logo
Watchdog opens case into ‘concerns' at Prince Harry's charity

Watchdog opens case into ‘concerns' at Prince Harry's charity

Telegraph03-04-2025

The Charity Commission has opened a case into 'concerns raised' about Prince Harry's African charity, Sentebale, amid a bitter boardroom battle.
The watchdog said it had made contact with those who have raised concerns about the charity's governance, including the Duke and Sophie Chandauka, the chairman.
The Charity Commission said in a statement on Thursday: 'The regulator for charities in England and Wales has opened a regulatory compliance case to examine concerns raised about the charity Sentebale.'
It comes after a bitter row over the charity's governance, fuelled by claims and counter-claims of racism, bullying and mismanagement.
The commission said it was 'in direct contact with parties who have raised concerns to gather evidence and assess the compliance of the charity and trustees past and present with their legal duties'.
It added: 'The regulator's focus, in line with its statutory remit, will be to determine whether the charity's current and former trustees, including its chair, have fulfilled their duties and responsibilities under charity law.
'The Commission is not an adjudicator or mediator and is guided by the principle of ensuring trustees fulfil their primary duty to their charitable purpose and beneficiaries.
'After a period of assessing the initial concerns raised with the Commission, the regulator informed the charity on April 2 2025 it has opened a regulatory compliance case. The regulator has not made any findings at this time.'
Decision welcomed by chairman
Ms Chandauka, who first raised concerns with the watchdog in February, said she welcomed its decision to open a case.
She revealed the charity had launched an internal governance review last year and would share its findings with the commission.
She said: 'We hope that, together, these actions will give the general public, our colleagues, partners, supporters, donors and the communities we serve comfort that Sentebale and its new board of trustees are acting appropriately to demonstrate and ensure good governance and a healthy culture for Sentebale to thrive.'
Carmel Gaillar, Sentebale's executive director, added: 'Transparency and accountability are central to how we operate, and the executive team and I are fully committed to supporting the Charity Commission's Regulatory Compliance case in any way needed.
'We will also continue to work closely with the chair and the new board of trustees to ensure the smooth running of the organisation, keeping our focus firmly on delivering for the young people and communities we serve.'
Prince Harry and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho, with whom he founded the charity, said last month that the relationship between the trustees and Ms Chandauka was broken 'beyond repair, creating an untenable situation.'
They said they would be sharing concerns with the Charity Commission 'as to how this came about'.
When Ms Chandauka first raised her complaint with the watchdog, she accused the board of 'bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir' – prejudice directed at black women.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU 'could hike £6 fee for Brits to enter the bloc' to help pay off monster £200bn Covid debt
EU 'could hike £6 fee for Brits to enter the bloc' to help pay off monster £200bn Covid debt

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EU 'could hike £6 fee for Brits to enter the bloc' to help pay off monster £200bn Covid debt

The EU could hike charges for Brits to enter the bloc as part of efforts to pay off massive £200billion Covid debts, it was claimed today. A new levy could top up the seven euro - £6 - fee that will be due when the new ETIAS system takes effect, currently scheduled for the end of next year. Under the European Travel Information and Authorisation System, arrivals from 60 countries with visa-free deals - including the UK and US - will need to pay for a travel pass. It will be valid for up to three years, and is billed as a way of streamlining border processes. However, according to Politico, states are pushing for the charge to be increased in negotiations for the EU Commission's budget proposal next month. Finances are under pressure from the £200billion of debt issued to finance recovery from the pandemic in 2021. 'It seems that there is a possibility of a gradual increase of the fee, strengthening the long-term revenue potential,' the Polish rotating Council presidency is said to have written in an internal note. A Commission spokesman told the site 'a possible adjustment of the fee' was being mooted to account for inflation since levy was adopted in 2018. The UK has a similar charge for visitors from the EU. The Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA), which took effect earlier this year, costs £16 and last two years. But the ETIAS increase would be a blow for UK travellers who are already facing disruption from the new EU's entry-exit system due to be introduced in October. This will replace the need for people arriving in the EU from non-member countries such as the UK to have their passports stamped. Instead, they will need to have their fingerprints scanned and a photograph taken to register them on a database, with the data stored for three years. But there are fears this will cause queues at EU airports, as well as at the Port of Dover, Eurotunnel's terminal in Folkestone and London's St Pancras railway station, where French border checks are carried out before people embark on cross-Channel journeys. Keir Starmer claimed to have secured Brits access to e-gates in his post-Brexit 'reset' with the EU last month. However, it is unclear how much help that will be as individual countries still need to implement measures.

Suspect's welfare prioritised over prompt probe after Harry Dunn crash
Suspect's welfare prioritised over prompt probe after Harry Dunn crash

South Wales Argus

time14 hours ago

  • South Wales Argus

Suspect's welfare prioritised over prompt probe after Harry Dunn crash

Anne Sacoolas, who was able to leave the UK under diplomatic immunity laws 19 days after the crash that left 19-year-old Harry Dunn fatally injured, was not arrested at the scene after police believed the 'necessity test' had not been met. The independent review also heavily criticised Northamptonshire Police's former chief constable Nick Adderley, whose 'erroneous statements' about Sacoolas's immunity status led the Foreign Office to contact the force asking him not to repeat them. Anne Sacoolas (right) was not arrested at the scene (Elizabeth Cook/PA) The report, commissioned by Chief Constable Ivan Balhatchet, concluded there was a lack of co-ordination and adherence to professional standards guidelines amongst senior leadership within the force. The force apologised to the Dunn family for 'what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case.' Harry was killed when Sacoolas's Volvo, which was travelling on the wrong side of the road, struck his motorbike near US military base RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire in August 2019. The Dunn family spent three years campaigning for justice after diplomatic immunity was asserted on behalf of the US suspect, which saw them meet US President Donald Trump in the White House. Sacoolas eventually pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link at the Old Bailey in December 2022, and she later received an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months. Reacting to the review, Harry's mother, Charlotte Charles, told the PA news agency the failures by the force were something 'no family should ever have to endure'. She said: 'Today's review report confirms what we have known for years – that we were failed by the very people we should have been able to trust. 'Harry was left to die on the roadside. Sacoolas was not arrested, even though the police had every power to do so. 'She fled the country, and they didn't tell us. 'These are failures no family should ever have to endure.' The review said there was a 'lack of appropriate recording and associated documentation in relation to high-level meetings such as minutes, strategy, tasking and action logs'. Addressing the role Mr Adderley played in the force's failings, Mrs Charles continued: 'I remain so angry at Adderley to this day. 'We knew from the outset that there was a problem with him and we will never forgive him for launching his personal attacks on our neighbour and spokesperson Radd Seiger, the one person in our tragedy who had the courage to stand up and help us when the police and our own government refused to do that. 'I am glad Adderley is long gone and will never be able to police again.' The review, published on Wednesday, found there is potentially a culture at Northamptonshire Police of not arresting suspects 'in circumstances such as these, which could lead to evidence not being obtained.' A total of 38 recommendations were made in the report, including that the force should adopt an 'investigative mindset' at serious road crashes and review how it recovers material from the scene of a collision. It read: 'A report has been prepared and concerning the consideration of arrest, the (Serious Collision Investigation Unit) lead is of the view that the decision not to arrest is not explained in enough detail and the overriding factor in the decision appears to be the welfare of the suspect and her suffering from shock, with little to no consideration around the full necessity test under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. 'A prompt and effective investigation was not considered or articulated. 'The view is that in these circumstances the suspect could and should have been arrested to assist the evidence gathering process.' Charlotte Charles called for the recommendations to be implemented across the country, saying 'no family should ever again be treated the way we were' (Aaron Chown/PA) It continued: 'The duty (police sergeant) made the decision not to arrest. 'The rationale was largely based on a belief that the necessity test was not met, and information received that Anne Sacoolas was in shock. 'Whilst the welfare of any person is a concern for officers, this should not have prevented the arrest of Anne Sacoolas.' Giving her final thoughts on the report, Mrs Charles told PA: 'Now, the focus must turn to ensuring that every single recommendation in this report is implemented, and not just here in Northamptonshire, but across the country. 'No family should ever again be treated the way we were. 'We will never stop fighting for Harry – but today, at least the truth of the failings of Adderley and the force he led has been recognised.' Assistant Chief Constable Emma James issued an apology to the family on behalf of the force, saying: 'First and foremost, on behalf of Northamptonshire Police, I want to apologise to Harry's family for what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case, Harry, and his family who fought tirelessly in the years that followed to achieve justice for him. 'The picture which emerges is one of a force which has failed the family on a number of fronts, and we hope the findings, which are troubling in several respects, will provide some answers to questions which the family will have wanted to know in the years that have passed. 'I hope some good comes out of this. Much of the learning which the force has taken from this has already been put in place and we make a number of specific recommendations for best practice at a national level. 'We have taken a deep look at ourselves and hope the transparent way we have identified failings of the past will go some way to re-building the confidence of Harry's family and friends going forward as well as the wider public at large.'

Suspect's welfare prioritised over prompt probe after Harry Dunn crash
Suspect's welfare prioritised over prompt probe after Harry Dunn crash

Glasgow Times

time15 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Suspect's welfare prioritised over prompt probe after Harry Dunn crash

Anne Sacoolas, who was able to leave the UK under diplomatic immunity laws 19 days after the crash that left 19-year-old Harry Dunn fatally injured, was not arrested at the scene after police believed the 'necessity test' had not been met. The independent review also heavily criticised Northamptonshire Police's former chief constable Nick Adderley, whose 'erroneous statements' about Sacoolas's immunity status led the Foreign Office to contact the force asking him not to repeat them. Anne Sacoolas (right) was not arrested at the scene (Elizabeth Cook/PA) The report, commissioned by Chief Constable Ivan Balhatchet, concluded there was a lack of co-ordination and adherence to professional standards guidelines amongst senior leadership within the force. The force apologised to the Dunn family for 'what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case.' Harry was killed when Sacoolas's Volvo, which was travelling on the wrong side of the road, struck his motorbike near US military base RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire in August 2019. The Dunn family spent three years campaigning for justice after diplomatic immunity was asserted on behalf of the US suspect, which saw them meet US President Donald Trump in the White House. Sacoolas eventually pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link at the Old Bailey in December 2022, and she later received an eight-month prison sentence, suspended for 12 months. Reacting to the review, Harry's mother, Charlotte Charles, told the PA news agency the failures by the force were something 'no family should ever have to endure'. She said: 'Today's review report confirms what we have known for years – that we were failed by the very people we should have been able to trust. 'Harry was left to die on the roadside. Sacoolas was not arrested, even though the police had every power to do so. 'She fled the country, and they didn't tell us. 'These are failures no family should ever have to endure.' The review said there was a 'lack of appropriate recording and associated documentation in relation to high-level meetings such as minutes, strategy, tasking and action logs'. Addressing the role Mr Adderley played in the force's failings, Mrs Charles continued: 'I remain so angry at Adderley to this day. 'We knew from the outset that there was a problem with him and we will never forgive him for launching his personal attacks on our neighbour and spokesperson Radd Seiger, the one person in our tragedy who had the courage to stand up and help us when the police and our own government refused to do that. 'I am glad Adderley is long gone and will never be able to police again.' The review, published on Wednesday, found there is potentially a culture at Northamptonshire Police of not arresting suspects 'in circumstances such as these, which could lead to evidence not being obtained.' A total of 38 recommendations were made in the report, including that the force should adopt an 'investigative mindset' at serious road crashes and review how it recovers material from the scene of a collision. It read: 'A report has been prepared and concerning the consideration of arrest, the (Serious Collision Investigation Unit) lead is of the view that the decision not to arrest is not explained in enough detail and the overriding factor in the decision appears to be the welfare of the suspect and her suffering from shock, with little to no consideration around the full necessity test under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. 'A prompt and effective investigation was not considered or articulated. 'The view is that in these circumstances the suspect could and should have been arrested to assist the evidence gathering process.' Charlotte Charles called for the recommendations to be implemented across the country, saying 'no family should ever again be treated the way we were' (Aaron Chown/PA) It continued: 'The duty (police sergeant) made the decision not to arrest. 'The rationale was largely based on a belief that the necessity test was not met, and information received that Anne Sacoolas was in shock. 'Whilst the welfare of any person is a concern for officers, this should not have prevented the arrest of Anne Sacoolas.' Giving her final thoughts on the report, Mrs Charles told PA: 'Now, the focus must turn to ensuring that every single recommendation in this report is implemented, and not just here in Northamptonshire, but across the country. 'No family should ever again be treated the way we were. 'We will never stop fighting for Harry – but today, at least the truth of the failings of Adderley and the force he led has been recognised.' Assistant Chief Constable Emma James issued an apology to the family on behalf of the force, saying: 'First and foremost, on behalf of Northamptonshire Police, I want to apologise to Harry's family for what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case, Harry, and his family who fought tirelessly in the years that followed to achieve justice for him. 'The picture which emerges is one of a force which has failed the family on a number of fronts, and we hope the findings, which are troubling in several respects, will provide some answers to questions which the family will have wanted to know in the years that have passed. 'I hope some good comes out of this. Much of the learning which the force has taken from this has already been put in place and we make a number of specific recommendations for best practice at a national level. 'We have taken a deep look at ourselves and hope the transparent way we have identified failings of the past will go some way to re-building the confidence of Harry's family and friends going forward as well as the wider public at large.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store