Judge will take additional briefs before deciding on trial for ex-Speaker Lee Chatfield
EAST LANSING – A hearing to decide if former Michigan House Speaker Lee Chatfield should stand trial over a series of alleged financial crimes related to his use of political funds wrapped up Friday after three days of testimony and argument, although it could be months still before a judge issues a ruling.
Chatfield, a Republican from Levering who led the House in 2019 and 2020, was charged last year with 13 embezzlement, conspiracy and larceny charges in East Lansing 54B District Court. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's office claims he knowingly used money from political funds to pay for vacations, dinners at upscale restaurants and other non-permitted items when he was a lawmaker.
State prosecutors made their final pitch to District Judge Molly Hennessey Greenwalt about binding Chatfield — and his wife Stephanie Chatfield, who faces one count each of embezzlement and conspiracy — over for a jury trial. Both Lee and Stephanie Chatfield pleaded not guilty to all charges at an arraignment last year.
But before deciding whether a trial should take place, Hennessey Greenwalt wants prosecutors and Lee Chatfield's lawyers to explain what the former Speaker's role was with the political funds he's accused of embezzling money from. She gave the Attorney General's office until March 31 to submit its brief and the defense until April 30 to respond. The judge's ruling on whether to continue the case and send the Chatfields to a trial will come after that.
Nessel's office argues Lee Chatfield and Stephanie Chatfield spent thousands of dollars on a credit card on things like vacations, clothes and meals at upscale restaurants, and then knowingly used the Peninsula Fund's money to pay off their credit card balance.
On Thursday, a forensic accountant called by the government as a witness said her analysis of the Chatfields' bank and credit card statements found there were likely thousands of dollars spent on things that weren't permissible under the Peninsula Fund's stated goals. The Peninsula Fund, as a 501c(4) social welfare fund, is allowed to pay for certain permissible political activities. For politicians, a 501c(4) fund can be advantageous because the organizations are subject to fewer public disclosure requirements and contribution limits than traditional candidate committees, allowing for greater fundraising and less scrutiny.
Lee Chatfield, through his attorneys, argued Friday that no wrongdoing took place – and if the credit card spending reimbursed by the Peninsula Fund was improper, a law firm contracted by the Peninsula Fund to ensure compliance would have, and perhaps should have, raised alarm.
Construction project to close parts of eastbound I-696 until 2027: What to know
Court: 9 stalled bills should have been sent to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for signature
Earlier in the hearing on Wednesday, Renae Moore, a senior compliance specialist with the Dykema law firm who was the assistant treasurer/secretary of the Peninsula Fund, testified that some spending reimbursements paid to Chatfield were questionable, including a receipt from a strip club which was eventually filed under meeting expenses.
Lee Chatfield's attorneys have argued it was the responsibility of Moore and the Peninsula Fund's former president to ensure compliance, not the former Speaker's. Anne Minard, a former aide of Lee Chatfield during his time in the Capitol, was the Peninsula Fund's president. Minard faces felony financial charges of embezzling political funds. Her husband, Rob Minard, also faces charges in the case.
Mary Chartier, Lee Chatfield's lead defense attorney, told reporters following the hearing she's encouraged the judge asked the parties to submit more briefs. At preliminary exams, the standard of evidence the prosecution has to prove is lower than it is at a jury trial. Instead of needing to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, at a preliminary exam, the prosecution only needs to prove probable cause that a crime took place to bind a defendant over for trial.
'The fact that the judge is taking the time to go through the evidence, the fact that she is asking for additional briefing on one of the elements, is quite a really important point, and one that we view extremely favorably,' Chartier said outside the courtroom.
The most serious charge Lee Chatfield faces carries a maximum 20-year prison sentence, if convicted. Stephanie Chatfield's charges each carry a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, if convicted.
Along with seeking improper reimbursements from political nonprofits, the state also alleges Lee Chatfield falsified mileage reimbursement forms while he was a lawmaker, claiming reimbursements for trips he didn't take. Prosecutors also claim Lee Chatfield profited by subletting a Lansing apartment where rent was paid for by the Peninsula Fund.
Lee Chatfield has denied the charges.
As a lawmaker, Lee Chatfield was considered a prolific fundraiser. Chartier noted the Peninsula Fund, at one point, had raised 'millions and millions' of dollars.
In Dec. 2021 Rebekah Chatfield, Lee Chatfield's sister-in-law, told Lansing police she had been sexually assaulted by Lee Chatfield from the time she was 15 years old and a student at the northern Michigan religious school where Lee Chatfield taught. She also reported misuse of campaign funds at the time, according to her court testimony Thursday.
Lee Chatfield has denied any sexual assault. Chartier previously said a years-long consensual affair took place between Lee Chatfield and Rebekah Chatfield when both were adults.
Michigan State Police began investigating Lee Chatfield, and were later joined by Nessel's office in the investigation. When Nessel announced the financial charges against Lee and Stephanie Chatfield in April, she said the investigation into the sexual assault allegations was closed without charges.
An investigation into the Chatfields' finances remains open and ongoing, according to documents filed by prosecutors in court Feb. 19.
This story has been updated.
Contact Arpan Lobo: alobo@freepress.com
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Judge to rule whether ex-Speaker Chatfield, wife, should stand trial
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox Sports
19 minutes ago
- Fox Sports
House v. NCAA settlement approved, paving way for colleges to pay athletes
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100-member schools, boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. The road to a settlement Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as "March Madness" or "Roll Tide." It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. [Related: Top 25 college athletes with highest NIL valuations] Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. Winners and losers The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers will be the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. One of the adjustments made at Wilken's behest was to give those athletes a chance to return to the schools that cut them in anticipation of the deal going through. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again. The Associated Press contributed to this report. [Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily .] recommended Get more from College Football Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more in this topic

USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump takes aim at Musk's government contracts but says ex-pal can keep White House key
Trump takes aim at Musk's government contracts but says ex-pal can keep White House key Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. WASHINGTON — Their breakup was full of insults and acrimony, but President Donald Trump says Elon Musk can keep his golden key. "I don't take things back, I gave him a key, he tried very hard," Trump said of his former DOGE head. The golden key, etched with the White House insignia, is not a real key but symbolizes respect and honor from the president. Trump and Musk had a public falling out this week after the billionaire, who worked part-time for the federal government until last month, waged a war on the president's tax bill over it's projected $2.5 trillion price tag. The fight spiraled as the pair traded attacks, and the two men stopped speaking. Trump told reporters on June 6 that he was not interested in reconciling with Musk. Elon Musk hits back after Trump threatens contracts. SpaceX's government ties, explained In social media posts on June 5, the president said he asked Musk to leave his post spearheading the DOGE initiative and threatened to cancel billions of dollars of the SpaceX founder's federal contracts. Trump said the following day that he was serious about ending the government contracts —and would do so if he thought it was in the financial interest of the country. 'We'll take look at everything. I look at everything. He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy," Trump told reporters on June 6. "Only if it's to be fair for him and for the country, I would certainly think about it." Musk responded by saying he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft immediately. He said in another post that without his help, Republicans would have lost the House and Senate and Trump would not currently be the president. A Washington Post analysis found that Musk's companies have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits over the years. SpaceX has about $22 billion in government contracts alone, Reuters reported. Trump says he's 'not thinking' about ex-pal Musk While the country might be twittering about his breakup with Musk, the president said on June 6 that his focus was squarely on a cache of complex international issues. 'Honestly, I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran ... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk," Trump told reporters riding with him on Air Force One to his New Jersey golf club. He also claimed he had not thought about whether or not he would keep his new Tesla. SpaceX works closely with the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. But the president told reporters the federal government can survive without its partnerships with Musk's companies. 'The U.S. can survive without almost anybody," Trump said. "Except me." Contributing: Joey Garrison of USA TODAY.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A NEW ERA IN COLLEGE SPORTS BEGINS: COURT APPROVES LANDMARK HOUSE SETTLEMENT, NEW COLLEGE SPORTS COMMISSION LAUNCHES
WASHINGTON, June 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Today marks a historic milestone for college athletics in the United States. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California has granted final approval to a settlement in the House v. NCAA ("House") litigation. This landmark settlement – agreed to by plaintiffs representing nearly 400,000 current and former student-athletes and the NCAA, Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC), Big Ten Conference, Big 12 Conference, Pac-12 Conference and Southeastern Conference (SEC) – will reshape the landscape of college sports, paving the way for a model that prioritizes fairness, stability, integrity and opportunity for student-athletes and institutions. Overseeing this model will be the newly established College Sports Commission – an independent body that will be responsible for implementing the settlement terms governing revenue sharing, student-athlete Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) deals and roster limits. The Commission will investigate any potential violations of these rules, make determinations regarding potential rules violations and penalties, provide notice and opportunity to be heard, participate in the arbitration process and ultimately administer penalties for violations of these rules. The Commission's leadership team will be announced in the near future. Under the new system, student-athletes will have more opportunities to financially benefit during their participation in intercollegiate athletics than ever before. Institutions are now able to share revenue directly with student-athletes, in addition to providing existing benefits such as athletic scholarships, access to world-class training facilities, academic counseling, medical care, post-eligibility medical coverage, mental health resources, nutritional guidance and life skills development. Beginning July 1, 2025, each year, participating schools can distribute up to 22% of the average revenue among schools in the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC from media rights, ticket sales, and sponsorships – known as the revenue sharing cap. The cap is estimated at $20.5 million per school for the 2025-26 academic year, pending final confirmation. To ensure revenue sharing with student-athletes is appropriately managed and reported to the Court for compliance, athletics departments will use the new College Athlete Payment System (CAPS) platform developed by LBi Software. Student-athletes will also be able to continue receiving compensation from third-parties other than their institutions for the use of their NIL, so long as their NIL deals are made with the purpose of using their NIL for a valid business purpose and do not exceed a reasonable range of compensation. On behalf of the College Sports Commission, Deloitte* has built and will maintain a new technology platform called NIL Go in which student-athletes will be required to report their NIL deals to confirm they are in compliance with the rules. Deals will be evaluated based on: Payor association – The relationship between the payor and the student-athlete's school. Valid business purpose – Whether the payor is seeking the use of the student-athlete's NIL for a valid business purpose, meaning to sell a good or service to the public for profit. Range of compensation – Whether the compensation paid to the student-athlete is commensurate with compensation paid to similarly situated individuals. Finally, for participating schools, NCAA scholarship limits have been removed and roster limits have been established for each sport, allowing for a significant increase in scholarship opportunities for student-athletes. Under this new model, schools will have the option to offer partial or full scholarships to every student-athlete on a team's roster, as long as the total number of student-athletes stays within the sport's specific roster limit. Efforts have also been made to ensure current and immediately incoming student-athletes are not adversely impacted by the establishing of roster limits. Removing scholarship limits allows schools to better support their student-athletes through new scholarships, particularly in non-revenue-generating sports. "This is a significant moment for college athletics that will provide unparalleled opportunities for student-athletes. We look forward to implementing this new system which offers much-needed transparency and structure to create a more sustainable model for the long-term future of college athletics," said Jim Phillips, Ph.D., Commissioner of the Atlantic Coast Conference. "We look forward to implementing this historic settlement designed to bring stability, integrity and competitive balance to college athletics while increasing both scholarship and revenue opportunities for student-athletes in all sports," said Tony Petitti, Commissioner of the Big Ten Conference. "As we enter this new era of college athletics, it is crucial we do so with structure, transparency, and the success of student-athletes in mind — this settlement and new model will ensure that happens. I look forward to working alongside my colleagues to implement this new system that prioritizes fairness and opportunity for all student-athletes and institutions," said Brett Yormark, Commissioner of the Big 12 Conference. "It's a new day in collegiate athletics. This historic moment allows us to maintain what makes college sports special, the development of young individuals through sport, while also evolving to meet today's student-athletes where they are with new opportunities in a manner that provides long-term stability for collegiate athletics. I am proud to work alongside my colleagues as we implement and introduce the future of college sports," said Teresa Gould, Commissioner of the Pac-12 Conference. "The approval of the House settlement agreement represents a significant milestone for the meaningful support of our student-athletes and a pivotal step toward establishing long-term sustainability for college sports, two of the Southeastern Conference's top priorities. As the journey to modernize collegiate sports continues, we remain focused on identifying and implementing innovative opportunities for our student-athletes across all sports while maintaining the core values that make collegiate athletics uniquely meaningful," said Greg Sankey, Commissioner of the Southeastern Conference. Following are significant dates related to the implementation of the settlement: June 6, 2025: Settlement approved; settlement-related NCAA rules are effective, as adopted by the NCAA Division 1 Board on April 21, 2025. June 11, 2025: NIL Go portal launches. June 15, 2025: Opt-in deadline for non-defendant schools to fully commit to revenue sharing. July 1, 2025: First date for direct institutional revenue sharing payments to student-athletes. July 6, 2025: Opt-in schools must "designate" student-athletes permitted by the settlement to remain above roster limits. Start of 2025-26 academic year: With the exception of the "designated" student-athletes, Fall sports must be at or below roster limits by their first day of competition. December 1, 2025: With the exception of "designated" student-athletes, Winter and Spring sports must be at or below roster limits by their first day of competition or Dec. 1, whichever is earlier. More information about the College Sports Commission and the implementation of these new policies can be found at * As used in this document, "Deloitte" means Deloitte Consulting LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see for a detailed description of its legal structure. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. MEDIA CONTACTcollegesportscommission@ View original content: SOURCE College Sports Commission Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data