  • News18

Three Indian Women Removed From Spirit Airlines Flight After Argument With Flight Attendant

Last Updated: Three Indian women were removed from a Spirit Airlines flight in the US after arguing with a flight attendant, causing a delay of over an hour. A TikTok video has 4 million views. Three Indian women were removed from a Spirit Airlines flight in the United States after their argument with a flight attendant caused a delay of more than an hour. A video of the incident, posted on TikTok, has gone viral and shows three three passengers arguing with the attendant over some mistakes during in-flight announcements. The crew member reportedly made a mistake and said the flight, which was head to New York, was going to New Orleans. In the video, the flight attendant is heard acknowledging and apologising for her mistake but the three women continued to bring up the error, accusing her of not knowing the flight's destination. Watch the video here: You said — M ✨ (@thespicexqueen) June 7, 2025 The women further ignored the flight attendant's directions to stow their baggage in the overhead bin. The situation escalated when she finally warned them that they will be asked to deboard and, eventually, called the police to escort them off the plane. But, the situation did not resolve itself as the three women resisted the officials' attempt to get them to leave the flight. After a long standoff and the threat of jail time, the women gathered their luggage and deboarded the plane, causing a delay of over an hour. First Published: June 11, 2025, 23:41 IST

It's getting harder and pricier to fly with your pet
It's getting harder and pricier to fly with your pet

Mint

time2 days ago

  • Mint

It's getting harder and pricier to fly with your pet

Flying with your pet this summer? Better brush up on confusing rules and higher fees. Oh, and have a plan B ready in case things go awry at the airport. Christina and Michael Kutzner spent hours boning up on the regulations so she could travel with her mother's dog from Las Vegas to Detroit in first class in April. They called Delta, tested different pet carriers, scoured online forums about in-cabin pet travel and more. It wasn't enough. The 20-pound dog was turned away at the airport for being too tall for an under-the-seat pet carrier. Christina and her mom had to buy expensive, last-minute tickets on American for the next day. Christina Kutzner and her mother were told that Kona was too tall for their pet carrier. They also had to get a new crate so Kona, a Shiba Inu, could fly in cargo. (Delta no longer takes pets in cargo except for certain active military or State Department employees.) And they had to fly into Chicago instead of Detroit and rent a car. It was, they say, an expensive lesson. 'We just want to make sure that people are aware there's not a lot of good information out there,'' Michael Kutzner says. Traveling with pets has never been simple. And it has become more difficult and expensive since U.S. airlines, with the support of the Transportation Department, banned emotional-support animals in 2021 after a surge in incidents. The only animals allowed in the cabin now are service animals with proper documentation and small pets in approved carriers that fit under a seat. The list of rules and regulations to bring your cat or small dog on the plane reads like the fine print on a basic economy ticket. It's even worse if you're traveling internationally. Figuring out whether that carry-on bag will pass muster in the airline bag-sizer is a cinch compared with whether your pet carrier and its beloved occupant will be cleared to fly with you. Airlines have robust pet sections on their websites but deciphering them isn't always easy, especially for newbies. Delta's website, for example, states that in-cabin pets must be 'small enough to fit comfortably in a kennel with the ability to move around without touching or sticking out from the sides." American's says only that the pets must be 'small enough to fit comfortably inside the closed/zipped carrier." The rules keep changing, too. Alaska Airlines last week said it would no longer allow passengers to book a separate seat for their pet. It was the last U.S. airline to offer the option of buying a second seat for a dog crate. It was popular with owners of medium-size dogs too big to fit under the seat. Other airlines that let you buy a second seat for a pet don't let you put the carrier on the seat. Thanks to Signature Pet Transport, a Petit Basset Griffon Vendeen named Rooney was delivered from his breeder to his new family. Supporters have filed a petition to reverse the decision. The airline also decreased the eligible carrier size for under-seat pets and said it would no longer take birds and rabbits beginning next year. (Alaska says it and other changes are designed to align its policies with those of merger partner Hawaiian Airlines.) Another challenge for travelers: Pet fees can now cost more than your plane ticket. A friend texted me last week lamenting the $300 price tag to bring her dog on a United flight from Denver to South Dakota. Her own ticket cost $209. American and United raised their domestic pet fees to $150 one way last year. Delta, which previously charged $95, joined the $150 club in April. JetBlue and Southwest charge $125 each way, Alaska $100. Cargo prices are higher. (It's all still cheaper than sharing a private charter or flying the new BARK Air—a luxury charter service for dogs, with prices starting at $6,000 one way for a pet and its human from New York to Los Angeles in July.) Even professionals find it hard to stay ahead of the varying pet policies and prices on airlines. 'We do our best to keep up with all of it," says Christian Diaz. The former flight attendant founded Signature Pet Transport in San Diego, which provides a variety of services—from phone consultation to guardians who travel with your pet—to help travelers navigate pet transport. Diaz, who is a regular contributor to the popular Flying with Dogs Facebook group, can rattle off airlines with what he considers the most generous under-seat carrier sizes (Delta tops the list domestically) and those with the stingiest (Hawaiian, American and now Alaska). Then there are the differences between a 20-pound French bulldog and a 20-pound Italian greyhound when it comes to fitting into a regulation-size carrier. The short, compact bulldog won't occupy much space, he says, but the greyhound has longer legs and probably won't make the airlines' cut, says Diaz who also breeds dogs and shows them. Diaz offers the following tips to reduce the chance of problems at the airport. Long before the day of travel, make sure the dog fits in the carrier and is comfortable. Practice, practice, take a chance if you think the dog is on the bubble sizewise. (Google any airline's pet policy and one of the related searches is always 'How strict is this airline?")Print out or bookmark the airline's policies and bring them with you. Airline employee understanding and enforcement of the complex rules can vary from flight to flight, airport to have a backup plan. The Kutzners story had a happy ending on American, but they wished they had received better directions from Delta throughout the process. Delta apologized for any miscommunication and says its pet policies are designed for 'safety and comfort throughout all aspects of flight." Write to Dawn Gilbertson at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store