Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka assures outcome of Waitangi Tribunal review won't be predetermined
Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka.
Photo:
RNZ / Reece Baker
The minister for Māori development says the government will not predetermine the outcome of a new
review of the Waitangi Tribunal
.
The review is set to refocus the "scope, purpose and nature" of the tribunal's inquiries back to its "original intent", Tama Potaka said on Friday.
It is part of the coalition agreement between New Zealand First and National, and will be led by an independent technical advisory group and supported by Te Puni Kōkiri.
This audio is not downloadable due to copyright restrictions.
Potaka - the chairperson of the ministerial group coordinating the review - told
Saturday Morning
the government would wait for feedback before making any decisions.
"Our intention of course is to of course make sure it operates effectively within a system that's coherent and sustainable, and we will take a look at structural matters such as the jurisdiction, how claims are categorised and what practises it adopts."
The Waitangi Tribunal was established in 1975 to investigate breaches of the Treaty of Waitangi. Originally it could only hear claims about current government actions, but in 1985 Parliament allowed the tribunal to investigate events dating back to 1840.
Potaka did not say whether the tribunal would return to only investigating current breaches. He did say the "government will determine the future of the tribunal", but it was not a predetermined outcome.
"I am certainly not predetermined, and this government is not predetermined over this outcome - we will await the feedback, recommendations from the technical advisor group."
Potaka said he was looking forward to seeing their engagement, and ensuring it was suitable for making the recommendations needed to Cabinet.
"Certainly in my view there's a lot of mahi that the tribunal still needs to close out."
Potaka said many of the historical claims had been carried out, with only five historical regional claims remaining.
Labour MP Willie Jackson.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Labour MP Willie Jackson - who was Māori development minister for three years - told
Saturday Morning
the review was "like a comedy".
"The most anti-Māori government I've seen in my lifetime is now conducting a review of the watchdog that at least keeps a lot of Māori, a lot of New Zealanders safe."
He said ACT leader David Seymour and
NZ First MP Shane Jones' comments
about the tribunal were "just disgraceful".
Jackson said the tribunal did not need a review - it needed support.
"A review is needed of David Seymour and Shane Jones, and they should be reprimanded by the prime minister for undermining a tribunal."
He said although he was comfortable with the inquiry panel's members, he questioned the level of independence it would have.
Engagement with Māori was scheduled to begin mid-2025, and proposals would be made before the end of the year.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
39 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: The ABC of boys' education needs a reintroduction; should we add Joe Schmidt to the NZ Rugby board?
(b) They have a clear focus and structure and know the limits and consequences. (c) There's a real challenge to action of some sort. At the time, we summed up these findings under three headings: Affirmation, Boundaries and Challenge. In short, an ABC of boys' learning. After staff feedback, each of these three vital elements was broken down into practical suggestions for teacher action that would maximise boys' enthusiasm for, and confidence in, classroom (and school-wide) learning. These ideas seem similar to what is being arrived at again in 2025, but it was useful to have them reduced to a clear, simple package that teachers could use on a daily basis. Maybe the ABC needs a reintroduction. Alister Williams, Waikanae. Ferry fiasco Nicola Willis demands accountability from everyone except herself. The cancellation of the Irex ferries project was done with little thought as to how it would affect the country as a whole. First, the Government waits nearly a year after the cancellation to appoint a Railways Minister who occasionally makes an announcement that there will be another announcement in the future. Meanwhile, our ferries, which are the lifeline between islands, either break down or get consigned to the scrap heap. Under Irex, we would have had the new ferries next year, but it is suggested it would be a risk to your life if you held your breath for the now-promised date of 2029. The cost of cancelling the Irex ferries is still a secret and we don't know the cost of the promised new ones. Unfortunately, we got a Toyota instead of a Ferrari when the PM appointed the Minister of Finance. Reg Dempster, Albany. Strategic infrastructure It's easy for people to be critical of the current Government over its decisions on the contract for new ferries. But the real issue goes beyond that instance. Major strategic infrastructure projects have been politicised for more than half a century. Our politicians play their ongoing games of one-upmanship and there are no winners, only losers - the people of New Zealand. The ferries and rail connections between the North and South Islands have been an integral part of the national transport system for how long, 70 years? Maybe more. No surprises, then, that it's a piece of strategic infrastructure that deserves better than the petty childish games our politicians play. It doesn't matter which party they are from, they are all the same. So, people of New Zealand, try not to cherry-pick your political targets when it comes to infrastructure projects. Instead, demand a better deal from all our politicians with respect to major/strategic projects. It's not difficult to identify them, is it? Phil Chitty, Albany. Tagging on and off I fail to understand why AT would charge senior citizens for forgetting to tag off. AT's website says that, if you fail to tag off, you will be charged the full cost of the journey to the end of the route. If you travel after 9am on a SuperGold Card, there is no cost for any part of the journey. So how can charging for a non-concession fare be reasonable? Kathy Simpson, Freeman's Bay. Troubled times for NZ Rugby Gregor Paul's 'Rugby Revolution' (June 8) is an excellent review of the troubled times at NZ Rugby with All Blacks coach Scott Robertson's appointment, the captaincy, selection and game plan questions. Not the hoped-for transition, and we are expecting better this year. A new CEO will help. The great loss to NZ Rugby was that Robertson could not find room for the very talented Joe Schmidt in his coaching team when asked to by NZR. It has not gone unnoticed how successful Schmidt has been with the Wallabies, a tenure ending when he hands over to Les Kiss at the end of the year. Perhaps NZ Rugby could offer Schmidt a seat on the NZR board on his return to New Zealand. It would be a shame to lose this level of rugby intelligence twice. Gary Carter, Gulf Harbour.
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
‘Why can't Momoa live here?'
Minister for the South Island James Meager. PHOTO: PHILIP CHANDLER The National-led government's South Island minister believes lifting the foreign buyer ban for $5million-plus Queenstown residential properties makes sense. At the last election, National campaigned on a $2m threshold for overseas buyers — currently only Aussies and Singaporeans are exempt from the ban introduced by the previous Labour government in 2018 — but kept the ban on as part of its coalition agreement with New Zealand First. Visiting Queenstown this week, James Meager, the first South Island Minister, agrees high-net-worth foreigners "bring a lot of investment and opportunities, and they don't really have a big physical footprint in terms of, you know, strains on resources or infrastructure". "I'd be very surprised if any of these people are coming here and using the public health system, anything like that. "So we campaigned on the $2m [threshold], couldn't get that across the line." He says Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's "very public" about looking at that. "It's something we continue to work on in government, and I think it's something if we can't get across the line in this government, we will certainly campaign on." Meager says even if it's a higher limit like $5m for places like Queenstown, "I think people will accept that". "Look at the kind of people who are looking to move here. "I mean, [Hollywood actor] Jason Momoa basically lives here, right? "But wouldn't it be fantastic to have him base himself in and out of Queenstown, flies internationally, brings in so much business and marketing and commerce from his movies and his franchises. "I think it makes sense, and you can do it in a way which doesn't put pressure on the housing for the workers and for the people who have lived here for 50 years and actually want to be able to have a home." Meanwhile, Meager's acutely aware of the limitations with Queenstown's current hospital and how, for example, a high proportion of local women give birth out of town — last year, there were 396 births outside Queenstown Lakes/Central Otago. While in Queenstown he visited friends who'd had a baby five weeks ago, who initially went to Invercargill to get ready. Things didn't move as quickly as they thought, so they returned to the resort. "Then all of a sudden away she went, and then it was a helicopter trip to Dunedin because Invercargill's full. "And then that meant [the parents] were actually separated for the birth." Meager says that "brings home the idea that for a place like Queenstown, that's probably not ideal". "There's a very low threshold in the medical profession here for saying, if it even looks like you're going to get in trouble, we'll call a helicopter in, and that's not ideal because it's stressful, it's time, it's costs." Meager says the Health Minister's aware of it and working on it — "I know there are proposals from a couple of entities around bringing private capital in and just getting a hospital up and running and maybe contract everything out to [the] public [system]". "I think we can get some solutions in the next few years." Supports our regional deal James Meager says he supports the proposal for a regional deal the Queenstown Lakes, Central Otago and Otago Regional councils have put to the government, describing it as "very good". Under a regional deal, the government works with councils to improve infrastructure, which can include public transport and health facilities — in this case a mass transit Queenstown cable car and a base hospital. The government's yet to approve any, but in the South Island "Queenstown and West Coast seem to be well on track", Meager says.
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Regulatory Standards Bill will stop lawmakers considering broader public health, warns cancer specialist
The Bill is part of ACT Party leader David Seymour's coalition agreement. Photo: RNZ Graphic / Nik Dirga The Regulatory Standards Bill will stop lawmakers from taking broader public health considerations into account, warns a leading cancer specialist. ACT Party leader David Seymour said the Bill - part of its coalition agreement with the National Party and New Zealand First - was about requiring governments to be more "transparent" about the financial impact of legislation. However, Auckland University associate professor George Laking, a medical oncologist and clinical Māori director in the Centre for Cancer Research, said the real intent seemed to make economic factors the only measure. "We already have transparency around lawmaking - that's why we have regulatory impact reports," he said. "This seems more like an attempt to narrow the frame for what's considered to count as being relevant in that type of decision." He joined other public health and legal experts, who have criticised the bill (in its current form) as allowing tobacco, alcohol industries or environmental polluters to seek compensation, if future legislation costs them profit. Associate professor George Laking from Auckland University. Photo: Supplied "You wouldn't want your surgeon to operate with a blunt instrument, but that's exactly the approach the Regulatory Standards Bill takes to the health needs of our society," Laking said. "I acknowledge ACT's faith in market-based solutions, but it is well known that markets fail. That's why the government should be very careful about market deregulation, when human health is at stake." The Bill also appeared to be a covert attack on the principles and articles of te Tiriti o Waitangi, he said. "The situation we have is quite inequitable in terms of distribution of wealth and power in society, and that's a big reason why government needs to be able to take into account a wider set of principles, than rather just the narrow, market-based, productivity-based ones that ACT likes to focus on. "The definition of 'liberty' begs the question of whose liberty - the ability to pollute the environment, to get people hooked on addictive substances, that's one side of the liberty coin. "The pursuit of short term economic gain is not necessarily the recipe for an harmonious society." Public submissions on the Regulatory Standards Bill close at 1pm Monday, 23 June 2025. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
