Peace talks between Ukraine and Russia end after less than two hours
Kyiv at the meeting on Friday accused the Kremlin of introducing new 'unacceptable demands' to withdraw Ukrainian forces from huge swathes of territory, according to the official, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to make official statements.
The demands had not been previously discussed, the official said.
He said the Ukrainian side reiterated it remained focused on achieving real progress — an immediate ceasefire and a pathway to substantive diplomacy 'just like the US, European partners, and other countries proposed'.
The Turkish Foreign Ministry also said in a statement that the session ended.
The two sides sat at a U-shaped table but remained far apart in their conditions for ending the war.
US President Donald Trump, who has pressed both Moscow and Kyiv for an end to the conflict, said a meeting between himself and Russian President Vladimir Putin would happen 'as soon as we can set it up'.
'I think it's time for us to just do it,' Mr Trump told reporters in Abu Dhabi as he wrapped up a trip to the Middle East.
In Istanbul, a Ukrainian delegation led by defence minister Rustem Umerov sat opposite a low-level Russian team headed by presidential aide Vladimir Medinsky, according to Ukraine's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi, who published a photo of the meeting.
Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan had opened the session by urging the parties 'to take advantage of this opportunity,' adding that it was 'critically important that the ceasefire happens as soon as possible'.
– Manoeuvring ahead of talks
Both countries engaged in diplomatic manoeuvring this week as they tried to show Mr Trump that they are eager to negotiate, although he has expressed frustration over the slow progress and threatened to punish foot-dragging.
On Thursday, Mr Putin spurned an offer by Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky to meet face-to-face in Turkey.
Mr Zelensky accused Moscow of not making a serious effort to end the war by sending a low-level delegation.
Ukraine has accepted a US and European proposal for a full, 30-day ceasefire, but Mr Putin has effectively rejected it by imposing far-reaching conditions.
Commenting on a possible Trump-Putin meeting, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov appeared to indicate that momentum for such a summit is building.
He told reporters that top-level talks were 'certainly needed', but added that preparing a summit would take time.
– Fighting continues
Meanwhile, Russian forces are preparing a fresh military offensive, Ukrainian government and Western military analysts say.
A Friday morning drone attack on the north-eastern Ukrainian city of Kupiansk killed a 55-year-old woman and wounded four men, Oleh Syniehubov, head of the Kharkiv Regional Military Administration, said.
All the victims worked for a municipal utility.
Russia's invasion has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, the UN says, and razed towns and villages.
Tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers have died, and likely a larger number of Russian troops, officials and analysts say.
On the battlefield, one Ukrainian soldier said he was not hopeful that the talks would bring a swift end to the war.
'I don't think they will agree on anything concrete, because summer is the best time for war,' he said, using only the call sign 'Corsair' in keeping with the rules of the Ukrainian military.
'The enemy is trying to constantly escalate the situation.'
But he told AP that many of his comrades 'believe that by the end of the year there will be peace, albeit an unstable one, but peace'.
Before the talks began, Ukrainian officials met with national security advisers from the US, France, Germany and the UK to co-ordinate positions, a senior Ukrainian official told AP, speaking on condition of anonymity to talk about sensitive matters.
The US team was led by retired Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg, Mr Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, while Mr Umerov and presidential office chief Andriy Yermak represented Ukraine, the official said.
A three-way meeting between Turkey, the US and Ukraine also took place, Turkish Foreign Ministry officials said.
The US side included secretary of state Marco Rubio as well as Lt Gen Kellogg.
On Thursday, Mr Rubio said 'we don't have high expectations of what will happen' at the Russia-Ukraine talks.
He said he believed a breakthrough was only possible is a meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Putin.
Mr Zelensky, meanwhile, was in Tirana, Albania, for a meeting with leaders of 47 European countries to discuss security, defence and democratic standards against the backdrop of the war.
'If the Russian representatives in Istanbul today cannot even agree to that, to (a) ceasefire, to this clearly necessary first step, then it will be 100% clear that Putin continues to undermine diplomacy,' Mr Zelensky said.
'If that's not the case, there must be at least some result today, starting with a ceasefire.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump makes major U-turn on mass deportation policy that could affect thousands of businesses across country
The Trump administration has for the first time pumped the brakes on its mass deportation agenda, telling ICE officials to pause raids on farms, hotels and restaurants, according to an internal email and three US officials familiar with the situation. The decision, as reported by The New York Times, comes after Trump made a rare acknowledgement that some of the deportations he's ordered has hurt industries in agricultural, hospitality and food sectors. 'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' he said in a Truth Social post on Thursday morning. 'We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!' he added. He further elaborated on these sentiments in a press conference later that same day. 'Our farmers are being hurt badly by, you know, they have very good workers, they have worked for them for 20 years,' he said. 'They're not citizens, but they've turned out to be, you know, great. And we're going to have to do something about that. We can't take farmers and take all their people and send them back because they don't have maybe what they're supposed to have, maybe not,' he continued, adding that there would be an 'order' soon. The official order from Trump came on Thursday via an email sent by a senior ICE official, Tatum King, to regional leaders of the ICE department that generally carries out criminal investigations. This post on Truth Social is what got the ball rolling on the switch-up in strategy These investigations often lead to worksite raids, which have been happening in increasing frequency all over the country. These raids have led to nationwide anti-ICE protests, most notably in Los Angeles, where demonstrations have been going on for a week straight. 'Effective today, please hold on all work site enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants and operating hotels,' King wrote in his message. King clarified that investigations 'human trafficking, money laundering, drug smuggling into these industries are OK.' The order instructed agents not to arrest 'noncriminal collaterals,' a seeming reference to illegal immigrants who have not committed any additional crimes. The Department of Homeland Security confirmed the new guidance and said it would follow it. 'We will follow the president's direction and continue to work to get the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens off of America's streets,' Tricia McLaughlin, a DHS spokeswoman, said in a statement. This marks a huge departure in Trump's rhetoric, since over the last few months, he's advocated for deporting all illegal immigrants, regardless of their criminal record. Trump posted about his change of mind after Brooke Rollins, the secretary of agriculture, told him that farmers were concerned that ICE enforcement would negatively impact their businesses, a White House official and a person familiar told The Times. There are still officials within the administration who are more aligned with the idea of deporting as many migrants as possible. Chief among them is White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who has been advocating for a minimum of 3,000 arrests a day by ICE. ICE confirmed that Miller held a meeting with dozens of top directors and officials on May 20, where he reportedly 'came in there and eviscerated everyone.' According to the Washington Examiner, Miller allegedly told them: 'You guys aren't doing a good job. You're horrible leaders.' He then reportedly gave them an open challenge and asked: 'Why aren't you at Home Depot? Why aren't you at 7-Eleven?' ICE agents were reportedly surprised by the new guidance to limit raids on certain industries after weeks and months of being told to step it up. King said in his memo that the new rules would hamstring the administration's goals for higher numbers of arrests. 'We acknowledge that by taking this off the table, that we are eliminating a significant # of potential targets,' he wrote.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
No more Edinburgh Book Festival for me – where did it all go wrong?
One other event at the book festival I recall, for different reasons, was a session with the writer Yasmin Alibhai-Brown. I can't remember why I went to see her now because she's the sort of harrumphing lefty who sets off my allergies, but perhaps I figured it's good to listen to a range of views, which it is. I certainly remember being irritated when she laid into Ukip as an English not a Scottish problem even though the party had just done well in Scotland at the European elections. The same sort of flawed reasoning persists now with Reform. But the audience seemed to like it. They applauded at the end, and shuffled out for tea and biscuits. I mention the Alibhai-Brown event in particular because even then, ten years ago, the problems with the Edinburgh Book Festival were starting to become obvious. The lack of diversity on the stage and in the audience, by which I particularly mean diversity of class. The weak, and sometimes execrable, chairing of events that fails to challenge or properly explore the writer's opinions and assumptions. And most important of all, the tendency to platform writers like Alibhai-Brown and unplatform or ignore writers of a different or more conservative persuasion. In the end, it meant the festival became a place I enjoyed less and less, and eventually I just stopped going. But, you know, it really is good to listen to a range of views and I'm a hopeful sort of person on the whole, so this year, like every year, I looked at the line-up on the festival website to see if there was something good and if things had changed, and I scrolled and scrolled and saw that the answer was no. Things appear to be just as bad as ever, worse in fact, and the worry is that the problems at the book festival may have started to rot it from the inside. You start to wonder: how long will it last? The most obvious symptom of the problems is the lack of diversity on stage, which is worse than ever. One of the biggest stories of the last year – and the focus of one of the biggest-selling books of the year – was the trans debate and the Supreme Court ruling on the definition of 'woman', and yet you will not find a trace of it on the festival line-up. The book in question, The Women Who Wouldn't Wheest, was edited by Susan Dalgety and Lucy Hunter Blackburn, so why haven't they been invited? Is it because – unlike one of the big guests of the festival Nicola Sturgeon – they are seen to be on the wrong side of the debate? Yes, of course it is. Read more The chairman of the festival, Alan Little, rather gave the game away when he said the festival should be 'a place where progressive and nuanced discussion can happen in a safe and respectful space'. He's spot on with nuanced – we need it badly – but why only progressive? Why not traditionalist or conservative as well? And what's with 'safe'? It's become one of those words certain activists use to ratchet up the pressure, to hystericalise, but would the festival be unsafe because the line-up included Susan Dalgety or Lucy Hunter Blackburn? The only thing that would be unsafe would be the consensus that's dominated the festival and still does. The organisers would probably say in their defence that there would be a threat of disruption from activists – indeed, that was reason they gave for dropping Baillie Gifford as one of their sponsors. A number of activists, you will remember, a very small number, demanded the investment company be dropped on the grounds it invests in fossil fuels and sad to say, the organisers caved. They said they could not be expected to deliver a festival that was safe – there's that word again – because there was a threat of disruption from activists and so they ended their relationship with Baillie Gifford but more importantly they ended their relationship with Baillie Gifford's money. But it didn't have to be that way. First of all, if everyone buckled as quickly as the festival did over the threat of disruption to the free expression of views, we'd be in a very unpleasant place indeed; their weakness is pathetic. They could also have borrowed some of the stoicism of the Fringe which faced similar pressure over Baillie Gifford from the same sort of activists, but stood firm and it all came to nothing. To put it another way, everyone was perfectly safe. The Edinburgh Book Festival (Image: Newsquest) The organisers of the book festival also appear to be guilty of a kind of economic and practical idiocy that now threatens their future. There are some people who object to corporate sponsorship of arts events – so what: the only alternative is an increase in public money and that ain't happenin'. Baillie Gifford also invests in fossil fuels – so what: it invests far more in clean energy, and the objections of the activists led to the cancellation of a million pounds in money for the arts. The danger here is that the arts world ends up, in the words of the director of the Science Museum Ian Blatchford, eaten alive by its own piety. And the risks are particularly high for book festivals aren't they? We saw what happened to Aye Write in Glasgow when it failed to get funding from Creative Scotland; it only went ahead after a donation from the charity set up by the Lottery winner Colin Weir. The Edinburgh book festival is also going ahead this year thanks largely to a donation from Ian Rankin. But how long before the activists start digging into the personal views of the philanthropists writing cheques? And is this what they want: the arts funded by a few wealthy individuals? It doesn't sound all that progressive to me. Better, I think, to try to build more robust festivals that have a chance of lasting and that must mean some changes. First, encourage a broad diversity of views and opinions at the festival that will attract a broader and more diverse audience. Secondly, drop the piety and encourage corporate sponsorship because public money is not coming to save you. And thirdly, be robust when the activists rock up and shout 'unsafe!' They only have power because you give it to them. Reject them. Ignore them. And carry on. Mark Smith is a Herald features writer and opinion writer
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's financial disclosure reveals true extent of family crypto venture
President Donald Trump has pulled back the curtain on the staggering scale of his personal and family fortune. A newly released 234-page financial disclosure reveals how Trump raked in more than $57 million last year from a single, family-linked cryptocurrency venture, rocketing the controversial project to the top tier of his income sources. The firm, a decentralized finance (DeFi) outfit called World Liberty Financial, was co-founded in 2024 not just by Donald but also his three sons, Don Jr., Eric, and even 18-year-old Barron alongside Zach Witkoff, the son of real estate mogul and Trump foreign policy envoy Steve Witkoff. While skeptics may have mocked Trump's forays into meme tokens and NFT trading cards as gimmicks, the eye-watering profits suggest otherwise. Trump personally holds between $1 million and $5 million in crypto assets, according to the filing, but the platform itself has proven to be a family cash machine. The Trump 'coin' was just created in digital code out of nothing – but suddenly it was worth billions. In fact, $57,355,532 is the figure what Trump took in from World Liberty Financial alone, the disclosure reads. While the venture has sparked concerns over ethical boundaries and presidential profiteering, the White House insists Trump's assets are safely walled off in a trust controlled by his children. The Trump family, who have faced relentless accusations of enriching themselves from Trump's first term, have showed a growing interest in digital currencies this time around. Last July, Trump promised to make America the 'crypto capital of the planet' by enacting new laws to pave the way for financial institutions and pension funds to invest in these controversial and risky assets, bringing them the respectability that has so far eluded them. Trump has credited his entrepreneurial youngest child, Barron, 19, with educating him about crypto. The pair, together with Barron's half-brothers Donald Jr and Eric, are heavily involved in his crypto business, World Liberty Financial, which Trump announced last September and which also has its own tradeable coin or 'token'. On its website, the company vows to 'leverage the global reach and recognition of the Trump brand' to promote crypto. Critics insist the President has created a new (and ingenious) vehicle for his supporters to give him money – risking corruption on an epic scale. Now anyone wanting to curry favor with him could quietly fill the Trump family coffers by buying the coins and pushing up its price. Putting money into $Trump coins would lend his political backers a degree of plausible deniability: the could legally argue that the purchase is not a bribe but an investment in an asset. Donald Trump disclosures by nloffredo 'Now, you can get your piece of history,' proclaims the blurb for the President's meme coin on its website. 'This Trump Meme celebrates a leader who doesn't back down, no matter the odds.' The revelation comes at a time when Trump's finances are under renewed scrutiny, not only due to his sprawling business empire, but because of historic legal penalties leveled against him. In addition to the $57 million crypto windfall, Trump disclosed: A $454 million civil fraud judgment from New York Attorney General Letitia James. $88 million in damages awarded to writer E. Jean Carroll. More than $100 million in mortgage liabilities tied to properties like Trump Tower and the Doral Golf Club. Those staggering judgments are marked as 'stayed pending appeal,' indicating they haven't yet come due, but they remain looming shadows over Trump's presidency. The sweet smell of success - ocne spritz of Trump's cologne and you'll smell like a billionaire - or at least someone who votes for one Trump's digital trading card collection is seen during its release in 2022 Trump made $3 million from his 'Save America' coffee table book A 234-page document details Trump's various finances including income from family crypto firm along with seven-figures from guitars, sneakers, watches and books Despite not taking a penny of the $400,000 salary as president of the United States, Trump's income continues to soar. Beyond crypto, he collected: $3 million from his 'Save America' coffee table book $2.5 million from Trump-branded sneakers and cologne $1.3 million from 'The Greenwood Bible' $1.05 million for a line of '45' electric guitars Another $1.06 million from licensing his image for digital trading cards In total, the disclosure paints a portrait of a man earning more as president than many former leaders earn after leaving the White House - yet Trump appears to be doing it while still in office. The political implications of Trump's crypto venture are hard to ignore. World Liberty Financial has operated largely outside traditional financial oversight, offering governance tokens, staking rewards, and decentralized yield pools tied to Trump-branded digital assets. Trump's holding of 15.75 billion governance tokens gives him significant sway over the platform's future - a fact that has alarmed government watchdogs and ethics officials alike. Of particular concern is the platform's close ties to Trump family members, the blurred lines between campaign promotion and product branding, and the mounting influence of crypto lobbying within the administration. But Trump's defenders argue it is simply an example of the free market in action. While World Liberty Financial and real estate remain the largest drivers of Trump's fortune, the president's speaking fees and royalties continue to stack up. The report lists more than $700,000 in speaking engagements, mostly paid for by conservative groups and international business forums. His real estate empire is also thriving again. In Florida alone, Trump's resorts and golf properties including Mar-a-Lago, Doral, and Jupiter, generated $217.7 million last year, according to the document. Even overseas, Trump-branded deals continue to deliver. A licensing agreement for a development in Vietnam brought in a $5 million reinforcing the idea that the Trump brand, far from fading, has gone global under his second term. By comparison, Vice President J.D. Vance's filing was a modest 15 pages as he disclosed $50,000 in earnings from his best-selling memoir Hillbilly Elegy and some smaller investment returns. The contrast underscores what many already knew: Trump is unlike any president in modern history, not just in style or policy, but in sheer wealth generation while in office. The Trump brand continues to be lucrative and as questions mount over ethics, influence, and the reach of crypto in US politics, one thing is clear: Donald Trump's second presidency isn't just about power but about profit.
