logo
App stores are set to verify ages under a new Utah law — and Meta, Snap, and X are thrilled

App stores are set to verify ages under a new Utah law — and Meta, Snap, and X are thrilled

Yahoo27-03-2025

Utah just passed a law that would make app stores verify user ages instead of individual apps.
Apple and Google would have to get parental consent before minors can download certain apps in the state.
Meta, Snap, and X praised the bill. Google and Apple have said it raises privacy concerns.
Utah just became the first state to pass a law that makes app stores — rather than individual apps — responsible for verifying user ages.
Google and Apple, the tech giants behind the two main app stores, have opposed the bill. But Meta, Snap, and X have praised the law, which Utah Gov. Spencer Cox signed on Wednesday.
The App Store Accountability Act, also known as S.B. 142, is set to take effect on May 7 — but is expected to face legal challenges.
It requires Apple and Google to confirm the age of anyone who creates an account in Utah. If that person is under 18, the account must be linked to a parent or verified with extra documentation. Parents must also approve in-app purchases.
The law represents a major shift in how states regulate child safety online. Instead of directly targeting social media companies, lawmakers in Utah have focused on the gatekeepers: app stores.
Supporters say the law gives parents more centralized control over what their kids can download, a change that major social media companies have been pushing for. Meta, Snap, and X — three companies under growing pressure to protect teens online — welcomed the law in a joint statement on Wednesday.
"Parents want a one-stop-shop to oversee and approve the many apps their teens want to download, and Utah has led the way in centralizing it within a device's app store," they said. "This approach spares users from repeatedly submitting personal information to countless individual apps and online services."The verification bill is the latest in a long-running turf war between Meta and Apple over data practices, platform control, and even smart glasses. Meta has pushed for app stores to take the lead on age restrictions, while Apple says it raises privacy concerns. Apple wrote in a paper last month that it doesn't want to collect sensitive user data for privacy reasons and that "the right place to address the dangers of age-restricted content online is the limited set of websites and apps that host that kind of content."
Google also opposed the bill, warning in a March 12 blog post that it could create unintended risks.
"These proposals introduce new risks to the privacy of minors without actually addressing the harms that are inspiring lawmakers to act," wrote Kareem Ghanem, the company's director of public policy.
Digital rights groups have raised concerns about how the data used for age verification will be stored and protected.
But the Utah bill could open the door for similar efforts across the country.
Lawmakers in a dozen other states, including California and South Carolina, are weighing similar proposals.
Apple and Google did not immediately respond to a Business Insider request for comment.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Here's how Uber's product chief uses AI at work — and one tool he's going to use next
Here's how Uber's product chief uses AI at work — and one tool he's going to use next

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Here's how Uber's product chief uses AI at work — and one tool he's going to use next

Uber's chief product officer has one AI tool on his to-do list. In an episode of "Lenny's Podcast" released on Sunday, Uber's product chief, Sachin Kansal, shared two ways he is using AI for his everyday tasks at the ride-hailing giant and how he plans to add NotebookLM to his AI suite. Kansal joined Uber eight years ago as its director of product management after working at cybersecurity and taxi startups. He became Uber's product chief last year. Kansal said he uses OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini to summarize long reports. "Some of these reports, they're 50 to 100 pages long," he said. "I will never have the time to read them." He said he uses the chatbots to acquaint himself with what's happening and how riders are feeling in Uber's various markets, such as South Africa, Brazil, and Korea. The CPO said his second use case is treating AI like a research assistant, because some large language models now offer a deep research feature. Kansal gave a recent example of when his team was thinking about a new driver feature. He asked ChatGPT's deep research mode about what drivers may think of the add-on. "It's an amazing research assistant and it's absolutely a starting point for a brainstorm with my team with some really, really good ideas," the CPO said. In April, Uber's CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi, said that not enough of his 30,000-odd employees are using AI. He said learning to work with AI agents to code is "going to be an absolute necessity at Uber within a year." Uber did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Kansal's next tool: NotebookLM On the podcast, Kansal also highlighted NotebookLM, Google Lab's research and note-taking tool, which is especially helpful for interacting with documents. He said he doesn't use the product yet, but wants to. "I know a lot of people who have started using it, and that is the next thing that I'm going to use," he said. "Just to be able to build an audio podcast based on a bunch of information that you can consume. I think that's awesome," he added. Kansal was referring to the "Audio Overview" feature, which summarizes uploaded content in the form of two AIs having a voice discussion. NotebookLM was launched in mid-2023 and has quickly become a must-have tool for researchers and AI enthusiasts. Andrej Karpathy, Tesla's former director of AI and OpenAI cofounder, is among those who have praised the tool and its podcast feature. "It's possible that NotebookLM podcast episode generation is touching on a whole new territory of highly compelling LLM product formats," he said in a September post on X. "Feels reminiscent of ChatGPT. Maybe I'm overreacting."

Google Photos vs. iCloud: Which should you use for your photos?
Google Photos vs. iCloud: Which should you use for your photos?

Tom's Guide

time2 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

Google Photos vs. iCloud: Which should you use for your photos?

Google Photos and iCloud are among the best cloud storage services that make it easy to sync your photos across devices and share them with friends and family. However, they differ in several key ways, and choosing the wrong platform for your needs could result in a headache. In this guide, we compare Google Photos vs. iCloud so you can decide which photo cloud storage app is right for you. While iCloud can be used for more than just photo storage, for the purposes of this comparison, we're going to highlight what you can do in the Apple Photos app vs. Google Photos. Let's dive into some key differences between Google Photos and iCloud, specifically Apple Photos. Everyone with a Google account receives 15GB of free storage space to use across Google Photos, Gmail, and Google Drive. You can buy additional data through Google One if you need to store more content. Paid plans offer 100GB for $1.99 per month, 1TB for $9.99 per month, and 2TB for $19.99 per month. iCloud offers only 5GB of free storage. iCloud+ plans provide an additional 50GB for $0.99 per month, 200GB for $2.99 per month, or 2TB for $9.99 per month. Plans for 6TB and 12TB of storage are also available. Importantly, Google Photos can store photos and videos only. You can store other types of content, such as documents and audio files, with Google Drive, but you have to switch between apps to access this content. Meanwhile, iCloud supports all types of files in a single location, making it an all-in-one cloud hub for your content. Another notable distinction is that Google Photos enables you to choose the resolution to upload when backing up photos and videos. On the other hand, iCloud automatically backs up original photos at full resolution and replaces the copies on your device with lower-resolution versions. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Google Photos offers apps for all devices, while iCloud provides apps for Apple devices only. You can install Google Photos on a Mac computer or iPhone, but you can't install iCloud on a Windows computer or Android phone. You can still use iCloud on Windows and Android devices, but you must go through your browser to access the iCloud web app. This significantly detracts from the point of using a cloud storage app. Your photos won't automatically upload to the cloud or sync across devices, and you'll need to visit the iCloud website to view them. Effectively, iCloud is only a good option if you have a Mac computer and an iPhone. If you use any non-Apple devices, you'll have a much better experience with Google Photos. Both Google Photos and Apple Photos enable you to organize images into albums. Likewise, both automatically curate albums based on photo data like location, date, and people. They use AI to tag elements of your photos, including people, objects, and landscapes (such as mountains or sunsets). This makes it easy to search your photos later using terms like 'family photos' or 'beach.' That said, Apple Photos has a slight edge over Google Photos in terms of image editing. You can easily open any photo in Apple's Photos app, which has relatively advanced touch-up options. Google Photos offers auto-correction and some basic color and light adjustments, but that's it. With Google Photos, you can invite anyone with a Google account to join a shared album. The album owner can customize permissions for others to control whether they can add photos to the album or comment. It's also easy to share photos to third-party apps like Facebook and X. iCloud enables you to create shared Apple Photos albums, but users must have an Apple ID to access them. This can be a barrier for people without an Apple device. In addition, you can't customize permissions in an iCloud album. Anyone invited can add or delete photos, and all content stored in the album counts against the album owner's storage limit. Both apps also enable you to share photos and albums with a link. The recipient doesn't need a Google or Apple account. Overall, Google Photos is a better choice than iCloud for anyone who isn't fully locked into the Apple ecosystem. It's also better if you have friends or family who aren't Apple users since iCloud makes it challenging to share photos with them. Interested in more photo storage options? Check out our guide to the best cloud storage solutions. Yes, Google Photos has an iOS app that enables iPhone users to easily back up and sync their photos. iCloud offers 5GB of free storage, but users can upgrade to a paid plan for additional space. Yes, you can manually download photos from iCloud and upload them to Google Photos. Apple also offers a tool to transfer images directly to Google Photos. iCloud is primarily designed for Apple devices, but you can access it via a web browser on Windows or Android (with limited functionality).

iOS 19's redesign had me worried — but now I think it will turn out fine
iOS 19's redesign had me worried — but now I think it will turn out fine

Tom's Guide

time2 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

iOS 19's redesign had me worried — but now I think it will turn out fine

Change can be scary — especially when it's change to something you rely on every day. So I'm guessing that news of the impending iOS overhaul that Apple will announce next week at WWDC 2025 is being anticipated in some quarters like a trip to the dentist. I mean, I'm certainly nervous about what's going to happen to the interface in iOS 19 (or iOS 26, depending on who's doing the rumor-mongering). And the natural inclination to distrust change only becomes heightened when you hear phrases like "the biggest iOS update in a decade" bandied about. There have certainly been tweaks here and there, but the iPhone interface we have now looks a lot like the one we've been using since iOS 7. There's comfort in that, and the idea that it's all about to change later this year can be unsettling. It doesn't help that it's really hard to assess interface updates until you actually get to see them in person. We can talk all about the rumored changes Apple is going to implement in iOS 19 and other software updates getting previewed at WWDC, but until we're actually using the update ourselves, who knows how smooth the transition will be. We won't be entirely clear what Apple plans to do until the iOS 19/iOS 26 preview gets underway as part of the WWDC 2025 keynote on June 9. But I've been spending some time reviewing some of the leaks and rumors out there about the proposed changes. And I'm feeling a lot less worried about the prospects of an interface update as a result. Here's why. Our best looks at potential iOS 19 changes have come from Front Page Tech videos posted by Jon Prosser, though not everyone's convinced some of those screen captures reflect Apple's final plans for its iPhone software. Still, an iOS 19 preview video posted about a month ago seems to be based on the most up-to-date info about Apple's plans, at least as Prossser tells it. Watching the video, a few things stand out, starting with the rounded — though not perfectly circular — icons on the home screen. A lot of visual elements are rounder in the posted designs, particularly widgets and sliders in the Control Center. The animations when you interact with the interface get a refresh — Prosser describes them as more fluid and bouncy — and there's a glass-like shimmer to some elements like the lock screen shortcuts. To me, the most noteworthy iOS 19 interface changes are the translucent menus that pop up on the home screen when you hold and press on an icon. Do that in iOS 18, and you'll see the same pop-up menu, but it's markedly more opaque. And you'll find a lot of elements at the bottom of your iPhone screen like search bars and a revamped dock that will be part of the iPhone's built-in apps. This will all look very familiar if you've ever strapped on an Apple Vision Pro, as the interface changes seem to be inspired by the look of visionOS — the platform for Apple's spatial computing headset. I haven't had a go with the Vision Pro, but my colleague Mark Spoonauer has. And his Apple Vision Pro review notes a lot of the visual elements like translucent panels and streamlined menus that look like they're coming to the iPhone with the new iOS update. If you're in the same Vision Pro-free boat as me, I'd suggest reading this MacRumors post on the visionOS elements likely to make their way to the iPhone. It helps explain how translucent menus, floating navigation bars and more work on the headset and how they might translate to a different device like an iPhone. Having reviewed all that and taken a closer look at some of the iOS 19 redesign mockups, I'm a lot less nervous about what Apple's going to show off at WWDC 2025. In fact, at the risk of being very wrong in public, I'm not prepared to think that the iOS 19 redesign isn't that big of a deal after all. And I mean that in a good way. When I say the iOS 19 interface update won't be a big deal, I'm not talking about the look of the software. From the images we've seen so far, iOS 19 is going to look radically different from the software currently running on the iPhone. And while that certainly is going to take getting used to, it doesn't seem like those interface changes are fundamentally altering how people use their iPhones. Oh, there will be some changes in that regard. It sounds like search menus are being located to the bottom of the screen, at least in apps like Messages and Music. But that's not a bad thing if you like using your phone one-handed or are used to the Safari layout with the search bar already at the bottom of the screen. From what I can tell, it looks like there's a more visually distinct animation when you switch tabs in one of Apple's built-in apps with that tab highlighted more prominently than it is in iOS 18. That sounds like a great change to me, as I appreciate anything that makes it easy to remember where I am in an app at just a glance. There's one visionOS style element in particular that I'm hoping makes the grade in iOS 19 — less cluttered menus. Since you navigate the Vision Pro with your eyes, you need spaced-out menus so that it's clear what exactly you're looking at when you want to select something. I think the iPhone could benefit from that, too, as it might reduce the number of mistaken taps where you select the wrong item from a drop-down menu. Again, changes like that aren't radically reshaping how you use your phone currently — they're fine-tuning the process you already have in place. To me, that will make the iOS 18 to iOS 19 transition a lot easier to manage. I reserve the right to hoot and holler during the WWDC 2025 keynote if I'm wrong and it turns out Apple is trying to reinvent the wheel in terms of the iPhone's interface. But the changes floating around out there right now sound more evolutionary than anything. And that's change we can all get behind.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store