logo
‘A True Game Changer:' Unprecedented School Choice Tax Credit Part of GOP Bill

‘A True Game Changer:' Unprecedented School Choice Tax Credit Part of GOP Bill

Yahoo14-05-2025

A historic bill creating a first-of-its-kind, nationwide tax credit scholarship program to expand private school choice is part of a sweeping Republican tax bill approved by the House Ways and Means Committee Wednesday.
'It is a true game changer that we think would really supercharge school choice across the country,' said John Schilling, senior advisor for the American Federation for Children, a conservative school choice advocacy group.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
The Educational Choice for Children Act would provide money to families in all 50 states making less than three times their area's median income. The recipients, including families who homeschool, could spend it on a large range of education-related expenses, including private and parochial school tuition, books and other instructional material, online classes, private tutoring, fees for dual enrollment and educational therapies.
Related
The measure would create $5 billion in annual tax credits starting next year for individuals who donate cash or stocks to nonprofit Scholarship Granting Organizations, which have discretion over handing out the funds. Donors would receive an unprecedented 1:1 return, allowing them to reduce their taxable income by $1 for every dollar donated, up to $5,000 or 10% of their adjusted gross income.
Currently, 1.2 million students are being served by 76 private school choice programs enacted in 34 states, according to Patrick Wolf, graduate director of the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas. Those programs include vouchers, which give parents public money directly for private school tuition, and Education Savings Accounts, which set aside public money for a range of educational expenses. Twenty-one of those states already have tax credit scholarship programs, according to EdChoice. That number might be about to radically change.
'If the ECCA is enacted and the maximum amount of tax credits … are claimed through individual donations, basically the number of students being supported by private school choice programs across the country would double in one year,' Wolf told The 74. 'A 100% increase in a single year in the number of people being served by private school choice programs. That's a big deal.'
Pro-choice advocates and conservative leaders celebrated the bill's advancement, arguing it will give unprecedented school choice access to families across the country who have historically been locked out, including in Democratic-controlled states where lawmakers generally oppose private school choice. Children, they say, will finally have the opportunity to be matched with the learning environment and tools that suit them best, largely regardless of how much money their parents make. And the tax incentives will allow individuals to fund it.
Related
Meanwhile, critics expressed serious concern, claiming the far-reaching measure would essentially use taxpayer money to fund largely unregulated private schools primed for discrimination and that loopholes in the bill allow for a system akin to a tax shelter. They also argue wealthier individuals in urban areas — both those donating and those receiving funds — stand to benefit the most, while those in underserved rural areas could be harmed.
And, they say, the $5 billion in taxes the government will lose out on has to come from somewhere and will likely drain resources from public schools, which serve the majority of U.S. students.
'This would be a back door way of creating what is essentially a very large, nation-wide private school voucher program, and it would be created by sneaking it into this big budget reconciliation bill,' said Jon Valant, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, who authored a report arguing against the measure. 'It may very well pass without most Americans knowing what it is and what it does.'
Because the choice act is part of the fast-track budget reconciliation process, it faces an easier road to passage in the Senate, requiring a simple 51-vote majority, rather than 60, and is not subject to stalling by the filibuster. In the House, where Republicans hold a slim majority, Speaker Mike Johnson has said he expects to have the budget bill done by Memorial Day.
With a $5 billion cap, Valant pointed out, the tax credit scholarship 'would overnight become one of the largest federal education programs that we have. As one of those programs, it just doesn't meet the kinds of standards that I think we should expect for public spending in education.'
Related
While public funding of school choice has been around since at least the late '90s, he said there's been a shift in the philosophy and incentives behind the measures. Historically, they were far more targeted to lower-income students or those with disabilities.
But, 'this newer wave of private school choice policies reflects very different motivations,' he said, arguing that when programs have almost-universal eligibility and are set up in ways that help wealthier people, 'it's really not at all equity- and opportunity-motivated policy.'
Related
One way families with greater wealth are incentivized to donate? Stockholders stand to benefit through a loophole that would exempt them from paying capital gains taxes. For example, if an individual were to donate $10,000 worth of stock that they had originally purchased at $2,000, they'd still get back the full $10,000 in tax credits without ever having to pay capital gains on the $8,000 profit.
If the choice act passes, it would run through 2029, with the ability to increase the cap by up to 5% each year. It's part of the 389-page 'one big, beautiful bill' approved by the House Ways and Means Committee Wednesday after a marathon six-hour hearing by 26-19 vote along party lines. Among many other provisions, the controversial bill would make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent, cut funding to Medicaid and food stamps and extend the current $2,000 Child Tax Credit while raising it to $2,500 per child through 2028.
The specifics for the tax credit scholarship in the omnibus tax bill differ from the original act introduced in January in three major ways: the $10 billion cap has been cut in half; only individual taxpayers, not corporations, are eligible to donate; and participating private and parochial schools must follow the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, which legally mandates support services and accommodations for special education students.
'That's a huge regulatory burden for small private schools, and in a sense, is potentially a poison pill for the legislation,' Wolf said.
But experts emphasized that the bill must still go through multiple committees and the reconciliation process, so is subject to significant changes. Pro-choice advocates in particular are hoping the final language more closely mirrors that of the original bill, which allowed corporations to participate and did not require private and religious schools to follow IDEA.
A version of the bill was introduced under the first Trump administration but didn't really gain momentum at the time. A new version was re-introduced this January by Sen. Bill Cassidy, the Louisania Republican who chairs the Senate education committee, and a number of his colleagues.
'For years I've advocated for school choice with my Educational Choice for Children Act. I am pleased to see it included in the big, beautiful bill,' Cassidy said in a statement. 'Expanding President Trump's tax cuts is about preserving the American Dream. Giving parents the ability to choose the best education for their child makes the dream possible.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US
Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Check out the latest Donald Trump presidential approval ratings for PA and across US

Despite mass firings within the government, threats of tariffs and struggles to get the 'big, beautiful bill' passed, President Donald Trump's approval ratings have held steady early in his second term. DOGE leader Elon Musk is leaving the White House and Trump is threatening to tariff two high profile American companies — Apple and Mattel — despite questions by the US Court of International Trade about his authority to unilaterally impose tariffs without action by congress. Here's what the recent polls show about Trump's presidential job approval ratings as of the first week of June. According to Rasmussen Reports polling, Trump's approval has improved to a 53% approval rating and 46% that disapprove. The TrafalGarGroup poll from this weekend found that 53.7% of Americans approve of how Trump is handling his job as president, while 45.6% disapprove. The Morning Consult tracker poll taken this weekend reported a drop to 46% approval rating and a 51% that disapprove. The Economist/YouGov poll taken this week, shows Trump improving with a 45% favorability versus 53% unfavorable. Americans expressed the most important issue was overwhelmingly focused on inflation/prices, followed by jobs and the economy, health care, immigration and civil rights. In this weekend's Quantus Insights poll, Trump's job approval improved with 48.3% approval versus 47.8% that disapprove and 3.9% that had no opinion. RealClear Polling which encompasses the average of different 15 different pollsters, including all those mentioned above, shows Trump's overall favorability at 47.5% and 49.7% that disapprove. These numbers have improved since his lows at the end of April, when it reached a 52.4% disapproval rating and 45.1% favorable approval rating. According to Civiqs polls, last updated June 2, Trump's approval ratings have dropped about three points in The Keystone State compared to what Pennsylvanians thought of his performance in January. About 53% of Pennsylvanians polled currently disapprove of the president's performance, up from 50% on Jan. 20. Only 43% of the commonwealth gave Trump a thumbs up as of early June, down from 46% six months ago. These polling numbers were also broken down by age, education, gender, race and party. Age: Those between 18-34 were most unfavorable of Trump (60%), while those 50 to 64 were the most favorable (55%). Education: Postgraduate students were most unfavorable toward Trump (68%). Non-college graduates were most favorable (49%). Gender: Men and women are split on Trump, more than half of females (58%) holding an unfavorable view and more than half of males (52%) having a favorable view of the president. Party: Members of the Republican party were 87% favorable of Trump, compared to the Democratic party, who felt just 3% favorable of the president's performance. Independent voters leaned unfavorable (48%). Race: Black voters had the highest unfavorable opinion of Trump (89%), followed by other races at 59%, Hispanic/Latino at 57% and white at 46%. Note: Polls are constantly changing and different pollsters ask different varieties of the population. These numbers were reflected as of Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 10 a.m. This article originally appeared on Donald Trump presidential approval rating today in PA vs. nationally

Elon Musk is now using Trump's favorite weapon against him
Elon Musk is now using Trump's favorite weapon against him

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Elon Musk is now using Trump's favorite weapon against him

With just those posts, the Tesla CEO and owner of X (formerly Twitter) disrupted Republican momentum on one of their top legislative priorities, sending senators scrambling and shifting the trajectory of a bill that had been months in the making. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt implied on Tuesday that the Musk post was old news and Trump 'already knows' how the tech entrepreneur felt on the bill. But 'This is one big, beautiful bill, and [Trump is] sticking to it,' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Related : Advertisement However within hours, Republican lawmakers who had spent months negotiating the tax-and-trade package began scrambling, while the bill's detractors gleefully piled on. House Speaker Mike Johnson weighed in, Senate Majority Leader John Thune also pushed back on Musk's argument, saying 'Obviously [Musk] has some influence, got a big following on social media,' he said. 'The question for our members is going to be, would you prefer the alternative? And the alternative isn't a good one.' Advertisement Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul, who long opposed the bill, wanted to join the Wisconsin Republican Senator Ron Johnson said Musk's warning 'bolsters' his case against new spending in the bill. Even Musk's tactic mirrors Trump's pre- and post-presidency strategy of derailing legislation with social media blasts rather than traditional lobbying. When Trump opposed a deal on immigration or infrastructure, he didn't hold a press conference. He posted. And Republicans often reversed course. The power wasn't in the policy argument, it was in the signal it sent to voters and activists. Now, Musk is testing that same method. He framed his opposition to the bill in libertarian terms of wasteful spending, bloated government, and runaway debt. But there's another explanation: the bill threatens his company Tesla. Related : The Big Beautiful Bill would roll back parts of the Inflation Reduction Act, including electric vehicle subsidies, battery production credits, and clean energy incentives. Musk didn't say that directly. Instead, he positioned his objection as ideological. But policy details suggest a more self-interested motive. This dynamic is increasingly important. Musk isn't just reacting to policy. He's trying to shape it and potentially block it. Democrats may try to amend the bill or preserve key provisions. But the central question isn't what Democrats do in the minority. It's whether Musk now holds effective veto power over Republican policymaking, in a way Trump has had the exclusive right to do for years. Advertisement If Musk succeeds, this probably won't be a one-time effort. It will likely become part of his broader playbook. He has followers and influence. That influence could grow. Musk's audience includes tech leaders, investors, libertarians, and a vocal online base that overlaps with the new populist right. When he speaks, elected officials listen if not for guidance, then for political safety. Related : For example, Musk warned voters will 'fire all the politicians who betrayed the American people' if they supported the bill. Yet all of this action comes just as Musk claimed a few weeks ago that he was stepping back from politics entirely. 'I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' He may not be spending money right now, but clearly, he's still spending influence. What makes this especially potent is Musk's ability to blur roles. He's not a donor or a candidate at the moment. He isn't even a 'special government employee' in the White House. And Musk doesn't have to be consistent. He can criticize government programs while profiting from them. He can call for deregulation while relying on federal contracts. Like Trump, the effectiveness lies in the disruption, not the coherence. And not for nothing, disruption is good for the X business bottom line as well in terms of user engagement. Advertisement This isn't a traditional power structure. It's a new one: driven by algorithms, attention, and reaction. And it raises real questions about where political authority now resides. That's why this moment matters. If the Big Beautiful Bill collapses under pressure from Musk's post, it sets a precedent. It confirms that he can shape the GOP's legislative agenda without holding office or formal political power even over the objections of Trump who just wants a bill on his desk. If this strategy works, future debates over energy, trade, taxes—even foreign policy—could all start with the same question we used to ask of Trump: What did Elon Musk post today? James Pindell is a Globe political reporter who reports and analyzes American politics, especially in New England.

Will Donald Trump Get to Pick New Supreme Court Justices?
Will Donald Trump Get to Pick New Supreme Court Justices?

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Will Donald Trump Get to Pick New Supreme Court Justices?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. President Donald Trump may have the opportunity to appoint new Supreme Court justices during his second term in office, legal experts told Newsweek. Why It Matters Trump reshaped the judiciary during his first term, appointing three justices to the nation's highest court. The next few years may grant him another chance to pick a new justice, who could serve on the court for decades. This could have major implications for public policy on issues related to abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration and the scope of executive authority. What To Know Conservative-leaning Justices Clarence Thomas, 76, Samuel Alito, 75, and Chief Justice John Roberts, 70, already face pressure from some on the right to step down over the coming years as Republicans currently hold a trifecta in the federal government. Not only is Trump president, but the GOP holds a 53-seat majority in the Senate. This means no Democrats would be needed to vote in favor of Trump's Supreme Court nominees. Republicans could learn from Democrats about the consequences of their justices not retiring. Late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg faced calls to retire during former President Barack Obama's administration from Democrats who wanted him to pick her replacement, rather than a Republican president potentially getting to do so. However, she declined to do so, continuing to serve during Trump's first term. She died in September 2020—just months before the election in which President Joe Biden would unseat Trump. A photo illustration shows President Donald Trump and the U.S. Supreme Court justices. A photo illustration shows President Donald Trump and the U.S. Supreme Court justices. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty But it was Trump who got to pick her replacement, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, 53, who could continue serving on the court for decades. Conservatives point to that example as to why some of their older justices should retire while Trump can pick their successor. Will Trump Appoint Supreme Court Justice? Legal Experts Weigh In Daniel Urman, a Northeastern University law professor, told Newsweek no one really knows when someone will leave the court, but that Alito and Thomas would be the most likely to retire to ensure someone with similar legal views could replace them on the court. But it may not necessarily be likely because they are now in the majority after years of being dissenting voices they care most about. Pressure from the right may not be convincing to the justices, he said. "Judges and especially Justices are very independent, and I don't think they will be too influenced by the pressure campaign," he said. "It's ultimately a very personal decision and the Ginsburg example is important but she was older and faced more health issues than the current justices." None of the current justices on the court have publicly said they plan to retire anytime soon. Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek Thomas could wait until after the 2026 midterms to avoid giving Democrats a motivating issue ahead of the elections. "However, if that happens, President Trump will pick a very young and conservative nominee because in his mind, he got burned with Justice Barrett," he said. "And he wants to put his further imprint on the tenor of the High Court." Although many conservatives may like to see Roberts retire, it's not clear that is likely, Stephen Wermiel, professor of practice in constitutional law at American University, told Newsweek, noting that he is only 70. His willingness to stand up against Trump may also leave a question about whether he would be "less than thrilled to give Trump the opportunity to replace him." Thomas, meanwhile, is only three years away from becoming the longest serving justice in history, and Alito also seemingly "still has a lot to say and do in the conservative Court," Wermiel said. "I think it is uncertain whether Trump will have another Supreme Court vacancy," he added. "It is certainly likely that conservatives will start putting pressure on Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito to retire after the current term so that Trump can appoint younger replacements." Trump Could Appoint Loyalist Justice, Experts Say Whether a jurist is conservative may not be the only question for Trump, analysts said. Barbara McQuade, former federal prosecutor, told Newsweek Trump could consider loyalty in appointing justices, as some conservatives on the court have been willing to break with him on key issues. "With frustration over some of the decisions by Justices Barrett and Roberts, there would be a push for justices who are not just conservative, but who are loyal to Trump himself," she said. "They could make a significant difference in some of the cases that are percolating up from the lower courts on issues such as birthright citizenship, transgender healthcare, and executive power." Barrett, at times, has been more willing than some of the other conservatives on the bench to break from the president, such as when she opposed his efforts to deport alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 and other key cases. Her independent streak has drawn backlash from conservatives aligned with Trump. Urman agreed Trump may be inclined to nominate a loyalist in the future, noting that he "seems to prize loyalty above all other characteristics in his nominees," and that his appointees could be more aligned with Alito or Thomas than Barrett. What People Are Saying Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek: "It's likely Trump appoints at least one Supreme Court Justice, and maybe two. The odds increase over his four-year term, especially with Justices Thomas and Alito being in their mid-70s." "Trump's Cabinet and officer appointees during his second term have been largely loyalists without the experience or independent streaks that frustrated him during his first term. His Supreme Court appointment(s) will likely reflect those same values, especially given the importance of the judiciary in standing in the way of his executive orders." Roberts, during a fireside chat in May, reported The Hill: "I'm going out feet first. I say that now. I mean, I'm sure if your health declines, and if you recognize that you're a burden to the court rather than part of an assist to everybody, then, it'll be time to go." What Happens Next It's unclear whether any justices plan to retire in the coming years, but the court will continue weighing in on key legal issues and serve as a check on Trump's executive authority.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store