AP WAS THERE: 'Jaws' and the parental debates it set off
LOS ANGELES (AP) — It didn't take long for 'Jaws' to make an impression. The movie that launched the summer blockbuster season and changed how people view sharks and the ocean 50 years ago also created a dilemma for parents: Was it a movie their children could watch?
To help answer that, The Associated Press went to the film's star, Roy Scheider.
Legendary AP Special Correspondent Linda Deutsch interviewed Scheider and others for a story that ran on July 28, 1975, roughly a month after 'Jaws' arrived in theaters.
The story is included below as it ran.
___
At a sunny hotel swimming pool, a small freckle faced boy rushes up to Roy Scheider and exclaims with delight: 'I think you played really good in 'Jaws.''
'You see,' says Scheider as the boy runs off to swim. 'Some children seem able to handle it.'
Scheider, star of the smash hit film which is breaking box-office records, was reacting to a stormy issue now almost as hot as the movie itself — should children see 'Jaws'?
The debate stems from the rating given to the movie — PG, meaning parental guidance suggested.
Several critics and members of the movie industry have called the rating too lenient. Some use it as an example of flaws in the frequently criticized rating system.
In practice, PG places no restrictions on who may see a film. Any child with the price of a movie ticket can view 'Jaws,' which climaxes with a man vomiting blood as a giant shark chews him up.
Los Angeles Times critic Charles Champlin noted that the PG 'does not sufficiently warn parents that the giant shark includes children among its victims and that children are known to be particularly impressed by what happens to children on the screen.'
Movie makers whose films recently were give the more restrictive 'R' rating — requiring an adult to accompany any child under 17 — have protested loudly.
Some have even appealed to the rating board of the Motion Picture Association of America for a rating change.
'With some of our innocuous action pictures we've been hit with Rs,' says Paul Heller, producer of 'Enter the Dragon.'
'But here we get a picture where there's all sorts of gore and blood, where arms and legs are seen floating in the water, where a girl is seen covered by crabs on the beach, and other horrifying scenes, and it gets a PG.'
Producers of the film 'Rollerball' unsuccessfully appealed their R rating after 'Jaws' was released, claiming their film's violence was far less objectionable.
Universal Studios, which released 'Jaws,' has taken the unusual steps of warning in its advertisements that the film 'may be too intense for younger children.'
Youngsters interviewed at a Los Angeles area beach after the movie's release expressed fears of swimming in the ocean.
One 12-year-old girl confessed 'I think about it so much. I dreamed about it. It really scared me.'
But Universal has no complaints about the PG rating, and, according to Rating Administration, no one may appeal a film's rating other than its producer and distributor.
Scheider, who portrays the sheriff of the beach resort menaced by the killer shark, recalls that 'Jaws' was made with the intention of obtaining a PG rating.
'The picture was judiciously shot to avoid unnecessary amounts of gore,' he says, recalling that some bloody scenes were added after final footage was reviewed by the filmmakers.
'When the film was brought back to the post, the editor and director found that it was necessary to show, after an hour and a half, what the shark does. the audience demands it.'
The scene of the girl covered with crabs was added later, he notes and the finale in which Robert Shaw is chewed up was embellished.
'I personally think that scene could have been modulated a bit,' says Scheider.
But Jack Valenti, president of the MPAA and father of the seven-year-old rating system, defends the 'Jaws' rating.
'In the view of the rating board, 'Jaws' involved nature's violence, rather than man's violence against man,' Valenti has said.
'This is the same kind of violence as in 'Hansel and Gretel.' Children might imitate other kinds of violence, but not the kind seen in 'Jaws.''
Valenti declared that, 'If this were a man or woman committing violence as seen in 'Jaws,' it would definitely go in the R category. But it's a shark, and I don't think people will go around pretending they're a shark.'
The rating controversy hasn't hurt business. Universal reports that 'Jaws' grossed an incredible $60 million in its first month and seems destined to grow richer than 'The Godfather,' the current record holder.
Scheider says his own 12-year-old daughter has seen 'Jaws' twice — but only after he and his wife explained 'which things she was going to see were real and which ones were not real.'
'She was scared in many parts, but she knew it was a movie,' he says, suggesting that parents who let children see the movie explain first that 'This is going to scare you. It's going to be like a roller coaster ride.'
'Some kids understand his and some don't,' he concedes.
'... I would be very careful about children under 10. If they're susceptible to nightmares, get scared easily and are impressionable, I'd say no, don't see it. If the child can handle it, fine, see it.'
Scheider holds the cynical view that the rating system exists because 'most parents don't give a damn what their kids see.' But he is convinced that a child who sees 'Jaws' without guidance won't be permanently traumatized by it.
'It'll go away,' he says. 'You can live through it. Traumatic shocks in entertainment disappear. Traumatic shocks through the lack of love and ill treatment by parents and peers persist through all of life.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cancer Daily Horoscope Yahoo Life Astrology: June 21, 2025
It's a great night to host or attend a dinner party. Your sparkly banter is sure to be a hit! It's one of those days when quiet social situations can really pay off, and you're right in the thick of it all. Your celestial forecast is just a click away. Get free horoscopes sent to your inbox every day, week, and month.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WWE SmackDown results, highlights (June 20): John Cena stuns CM Punk with wild pipebomb promo
John Cena has been holding out on the world with his heel work after the latest "WWE SmackDown." (Photo by Craig Melvin/WWE via Getty Images) It's perplexing how, all in the same week, "WWE Raw" can be as massive of a stinker as it was, while "WWE SmackDown" enters Grand Rapids, Michigan, and delivers in spades. Honestly, this week was the perfect example of what it looks like when the company tries to book creatively. Killing(s) the game This chapter in the Ron "R-Truth" Killings saga is fascinating and, quite frankly, pretty unpredictable. Advertisement There was supposed to be what you could only assume would have been a squash match between Aleister Black and Pretty Deadly's Kit Wilson — then Ron Killings attacked Wilson before Black could even enter the ring. Killings put Wilson in the STF and called for his John Cena rematch right then and there, but backstage authorities told him to hold off until main event time. Black was rightfully upset and confronted Killings backstage about him ruining his match before Damian Priest intervened with a motivational pep-talk. I didn't see that coming, but Priest's callbacks to the pair's brief time together in The Judgment Day were welcome. Once we got to the main event, it was surprising to see that the match actually happened. Throughout the night, there was no sight of Cena, and the vibe just felt like he wouldn't appear unless it were something like a video on the tron to tell everyone he wasn't there. But no, they had a match, and Killings got the win when Cena DQ'd himself using his WWE title. The duo essentially just played Cena's hits on each other before the champ tried to take the belt and hit the bricks. Killings followed him down the ramp and got hit with the belt to end the match, and then he just disappeared when CM Punk came out to brawl with Cena. Talk about a way to completely devalue the whole Killings angle. As absurd as it was for Killings to vanish, the end of this "WWE SmackDown" was phenomenal, as Cena got the upper hand on Punk and stole a page out of his playbook. Advertisement The champion reverted to a more classic, vintage version of himself, but in heel fashion, getting cheered and calling back to the classic Punk pipebomb promo that saw Cena driven through a table as it happened. This time, it was Cena's turn, dropping his own pipebomb after planting Punk with an Attitude Adjustment through a table in the ring. I mean, the guy literally name-dropped AEW's Claudio Castagnoli, TNA's Nic Nemeth, and Matt Cardona. This. Was. Excellent. It wasn't as hard-hitting as Punk's promo back in the day, but this was by far the best mic work of Cena's heel run. You just knew these two would recreate magic once they got put back together, and this type of Cena is what his heel run should have consisted of from the beginning. Hopefully, he doesn't go back to the stereotypical trashing of fans' heel work he's been doing after all is said and done between him and Punk. This was just too good, and what we've been waiting for. One strong Knight LA Knight didn't need to explain his recent actions that saw him cost Bron Breakker and Bronson Reed in their Fatal-4-Way King of the Ring matches. But that was how the "Megastar" kicked off this "WWE SmackDown." Advertisement There's a certain edge to this vengeful Knight that's really working, and it was arguably needed after the U.S. title saga. Also, shout out to him for the sick Rage Against the Machine Guerrilla Radio reference. If you know, you know. Knight called out Seth Rollins, and instead received the presence of Paul Heyman. The interaction was brief, but relatively tense, as Heyman threatened Knight to leave the arena by night's end — or else. Ultimately, Knight pointed out the grifter nature of Heyman before challenging him to a match since Rollins didn't come out. That was funny, and I almost wish it happened, as silly as it would have been. But surely, you can guess what happened after that. Breakker and Reed made their way to the ring to attack Knight, but the former U.S. champ stood tall after he got his hands on a steel chair. It was a pleasant surprise to see Knight stand tall against these two. It made him look pretty strong and set up a match later between Knight and Reed. Advertisement In the match, Knight couldn't have made those two look any dumber than he already had. Knight made his entrance, emerging from the announce table area to attack Breakker and Reed from behind for an early advantage. Reed stopped Breakker from the early interference because he wanted him for himself. I love the thought process there, but ultimately, the interference was inevitable after Breakker couldn't keep his cool the second time Knight hit him. So, Knight won by DQ when Breakker speared him. I don't love it, but it was expected, and most importantly, it maintained the aura of Knight looking strong on this "WWE SmackDown." I also never expected a pairing like Knight and Reed to mesh as well as they did. In the end, Breakker and Reed Speared and Tsunami'd him into oblivion, so we'll see if this leads to a brief write-off or something of the sort. 👑 Uncrowned GEMS of the Night 👑 So, before Sami Zayn and Randy Orton got their hands on each other in the first King of the Ring semifinal match, Cody Rhodes made his entrance only to have his promo completely hijacked by the overkill Jey Uso entrance. To be fair though, Rhodes' pyro is also pretty comically overkill when he isn't wrestling. Advertisement Anyway, Orton embarrassed all of them on the mic before his match, promising Zayn would be champion — but it won't be at SummerSlam after a King of the Ring win. As for Uso, well, he essentially just told Rhodes it can only be one of them who advances. Rhodes and Uso being on this "WWE SmackDown" was completely unnecessary, other than to boost Zayn's promo, stating it was his time as the other three have all already been world champions. What we got out of the match was stellar for a TV pairing, as Orton got the win clean off a brilliant RKO attempt sequence. Despite WWE's abysmal booking finishes to most of the tournaments' Fatal-4-Way matches, the advancing victors have led to some seriously compelling options. It felt like there really could have been something with Zayn's pursuit of a world title by taking out one of his good friends in Rhodes or Uso. However, with Orton winning, now we have to get that long-awaited Rhodes match. This was all-around quality stuff. Before the King of the Ring match, the Queen of the Ring gave us the same degree of greatness. Advertisement First of all, I just want to say how great it is to get a match between Asuka and Alexa Bliss in 2025. And immediately, it scored the Uncrowned Gem of the Night because we stunningly got the first of two clean finishes! Asuka has made it to the finals on the women's side. Incredible, folks. The match was also good, but the booking here was what elevated the semifinal matches. A Charlotte Flair interference felt like a guarantee in Asuka vs. Bliss after the teasing WWE has been doing between her and Bliss. There was one spot where Bliss set up Twisted Bliss but bailed on it to jump down from the top rope and get caught in an armbar before a Rings of Saturn-type submission. Bliss escaped, but that was a weird moment that totally felt like a camera angle used for the patented Triple H interference spot. In the end, Bliss came up short when she did go for Twisted Bliss, falling into Asuka's knees and taking the Empress Impact. Honestly, that finish, and its name, is so goofy, especially for Asuka, but I couldn't be happier to see her booked strong upon her return. She'll face either Jade Cargill or Stephanie Vaquer in the finals. You can't go wrong with either of those matches. ♻️ Recycling of the Night The booking on this "WWE SmackDown" just couldn't be perfect, could it? Advertisement When the Nia Jax and Tiffany Stratton feud continued, I audibly uttered some expletives. This couldn't be any dumber. Jax complained, and Stratton came out and just gave her a title match for next week's "WWE SmackDown." It will be a Last Woman Standing match, but who cares, man? I genuinely don't know why this rivalry won't die, and it's hurting Stratton's reign, wasting her time. There was a Naomi cash-in tease, but of course, Jax stopped it. So, that was the only "good" thing about this but it still sucked. 👍FRIDAY NIGHT FIRE👍 1. B-Fab and Michin mentioned needing to talk to "WWE SmackDown" general manager Nick Aldis about the Women's Tag Team titles. Yeah, those still exist, WWE. It's good to see the company is remembering that now that Liv Morgan is injured. Plus, B-Fab rules, so let's give her anything to do, please. Advertisement 2. Flair got the win with the Figure-8 against Chelsea Green in a solid match for what it was. To springboard off our previous bit of fire, Bliss came out to make the save when The Secret Hervice attacked Flair. The foundation is being set for the women's tag team division, but Flair still wasn't ready to accept the aid from her fellow former world champion. They would make for great champions together, so hopefully this goes in that direction. (Bliss's Sister Abigail DDT is still ridiculous in a bad way, though.) 3. The reconciliation between Solo Sikoa and Jacob Fatu (who wore his Raiders jersey backwards) didn't go according to plan for Sikoa. The duo had a good old-fashioned family drama segment, with Sikoa trying to gain sympathy by saying he has no one left and loves Fatu. Fatu said he felt used and questioned Sikoa while the crowd chanted "bulls***." Then, he asked if the U.S. title was the problem, and if so, Sikoa could fight him for it. Instead of accepting, Sikoa went for the Samoan Spike in the middle of Fatu's catchphrase. JC Mateo came out to aid in the assault before Jimmy Uso made the surprise save. As much as I'd prefer to see The Usos reunite, I'm curious to see where this goes, and am glad we have a clear line in the sand now. Everyone played their roles exceptionally. Sikoa will now get a title shot at WWE Night of Champions 2025. That doesn't make a ton of sense, but it is what it is. 👎DOWN & OUT👎 1. Breakker literally barked at Byron Saxton when he approached backstage after the opening segment. Holy hell, WWE has booked him to look like such a mindless bozo enforcer since he joined Rollins and Heyman. Advertisement 2. The video package that recapped Goldberg's return to face off with Gunther was just ridiculous. How can anyone take the match seriously when every Goldberg highlight was from over 25 years ago in WCW? 3. Stamping logos onto tables is so lame. 👑 This "WWE SmackDown" felt every bit of its three hours, but was a great show outside of the waste of time between Jax and Stratton. I give this show a Crown score of: 9/10.👑
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Emily Ratajkowski Has ‘Zero Straight Men' In Her Life That Don't Serve a Specific Role
Emily Ratajkowski doesn't have any straight male friends—and she's perfectly okay with that. In a new interview with Elle UK, Ratajkowski declared she has 'zero straight men' in her life that fit that description. 'I still like men,' the 24-year-old model and actor told the publication. 'I just have zero straight men in my life, unless they're a romantic interest." She continued, 'In the hierarchy of needs, that's at the top of the pyramid, which is nice. [Men are] pleasure and fun, but not a part of my core. The rest of my life is community with other women and queer people, and being a mom.' Ratajkowski shares her four-year-old son, Sylvester Apollo Bear, with her former husband, Sebastian Bear-McClard. Following her divorce in 2022, she spent some time 'enjoying the freedom' of single life before jumping back into the dating scene. She was quickly linked with multiple A-list bachelors, eventually declaring that she attracts the 'worst' men during an episode of her podcast, High Low With EmRata. Now she says 'not centering men is wonderful,' adding, 'In general, in our world, men have somehow filed this space, but what I found instead of it is community.' Celebrity Splits Emily Ratajkowski Says It's 'Chic' to Be Divorced by 30 Amid Sophie Turner's Split From Joe Jonas 'Congratulations…congratulations.' That community includes longtime friend Lena Dunham, who wrote a part for the Gone Girl star in her upcoming Netflix series, Too Much—Ratajkowski's first significant acting role since 2019. 'I don't agree to a lot of offers,' she said. 'I really value control. In my 20s, I didn't have a lot of it in my career. Now, I like making things and I like not being an addition to them. With Lena, I got to shape the character so much, which was really fun. It gave me a bigger role than just an actor for hire.' According to Elle UK, Ratajkowski's character, Molly, is 'the model/influencer rebound girlfriend of the lead's ex-boyfriend.' Though the part was written for Ratajkowski—and with her input—it doesn't sound as if it's about her, especially not the woman she is at 34 years old. 'I'm fascinated with this decade of my life,' Ratajkowski says of her 30s. 'My mom had me at 39, and I remember she always romanticized her 30s as a time of self-exploration and power as a woman. I'm in the midst of it and really feel that way too.' Celebrity News Emily Ratajkowski Is the Latest to Blast Blue Origin's All-Female Space Flight: 'End-Time Shit' 'I'm disgusted.' Originally Appeared on Glamour