logo
Thickthorn Junction: £200m road scheme gets government approval

Thickthorn Junction: £200m road scheme gets government approval

BBC News27-02-2025

A multi-million pound road scheme, delayed by court action, has been given the go-ahead by the government.The £200m project to overhaul the A47-A11 Thickthorn junction on the edge of Norwich aims to speed up journey times.The government has said the scheme will also support a strategy for the area, called the Greater Norwich City Deal, to help build more than 44,000 homes and create 33,000 jobs."This scheme is finally getting the go-ahead it deserves, after years of expensive legal blocks," said Future of Roads Minister Lilian Greenwood.
"We are now able to unlock this vital scheme that Norwich has waited long for."We are determined to get Britain building again as this scheme is set to not only improve journeys but create thousands of new homes and jobs."
Redevelopment of the Thickthorn junction, which connects the A47 with the A11 and brings in traffic from south of Norwich, was one of three major A47 projects blocked by court action.Climate activist Andrew Boswell had his crowd-funded legal challenge about carbon emissions rejected in the appeal court last year.The other schemes were the new junctions and dualling of the road between Blofield and North Burlingham and between North Tuddenham and Easton.The Department for Transport (DfT) said the court cases meant work on the Thickthorn scheme had been "delayed by over a year".
Once work is completed, drivers are predicted to save up to four minutes on their journeys at peak times on the eastbound A11 to A47, and up to three minutes along the A11, according to the DfT.It has also estimated that up to 26 fatal or serious injury road crashes could be avoided over 60 years due to rerouted traffic and new pedestrian and cycle routes.Two new slip roads linking the A47 and A11 will reroute traffic away from the junction and take it beneath new underpasses.
Graham Plant, Norfolk County Council's Conservative cabinet member for highways, said the local authority was "thrilled" by the minister's announcement."Thickthorn junction has been a persistent bottleneck, and we've been pushing for these improvements for a number of years," he said. "This scheme will unlock significant economic growth, helping to supercharge the vital connection between the A11 and the nationally significant businesses who have found a home in Norfolk."Nova Fairbank, chief executive of Norfolk Chambers of Commerce, said the business community had "long campaigned" for the improvements along the A47 and the latest funding was "much needed".She added: "The ability to deliver further housing, jobs and new commercial opportunities, as a result of this junction upgrade, will make a significant difference."
Preparations started
There were concerns the Thickthorn scheme would be cancelled when the incoming Labour government announced a DfT spending review, with the junction plans under scrutiny.A £300m package of A47 improvements was first pledged in 2014 by the then prime minister, David Cameron.According to the National Highways website, preparation work is already under way at the site. A completion date has not yet been announced.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The BBC is helping Reform - and has become a danger to democracy
The BBC is helping Reform - and has become a danger to democracy

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

The BBC is helping Reform - and has become a danger to democracy

You might not know it - as the national broadcaster, the source of most information for most of Britain has singularly failed to report it - but the BBC has drawn up plans to win over Reform voters. It's strange how the BBC, a channel of staggering narcissism which never misses a chance to talk about itself, isn't saying much about the leaking of minutes from a meeting of its Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee. Read more The story was broken by the Byline Times, one of Britain's 'new media' outlets that's increasingly proving to be an excellent source of investigative journalism. BBC Director-General Tim Davie and other senior figures like 'News CEO' Deborah Turness want to reshape the broadcaster to appeal to Reform voters. They believe BBC news and drama is causing 'low trust issues' among the radical right. Turness discussed altering 'story selection' and 'other types of output, such as drama' to win Reform hearts and minds The committee includes former GB News executive Robbie Gibb, appointed to the BBC board by Boris Johnson. Emily Maitlis once called him an 'active agent of the Conservative Party'. Minutes stated that bosses 'recognised the importance of local BBC teams in the plan, given their closeness to audiences'. So keep an eye on how BBC Scotland behaves from now on. Here's the bottom line: the BBC should not seek to appeal to anyone. It should report the news with complete objectivity, impartiality, and political neutrality. The words 'without fear or favour' should be tattooed on the heart of every BBC employee, especially the cosseted, overpaid establishment mandarins who run the organisation. We pay their wages. The BBC should represent Britain in its entirety, not favoured special interest groups. However, this courting of Reform proves impartiality to be a lie. It doesn't matter if Marxists or Nazis like a particular story. It's irrelevant whether coverage makes liberals happy or conservatives sad, or vice versa. No consideration should ever be paid to whether drama is perceived as progressive or reactionary. What matters is that news is reported accurately and fairly, analysis is balanced, and drama has cultural merit and entertains. By attempting to woo Reform, the BBC alienates everyone else. Worse, the BBC reinforces the grievances levelled against it. Scotland's Yes movement has accused the BBC of bias for years. Now independence supporters can continue to do so but with ammunition to back up their allegations. How can the BBC pretend to report news honestly, or reflect British politics and culture fairly, when it has been caught out cosying up to Nigel Farage? BBC Director-General Tim Davie with former Conservative PM David Cameron (Image: free) The BBC slits its own throat. And many of its enemies will gleefully watch the blood spill. Specifically, Farage. He has consistently attacked the BBC. Indeed, he uses his own platform - the disgracefully biased GB News - to do so. With delicious irony, Farage previously accused the BBC of being a 'political actor'. Well, now the broadcaster appears to be acting politically for its nemesis. Farage threatened to boycott the BBC, and claimed editors used 'story selection' to bash Reform. If Farage ever takes power he'll gut the BBC in an afternoon. In truth, the BBC deserves all it gets. It made Farage's career, endlessly platforming him, giving him far higher exposure than other comparative politicians. If you think there's any fairness to BBC coverage ask yourself how much you see the LibDems on air compared to Reform. Then look at the two parties and their parliamentary representation. Reform has five MPs, the LibDems 72. Indeed, the Greens have four. Do the Greens get four-fifths of the time devoted to Reform? Do they hell. Only last month, Davie, the director-general, was sounding off about the 'crisis of trust' in Britain. He grandly claimed the BBC would play a leading role in reversing the decline and help combat division. The BBC would create a future where 'trusted information strengthens democracy'. Davie, though, is doing everything he can to deepen division, damage democracy and foment distrust in journalism at a time when society needs good, honest reporting more than ever. When he said 'reform' was needed, it now appears Davie meant with a capital R. Currently, Reform is causing chaos in councils the party won at the English local elections. Will that be reported under the new pro-Reform BBC guidelines? I'm afraid we now need to ask ourselves whether the BBC will tip the next election for Reform. Davie should go, along with the entire BBC board. They disgrace journalism, and are not impartial or balanced. Read more The notion of politicising drama is disgusting. Artists exist to create and enrich our lives, not do the bidding of tawdry media executives in hock to the hard-right. In Britain, trust is at rock bottom. New findings released yesterday from the National Centre for Social Research found that just 19% of us believe the current system of governing Britain works. Only 12% trust governments to put country before party. As long as I've been alive, the BBC was billed as the last redoubt for fairness and balance. Over the last decade, that claim has well and truly undergone an acid bath. Now, the mask is off. The BBC has shown us what it really is, and we need to take notice. Globally, the rise of the hard-right has caused many to lose their minds - from commentators and business leaders, to political parties and academics. In Britain, the BBC hasn't just suffered a nervous breakdown, it has completely surrendered its principles of fairness. It's now more a danger to our democracy than a line of defence. Neil Mackay is the Herald's Writer-at-Large. He's a multi-award winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics

Norfolk and Suffolk Broads boss says toll rise necessary
Norfolk and Suffolk Broads boss says toll rise necessary

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Norfolk and Suffolk Broads boss says toll rise necessary

Recent toll rises were necessary, said the chief executive of the Broads Authority, which runs national parks in Norfolk and Packman said he sympathised with those who opposed the rise, but added costs to maintain the water network had spiralled due to boat firms had argued that the new average charge of 5.9% was unreasonable and put holidaymakers off from visiting the last month, the Department for Transport ruled the increased charges were fair. In November, the authority said it was looking at a £400,000 shortfall, and would have to do less this year as a result. The Broads Authority received its core funding from two sources - the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and questions from the public about the increase on BBC Radio Norfolk, Mr Packman said: "Every year it's difficult because it's this balance between getting enough money to do what people want."Many of our private owners, in particular, they want more. They want more moorings, more dredging, more rangers out on the water checking about the speeding."Dredging is probably our largest single things are in good condition and we're happy where we are at the moment."The number of visitors has fallen compared to previous decades, but Mr Packman believed the state of the economy, the cost of living and the rainy weather might have played a role in fewer tourists rather than toll costs."People used to book for two weeks and come whatever the weather, now they're watching what the weather is doing and booking late," he said. He was also asked about accessibility issues and how holidays on the broads could be improved for people with Packman said he was "entirely sympathetic" to the issue."It's one of the things I've picked up with the hire boat federation," he said."They point out that it's really quite difficult for a weekly cruiser to be able to get people on and off a boat."I do think the issue is something we need to have another look at."Mr Packman said the authority was also working with the Environment Agency on how climate change and sea level rises could impact the Broads in the next 100 years. Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Acorn project funding uncertainty as 'final decision' still to be made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves
Acorn project funding uncertainty as 'final decision' still to be made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Acorn project funding uncertainty as 'final decision' still to be made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves

Concerns have emerged over how much funding the Chancellor will hand over for the Acorn project. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... North Sea bosses have welcomed the UK government finally pledging to back Scotland's carbon capture project after years of delay - but concerns have been raised after it emerged a final investment decision is still to be made. Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed in her spending review that the Acorn carbon capture and storage project, based at St Fergus near Peterhead, will receive funding from the Treasury. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Keir Starmer's government has finally pledged funding for the Acorn project at the St Fergus gas terminal hear Peterhead (Photo by Jeff) | Getty Images But buried in the detail, the Treasury has confirmed that 'a final investment decision will be taken later this parliament, subject to project readiness and affordability'. This has led to a warning over 'investor uncertainty' if a final decision for the Acorn project is not taken 'urgently'. The Acorn project, made up of several firms including Shell, Harbour Energy and Storegga, will, in theory, take harmful carbon emissions and prevent them from being released into the atmosphere and instead buried under the seabed off the Aberdeenshire coast. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are also plans to repurpose an existing oil and gas pipeline to potential transport carbon from Grangemouth to the offshore storage sites. The Scottish Government has commissioned a report into whether this is possible, but has not yet published that work. The previous Conservative UK government had only granted the Acorn project 'reserved' status and favoured projects south of the Border for full early funding. But the Chancellor told the House of Commons she was announcing 'support for the Acorn project', adding that it will 'support Scotland's transition from oil and gas to low-carbon technology". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Pressed over how much investment will be allocated by the UK government, Ms Reeves simply said that 'we are putting money into Acorn'. As well as indicating support for the Acorn project, the Chancellor also pledged to back the Viking project south of the Border. David Whitehouse, Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) CEO, said: 'The support for the next phase of carbon storage projects in Scotland and Humberside is welcome, and an important step towards final investment decisions later in this parliament. OEUK's chief executive, David Whitehouse | OEUK 'Together Viking and Acorn have the potential to unlock over £25 billion of investment by 2035, creating over 30,000 jobs at peak construction.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added: 'These projects will provide the pathway to support the decarbonisation of UK industries and are critical to the government's clean power objectives. We will continue to work with government to detail the long-term support required to deliver these projects and unlock the UK's wider CCS ambitions.' Trade unions have also welcomed the vow to back the Acorn project. STUC general secretary, Roz Foyer, said: 'Following years of Tory failure to invest in carbon capture and storage, this funding is welcome. STUC general secretary Roz Foyer | Andrew Milligan/PA Wire 'The UK and Scottish governments must now work with the relevant unions to ensure that the project maximises the opportunity to create and retain high quality, unionised jobs.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sara Thiam, chief executive of development body, Prosper, said that 'advancing development' in the Acorn project was 'a welcome step', but she warned that 'final confirmation for the project is urgently required to reduce investor uncertainty'. Environmental campaigners have repeatedly raised concerns about the reliance on carbon capture to meet emissions goals, despite independent watchdogs, the Climate Change Committee, suggesting net zero targets cannot be hit without the technology. There are concerns about the reliability of carbon capture technology which is yet to be proven at commercial scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Friends of the Earth Scotland's climate campaigner, Alex Lee, branded the project 'a fossil fuel polluters pipe dream' that 'will never live up to the hype'. They added: 'Carbon capture has received billions in funding around the world and it has never worked properly.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store