logo
Our hard-won rights are being erased one letter at a time

Our hard-won rights are being erased one letter at a time

The Guardian02-03-2025

I type this through nervous laughter but, haha, should we all be learning how to perform abortions? Just in case? Should we all perhaps, have a little stash of mifepristone in our makeup bags, a secret number in our phone? Something is happening in the US that requires our attention. Hard-earned rights are being erased and the speed at which history is being rewritten there does not bode well for our freedoms here. We are already seeing dark reflections in the glass. This month the Observer reported how British anti-abortion campaigners are echoing US vice-president JD Vance. He claimed our new buffer zone laws, preventing protests outside abortion clinics, were an attack on the 'liberties of religious Britons', shifting focus away from the reason they were implemented to a debate about freedom of speech.
Buffer zones (intended to protect staff and women using the clinics) are being targeted in a careful campaign by conservative Christian groups such as the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a group that wants to ban abortion, opposes same-sex marriage and, in the US, has helped at least 23 states pass legislation barring trans athletes from girls' and women's events as well as drafting legislation restricting gender-affirming treatment for minors. With only 1.4% of adolescents in the US identifying as transgender, LGBTQ+ rights groups accused the ADF of 'whipping up a panic' over decisions better left to doctors, teachers and parents.
Then, on Thursday afternoon two weeks ago, the word 'transgender' and the letter T in LGBTQ+ was removed from the National Park Service's Stonewall National Monument website. This was particularly shocking for those familiar with the Stonewall Riots in 1969, a time when being gay was classified as a mental illness in the US – it had been a crime in the UK until only two years earlier.
Integral to this uprising against anti-queer police harassment were trans women, including Marsha P Johnson and Sylvia Rivera. The deletion of the word from a website dedicated to one of the most important areas of gay activism works immediately to delegitimise trans people and clear the way for conservative groups to frame them as sick, or the result of a brand new contagion.
By that Thursday evening, 'queer' and the letter Q had also been disappeared from the site, along with words deemed too 'woke' on thousands of other government websites. Elsewhere, Google removed Black History Month, Women's History Month and LGBTQ+ holidays from its online calendars. It was as if a van had quietly driven across America vandalising shrines with white paint.
It's clear that the past is being erased in order to direct the future. But – a key part of our history of oppression is resistance. In the US, where abortion is again banned in 20 states (and a government website outlining reproductive rights was removed within hours of President Donald Trump taking office), young women are getting sterilised. A recent study found that tubal sterilisation visits increased 70% after May 2022 (when the Dobbs decision overturning Roe v Wade leaked) in states likely to ban abortion. Perhaps it's ironic that one effect of 'pro-life' legislation will be fewer babies born.
That news led me to dip back into the story of the Jane Collective, a group of activists who, in the 1960s when abortion was illegal in the US, put up posters: 'Pregnant? Don't want to be? Call Jane.' First they referred women to doctors known to perform safe abortions, then they learned how to do it themselves. Women paid what they could afford and many said (in a lifetime of being dismissed or misunderstood) it was the best medical experience they'd had. Between 1969 and 1973, it's estimated that the Jane Collective provided safe abortions for more than 11,000 people. Looking out across the anxious suburbs today, I can absolutely imagine school-gate mums organising similar.
It's no coincidence that the same tactics used to restrict abortion access are used to restrict gender-affirming care, nor that they're lobbied for by the same conservative groups, who litigate loudly against trans, gay and abortion rights. It is bewildering, though, to see feminists who engage in anti-trans rhetoric offering up their own reproductive rights as a sweetener. Authoritarian movements require solidarity to resist, otherwise we're all toast.
And, with these rollbacks in the US, it feels urgent. At a rightwing conference two weeks ago, Kemi Badenoch said that 'pronouns, diversity policies and climate activism' are a 'poison'. Abortion is under attack here, too. In the decade leading to 2022, police in England and Wales recorded at least 67 cases of procuring an illegal abortion, with some women facing prosecution. Even if charges weren't brought, the impact of the investigation can cause life-changing harm to the women and their families, with children being removed from their mothers or access restricted. In January, medical leaders spoke out after an 'unprecedented' rise in women and girls being prosecuted for ending their own pregnancies – it's still a criminal offence to have an abortion without approval from two doctors, carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. In 2025. In 2025!
The more pregnancies I've had, the more noisy I get about the fact no person should be forced to continue a pregnancy against their will, or lose their autonomy and have their body policed. It feels as if it might be time to get our hands dirty, and form alliances to fight every deleted letter. Because when the words start disappearing, our rights are surely not far behind.
Email Eva at e.wiseman@observer.co.uk

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Foreign Office alert for 47 countries over airport arrests
Foreign Office alert for 47 countries over airport arrests

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Foreign Office alert for 47 countries over airport arrests

Officials issued new advice in the wake of a number of high profile cases involving UK citizens The Foreign Office today issues a serious warning for people travelling to 47 countries from the UK - and added 'expecgt severe penalties'. Officials have updated the travel advice on websites in the wake of a number of high profile drugs arrests involving British citizens. And they said people were likely to be caught carrying illegal drugs, including cannabis, because many countries have upgraded their airport scanning devices. If caught people can face huge jail sentences in appalling prisons and potentially even the death sentence. ‌ The advice has been issued for 47 countries - including some of the UK's favourite holiday hotspots such as Spain, Francie, Portugal, Croatia, Italy and Cyprus. In one update for Spain the Foreign Office warned: 'Illegal drugs, including cannabis, carry severe penalties. You should expect a long jail sentence and heavy fines for possessing, using or smuggling illegal drugs, including when transiting through airports. Possession of even a small quantity of drugs can lead to arrest and detention. ‌ 'Airports in Spain have excellent technology and security for detecting illegal items. This is also used to scan the baggage of transiting passengers.' Full list of countries in warning: Burundi, Slovenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Sweden, Lichtenstein, Norway, Finland, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Portugal, Hungary, Denmark, Poland, Romania Luxembourg, Kazakhstan, Iceland, Malta, France, Spain, Kosovo, Armenia, Switzerland, Belgium, Latvia, Moldova, Montenegro, Nigeria, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Rwanda, Bosnia and Hertzegovena, Bulgaria, Georgia, North Macedonia, Turkey, USA, Albania, Lithuania, Slovakia, Austria, Netherlands, Ireland, Croatia, Serbia, Belarus, A number of UK citizens are facing the courts after arrests in recent weeks. These include: Jon Collyer, 38, and Lisa Stocker, 39, were arrested at Bali's international airport in February after being caught with 994g of cocaine, according to Balinese authorities. The pair appeared in court alongside Phineas Float, 31, who was allegedly due to receive the packages and was arrested a few days later. All three defendants, who are from Hastings and St Leonards in East Sussex, could face the death penalty – the heaviest punishment for taking part in a drug transaction under Indonesian law. It is alleged that Mr Collyer and Ms Stocker were caught with 17 packages of cocaine, with a value of roughly £300,000. ‌ A 21-year-old woman is being held by police in Germany after allegedly travelling with cannabis from Thailand. Authorities in Germany say Cameron Bradford, from Knebworth in Hertfordshire, was stopped and arrested at Munich Airport on 22 April. Charlotte May Lee, 21, from south London, is accused of attempting to smuggle 101lbs (46kg) of the synthetic drug kush in her suitcase into Sri Lanka last month. The former flight attendant denies knowing there were drugs in her luggage and says she believes they were planted there. Ms Lee is being held in a prison north of the south Asian country's capital, Colombo, and is contact with her family, her lawyer told the BBC. She could face up to 25 years in prison if found guilty.

Three Britons could face death penalty in Indonesia
Three Britons could face death penalty in Indonesia

Western Telegraph

time2 hours ago

  • Western Telegraph

Three Britons could face death penalty in Indonesia

Jonathan Christopher Collyer, 28, and Lisa Ellen Stocker, 29, were arrested on February 1. Prosecutor I Made Dipa Umbara said customs officers halted them at the X-ray machine after finding suspicious items in their luggage disguised as food packages. Mr Umbara told the District Court in Denpasar that packets of Angel Delight powdered dessert mix in their luggage contained 993.56 grams of cocaine, worth an estimated six billion rupiah (£272,000). BREAKING: Three Britons could face the death penalty in Bali after appearing in court charged with smuggling nearly a kilogram of cocaine into Indonesia. 🔗 Read more — Sky News (@SkyNews) June 3, 2025 Two days later, authorities arrested Phineas Ambrose Float, 31, after a controlled delivery set up by police. This involved the other two suspects handing the drug to him in the parking area of a hotel in Denpasar. He is being tried separately. The drugs were brought from England to Indonesia with a transit in the Doha international airport in Qatar, Mr Umbara said. The group had successfully brought cocaine into the country twice before, Ponco Indriyo, the deputy director of the Bali Police Narcotics Unit, told reporters in February. The trial was adjourned until next week, when the three-judge panel will hear witness evidence, Sky News reports. Both the defendants and their lawyers declined to comment to the media after the trial. Three Brits charged in Indonesia for smuggling cocaine in Angel Delight sachetshttps:// — ITV News (@itvnews) June 3, 2025 What are Indonesia's drug laws? According to Adventure Alternative, drug use or the possession of even small amounts of drugs such as marijuana or ecstasy can lead to prison sentences longer than four years in Indonesia. Convicted traffickers or users of hard drugs such as cocaine or heroin can face the death penalty. Sky News adds that drug smugglers in Indonesia are "sometimes executed by firing squad". About 530 people, including 96 foreigners, are on death row in Indonesia, mostly for drug-related crimes, the Ministry of Immigration and Corrections' data showed. Indonesia's last executions, of an Indonesian and three foreigners, were carried out in July 2016. A British woman, Lindsay Sandiford, now 69, has been on death row in Indonesia for more than a decade. She was arrested in 2012 when 3.8 kilograms of cocaine were discovered stuffed inside the lining of her luggage at Bali's airport.

Māori lawmakers suspended over protest haka performed in New Zealand Parliament
Māori lawmakers suspended over protest haka performed in New Zealand Parliament

NBC News

time3 hours ago

  • NBC News

Māori lawmakers suspended over protest haka performed in New Zealand Parliament

Three Māori lawmakers in New Zealand received record suspensions of up to three weeks on Thursday, local media reported, over a protest haka they performed in Parliament last year against a contentious bill. The lawmakers drew global attention in November when they performed the haka, a ceremonial chanting dance of defiance that is a cherished cultural symbol of New Zealand. They were protesting legislation that would have reinterpreted the country's 184-year-old founding document, a treaty that was signed between colonial British rulers and Indigenous Māori. A parliamentary committee found the three lawmakers in contempt of parliament last month and recommended that they be suspended for up to three weeks 'for acting in a manner that could have the effect of intimidating a member of the House.' Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi, co-leaders of Te Pāti Māori, the Māori party, which holds six of Parliament's 123 seats, were suspended for three weeks each. Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, who at 22 is New Zealand's youngest legislator, was suspended for one week on the recommendation of the committee, which said in its report that she had demonstrated 'some level of contrition' in her written statement. It is rare for New Zealand lawmakers to receive such suspensions, which are unpaid, and the longest anyone had previously been suspended was three days. The opposition Labour Party as well as the Green Party criticized the suspensions as disproportionate, with the Labour Party proposing censure instead. The three lawmakers performed the protest haka in November during the reading of a bill that would have redefined the Treaty of Waitangi. Signed in 1840 between the British Crown and Māori chiefs, the treaty established British governance and structures to protect Māori rights and continues to influence policy today. The legislation was brought by the small libertarian party ACT New Zealand, which said the treaty had been misinterpreted to give Māori people special treatment. Critics of the bill, which was defeated in April, said it would undo decades of progress for Māori, who make up about 20% of New Zealand's 5 million people and fare worse than the rest of the population in health, education and the criminal justice system. One of the Māori lawmakers, Maipi-Clarke, led the haka by tearing up a copy of the bill, joined by other Māori members and some visitors in the public gallery. Video of the protest went viral and gathered hundreds of millions of views across social media. Some lawmakers objected to the way their Māori colleagues advanced toward them across the floor. 'This was a very serious incident, the likes of which I have never seen before in my 23 years in the debating chamber,' said Judith Collins of the center-right National Party, chair of the parliamentary committee that issued the report. She added that the lawmakers had performed the haka without permission and that the disruption had suspended legislative proceedings for 30 minutes. The three Māori lawmakers declined to appear before the committee during its investigation, citing disrespect for their cultural traditions. Their party said the way it was being conducted was 'grossly unjust' and that 'this was not about process, this became personal.' The committee said the lawmakers were being sanctioned not for performing the haka, but for 'the time at and manner in which it was performed.' It said the severity of the sanctions was intended to 'leave members in no doubt that the behavior discussed is not acceptable.' The vote had originally been scheduled for last month but was postponed so that the three Māori lawmakers could participate in debate over the federal budget. Performing haka in Parliament is not uncommon, and is typically seen when Māori members celebrate the passage of a particular bill. The dance is known abroad for being performed at matches by New Zealand's rugby teams, and variations of it are also performed at funerals and formal welcomes. 'It would have been clearly understood by everyone in the parliament that this was a peaceful act of protest done in a way that aligns with Māori tradition,' said Julian Rawiri Kusabs, a Māori historian and researcher at the University of Melbourne in Australia. Kusabs said the suspension was a setback in decades of reconciliation efforts between the New Zealand government and Māori communities, whose members have had to navigate 'a highly complex and frequently painful relationship' even to achieve representation in Parliament. The suspension, he said, reinforces the longstanding perception that 'Māori culture is not equally respected within New Zealand's formal institutions of governance.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store