Lebanon Says Two Killed in Israeli Strikes in South
Lebanon's health ministry said Israeli air strikes killed two people in the south on Friday, with Israel announcing attacks in the same areas targeting Hezbollah militants.
Despite a November 27 ceasefire that sought to halt more than a year of conflict between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah, Israel has continued to conduct near-daily strikes in Lebanon, AFP said.
An Israeli attack on "a car on the Sidon-Ghaziyeh road resulted in one dead", a Lebanese health ministry statement said on the fourth straight day of Israeli attacks in the south.
Hours later, the ministry said another Israeli strike on a vehicle around Aita al-Shaab had also killed one.
Israel's military said it had "conducted a precise strike in the area of Sidon and eliminated the Hezbollah terrorist Muhammad Jaafar Mannah Asaad Abdallah".
It said Abdallah was "responsible, among other things, for the deployment of Hezbollah's communication systems throughout Lebanon".
On Friday evening, it announced "a Hezbollah terrorist was struck and eliminated' by the Israeli military in the area of Aita al-Shaab.
An AFP journalist said the Israeli attack in Sidon had hit a four-wheel-drive vehicle, sending a column of black smoke into the sky.
At the scene of the strike, members of the security forces stood guard as a crowd gathered to look at the charred remains of the vehicle after firefighters had put out the blaze.
The Israeli military has also said it was behind other attacks this week that it said killed Hezbollah members.
Hezbollah, significantly weakened by the war, insists it is adhering to the November ceasefire, even as Israeli attacks persist.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
6 hours ago
- Arab News
Oman spearheads push to revive US-Iran nuclear talks
Omani Foreign Minister Badr Al-Busaidi's lightning visit to Tehran on May 31 has injected fresh momentum into the stalled US-Iran nuclear negotiations, as the Gulf sultanate positions itself as the crucial mediator in preventing regional conflict while advancing diplomatic solutions. The brief but high-stakes visit saw Al-Busaidi deliver an American proposal to Iranian officials regarding Tehran's nuclear program, setting the stage for a pivotal sixth round of negotiations scheduled for later this month under Omani supervision. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi responded via social media, stating his government would 'examine the proposal and respond according to our principles and national interests.' The diplomatic exchange followed closely on from President Masoud Pezeshkian's two-day state visit to Muscat, where he held extensive talks with Sultan Haitham bin Tariq on political, economic and bilateral cooperation matters. He also met with high-level Omani officials, businessmen and the Iranian community in Oman. Oman is pursuing tangible outcomes from the current US-Iran diplomatic process through intensive bilateral engagement and coordination with key Arab nations to build regional consensus around negotiated solutions. The sultanate views dialogue as the only viable mechanism for bridging Washington-Tehran divisions, recognizing that diplomatic breakdown could trigger dangerous escalation dynamics. Should negotiations collapse or reach an impasse, the resulting tensions might provide Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with the political and strategic justification to authorize military action against Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Such strikes would risk unleashing a broader Middle Eastern conflict with catastrophic and unpredictable ramifications — a scenario Gulf Arab states are determined to prevent as they advance ambitious economic transformation initiatives that fundamentally depend on sustained regional stability and cross-border cooperation frameworks. The sultanate views dialogue as the only viable mechanism for bridging Washington-Tehran divisions Hassan Al-Mustafa Uranium enrichment remains the core obstacle frustrating diplomatic progress. American officials have sent mixed signals, alternately supporting low-level enrichment for peaceful purposes while sometimes demanding complete suspension — a position Iran categorically rejects. Araghchi has consistently maintained that enrichment capabilities represent 'fundamental national necessities,' declaring that 'the right to enrichment has always been our Foreign Ministry objective in both previous and current negotiations,' while emphasizing Iran's rejection of what it terms foreign 'hegemony.' Building on these diplomatic efforts, Oman has developed behind-the-scenes proposals that remain unpublicized, though Iranian diplomatic sources have revealed to me a 'core concept centered on temporary enrichment cessation lasting several months, with potential extension up to two or three years.' This Iranian moratorium would trigger reciprocal American concessions, including graduated sanctions relief and the release of frozen Iranian financial assets, creating space for sustained bilateral negotiations aimed at securing a comprehensive, lasting accord. According to the source, this framework would ensure 'Washington refrains from blocking Iranian enrichment activities within internationally sanctioned parameters for civilian nuclear applications,' representing 'a pragmatic compromise acceptable to both sides that could narrow existing gaps and avert diplomatic collapse.' Tehran appears receptive to this approach, particularly given its prior willingness to halt enrichment activities temporarily. The implementation of such measures would likely be interpreted as a confidence-building initiative demonstrating genuine commitment to peaceful resolution of the nuclear standoff. Sweeping alignment remains distant, suggesting an interim arrangement may represent the most achievable near-term outcome Hassan Al-Mustafa However, implementation faces significant technical hurdles requiring resolution. First, determining the operational status and disposition of Iran's advanced third-generation centrifuge infrastructure. Second, establishing protocols for managing Iran's substantial stockpiles of 60 percent-enriched uranium. Third, resolving uranium supply chain arrangements for Iranian reactor operations — whether through the depletion of existing reserves or negotiating external procurement agreements. And, fourth, defining the scope and structure of international monitoring mechanisms, particularly whether Tehran would accept oversight personnel beyond standard International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors. Concerning the American initiative delivered by the Omani foreign minister to Iranian officials on May 31, while official details remain classified, Axios cited a US administration source indicating the 'American proposal aims to resolve the central impasse surrounding Iran's insistence on maintaining domestic enrichment capabilities.' According to Axios, US envoy Steve Witkoff's communication to Tehran outlined a concept for 'a regional consortium operating under joint International Atomic Energy Agency and US oversight to manage uranium enrichment for civilian nuclear applications,' with the critical caveat that Washington 'insists any shared enrichment infrastructure be established outside Iranian territory.' These recommendations align with a complementary diplomatic formula proposing 'American acknowledgment of Iranian enrichment rights contingent upon Tehran's complete cessation of all enrichment activities.' The New York Times reported that 'the American document delivered to Iran consists of condensed talking points rather than a comprehensive draft accord,' indicating that sweeping US-Iranian alignment remains distant and suggesting an interim framework arrangement may represent the most achievable near-term outcome. Meanwhile, the Tehran Times emphasized in its June 1 analysis that any successful agreement must treat Tehran's core demands as fundamental rather than peripheral considerations, particularly regarding 'effective, verifiable and irreversible sanctions relief' — described as a nonnegotiable prerequisite for meaningful progress. The forthcoming sixth round of talks promises to be exceptionally demanding, but it could prove decisive in charting the exact trajectory of US-Iran diplomatic engagement, establishing whether the two nations can forge workable accommodations that secure Gulf Arab endorsement, while thwarting the military escalation actively sought by extremist factions and the Netanyahu administration.
Leaders
7 hours ago
- Leaders
US-Backed Gaza Aid Centers Close Temporarily After Deadly Shooting
Aid centers in hunger-stricken Gaza will temporarily close on Wednesday, according to a controversial US-backed agency. The Israeli army warned that roads leading to distribution stations 'are considered combat zones.' This announcement follows a tragic incident where twenty-seven people died in southern Gaza on Tuesday. Israeli troops opened fire near one of the centers operated by the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Israel recently eased its blockade of the Palestinian enclave. However, the United Nations has stated that the entire population remains at risk of famine. The UN Security Council will vote on a resolution calling for a ceasefire and humanitarian access to Gaza. This measure is expected to face a veto from the United States. The GHF announced that its 'distribution centers will be closed for renovation, reorganisation, and efficiency improvement work' on Wednesday. They plan to resume operations on Thursday. The Israeli army confirmed the temporary closure and warned against travelling on roads leading to the distribution centers. Controversy Surrounding GHF Operations The GHF, which began operations a week ago, has faced criticism from the UN and major aid groups. They have refused to cooperate with the GHF due to concerns that it serves Israeli military objectives. Following Tuesday's deadly incident, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres condemned the killing of Palestinians seeking food aid as 'unacceptable.' Israeli authorities and the GHF, which employs contracted US security, denied allegations that the Israeli army shot at civilians, stating that the incident is under investigation. The Israeli military insists that its forces do not prevent Gazans from collecting aid. Army spokesperson Effie Defrin stated that soldiers fired at suspects who 'were approaching in a way that endangered' the troops. He confirmed that the 'incident is being investigated.' International Response to Civilian Casualties UN human rights chief Volker Turk condemned such attacks against civilians as 'unconscionable.' He stated that they 'constitute a grave breach of international law and a war crime.' The International Committee of the Red Cross reported that Gazans face an 'unprecedented scale and frequency of recent mass casualty incidents.' The United States acknowledged that a US-backed relief effort in Gaza has succeeded in distributing meals. However, they also recognized the need for improvement following reports of shootings near the GHF center. Meanwhile, a boat organized by an international activist coalition is sailing toward Gaza to deliver aid. Israel has intensified its offensive, claiming it aims to defeat the Palestinian group Hamas, with health ministry in Gaza reported that at least 4,240 people have died since Israel resumed its offensive on 18 March, bringing the war's overall toll to 54,510, mostly civilians. Short link : Post Views: 82
Leaders
7 hours ago
- Leaders
Israeli Military Strikes Syria in Response to Fired Projectiles
The Israeli military said it launched strikes on targets in Syria on Tuesday, responding to projectile launched from Syrian territory, with Defense Minister Israel Katz explicitly holding Syria's leader directly responsible for these provocative actions. However, Syria's foreign affairs ministry vehemently denied any involvement in the projectile launches, asserting that Syria has never posed and will never pose a threat to regional stability. Israeli media reported that these strikes marked the first instance of projectiles fired from Syria into Israeli territory since the fall of Bashar al-Assad in December, with no reports of casualties or damage on the Israeli side. The projectiles triggered air raid sirens in parts of the southern Golan Heights, a region Israel captured from Syria in 1967 and annexed in 1981. Statements from Key Figures Israeli defence minister, Israel Katz, issued a statement through his office, emphasizing that they view the Syrian president as directly responsible for any threats or attacks directed at Israel. Syria's interim president, Ahmed al-Sharaa, who led the Islamist group that overthrew Assad, now faces the consequences of these actions. The Israeli military confirmed that two projectiles crossed from Syria into Israeli territory, landing in open areas. In response, Israeli artillery struck targets in southern Syria. Syria's official news agency, SANA, reported shelling targeting the Yarmuk Basin in the west of Daraa province. The Britain-based war monitor, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, noted that the bombardments hit farmland without reporting any casualties. Regional Impact and International Reactions Violent explosions shook southern Syria, particularly the town of Quneitra and the Daraa region, following Israeli aerial strikes overnight. Syria condemned the Israeli shelling as a blatant violation of its sovereignty, which further aggravates regional tensions. The foreign ministry reiterated that Syria has never been a threat to anyone in the region. The ministry denied responsibility for the strikes but acknowledged that numerous parties are attempting to destabilize the region for their own interests. They emphasized the priority of extending state authority in southern Syria and ending the presence of unauthorized weapons. Following Assad's overthrow, Israel moved its forces into the UN-patrolled demilitarized zone in the Golan Heights and has conducted hundreds of strikes against military targets in Syria. Ongoing Military Operations Israel asserts that these strikes aim to prevent advanced weapons from reaching Syria's new authorities, whom they consider jihadists. The Israeli military stated that its troops continue defensive operations in southern Syria to dismantle terrorist infrastructure and protect residents of the Golan Heights. Syria and Israel have technically been at war since 1948. US President Donald Trump announced the lifting of sanctions on Syria last month and expressed hope for normalized relations with Israel. However, experts believe that this prospect remains far from reality since the situation continues to evolve, with both nations on high alert and international observers closely monitoring the developments. The recent exchange of fire between Israel and Syria underscores the volatile nature of their relationship. As both countries navigate this complex geopolitical landscape, the international community watches with bated breath, hoping for a de-escalation of tensions and a path towards lasting peace in the region. Short link : Post Views: 41
