
Brits in Greece warned of strict dress code with £771 fines for rule-breakers
Brits planning Greece summer holidays may want to double check the dress code rules before packing their bag - or risk being turned away at major hotspots
Brits heading on Greece holidays this summer may want to double check their suitcase, due to a strict dress code rule that applies at some of the country's biggest hotspots.
That's because there are certain types of footwear that have been banned at plenty of attractions so you could risk being turned away if you're out and about sightseeing - or even face a fine of around 900 euros (£771).
Since 2009, high heels have been a no-go at the country's ancient monuments as part of preservation efforts, including huge tourist hotspots like the Acropolis in Athens. In fact, a statement on the iconic landmark's website explains: "Most types of shoes are allowed at the Acropolis, except for high heels that have been forbidden in 2009 at all of Greece's ancient monuments. The ban was put in in place due to the damage that the sharp soles were adding to Greece's ancient sites."
While most people will don the likes of trainers or other comfortable shoes for a day of sightseeing, if you are someone who braves heels, it's worth noting that you won't be allowed to enter the attraction unless you have a change of shoes with you. As for the fines, these tend to be aimed at those who actively flout the rules - for example if someone changed back into heels once they'd entered the monuments.
Travel insiders at insurance firm Tiger.co.uk recently reminded Brits of the rules, adding: "In Greece, wearing high heels is prohibited at certain historic sites, including famous attractions like the Acropolis and the Epidaurus Theatre. This rule helps protect delicate surfaces from erosion and cracking. Sitting on ancient monuments is also discouraged out of respect for preservation efforts."
It's not the only dress code rule that Brits need to be aware of this summer. For those planning holidays to the likes of Spain and Italy, you may want to pack an extra beach cover up. That's because certain holiday hotspots have rules in place that ban tourists from wearing swimwear away from the beach, with fines of up to €500 for rule-breakers.
In Sorrento, Italy, for example the ban has been in place since 2022. The mayor at the time explained the crackdown came because too many tourists were walking around the town in bikinis or topless, and causing unease with locals.
They added at the time: "The continuation of this situation, as well as causing discomfort and unease in the resident population and among visitors, could lead to a negative judgment on the quality of life in our town, with consequences for its image and for tourism."
Of course if you're staying in a beachfront hotel or beach club and walking back in your swimwear from the shore to your room or cabana, you won't be fined while you're on property. The rules are to deter people who were leaving public beaches and then heading to restaurants or wandering around the shops without a cover-up.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Five-word warning for Brits visiting tiny island flooded with over 6m tourists
Despite witnessing a record-breaking number of international tourists last year, one picture postcard island has witnessed a surge in incidents relating to methanol poisoning A tiny island famed for its pristine beaches and lively nightlife has seen its tourism boom in recent years - despite stark travel warnings. Whether you're after a chilled beach club, silent yoga retreat, or TikTok-inspired spiritual awakening, Bali's mass appeal is undeniable. It has some pretty stunning temples, sugar-like beaches, lush rice paddies, and an unbeatable cuisine. Last year, the hotspot, located in Indonesia, welcomed a staggering 6.3 million international tourists, surpassing its pre-pandemic peak. Unsurprisingly, Australia accounted for the majority of tourists, due to its close proximity. But, last month (May 30) the country's government reviewed its advice for Indonesia following a series of recent incidents involving drownings and methanol poisoning. Urging Aussies to 'exercise a high degree of caution' when travelling to the country - the body said: "Be alert to the potential risks around drink spiking and methanol poisoning through consuming alcoholic drinks. Cases of methanol poisoning in drinks have previously been reported in Indonesia, including in Bali and Lombok." The Mirror contacted the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) - which advises Brits on which countries are safe to travel to - asking whether it was also updating its warning page for Indonesia to reflect the recent surge. A spokesperson did not explicitly comment on Australia's updated advice, and instead sent over the organisation's guide for Indonesia - which hasn't been updated since April 8, 2025. The FCDO currently advises against all travel to a number of volcanoes in Indonesia, including Mount Lewotobi Laki-Laki, Mount Sinabung, Mount Marapi, Mount Semeru, and Mount Ruang. However, it does not have a current warning against Bali for either essential or non-essential travel. Still, under its 'Safety and Security' section, the FCDO has issued a blunt five-word warning for travellers: "Watch your drinks being prepared." It adds: "There have been reports of drink spiking linked to sexual assault in Bali, Lombok and the Gili Islands. "Do not leave [your drinks] unattended. Do not accept drinks from strangers at clubs or parties. Tourists have been assaulted or robbed after taking visitors to their hotel rooms, and in some cases have found that their drinks were spiked." The FCDO clearly states that many people, including British nationals, have died or suffered serious illness in Indonesia after drinking spirits that contain methanol due to inadequate distillation. Affected drinks have included: local spirits, including arak/arrack (a local rice or palm liquor) spirit-based mixed drinks, such as cocktails counterfeit brand-name bottled alcohol in shops or behind the bar To protect yourself from methanol poisoning, it is recommended to only buy alcohol from licensed liquor stores or bars, and make sure the bottle seals are intact. It's also worth checking for poor print quality or incorrect spelling on your beverages, as well as avoiding homemade alcoholic drinks. The FCDO also warns tourists to be 'alert' when out at night and avoid poorly-lit areas due to a high number of reported rapes and sexual assaults. "If you call a taxi, use only registered companies, such as Bluebird, Silverbird or Express, and check the driver's identity," it states. "If you book with a mobile app, check the driver is the same as the person on the app, and share your journey with a friend using the app. Be wary of drivers claiming to be registered with app companies and trying to pick up passengers on the street." Other safety warnings include credit card fraud, bag-snatching, and pickpocketing. "Conceal your bag as much as possible to reduce the risk. Carry only essential items and take care of your passport and bank cards," the FCDO advises.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU
Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights, and the second related to free hand luggage Four European countries are outraged at new rules that could limit how much delayed passengers can claim in compensation and when airlines can charge passengers for carrying hand luggage. Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights. The Council decided that passengers on short-haul flights would have to be delayed by four hours or more before they could claim compensation, rather than the current three. For long-haul flights, delays will have to be six or more hours. The good news for passengers is that compensation for those delayed on short-haul flights will increase from €250 (£211) to €300. However, compensation for long-haul flights will be cut from €600 to €500. The changes were first tabled 13 years ago and must still be approved by the European Parliament before they become law. The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, has argued that the changes will be a huge blow for consumers and deprive 'the majority of passengers from their compensation rights". The BEUC claims that most delays are between two and four hours. While the UK now sets its own compensation rules following Brexit, the changes will impact Brits if they come into force, as it will apply to passengers taking flights with an EU carrier. This means it could affect a passenger travelling to and from an EU country on an EU airline. The second decision relates to baggage allowance. Under the new rules, the concept to free luggage will be limited to 'personal items' that can be placed under the front seat. That will leave other stowed cabin bags exposed to charges. Spain, Germany, Slovenia, and Portugal voted against the changes, warning that they could mean passengers end up paying extra for almost any cabin bag. The Spanish government criticised the new rules as 'too restrictive.' Spain's Minister for Social Rights, Consumer Affairs and the 2030 Agenda, Pablo Bustinduy, described the changes as an 'outrage'. The political agreement, adopted by a qualified majority in the EU Council, was voted against by Spain, Germany, Slovenia and Portugal. Minister Bustinduy argued that the new rules would violate consumer rights and "only strengthen the power and profits of airlines." If the rules are accepted, then Ryanair would have to change its free hand luggage policy. Right now, the budget Irish airline require customers to have a bag no larger than 40x20x25 centimetres, which must fit under the seat in front. Under the new rules, the dimensions will be changed to 40x30x15 centimetres. That means Ryanair would be obliged to allow a bag 10 centimetres wider, but could also reduce the depth currently allowed by 10 centimetres.


Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Passengers flying with major airlines to face new 4 hour rule at airports
In a huge blow to Brits, EU countries have green-lighted controversial plans to lengthen the wait time before delayed passengers can claim compensation for both short and long-haul journeys Customers flying with some big name air operators on short-haul flights have been hit with a brutal four-hour warning over a controversial shakeup. After 12 years of wrangling, EU countries have green-lighted plans to lengthen the wait time before flyers can lodge claims for delayed flights. Currently, passengers have to be delayed by more than three hours before qualifying for compensation. However, under the new stipulations - which still have to be negotiated with the European Parliament before they become law - short-haul travellers will only be eligible to claim compensation after being delayed by four hours or more, while those on longer journeys will have to sit tight for a six-hour hold-up before they can lodge a compensation claim. It's not all bad news though, as EU nations have also agreed to increase the amount of compensation for those delayed on short-haul journeys from €250 (approx £210.47) to €300 (£252.56). But, passengers hit with delays on long-haul flights could see their compensation reduce from €600 (£505) to €500 (£420). The trade body Airlines for Europe (A4E), which represents companies such as Ryanair, easyJet and Lufthansa, and The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, both slammed the rules - arguing it would deprive the majority of passengers from being able to claim compensation. This is because most delays are only between two and four hours. "Europe has been waiting for transparent and workable passenger rights for 12 years and member states have fallen at the final hurdle to deliver," A4E said. "Member states have diluted the European Commission's original proposal and introduced even more complexity." According to Yorkshire Live, German members of the European People's Party have also expressed their disapproval, stating that 'decreasing the rights to compensation for air passengers would be a step in the wrong direction'. "Reimbursement after a three-hour delay has been standard for many years and should remain so," they added. A senior EU diplomat is believed to have said that 'no politician wants to say more than four hours' at risk of dampening Europeans' holiday plans. The news comes amidst accusations by 16 consumer protection associations from 12 Member States against seven budget airlines for imposing unfair charges on passengers' hand luggage. "The European Court of Justice has made it very clear that hand baggage is an integral part of the basic ticket price. Normally, there is no surcharge on the price as long as the hand luggage is of a reasonable size," explained Steven Berger, a solicitor with the European Consumers' Organisation (BEUC). "All we're seeing is a proliferation of airlines charging for this baggage... We're calling for very clear rules. Passengers must be able to take one piece of luggage, a small suitcase or a rucksack." He added: "At the moment, there are two different opposing positions among the member states in the Council. On the whole, you have the camp of the member states that are going to defend the three hours to be able to benefit from the right to compensation and others that are going to ask for five hours and nine hours based on distance. So right now this is really the big source of conflict." *Prices based on EUR to GBP conversions at the time of writing.