Supreme Court gender ruling sees clash at Stormont assembly
Members of the Northern Ireland Assembly have clashed over the UK Supreme Court ruling that a woman is defined in law by biological sex.The ruling was raised for debate by Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) assembly member Jonathan Buckley, who described it as a moment of "truth, clarity and common sense".First Minister Michelle O'Neill said she has "sought advice" from officials on how the judgment may apply in Northern Ireland.The Sinn Féin vice-president said "these are complex issues" and encouraged people to "demonstrate some compassion for the LGBTQ community".
The Supreme Court ruling has significant implications for single-sex spaces in Great Britain, such as female changing rooms and toilets.The court had been asked to decide on the proper interpretation of the 2010 Equality Act, which applies across Great Britain but not in Northern Ireland.Northern Ireland's Equality Commission has said it aims to publish new formal guidance in June.Speaking in the assembly, Buckley welcomed the "unanimous, landmark ruling".He added: "How ridiculous have things become that it took the UK Supreme Court to rule on the definition of a woman - something that the vast majority of people already knew the answer to."The member of the legislative assembly (MLA) accused other Stormont parties of promoting a "warped and dangerous ideology" on gender issues.O'Neill called for "sensitivity" in the debate, saying that transgender people were "feeling quite attacked right now"."These are complex issues and we need to work our way through the outworking of the Supreme Court ruling," she said.The Sinn Féin MLA added: "We ourselves have sought advice from our own officials."We await the Equality Commission's ruling and guidance because I think that will be important for everybody in terms of how we would respond to this in a wider way."
Alliance Party MLA Nuala McAllister said the court ruling "must not be used to fuel division or hostility"."We have seen those divisive culture wars, filled with misinformation, result in real-world consequences, with hate crimes against the trans community rising in recent years across the globe," she said.McAllister said the ruling "has not provided clarity around its real-world implications"."Any response here in Northern Ireland should be carefully considered," she added.Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) Doug Beattie said the trans community remained a protected group under the law.He said the court ruling was about "privacy, safety and dignity" and "above all, it's about women's rights"."Women wanting their own space at sport, groups, refuges, hospital wards or toilets should never be viewed as controversial," he added.Beattie said "clear, detailed guidance" was now needed from the Equality Commission in Northern Ireland.Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) assembly member Matthew O'Toole, leader of the opposition at Stormont, said the debate had become "tragically toxic".He said the "hard-fought rights of women" and those of the transgender community "do not have to be in competition or in opposition with one another"."That judgment does not render invisible or meaningless the lives and experiences of trans people," he added.He said some of the debate had "drifted into stigmatising and humiliating those people".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
41 minutes ago
- NBC News
Judge deems Trump's cuts to National Institutes of Health illegal
A federal judge in Boston on Monday said the termination of National Institutes of Health grants for research on diversity-related topics by President Donald Trump' s administration was 'void and illegal,' and accused the government of discriminating against racial minorities and LGBT people. U.S. District Judge William Young during a non-jury trial said the NIH violated federal law by arbitrarily canceling more than $1 billion in research grants because of their perceived connection to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Young said he was reinstating grants that had been awarded to organizations and Democratic-led states that sued over the terminations. And the judge indicated that as the case proceeds he could issue a more sweeping decision. 'This represents racial discrimination and discrimination against America's LGBTQ community,' said Young, an appointee of Republican former President Ronald Reagan. 'Any discrimination by our government is so wrong that it requires the court to enjoin it and at an appropriate time, I'm going to do it.' Referring to the termination of grants for research related to issues involving racial minorities, the judge said he had in four decades on the bench 'never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable.' 'You are bearing down on people of color because of their color,' the judge said, referring to Trump's administration. 'The Constitution will not permit that.' Representatives of the NIH and its parent agency, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Rachel Meeropol of the American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the grant recipients who sued, said Young's ruling applies to hundreds of grants. The plaintiffs include the American Public Health Association, a membership organization for public health researchers, and 16 states led by Massachusetts. The NIH, the world's leading funder of biomedical and behavioral research, has terminated 2,100 research grants totaling about $9.5 billion and an additional $2.6 billion in contracts since Trump took office in January, according to a letter that dozens of NIH employees signed onto last week protesting the cuts. The funding cuts are part of Trump's wide-ranging actions to reshape the government, slash federal spending and end government support for DEI programs and transgender healthcare. The administration's plans to cut 10,000 jobs at health agencies including NIH have been temporarily blocked by another federal judge. Trump also has signed a series of executive orders requiring agencies to ensure grant funds do not promote 'gender ideology' and to end support of what it sees as 'discriminatory' DEI programs. Conservative critics of DEI programs have portrayed them as discriminatory against white people and certain others. In line with Trump's policy agenda, the NIH has instructed staff to terminate grant funding for studies related to DEI programs, transgender issues, COVID-19 and ways to curb vaccine hesitancy, and grants that could potentially benefit Chinese universities. The trial that Young held on Monday concerned only some of the claims in the consolidated lawsuits over the cuts. The judge will consider others later. Young said he would give the parties an opportunity to present further evidence before he rules on those claims and decides whether to reinstate grants beyond those awarded to the plaintiffs. The NIH grant terminations, as well as a slowdown in approving and renewing grants, have reverberated through universities across the nation, many of which have faced losing the vast majority of their research budgets. In response, universities implemented hiring freezes, travel restrictions, class size reductions, furloughs and layoffs. Many colleges depend on NIH grants for the majority of their research budgets. The University of Washington, a top public university for biomedical research, for example, said it had received about 1,220 grants from NIH and about $648 million in funding last fiscal year, according to court filings. Students and faculty at the university said the disruption to grant funding has touched off a brain drain from the U.S., as researchers are increasingly leaving for positions abroad. The slowdown have also endangered long-running studies, including a program to bank and study Alzheimer's patients' brains. The Trump administration has tried to cut other key sources of research funding. In February, Angel Kelley, a U.S. district judge, of research like equipment, maintenance, utilities and support staff. The administration had estimated that the move would cut about $4 billion in funding to research centers.
BreakingNews.ie
5 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Politics watch: Housing and homelessness on agenda
Here, we have a look at the issues likely to dominate political discourse in the week to come. Housing and homelessness An Sinn Féin motion on housing and homelessness will be debated in the Dáil on Tuesday. Advertisement The motion will call for emergency action and a Raise the Roof protest will take place outside Leinster House to coincide with it. Along with Sinn Féin, Labour, the Social Democrats, People Before Profit-Solidarity, the Green Party and a number of Independent TDs will back the motion. The motion will call for a huge increase in public housing spending and stronger taxes for vacancy and dereliction. Public transport experience On Wednesday, the Regional Independent Group will bring a motion on the experience of people on public transport. Advertisement It comes amid various compliants on the prices of public transport, expierence of commuters, and anti-social behaviour on public transport. Nursing home controversy A recent RTÉ documentary revealed serious issues at a number of nursing homes . The film examined standards of care at nursing homes operated by Emeis Ireland, formerly known as Orpea. The French-owned company runs 27 residential homes across the State. Undercover researchers found multiple examples of care failings and neglect of vulnerable older residents in the facilities. Advertisement Problems in nursing homes will be in focus in the Dáil this week. At 2.12pm on Wednesday, June 18th, the Dáil schedule includes: Government Business: Statements on Nursing Homes and Care for Older Persons. Harris warns of 'dark cloud on the horizon' amid US tariff threat There are 'dark clouds on the horizon' the Tánaiste warned, as looming US tariffs influenced discussions between ministers and key budgetary stakeholders on Monday. Simon Harris was among attendees at the National Economic Dialogue at Dublin Castle, regarded as one of the first steps of the Budgetary process, where Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe also told those gathered that the 'near-term outlook is clouded in uncertainty'. Paul Murphy detained and passport seized in Egypt again Paul Murphy has been detained again in Egypt, according to his family. It is claimed the People Before Profit TD went to a Cairo police station to retrieve his phone, under the advice of the Irish Embassy, but has not been allowed to leave. Advertisement Other participants in the Global March to Gaza are reportedly also detained. Paul's partner, Jess Spear is appealing to Tánaiste Simon Harris to ensure all those involved are released, and their passports are returned. A statement on behalf or Mr Murphy said: "I have been detained in the Abdeen police station in Cairo." He said after arriving at the police station, officials "had me talk to the secret police and left me in a room with an interpreter". Advertisement "They claim they are looking for my phone. I just attempted to leave but they said that I cannot leave." Ms Spear said the Tánaiste "must ensure that Paul and all the Global March to Gaza participants are released, have their passports returned and are allowed to continue their humanitarian mission to try and get aid to the people of Gaza". Abroad The man suspected of killing a Minnesota politician and wounding another crawled to officers in surrender on Sunday after police located him in woods near his home, bringing an end to a two-day search. Vance Boelter was arrested and charged with two counts of murder and two of attempted murder. US president Donald Trump vetoed an Israeli plan , presented to the US, to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to a US official. The Israelis informed the Trump administration in recent days that it had developed a credible plan to kill Mr Khamenei. After being briefed on the plan, the White House made clear to Israeli officials that Mr Trump was opposed to the Israelis making the move. In the UK, t he findings of a national audit into the sexual exploitation and abuse of children by grooming gangs in England and Wales will be announced this week.
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE JILLIAN MICHAELS: Why I, a gay woman, can't celebrate Pride Month now that it's been hijacked by leather daddies, drag shows and corporate stunts
I've never been 'proud' to be gay. Despite being openly gay, happily married, a parent, a public figure. The truth is, I'm proud of my accomplishments. The things I fought for. My career. My family. My grit. Not the things I am by default. Being gay isn't a merit badge — it's a fact of my existence. And that's why I've always had a complicated relationship with Pride Month. When I was a teenager in the '90s, being gay meant living with shame, not pride. It meant keeping your truth under wraps to avoid being bullied, rejected, or worse. Back then, gay rights weren't just limited, they were almost nonexistent. We couldn't marry. We couldn't adopt. Most of the country still associated us with AIDS. You were a punchline at best, a pervert at worst. Being gay wasn't cool — it was dangerous. So yes, I understand how Pride started. I understand why it mattered. The original Pride wasn't a party, it was a protest. It grew out of the Stonewall Uprising in 1969, when brave gay men and women finally said, 'Enough.' They fought back against brutality, against invisibility, against erasure. Pride parades became a vehicle for visibility, a way to commemorate those lost to hatred, disease, and silence. It was defiance in the face of rejection. It was necessary. But that was then. This is now. Today, gay people can marry. Adopt. Run for office. We have legal protections and public support that would have been unthinkable when I came out. Many LGBTQ individuals are not just tolerated, they are embraced, celebrated, and platformed. In some circles, they are practically untouchable. And still, Pride Month has ballooned into a 30-day spectacle that now feels less about unity and more about domination — cultural, corporate, and political. Let's be honest. This isn't 1992 anymore. We're not fighting for survival. We're fighting for relevance — and it shows. Pride Month today has become a lightning rod, not because gay people are asking to be treated equally, but because the month has become synonymous with shock value, sexual exhibitionism, and corporate hypocrisy. We've all seen the footage. Leather daddies in assless chaps simulating sex acts in public. Drag queens twerking in thongs in front of children. Parades that look more like adult fetish conventions than civil rights celebrations. I'm all for sexual liberation, but not on a sidewalk in broad daylight with families in the crowd. Keep your kink — straight or gay — in private where it belongs. We're told Pride is about 'inclusion,' but increasingly it feels like a middle finger to anyone who doesn't co-sign every fringe performance or ideology. If you so much as raise an eyebrow at what's happening on your city's main street, you're labeled a bigot, even if you're gay yourself. You don't have to be a conservative Christian mom to think that maybe the Pride movement has lost the plot. What's worse, Pride has become corporatized to hell. Every June, major brands roll out rainbow flags like seasonal decor. You can't walk through a Target without being bombarded by LGBTQ-themed merch — not just for adults, but now for toddlers and babies, too. Meanwhile, some of these same companies have no problem doing business in countries where homosexuality is punishable by death. It's not activism. It's marketing – and it's insulting. Even the most well-intentioned people, those who once marched beside us for equal rights, are starting to feel alienated. I don't blame them. They didn't fight for this so that kids could be exposed to sexually explicit performances at public libraries or pride parades that make Mardi Gras look modest. They fought for fairness and dignity. We say Pride is about belonging, but today it often looks more like tribalism, where every dissenting voice, even from within the community, is vilified. And ironically, it's made Pride more divisive than ever. Instead of inviting people in, we're pushing them out. Instead of celebrating how far we've come, we're flaunting how little we care about what anyone thinks, even if it undermines our own cause. And all of this is happening at a time when we're supposed to be united. Let's put this into perspective. We honor our fallen soldiers for one day: Memorial Day. Meanwhile, Pride gets a month — filled with parades, corporate takeovers, and media coverage wall-to-wall. This year half the country raged that celebrating our army's 250 birthday and honoring wounded warriors and gold star families was authoritarian. But nobody batted an eye at rainbow flags flying from government buildings for all of June. This isn't equality. It's imbalance – and imbalance breeds resentment. Maybe it's time for a reset. What if Pride wasn't 30 days of identity politics, but one powerful day of shared humanity? A day of gratitude for how far we've come, and a reminder to lead with empathy, not ego. A celebration not of sexual orientation, but of freedom. A day where we invite everyone — gay, straight, confused, whatever — to come together not in protest, but in unity. Because here's what most people don't realize: We're not that different. We all love our families. We want health, peace, safety, and a shot at a decent life. That's not gay or straight. That's human. So let's stop building walls out of rainbows and start building bridges. Real pride doesn't need a stage, a sponsor, or a spotlight. It doesn't demand applause. It is lived — quietly, confidently, unapologetically. Every single day.
